The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
-'•f
D I S C 0 tJ N T.
TR AN
GI
T A lf
1)
TABLE
11 C> N. E Y D E P A R
f
M I R 'r
J
A-3357
J'
1..
\
• '
#
·~
Name of Bank
UNITS HANDLED PER. DQI!LAR OF EXPENSE
TOTAl! tJEENSE - 1921
Disc9Unt
'l'rmsit
Money
DISCOUNT
Number
units
handled
per
Appardollar Index. ent
SDent Number Rank
TRANSI!
MONEY
Number
Number
units
units
handled
handled
Appar- par
per
A~ pardollar· Index -ent
dollar Index vnt
Number Rank
soent Number Rank
BDent
. COMBINED
Weighted
In4ax
Number
:,
Appar.•nt
Rank'
$ 51., 921
$ 337.,101.
$ 199.838
1.59
138
5
151
178
1
1~a
196
2
181
1
229,048
1., 000,430
756,234
.65
57
11
90
l<l>
4
948
250
1
155
2
Philadelphia
50,316
475.,109
264,441
J.C2
263
1
114
134
2
397
1o4.7
6
132
3
Cleveland
76,947
644,388
355.,416
.. 99
86
9
76
89
9
322
85
7
87
9
Richmond
84,957
488,509
193,511
1.47
128
6
82
96
6
254
67
8
91-9
s
3
504
133
3
130
4
36
12
60
12
Boston
New York
87,925
204.,649
223,501.
1.81
157
2
99.
116
Chicago
156,576
965,525
1,473,422
1.64
143
3
71
84
10
138
St. Louis
76.,559
431,331
233,214
l .. o4
90
8
80
94
1
398
105.0
5
97
6
Minneapolis
94,690
389,6C2
273,492
1.15
100
7
59
69
12
185
49
10
66
1Q
Kan8as City
lt,G, 79&
646.,854
192,903
.93
81
10
89
1<1.)
5
223
9
90,617
)61.,056
831789
1.63
142
4
78
92
8
4ol
59
1o6
4
103
270,.879
664., 516
275,583
·57
50
12
65
76
u.
178
47
11
64
Dallas
San Francisco
'
·.··'
i>
Atlanta
g2.4
!c
'cj•
..
7
(
. ;1
,,
;
~~
~{
fc
5
9
u
;
Avera&!
$118.1Ql: . ~ .550.. 7~
$ 377.112
1.15 - 100
85 - 100
179 = 100
100
~~,.>
.
2,·
"
fQ:Uw
NUMB~
QE
NUMBEB,
~:t.QYEE~l..9a
-
Nam~
gt
Bank
Dj.iiJ~ounjj
· Ttans;i.jj
Boston
24
209
New York·
94
651
28
Cleveland
Richmond
Philadelphia
DISCOUNT
Index Appaunite
Number rent
handled
Rank
by each
ellll:l1oyee
Number
units
handled
by each
elilD1ovee
Number
!!swa
Q[
Iw:Il:S BAWLiD BI E.GCij IMELOYEE
TRANSit
-rnJex
Number
Appa.-
rent
Rank
units
han,iled
by each
eDID1oyee
AppaNumber rent
Rank
·'
.
128
3,445
118
8
243,236
153
1
1,152.,170
90
6
388
1,587
55
11
138,879
87
10
1,846,711
144
261
90
5.. 428
186
1
200.,830
131
3
1,163,829
15
271
92
5.,075
174
3
179,762
113
4
36
263
64
3,4~
119
7
149,279
..
93-7
COMBINED
Weighted Appa.•
Index
rent
Number
Rank
140NEYf
Nwab&r Index
1
128
2
1
104
5
91
5
126
3 ·.
1,243.,51.1
97
4
112
4
7
769,461
60
11
-
'
74
5,315
182
2
233,748
147
2
1,530,008
119
3
142
1
Chicago
65
510
200
3,949
136
4
135,18.3
S5
:u
1, 015.,833
78
7
87
ll
St. Louis
33
2o6
94
2,420
83
9
' 163_,266
102
5
985.387
77
8
93.1
7
Jlinnea.poli~
29
178
31
3.. 765
129
6
128,658
81.
12
1,628,978
127
2
92-9
8
Kanaae·City
57
383
55
2,388
82
10
150.. 043
94.2
6
780,889
61
10
89
10
Dallas
31.2
191
38.4
3.,859
133
5
146,686
92
9
878,102
68
9
94
6
291·9
~.4
1,419
49
2. <312 = 100
12
148.,658
93
8
5Sl,<l>5
12
75
12
~'59.\00
: 100
45
= 100
292
f Number of pieces sorted.
'
..
111.6
.:·
9
87
1()9..4
46.6
.E
90
30
Francisco
(Average
i
1
-~
Atlanta
San
·i
.;
•.·
l
282~017
100
,.•..
~
~
-
'"'"~
cS
·ci
@FedFRASER