View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
*******

X-9658

OF THE

55

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON
A D D R E S S OFFICIAL C O R R E S P O N D E N C E
TO T H E BOARD

60s*




July 21, 1936

Dear Sir:
There is attached, for the information of
your bank, a copy of a letter addressed by the
Board under date of July 16, 1956, to the Vice
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis with respect to the question whether the
indebtedness of an officer of a member bank to
a trust company as trustee should be reported to
the board of directors of the member bank.
Very trujy^yours

Assistant Secretary.

Inclosure.

TO PRESIDENTS OF ALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS.

COPY

X-9658-a

July 16, 1936.

Mr. John S. Wood, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
St. Louis, Missouri.
Dear Mr. Wood:
This refers to your letter of June 5, 1956, inquiring whether
the indebtedness of Mr.

, President of the

Bank and Trust Company,

, to the

Bank and Trust Company in its capacity as trustee of the estate of

should be reported by Mr.

board of directors of the

to the

Bank and Trust Company in order to

comply with the requirements of section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve
Act and section 5 of the Board's Regulation 0.
It is understood that Mr.
to

became personally indebted

& Company, a brokerage firm, in 1924 as a

result of losses sustained by him in connection with certain stock
transactions; that upon the death of Mr.

(creditor) the

indebtedness in question was included in the assets of his estate
which is now being administered by the
Trust Company as trustee; and that Mr.

Bank and
gave his renewal note

covering such indebtedness to the trustee bank in 1929.
Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act provides, in part,
that if any executive officer of a member bank be indebted to any bank
other than a member bank of which he is an executive officer he shall




X-9658-a

-2-

make a written report of such indebtedness to the board of directors
of the member bank of which he is an executive officer, and section 5
of the Board's Regulation 0 provides, among other things, that an
executive officer of a member bank who, on the effective date of such
regulation, is indebted to any bank other than the member bank of
which he is an executive officer shall make the report required by the
law.

It appears from the facts stated above that Mr.

indebted to the

was

Bank and Trust Company, as trustee,

on the date of the enactment of section 22(g) and also on the effective date of the Board's Regulation 0 and is now so indebted, and the
only question is whether the indebtedness to the bank in its capacity
as trustee is required to be reported.
The Board's ruling dated March 20, 1956 (X-9528), referred to
in your letter, related to an indebtedness of an executive officer of
a member bank to another bank arising as a result of the lending of
trust funds but the effect of such ruling was to disregard any technical distinction between a bank lending funds in its own capacity or in
its capacity as trustee.
Mr.

The fact that the original indebtedness of

did not arise as a result of the lending of trust funds

try the trustee bank but accrued to the trustee bank by virtue of its
appointment as trustee is not sufficient to remove the transaction
from the provisions of the law.

It is apparent that Congress contem-

plated that the board of directors of a member bank should be advised
of the indebtedness of the executive officers of such bank to other



X-9653-a

-3-

banks without regard to the manner in which the indebtedness arose and,
therefore, the indebtedness in question should be reported by Mr.
as provided in section 5 of the Board's Regulation 0.
Your letter also referred to the question whether the examiner
for the Federal Reserve bank should advise the directors of the
Bank and Trust Company of Mr.
Bank and Trust Company.
for Mr.

indebtedness to the
Of course, it would be more desirable

to make the required report of his indebtedness than

for the examiner to have to make a report of such indebtedness to the
directors of Mr.

bank, and it is assumed that Mr.

will make the required report upon receipt of advice of the Board's
ruling in the matter.

Please advise the Board of the disposition which

is made of this matter and, if it should become necessary, further consideration can be given to the question whether the examiner for the
Federal Reserve bank or your office should take any action in calling
the matter to the attention of the directors of the
Trust Company.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

L. P. Bethea

L. P. Bethea,
Assistant Secretary.

bank and

58