The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
October 9, 1941 FISCAL POLICY IN THE POST-DfiFENSE PERIOD Summary A study aimed a t evolving the basis for a post-defense f i s c a l program should contain the following elements: 1# A comparative analysis of f i s c a l policy (forfeijgn f i n a n c i a l developments, as w e l l as our own past experience;, 2. A presentation of the type of f i s c a l structure which we are l i k e l y to have at the end o f "the war (as a working basis i n the consideration of fltture programs). 3. A presentation of the essential elements o f a post-defense f i s c a l program (including an examination o f the relationship of post-defers e f i s c a l policy to t h e whole national and i n t e r national scene) f 4. An examination of the means of t r a n s l a t i n g recommendations i n t o policy and action. Post-Defense Objectives The generally accepted social objectives of the American people may be translated ( a t the policy l e v e l ) i n t o a program, for the post-defense period, which embraces the following: 1. The formulation of a large o v e r - a l l governmental program of services and expenditures based on our more essential social needs, 2. The evolution of a Federal tax structure which would meet the requirements of encouraging economic s t a b i l i t y and progress, as w e l l as those of equity, adequacy, md administrative ease* 3. The development of means of executing u n i f i e d and coordinated f i s c a l policies a t a l l levels of government, the extension of national standards of service, and the equalization of f i s c a l resources among t h e various areas of the nation, A Post-Defense Program of Governmental Services and Expenditures To be t r e a t e d i n the proper context, the study must involve consideration o f these factors of post-defense adjustments: - 2 1. Estimated labor supply 2# Estimated plant capacity 3. Estimated backlogs end deferred demands 4. Estimated savings 5. Anticipated volume of private capital 6. Estimated glro$s national product anl national income. 7. A governmental# program necessary to maintain f u l l employment (includir^ programs for the extension o f social services; public improvement projects - especially urban redevelopment and housing, and developmental programs on a regional basis; and the i n t e g r a t i o n of our economic system more closely w i t h t h a t of the outside -world). expenditures I n s e t t i n g f o r t h the magnitude and character of the probable (and desirable) governmental services and expenditures for the post-defense period, what i s important i s not the accuracy of the estimates - which merely providea working basis - but the h i g h l i g h t i n g of our social needs as w e l l as the broad expenditure requirements of a f i s c a l policy aimed at f u l l employment• The gap which w i l l be l e f t by the dropping out of the larger part of defense expenditures must be f i l l e d by consumption and net c a p i t a l formation i f we are to maintain f u l l employment. Thus, governmental p o l i c i e s w i l l have to be directed a t the expansion of consumption and investment. Furthermore, the Federal Government w i l l have to be prepared to play a balancing r o l e , checking any temporary tendency toward an excessive boom, and, on the other hand, prepared to go forward w i t h large expenditures to compensate for any strong tendency toward d e f l a t i o n and depression, I t i s extremely important to hold i n readiness both an adequate program of useful public improvement projects and programs for the extension of social services* The l i m i t a t i o n s upon the taxable resources and borrowing capacities of the States and l o c a l i t i e s mean that increased expenditures, i f l e f t to State and l o c a l u n i t s , can only be financed out of regressive taxes. Such - 3 - taxes can o f f s e t almost a l l of the s o c i a l b e n e f i t s and economic stimulus t h a t are derived from the expenditures which they help to 00trpr. I t would be useful t o draw up a model based on administrative and economic considerations alone, aiming a t an i d e a l d i s t r i b u t i o n o f governmental functions. The Federal Tax Structure Eow much r e l i a n c e should be plaoed on t a x a t i o n , borrowing, and changes i n the money supply as a means of financing the governmental expenditure program depends upon a v a r i e t y of considerations. It involves judgments with respect to "the adequacy of the means o f payment, adequate l i q u i d i t y , the importance under c e r t a i n conditions of using r e l a t i v e l y expansionist and less r e s t r i c t i v e methods of financing, the r e l a t i v e desirab i l i t y of tapping t h e savings stream through borrowing or through t a x a t i o n . A decision as to t h e d e s i r a b i l i t y of reducing the public debt i n the immediate post-defense period {and i f i t i s to be reduced, the r a t e a t which i t i s t o be done), must depend i n large part on the vigor of the p r i v a t e investment boom. Furthermore, i f a large part of the public debt i s t o be r e t i r e d , the character of the tax structure through which the t r a n s f e r payments ( w i t h i n the community) b.re effected becomes a l l - i m p o r t a n t . I f the e f f e c t of the t r a n s f e r i s to reduce consumption and increase savings, a serious d e f l a t i o n a r y movement may be s t a r t e d , or encouraged. C e r t a i n l y , debt redemption should not precede a proper adjustment of the tax structure. In general, f u l l consideration should be given t o the e f f e c t of the public debt ( 1 ) upon the d i s t r i b u t i o n of income; ( 2 ) upon the propensity t o consume; ( 3 ) upon the supply of fUnds for investment; and ( 4 ) upon the banking.system and the e f f i c i e n c y of techniques of c r e d i t control. - 4 The formulation of tax policy i n the post-defense period must be based c h i e f l y upon considerations of c e r t a i n desirable relationships of the tax structure to t t e national economy* I n general, we should aim at a tax structure which, i n the post-defense period 1, involves a minimum reduction of consumer purchasing