View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

October 9, 1941
FISCAL POLICY IN THE POST-DfiFENSE PERIOD

Summary

A study aimed a t evolving the basis for a post-defense f i s c a l
program should contain the

following

elements:

1#

A comparative analysis of f i s c a l policy (forfeijgn f i n a n c i a l
developments, as w e l l as our own past experience;,

2.

A presentation of the type of f i s c a l structure which we are
l i k e l y to have at the end o f "the war (as a working basis i n
the consideration of fltture programs).

3.

A presentation of the essential elements o f a post-defense
f i s c a l program (including an examination o f the relationship of
post-defers e f i s c a l policy to t h e whole national and i n t e r national scene) f

4.

An examination of the means of t r a n s l a t i n g recommendations i n t o
policy and action.

Post-Defense Objectives
The generally accepted social objectives of the American people may
be translated ( a t the policy l e v e l ) i n t o a program, for the post-defense
period, which embraces the following:
1.

The formulation of a large o v e r - a l l governmental program of
services and expenditures based on our more essential social
needs,

2.

The evolution of a Federal tax structure which would meet the
requirements of encouraging economic s t a b i l i t y and progress,
as w e l l as those of equity, adequacy, md administrative ease*

3.

The development of means of executing u n i f i e d and coordinated
f i s c a l policies a t a l l levels of government, the extension of
national standards of service, and the equalization of f i s c a l
resources among t h e various areas of the nation,

A Post-Defense Program of Governmental Services and Expenditures
To be t r e a t e d i n the proper context, the study must involve
consideration o f these factors of post-defense adjustments:




- 2 1.

Estimated labor supply

2#

Estimated plant capacity

3.

Estimated backlogs end deferred demands

4.

Estimated savings

5.

Anticipated volume of private capital

6.

Estimated glro$s national product anl national income.

7.

A governmental# program necessary to maintain f u l l employment
(includir^ programs for the extension o f social services; public
improvement projects - especially urban redevelopment and
housing, and developmental programs on a regional basis; and
the i n t e g r a t i o n of our economic system more closely w i t h t h a t
of the outside -world).

expenditures

I n s e t t i n g f o r t h the magnitude and character of the probable (and
desirable) governmental services and expenditures for the post-defense period,
what i s important i s not the accuracy of the estimates - which merely providea working basis - but the h i g h l i g h t i n g of our social needs as w e l l as the
broad expenditure requirements of a f i s c a l policy aimed at f u l l employment•
The gap which w i l l be l e f t by the dropping out of the larger part of
defense expenditures must be f i l l e d by consumption and net c a p i t a l formation
i f we are to maintain f u l l employment.

Thus, governmental p o l i c i e s w i l l have

to be directed a t the expansion of consumption and investment.

Furthermore,

the Federal Government w i l l have to be prepared to play a balancing r o l e ,
checking any temporary tendency toward an excessive boom, and, on the other
hand, prepared to go forward w i t h large expenditures to compensate for any
strong tendency toward d e f l a t i o n and depression,

I t i s extremely important

to hold i n readiness both an adequate program of useful public improvement
projects and programs for the extension of social services*
The l i m i t a t i o n s upon the taxable resources and borrowing capacities
of the States and l o c a l i t i e s mean that increased expenditures, i f l e f t to
State and l o c a l u n i t s , can only be financed out of regressive taxes.




Such

- 3 -

taxes can o f f s e t almost a l l of the s o c i a l b e n e f i t s and economic stimulus
t h a t are derived from the expenditures which they help to

00trpr.

I t would be useful t o draw up a model based on administrative and
economic considerations alone, aiming a t an i d e a l d i s t r i b u t i o n o f governmental
functions.

The Federal Tax Structure
Eow much r e l i a n c e should be plaoed on t a x a t i o n , borrowing, and
changes i n the money supply as a means of financing the governmental
expenditure program depends upon a v a r i e t y of considerations.

It

involves

judgments with respect to "the adequacy of the means o f payment, adequate
l i q u i d i t y , the importance under c e r t a i n conditions of using r e l a t i v e l y
expansionist and less r e s t r i c t i v e methods of financing, the r e l a t i v e desirab i l i t y of tapping t h e savings stream through borrowing or through t a x a t i o n .
A decision as to t h e d e s i r a b i l i t y of reducing the public debt i n
the immediate post-defense period {and i f i t i s to be reduced, the r a t e a t
which i t i s t o be done), must depend i n large part on the vigor of the p r i v a t e
investment boom.

Furthermore, i f a large part of the public debt i s t o be

r e t i r e d , the character of the tax structure through which the t r a n s f e r
payments ( w i t h i n the community) b.re effected becomes a l l - i m p o r t a n t .

I f the

e f f e c t of the t r a n s f e r i s to reduce consumption and increase savings, a
serious d e f l a t i o n a r y movement may be s t a r t e d , or encouraged.

C e r t a i n l y , debt

redemption should not precede a proper adjustment of the tax structure.

In

general, f u l l consideration should be given t o the e f f e c t of the public debt
( 1 ) upon the d i s t r i b u t i o n of income; ( 2 ) upon the propensity t o consume;
( 3 ) upon the supply of fUnds for investment; and ( 4 ) upon the banking.system
and the e f f i c i e n c y of techniques of c r e d i t control.




