View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
WASHINGTON
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE T O
T H E FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD

X-7290
Hovember 12, 1932.

SUBJECT:

Shipment of Checks, e t c . , "by Express.

Dear S i r :
There i s inclosed herewith f o r your information, a copy
of a l e t t e r addressed to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
"by a Post Office Inspector, quoting a r u l i n g by the Second
Assistant Postmaster General.
You w i l l note that the r u l i n g s t a t e s that "there would he
no objection to checks being forwarded by express" i f not accompanied by a l e t t e r .

Apparently cash l e t t e r s or similar form l e t t e r s

of t r a n s m i t t a l covering such shipments are regarded by the Post
Office Department as " l e t t e r s " within the meaning of the "private
express s t a t u t e s . "
Some Federal reserve banks have already adopted the p r a c t i c e
of sending such covering l e t t e r by mail, and the checks by express.
The r u l i n g r e f e r r e d to above, however, indicates that there w i l l be
no objection to inclosing with the checks a l i s t prepared on an
adding machine, provided such l i s t i s not w r i t t e n on a form containing i n s t r u c t i o n s or other communications.




Whether or not i t would

X-7290

"" 2 *•

"be permissible to date the adding machine l i s t does not s p e c i f i c a l l y
appear from the above r u l i n g .
Very t r u l y yours,

Chester M o r r i l l ,
Secretary.

Inclosure.
TO GOVERNORS OF ALL F.R. BA.HKS EXCEPT KANSAS CITY.




488

I

X-7290~a

COPY

(COPY)
POST

OFFICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Inspector.
Case No. 32426-C

B. W. Ficlcen
Inspector.

Kansas City, Missouri
November 4, 1932.
SUBJECT:

Shipment of clearings by express.

Federal Reserve Bank,
Kansas City, Missouri.
Gentlemen:
Referring to the matter of shipment of checks and clearings
by express, I have to advise that I have received the following addit i o n a l r u l i n g from the Second Assistant Postmaster General:




"Under the provisions of the p r i v a t e express
s t a t u t e s , i t i s not permissible to send checks
or d r a f t s in process of collection from one
hank to another by express without payment of
postage i f such checks are accompanied by
clearance l e t t e r s or anything else i n the
nature of correspondence, though there would
be no objection to checks being forwarded by
express i f they are not accompanied "by anything other than an adding machine l i s t . "
Sincerely yours

/s/

B. W. Ficken

Post Office Inspector.