View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

October 5, 1943*
To;

Mr. Ecclea

Frorfl

M* S* Si

1. General
Thfe Governors of the International Fund and Bank, in Washington
last week for their Third Annual Meeting, generally agreed that the Fund
and Bank were being operated as well as could be expected under current
world conditions. While both institutions had had difficulties, it was
recognized that these were due to problems whose magnitude was such that
the resources of the Fund and Bank could not meet them. The hope was
widely expressed that the ERP, involving U. S. Government funds greater
than the amounts of dollars available to the Fund and Bank, would bring the
world back to a degree of relctive stability in which the Fund and Bonk
could perform their intended functions«
2* Dissent
The dissenting views expressed at the meeting were much milder than
had been anticipated• The Czech and Yugoslav Governors objected that the
annual reports of the two institutions dwelt unduly on recovery problems in
Western Europe and completely ignored the great strides in reconstruction and
production in their countries, and tfcut the reports treated the ERP as if it
were purely an economic program instead of having important political aspects.
They also supported the Polish Director in his objection to the lending policy
of the Bank, As to this latter point, Mr. Clayton for.the U, S. noted that
the Bank must moke its loons to countries that hcve prospects of earning
the dollars needed for repayment, and that if any country chose a policy
of orienting its trade away from Western Europe aid the dollar area, this
fact could not be ignored in considering the country1 s ability to repay. He
also pointed out that the Bank must obtain its dollars in the American market




-2rnd therefore public opinion in America as to the Bank and its lending policy
must be reckoned with, especially since there is now no other market source
for Bank funds. The relative mildness of the criticisms was, of coarse,
influenced by the Fund's having just permitted a drawing of $6 million by
Czechoslovakia, and also by the Bank1s assurance of early action on the
proposed loans to expand timber production in Eastern Europe.
The criticism of the Bankfs lending policy by representatives of
Latin American and other countries needing development loans was also milder
than expected. Apparently they accepted Mr. McCloyfs assurances that the
Bank was preparing to be much more active in the field of development loans.
(There is attached a summary of loons made by the Bank as of June 30, 1948.
Likewise, there is attached a summary of drawings on the Fund as of July 31>
1948)•
3« Election of ffaw Directors
In the election of Directors for the next two years, there were
few changes. Apart from the five Directors appointed by the five biggest
members, there were elected nine Directors in each institution to represent
the remaining member countries. The Middle Eastern countries and Greece had
previously formed a group electing one Director, but with the admission of
Turkey, Syria and Lebanon to the Fund and Bonk, the Middle East will form a
group without Greece and will be represented in the Bank by a Turkish instead
of a Greek Director* A new grouping of Italy, Austria, and Greece will be
represented by Italian Directors in both institutions. The Australian
Director will now represent a group consisting of his country and South Africa.
The group of Czechoslovakia, Poland end Yugoslavia continues to have a
Director in each institution but there will be ?. new Czech Director of the
Fund in place of Mladek who is on anti-communist. Finland will also be




-3represented by the Czech in the Fund and the Polish Director in the Bank,
but this is considered to be a technicality r:/ther thsn reflecting any significant political decision on the pert of Finland. There will continue to
be two Latin American Directors in each institution; the Fund Directors will
be from Venezuela (instead of Mexico) and Brazil, and the Bank Directors
will be from Colombia (instead of Chile) and Cuba..
4- Future of Bank Directors
The United States put forward the suggestion that a committee
study the possibility of changing the Bank Directorships from a full-time
to a part-time basis, andtitlesuggestion was accepted without incident*
Two years ago at Savannah, the United States vigorously insisted tlurt the
Fund Directorships should be full time, and those of ,the Bank were made full
time by the same resolution. Subsequent developments have borne out the
wisdom of setting up the Fund Directorships as full-time jobs, but it now
seems that the functions of the Bask could be performed adequately by the
President cud Staff with review and policy consultation by the Directors:.it
perhaps monthly intervals. The resolution contemplating this possible change
in the Bank directorship provides for the creation of a committee "to consider the provisions of the Articles of Agreement and By-Laws of the Bank
relating to the duties and remuneration of the Executive Directors end their
alternates and to recommend to the Board at or before its Fourth Annual Meeting cny changes therein which such committee shall deem necessary or
advisable•" The Committee consists of Belgium, the United States, the United
Kingdom, Cuba, Finland, and China - and Belgium is Chairman. I was asked by
the Governor for the United States to act as his deputy. The Committee has
already held three meetings, and will continue to meet from time to time
until it submits its report early in January, perhaps in London or Brussels*




5* Suggested Supervision of Local Currency
The Danish Governor suggested thet when the Bcnk extends credit
to a member country it should retain supervision over the local currency
that the country receives from selling the imported goods to its nationals.
This would parallel the requirement that the United States makes in connection
with ERP grants. This proposal will pro@UEor.lxLy be under study during the coning year, tut there would appear to be iaany ro;: sons why it would be undesirable for the Bank to try to exercise any such power.
6. Suggested Source of Lending Funds
Mr* McCloy broughtforward a suggestion that member countries should
generally permit the Bank to use, for the purpose of making loans, at least
a part of the local currency that they have prid in on their capital subscriptions. Sir Stafford Cripps and Mr, Lieftinck, however, mcue statements
as to why the U. K. and the Netherlands are not in a position to consent
to such capital exports from their countries at present.
7. Conclusion
While I attended practically all of the sessions, I was specifically
the U* S. Governor1s alternate on the Fundfs Rules end Regulations Committee.
The Governors decided to hold the 1949 Annual Meeting in Washington,
bit voted that next year1 s meeting should 'consider Paris as the site of the
1950 meeting.
The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Fund end Bonk was
The Honorable Yun-Wu Wang of China. The new Chairmen of the Board of Governors
of the Fund and Bank is M. Mendes-Frr,nce of France.
The Third Annual Reports of the Fund and.Bank .are now available and
any Board member desiring copies nay obtain them directly from our International
Section.
Attached hereto is a list of the U. S. Delegation



