View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

CONFIDENTIAL

Would it be Wise or proper for Federal Reserve
Board to Authorize Federal Reserve Banks to Pay
their Member Banks, say One Percent, or Possibly
Two Percent Interest on Deposits in Excess of
Legal Requirements?

FIRST:
Except in Central Reserve Cities, only one-third of
the reserve deposits have been paid in, and it will be six
months before another instalment will come in and two and a
half years before it is all paid in.

Even in the end it is

optional with the member banks whether they shall keep more
than the Required percentage of their reserves in their own
vaults or in the vaults of the Federal Reserve Banks.

NOTE; At the end of 36 months the member banks will have the
option of keeping the following percentages of their demand de­
posits in the manner indicated, depending upon their location:
(a)

Member
Banks
Locat­
ed In

Required
Minimum
In Own
Vaults

(b)

Required
Minimum
Federal
Reserve
Bank
Vault§

(c)

(d)

Reserve
Which at
Option of
Member Bank
may be Kept
in Feder­
al Reserve
Bank or in
Own Vaults

(e)

Total of
(b) and (c)

Total
Reserves

5%

12 %

18%,

Central)
Reserve)
Cities )

6%

Reserve)
Cities )

5%

6%

4%

10%

15%

4%

5%

Z%

8%

12%

Country)
Cities )


& Towns)


265
2
SECOND:
It is a recognized fact that cash reserves in
the hands of the Federal reserve banks can be used ex­
pansively two and one-half times for one, whereas the
ssmeereserves in the vaults of the member banks have not
that potentiality.

THIRD:
The temper of the American people does not brook
delay.

After a thing has been widely considered the people

want results.

The Federal reserve banks, while endeavoring

to equip themselves for full operations, find themselves hand­
icapped by the fact that for two and one-half years they nust
compete actively with the banks in Central reserve and reserve
cities, -which are permitted to hold reserve deposits of other
national banks and at the same time are permitted to pay in­
terest on those deposits.

The Federal reserve banks mubt

therefore either expect the member banks to make sacrifices
in keeping excess reserves with the Federal reserve banljs or
must operate only in a limited way until the remaining re- .
serves shall have been paid in.
FOURTH:
One of the principal and very natural reasons for
opposition to the introduction of a general clearing plan is
the fact that country banks may now collect their city items




3

268
through thoir city correspondents and, while having
this service rendered for them free, are given the
benefit of counting as reserves the deposits in the
hands of city correspondents and besides being given
at least two percent interest on their balances*
City correspondents are, in many cases, giving country
banks the benefit of immediate credit on items received
and deferred debit for items collected.

In other words,

the city correspondent is in many cases carrying the
"float", besides giving the country bank interest on
its deposits and at the same time acting as collection
agency.
FIFTH:
It must be admitted that the immediate charge
against member banks* reserve deposits of items even
though endorsed by the depositing member banks, in­
volves some risk to the Federal reserve bank, because
the aggregate of items so charged, as experience has
already shown, sometimes considerably exceed the re­
serve deposit of tho bank against whom drawn.

The

risk on this account will, however, greatly diminish
when the bucceeding installments of reserve deposits
have been made*

The difficulty is that in the next

six months the risk may be considerable.

The ques­

tion therefore arises, how can Federal reserve banks
create an insurance fund by securing excess reserves




287
4

from member banks in the face of the fact that national
banks in Central reserve and reserve cities are able to
offer inducements already referred to?
SIXTH:
It is likely that two or three of the FBderal
reserve banks will, in the next six months, be obliged
to rediscount a considerable amount of commercial paper
with other Federal reserve banks and will have to pay
for this rediscounting privilege four percent or more.
Might it not be better for the Federal reserve bank to
exhaust the resources of its own District before going
outside9

In other words, might not the Bank of Atlanta
f

more wisely pay one, or even two percent for balances of
member banks in excess of legal reserves than to pay New
York, Philadelphia or Chicago four percent?
It may be argued that these reserves will dim­
inish the resources of the member banks, but it may be
truly answered that it will not diminish those resources,
for the reason that the reserves of member banks in the
hands of the Federal reserve bank of the district will be
more effective than if they remained in the vaults of the
banks of Central reserve and reserve cities.




SEVENTH:
It may be 3aid - and in this the writer
concurs - that the practice of paying interest on
checking deposits is mischievous.

It will be remem­

bered that, in its original form, the Federal Reserve
Act contemplated forbidding the payment of interest on
active deposits, either by the Federal Reserve Bank or
by member banks; but this provision was stricken out
of the Act.

Why, it may be inquired, should the Fed­

eral Reserve Board authorize the Federal Reserve Banks
to initiate a practice which it considers vicious,
3imply becau.se the law does not prohibit it or because
it does r.ot deny member banks

the privilege?

The

answer is that the most effective way of stopping a
practice of this kind by the member banks is by authoriz­
ing the Federal Reserve Banks to do it.

When the Federal

Reserve Banks have been put in position to meet the com­
petition of the member banks in this practice their bonds
have been greatly strengthened,and the chances are that
at the end of two oh three years the Board ca*n look
forward to the likelyhood of abolishing or greatly re­
stricting this pernicious practice, although in saying
this, it is admitted that the number of state banks
remaining outside the system and the influence which they
will have on the situation will have a very important
bearing on the final outcome.