The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
X-7713 INTERPRETATION 0? BAHKIUG- ACT OF 1933. 476 (Copies to "be sent to a l l Federal Reserve Banks) December 11, 1933. Mr. George W. Morris, Governor, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dear Governor Norris; Receipt i s acknowledged of your l e t t e r s of November 8 and November 21, 1933, regarding the withdrawal of savings d e p o s i t s . You s t a t e that i t i s the practice of some hanks i n to permit withdrawals from savings deposits without n o t i c e , i n cases of emergency, of an amount s u f f i c i e n t to meet the emergency, and inquire i f , a f t e r a statement of the emergency and approval "by an o f f i c e r of the hank, the depositor i s allowed to withdraw a s p e c i f i e d sum of h i s savings deposit without n o t i c e , the bank must permit the withdrawal of the same s p e c i f i e d sum by a l l depositors without n o t i c e . Under the provisions of subsection (a) of Section VI, Regulation Q,, the payment by a member bank of any portion or percentage of the savings deposits of any depositor without requiring notice of intended withdrawal can only be made on condition t h a t , upon request and without requiring such n o t i c e , i t s h a l l pay the same portion or percentage of the savings deposits of every other depositor which are subject to the same requirement, As indicated i n the Board's l e t t e r of November 6, 1933, (X-7671), the word "portion", as here used, i s to be interpreted as including a s p e c i f i e d amount. The Board i s of the opin- i o n , therefore, that i f a member bank pay any s p e c i f i e d sum of a savings X-7713 Mr. George W. Horris - 2 deposit of a depositor "because of an emergency or for any other reason without requiring n o t i c e of intended "dthdravral, such "bank would "be required to pay the same s p e c i f i e d amount of the savings d e p o s i t s of every other depositor which are subject to the same requirement regardl e s s of the purpose for ~rhich the withdrawals are made. The f a c t that an emergency e x i s t s which j u s t i f i e s the withdrawal of the deposit cannot "be regarded as a "requirement" to which such deposit i s subject within the meaning of the r e g u l a t i o n . Very truly yours, (Signed) Chester Morrill Chester M o r r i l l , Secretary.