View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

It has been the Administration's purpose, as stated by the President on more than one occasion, to restore the price level and then to
* establish and maintain a dollar which will not change its purchasing and debtpaying power during the succeeding generation."
Since the President first declared that purpose, the general price
level has been restored*

It is essential now that monetary authorities do what

they can towards the maintenance of a dollar of stable purchasing and debtpaying power•
To protect the dollar against the danger of monetary inflation that
may arise when the country has reached a condition of full utilization of its
economic capacity, the Federal Reserve System has submitted to the Congress a
special report, in which all members of the Board of Governors, the presidents
of the Federal Reserve Banks and the members of the Federal Advisory Council
have unanimously joined.
It is scarcely necessary to point out that inflation means high prices.
It means loss of the purchasing power of the dollar*

It would be exactly con-

trary to the declared purpose of the Administration to establish and maintain
a dollar of steady purchasing power*

Such a dollar is one that is safeguarded

both against inflation and deflation*
Congress has placed upon the Federal Reserve System definite responsibilities in the banking and monetary field* Monetary authorities cannot prevent
price inflation due to bottlenecks or other non-monetary causes, but they have a
duty to recommend precautionary measures necessary in their field to cope with
monetary inflation. In its special report the System has sought to discharge
that duty*




The Secretary of the Treasury is quoted in the press as having stated

- 2 that there has been an unwarranted decline in the price of IT. S. Government
securities, that the decline has been caused by the System1 s special report,
that he sees no reason for a hardening of rates at this time, and that he
does not believe any artificial means should be taken to increase rates at
this time.
It is important, first of all, to make perfectly clear that it is
the Treasury, and not the Federal Reserve System, which is responsible for the
excessively low levels of interest rates. Virtually all of the powers and
authority to influence the money market reside in the Treasury. Money rates
are at the lowest levels in all history*

They are so low that Treasury bills

issued this week are selling at a premium above a no-yield basis —

a negative

rate of interest. The latest issue of Treasury 5-year Defense notes is selling
on a 0.77 per cent yield basis. Treasury 2-3/4 per cent bonds, with a maturity
of from twenty to twenty-five years, sold on January 8 at 109-1/4, or at a
yield of only 2.17 per cent. It is premature, to say the least, for the
Secretary to talk of a hardening of rates in the light of these facts.
If our country is to preserve the debtor-creditor system which is at
the heart of our political and economic order, then interest rates must be fair
to lender and borrower alike. They must be a means to an end, not an end in
themselves. The end which they serve is that of stabilized economic progress,
free from the disasters of uncontrolled inflations and deflations.
If we are to scrap that system and consider only how cheaply the
Government can sell its bonds, then we might as well go all the way and put
out non-interest bearing obligations, commonly known as greenbacks. For the




- 3 -

Government controls interest rates*

It can pay sane interest or no interest

at all, if it pleases*
We have had a condition of artificially low interest rates for a
long period*

So long as we were on the road upward recovering from the worst

deflation this country has ever known I, for one, have favored so-called easy
money conditions*
effective*

That was necessary to economic restoration and it has been

I have never favored, nor can anyone who subscribes to the Presi-

dent's purpose of maintaining a reasonably stable dollar, favor applying to a
period of full economic activity the same policies that are appropriate for a
period of stagnation*

It is because we are rapidly advancing into new high

ground of economic activity and production that the steps proposed by the Reserve System become necessary as a prudent safeguard*
Let there be no misunderstanding about interest rates*

In our sys-

tem it is vitally important to be fair to both creditor and debtor* Many
millions of our people have both debts, on which they prefer to pay as little
interest as possible, and savings on which they wish to earn as much interest
as possible*

There are tens of millions of people in this country who have

insurance policies and savings accounts*

There are innumerable educational,

religious, and fiduciary institutions, representing the vast majority of all
of our millions of citizens*

The survival of these institutions depends upon

their ability to derive a fair return upon the accumulations of savings in
their hands*

The Government has a grave responsibility to these purchasers

of Government obligations —

and they are the chief purchasers today when the

Treasury itself is seeking to tap existing savings in meeting defense needs,




- 4 instead of creating more deposits by selling securities to the commercial banks.
I regret that the Secretary of the Treasury and I appear to have
opposite ideas as to what constitutes "artificial11 influences upon the money
market*

In his press conference he referred to the Reserve System's program

as one that would apply "artificial* restrictions upon the money market*

I

wish merely to say that if the condition now prevailing whereby the banking
system has an unprecedented total of more than seven billion dollars of excess
reserves it not an artificial one, then that word has no meaning for me*

This

vast excess, on which a runaway inflationary credit expansion of fifty to sixty
billions could be pyramided is not the result of Reserve Systea action —
the contrary*
and silver*

quite

It is a result of Treasury policies and the purchasing of gold
The time has come, in my judgment, when the justification for per-

mitting these excessive funds to weighflownthe money markets no longer exists — when the interest rate should be governed by the supply of savings and
the demand for their use*
The System's special report to the Congress proposes that monetary
authorities be placed in a position where they can cope with the potentialities
inherent in this now uncontrollable reservoir of bank credit*

The problem is

real, it cannot be ignored, it needs to be faced frankly and courageously*