View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

293

S-184
Reg. T-88
INTERPRETATION OF LAW OR REGULATION
(Copies to be sent to all Federal Reserve banks)
September 15, 1959.

Mr.

. Vice President

Federal Reserve Bank of
Dear Mr.
Reference is made to your letters of August 7, 1939 and
'
Company,
August 31, 1939, regarding the question raised by
,
, as to whether it "transacts a business in securities through the medium of a member of a national securities exchange"
within the meaning of Regulation T.
As indicated in the Board's letter (X-9880; Reg. T-54) of
April 26, 1957, and the ruling which accompanied the Board's letter
(8-123; Reg. T-80) of October 27, 1938, to which you refer, the question here presented necessarily must turn upon all the relevant facts
involved in the particular case.
The facts presented by
Company, however, apparently raise for interpretation the question whether a broker or dealer
would be prevented from being one who "transacts a business in securities through the medium of a member" if the business so transacted is
not the major business of the firm, the business so transacted in this
particular case being said by the firm to constitute approximately 10
per cent of its total business.
It is to be noted that the phrase does not require that a
majority of the broker's business be transacted through the medium of
a member, or that the business be "principally" or "chiefly" so conducted. The omission of any such requirement indicates an intention
to exclude such questions of degree from present consideration and to
narrow the problem down to the simple question whether "a business"
in securities is so transacted. It seems clear that a firm could be
transacting "a business" in securities through the medium of a member
even though such business constituted no more than 10 per cent of the
total securities business of the firm.




S-184
2 9 4
Reg. T-88

-2-

Accordingly, it is the view of the Board in the present
case that the facts presented do not exempt the firm from the
application of the phrase in question, and hence do not exempt
it from Regulation T.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) L. P. Bethea
'L. P. Bethea,
Assistant Secretary.