A . /I

/

The following table shows loans extended by the International
Brjik €is of June 30 > 1948:
Unused balance
DisburseLorjis
o f conciitiiient
authorized
raents
(Millions of U. S. dollars)

250
195

250
195

France

Netherlands
Netherlands
shipping companies*
Denmark
Luxembourg
Chile

12
16.4
8.6
0

12
40
12
16

23.6

3.4
16

* $8.1 million of this loan was extended by 10 U. S.
CoBimercial baiks and guaranteed by the International
Bank.
Total drawings on the Fund to July 31 > 194#> by country are as

follows;
ERP Countries

Drawings
Quota
(In millions of U. S. dollars)

In U.S.
Belgium
Denmark
France
Netherlands
Norway

Turkey
United Kingdom

225
68
525
275
50
A3
1,300

dollcrs

Other

Total

33-0

_~

10.2
125-0

~—

33.0
10.2
125.0

62.5

( 6

'5«0
5-0

(6.8 1/
4.6 c/
—
—

300.0

a/

540.7

75.3
9.6
5.0
300.0
558.1

a/ Dollar equivalent of purchase of sterling
b/ Pollar equivalent of purchase of Belgian francs
c/ Dollar equivalent of purchr.so of Belgian f
Other than
ERP countries
Chile
Ethiopia
India
Mexico




50
6
400
90

8.8
.3
.2
44
22.5

8.8
.3
44.2
22.5

75.8

75.8

United States

John W* Snyder
Secretary of the Treasury

Governor (Fund and Bank)

William L. Clayton
Adviser to the Secretary of
State

Alternate Governor
(Fund and Bank)

Prank A« Southard, Jr.
Associate Director, Div» of
Research and Statistics
Federal Reserve System

Temporary Alternate
Governor (Fund and Bank)

Eugene R. Black
Executive Director, Bank

Adviser (Bank)

Howard Bruce
Economic Cooperation
Administration

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Preston Delano
Comptroller of the Currency
Treasury Department

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Edmond M« Hanrahon
Chairman, Securities and
Exchange Commission

Adviser ( Fund and Bank)

Paul G* Hofftaan
Administrator, Economic
Cooperation Administration

Adviser (Fund and Bcmk)

John S # Hooker
Alternate Executive
Director, Bank

Adviser (Bank)

Thomas J* Lynch
General Counsel,
Treasury Department

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Delegation




William McChesney Martin, Jr* Adviser (Fund and Bank)
Chairman, Export-Import Bank
Adviser (Fund and Bank)
Garrison Norton
Assistant Secretary of State
Andrew N. Overby
Executive Director, Fund

Adviser (Fund)

Charles Sawyer
Secretary of Commerce

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

James J« Saxon
Adviser (Fund and Bank)
Assistant to the Secretary of
the Treasury

-2United States
Delegation

Brent Spence
Adviser (Fund and Bank)
Congressman, House Committee
on Stinking and Currency

(continued)




Allan Sproul
President, Federal Reserve
Brnk of New York

Adviser (Fund end Bank)

M* S. Szymczak
Member, Board of Governors
Federal Reserve System

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Wayne Chatfield Taylor
Economic Cooperation
Administration

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Charles Williem Tobey
Chairmrn, Senate Brnking
and Currency Committee

Adviser (Fund and Brnk)

Robert F« Wrgner
Senate Banking and Currency
Committee

Adviser (Fund and Bank)

Jesse Paine Wolcott
Adviser (Fund and Bank)
Congressman, Chcdrman, House
Banking and Currency Committee
Hawthorne Arey
Export-Import Bank
Elting Arnold
Treasury Department
George L* Bell
Commerce Department
Henry J« Bittermann
Treasury Department
Thomas C. Blaisdell, Jr*
Commerce Department
Clarence I. Blau
Commerce Department
James R* Brooks
Commerce Department
Chester L. Ccllander
Treasuiy Department
Philip E* Coleman, III
Boai^i of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System

Technical Adviser to
Delegation (Bonk and Fund)

United States
Delegation

Lewis N* Dembitz
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System

(continued)




Herbert E# Gaston
Export-Import Bank
C. Dillon Glendinning
Treasury Department
J. Burke Knapp
State Department
L« Werner Knoke
Federal Reserve Bank
of New York
Walter C. Louchheim, Jr.
Securities and Exchange
Commission
James A* McGullough
Economic Cooperation
Administration
Raymond F. MikeseH
State Department
Winfield ¥. Riefler
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System
Arthur Smithies
Economic Cooperation
Administration
Harold R. Spiegel
State Department
Frank M. Tcmagna
Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System
Rifat Tirana
Export-Import Bank
Henry C. WaUich
Economic Cooperation
Administration
George H* Willis
Treasury Department
John Parke Young
State Department
Walter C. Sauer
Export-Import Bank

Technical Adviser to
Delegation (Bank and Fund)