- 4 The formulation of tax policy i n the post-defense period must be
based c h i e f l y upon considerations of c e r t a i n desirable relationships of the
tax structure to t t e national economy*

I n general, we should aim at a tax

structure which, i n the post-defense period
1,

involves a minimum reduction of consumer purchasing power;

2#

generally, is highly progressive at a l l ranges;

3,

discourages any tendency to oversaving;

4.

imposes as few obstacles as possible i n the way of
investment*

An immediate problem i n the postwar period w i l l be to maintain
consumption levels at a time when there may be a-severe reduction i n governmental expenditures,

A drastic reduction in consumer taxes would stimulate

consumption and help maintain these l e v e l s .

I t would be h e l p f u l to stress

publicly end constantly the f a c t that the increases i n consumption taxes
during the defense period have specific purposes — to control production of
c e r t a i n a r t i c l e s and to prevent i n f l a t i o n — so as t o c r y s t a l l i z e sentiment
for an immediate reduction i n consumption taxes a t the end of the defense
effort.

Attention should also be paid t o the p o s s i b i l i t y of reducing p a y r o l l

taxes.
I t i s clear t h a t i f regressive taxes are to be substantially
reduced, and i f our Federal tax structure is t o be progressive from top to
bottom, the r e l a t i v e importance of the income tax i n the Federal revenue
system w i l l have t o be greatly increased.

A mere broadening of the income

tax base i n terms of reduced personal exemptions and credits for dependents
i s not enough.

Income for income tax purposes should be brought i n t o b e t t e r

harmony with t r u e income.

To broa,den the income tax base substantially

would require revisions i n several directions:




1.

Tcpcation of stock dividends and corporate earnings;

2#

Disallowance of the personal exemption and c r e d i t for
dependents i n the computation of net income subject t o
surtax;

3,

Taxation of i n t e r e s t from Government s e c u r i t i e s ;

4.

A b o l i t i o n of the p r i v i l e g e enjoyed by husbands and wives
of f i l i n g separate returns.

The progressivity of the Federal tax structure could further be increased by
changes i n estate and g i f t tax provisions*
The question as to whether high turtax r a t e s , corporate taxes
generally, and the t a x a t i o n of capital gains dampen the incentive to invest
requires careful a t t e n t i o n .

I n analyzing the problem of private c a p i t a l

investment, the & 1 lowing deserve f u l l treatment:
1.

The encouragement of investment through the expansion
of consumptionj

2.

The encouragement of investment i n equity capital$

3.

The elimination o f discrimination against corporations
with highly f l u c t u a t i n g incomes*

4.

Incentive taxation.

Due consideration must also be given t o examining the proper
balance between personal and corporate taxation i n f u l f i l l i n g governmental
revenue needs*
I t seems essential to know how various types (and rates) of taxes
are l i k e l y t o a f f e c t business decisions.

Indications to business reactions

might be obtained through a questionnaire survey conducted by the U, S.
Chamber of Commerce, or a similar organization.

Businessmen would be asked

to indicate t h e i r preference for one o f , l e t us say, f i v e combinations of
taxes, each calculated to produce substantially the same amount of governmental revenue*




- 6 Federal-State-Local Fiscal Relations
A study of intergovernmental relations might begin with an analysis
of the impact of the defense program upon the burdens and f i s c a l capacities
of the States and l o c a l i t i e s .

On the basis of such a study, an estimate of

the f i s c a l position of non-Federal units toward the end of the defense e f f o r t
could be made.

An attempt should also be made to estimate the e f f e c t s of the

proposed service and expenditure program and of the proposed Federal t a x
structure on the f i s c a l position of States and l o c a l i t i e s .
An examination of present trends i s h e l p f u l i n looking toward the
formulation of policy, i n the post-defense period, i n the realm of FederalState-local fiscal relations.

The fbllowing trends seem to stand out c l e a r l y ;

1.

The need for continuing governmental expenditure on a
large scale;

2*

The greater r o l e of the Federal Government;

3.

The increasing reliance o f State and l o c a l governments
on regressive taxea;-

4.

The increasing discrepancies of wealth and of governmental
services i n various areas of the nation;

5.

The increasiig need for coordinated f i s c a l policies a t
a l l levels of government i n combating the problems of
our economy.

These trends point to the need f o r a fundamental revision i n
Federal-State-local fiscal'"relations.

An absorption by the Federal Government

of those functions which are of d i r e c t national i n t e r e s t could have several
b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t s : (1) Such services could be performed on a high standard
l e v e l ; ( 2 ) The f i e l d f o r coordinated and rapid f i s c a l action would be greatly
enhanced; the problems of our economy could be met with a l l the weapons at
the disposal of the nation; ( 3 ) The States and l o c a l i t i e s would be able to
finance the services o f a local nature out of t h e i r own revenues and without
the pressure to resort to regressive taxes,




A fundamental revision would require, moreover, t h a t , w i t h very fewexceptions, tax c o l l e c t i o n should be transferred from the States to the
Federal Government,

States would depend c h i e f l y upon shared taxes, State

supplements to Federal taxes, and g r a n t s - i n - a i d .

Through the development of

such financial dependence upon the Federal Government, States would become,
i n essence, administrative units — something which i s much to be desired i n
the face of modern economic exigencies and popular demand for more e f f e c t i v e
governmental action.
Such revisions do not, however, remove the necessity for additional
and more immediate improvements i n State and local f i s c a l structures, and i n
Federal-State-local fiscal relations.

Attention w i l l have to be paid to

many other aspects of the problem, among which are:




1.

The improvement i n the c o l l e c t i o n of State and l o c a l
f i n a n c i a l data;

2.

The equalization of burdens and resources; and

3.

The improvement i n the means of coordinating f i s c a l
policies at a l l levels of government.