View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

28

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
WASHINGTON
4373

A D D R E S S OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE TO
T H E FEDERAL RESERVE B O A R D

July 2, 1925.

C

SUBJECT: Eligibility of Officer of Insurance Company for Election
as Class 3 Director.
Dear Sir:
The Federal Reserve Board has recently been requested to rule
on the question whether a person whose sole occupation is that of an officer of a life insurance company is eligible for election as a Class
B director of a Federal reserve bank.

After a careful consideration of

this question* the Board reached the conclusion that such a person is
not eligible for election as a Class B director; because (a) he is not
actively engaged in

1
1

commerce, agriculture, or some other industrial

pursuit" within the meaning of that language as used in the Federal
Reserve Act and (b) it is contrary to the policy of Congress for a person so closely identified with the financial interests to be permitted
to serve as a Class B director of a Federal reserve bank.
The decided cases show clearly that the business of insurance
companies is not regarded as "commerce" by the courts (Hooper v, California, 155 U. S . 648)* and obviously it is not "agriculture",

A person

whose sole occupation is that of being an officer of an insurance company,
therefore, is not engaged in such a business as will render him eligible
for election as a Class B director unless it can be said that the insurance business comes within the general term; "some other industrial
pursuit".



Pago 2.

X-4373

It appears from the dictionary definitions that the terms"industry" and "industrial" are susceptible of two meanings:

(1) a broad

meaning which includes substantially all forms of business enterprises,
and (<5) a more restricted meaning which applies only to manufacturing,
mining and similar enterprises which have for their object the production of material tangible values.

The insurance business probably would

come within the term "other industrial pursuit" if that term is to be
construed in its broadest possible sense; but it would not come within
the meaning of that term if the word "industrial" is to be given its
more limited meaning.
It is necessary, therefore, to go beyond the bare language
of the Act and endeavor to ascertain from every possible source the
real intention of Congress.

It is a fundamental rale of statutory

construction that, where the language of a statute is susceptible of
more than one interpretation, the intended meaning must be sought by
the aid of all pertinent and admissible considerations*
Section 4 of the Federal Reserve Act provides that a Class B
director shall be actively engaged in "commerce, agriculture, or some
other industrial pursuit" and also provides that no Class B director
"shall be an officer, director or employee of any bank".

It is clear,

therefore, that Congress intended that Class B directors should be business men, and should not be bankers or closely identified with the banking business.
It may be said that the three classes of directors of Federal
reserve banks are representative of:



29

Pago 3.

X-4373

30
(A) The "banks (or the principal lendirg class of the public);
(B) Business (or the principal borrowing class of the
public); and.
(C) The Government or the general public.
Is the insurance business one of the classes of business which
Congress had in mind when it used the language "commerce, agriculture or
some other industrial pursuit"?
by asking another question:

This question may be clarified somewhat

What is the fundamental distinction, from the

standpoint of the Federal Reserve Act, between business men who are represented on the boards of directors of Federal reserve banks by Class B directors and bankers who are represented by Class A directors?

The answer

would seem to be that bankers are lenders whereas business men are borrowers .
Considering the insurance business in this light, it seems clear
that it must fall on the same side of the line as banking, becau.se insurance companies (as distinguished from insurance agents and brokers) do not
as a rule borrow money but have large funds for investment purposes and
constitute an important factor on the lending side of the money market.
This phase of their business is very closely analogous to that of investment banking.
The Board feels, therefore, that it is contrary to the general policy of Congress for officers of insurance companies to serve as
Class B directors, not only because they are not borrowers and, therefore,
not the class of business men which Congress presumably had in mind, but
also because they are lenders and are closely analogous to bankers who
are expressly forbidden to be Class B directors.



Page 4.

X-4373

31
The language of the Act also indicates that it was the intention
of Congress that Class B directors should represent not only the borrowing public hut that particular class of the borrowing public whose borrowings give rise to paper which is eligible to rediscount.

They are ex-

pressly required to be actively engaged in "commerce, agriculture, or
some other industrial pursuit," and this language is very similar to
that used in the principal definition of eligible paper;
"Notes, drafts, and bills of exchange issued
or drawn for agricultural, industrial, or commercial purposes, or the proceeds of which have been used, or are to
be used for such purposes," (Section 13)
It is probable that this close similarity in the two sections
was not accidental, but on the contrary was the result of intention and
design.

Congress probably intended that the board of directors of a Fed-

eral reserve bank should include in its membership men v;ho are familiar
with the kinds of business from which paper eligible for rediscount with
Federal reserve banks would arise.

The policy of such an intention is

obvious.
Under the established construction of the law regarding the
eligibility of notes, drafts and bills for rediscount, it is hardly
possible that the business of insurance companies (as distinguished
from that of insurance agents or brokers) could give rise to paper eligible for rediscount at Federal reserve banks.

It seems reasonable

to conclude, therefore, that Congress did not have that business in
mind when it used the phrase "some other industrial pursuit" in Section 4, but intended to use that language in the more restricted




•32
X-4373

Page 5.

sense which, includes only manufacturing, mining and similar enterprises which have for their object the production of material tangible
values.
For those reasons, the Board reached the conclusion that a
person whose sole occupation is that of officer of an insurance company is not eligible for election as a Class B director of a Federal
reserve bank.

This does not mean that all officers of insurance com-

panies are ineligible for election as directors of Federal reserve
banks; because many of them are bank directors and, therefore, are
eligible for election as Class A directors, which would seem to be
the class to which they properly belong.
Very truly yours,

D. B. Crissinger,
Governor.

TO ALL FEDERAL RESERVE AGENTS EXCEPT BOSTON.