power; 2# generally, is highly progressive at a l l ranges; 3, discourages any tendency to oversaving; 4. imposes as few obstacles as possible i n the way of investment* An immediate problem i n the postwar period w i l l be to maintain consumption levels at a time when there may be a-severe reduction i n governmental expenditures, A drastic reduction in consumer taxes would stimulate consumption and help maintain these l e v e l s . I t would be h e l p f u l to stress publicly end constantly the f a c t that the increases i n consumption taxes during the defense period have specific purposes — to control production of c e r t a i n a r t i c l e s and to prevent i n f l a t i o n — so as t o c r y s t a l l i z e sentiment for an immediate reduction i n consumption taxes a t the end of the defense effort. Attention should also be paid t o the p o s s i b i l i t y of reducing p a y r o l l taxes. I t i s clear t h a t i f regressive taxes are to be substantially reduced, and i f our Federal tax structure is t o be progressive from top to bottom, the r e l a t i v e importance of the income tax i n the Federal revenue system w i l l have t o be greatly increased. A mere broadening of the income tax base i n terms of reduced personal exemptions and credits for dependents i s not enough. Income for income tax purposes should be brought i n t o b e t t e r harmony with t r u e income. To broa,den the income tax base substantially would require revisions i n several directions: 1. Tcpcation of stock dividends and corporate earnings; 2# Disallowance of the personal exemption and c r e d i t for dependents i n the computation of net income subject t o surtax; 3, Taxation of i n t e r e s t from Government s e c u r i t i e s ; 4. A b o l i t i o n of the p r i v i l e g e enjoyed by husbands and wives of f i l i n g separate returns. The progressivity of the Federal tax structure could further be increased by changes i n estate and g i f t tax provisions* The question as to whether high turtax r a t e s , corporate taxes generally, and the t a x a t i o n of capital gains dampen the incentive to invest requires careful a t t e n t i o n . I n analyzing the problem of private c a p i t a l investment, the & 1 lowing deserve f u l l treatment: 1. The encouragement of investment through the expansion of consumptionj 2. The encouragement of investment i n equity capital$ 3. The elimination o f discrimination against corporations with highly f l u c t u a t i n g incomes* 4. Incentive taxation. Due consideration must also be given t o examining the proper balance between personal and corporate taxation i n f u l f i l l i n g governmental revenue needs* I t seems essential to know how various types (and rates) of taxes are l i k e l y t o a f f e c t business decisions. Indications to business reactions might be obtained through a questionnaire survey conducted by the U, S. Chamber of Commerce, or a similar organization. Businessmen would be asked to indicate t h e i r preference for one o f , l e t us say, f i v e combinations of taxes, each calculated to produce substantially the same amount of governmental revenue* - 6 Federal-State-Local Fiscal Relations A study of intergovernmental relations might begin with an analysis of the impact of the defense program upon the burdens and f i s c a l capacities of the States and l o c a l i t i e s . On the basis of such a study, an estimate of the f i s c a l position of non-Federal units toward the end of the defense e f f o r t could be made. An attempt should also be made to estimate the e f f e c t s of the proposed service and expenditure program and of the proposed Federal t a x structure on the f i s c a l position of States and l o c a l i t i e s . An examination of present trends i s h e l p f u l i n looking toward the formulation of policy, i n the post-defense period, i n the realm of FederalState-local fiscal relations. The fbllowing trends seem to stand out c l e a r l y ; 1. The need for continuing governmental expenditure on a large scale; 2* The greater r o l e of the Federal Government; 3. The increasing reliance o f State and l o c a l governments on regressive taxea;- 4. The increasing discrepancies of wealth and of governmental services i n various areas of the nation; 5. The increasiig need for coordinated f i s c a l policies a t a l l levels of government i n combating the problems of our economy. These trends point to the need f o r a fundamental revision i n Federal-State-local fiscal'"relations. An absorption by the Federal Government of those functions which are of d i r e c t national i n t e r e s t could have several b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t s : (1) Such services could be performed on a high standard l e v e l ; ( 2 ) The f i e l d f o r coordinated and rapid f i s c a l action would be greatly enhanced; the problems of our economy could be met with a l l the weapons at the disposal of the nation; ( 3 ) The States and l o c a l i t i e s would be able to finance the services o f a local nature out of t h e i r own revenues and without the pressure to resort to regressive taxes, A fundamental revision would require, moreover, t h a t , w i t h very fewexceptions, tax c o l l e c t i o n should be transferred from the States to the Federal Government, States would depend c h i e f l y upon shared taxes, State supplements to Federal taxes, and g r a n t s - i n - a i d . Through the development of such financial dependence upon the Federal Government, States would become, i n essence, administrative units — something which i s much to be desired i n the face of modern economic exigencies and popular demand for more e f f e c t i v e governmental action. Such revisions do not, however, remove the necessity for additional and more immediate improvements i n State and local f i s c a l structures, and i n Federal-State-local fiscal relations. Attention w i l l have to be paid to many other aspects of the problem, among which are: 1. The improvement i n the c o l l e c t i o n of State and l o c a l f i n a n c i a l data; 2. The equalization of burdens and resources; and 3. The improvement i n the means of coordinating f i s c a l policies at a l l levels of government.