View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

April 1, 1947
Td

Policy Group

From

Staff Group on Foreign Interests
The Staff Group desires to present the following specific conclu-

sions and recommendations on the matters covered in its memorandum of March
28 concerning "Policy Problems Relating to Gold";
!• Procedure on Gold Transactions in the United States by Foreign
Monetary Authorities
Some of the existing uncertainty concerning U. S. gold policy
could and should be removed by public announcement that hereafter and until
further notice Treasury procedures will permit foreign monetary authorities
to convert any free (i.e. unblocked) dollar balances into gold (for earmark
or for export) without any formalities under the Gold Reserve Act of 19S4
or the provisional regulations issued pursuant thereto, The Staff Group
does not recommend any change at the present time in the procedures governing the purchase of gold by the United States from foreign countries.
2. The U, S. Treasury's 1/4 Per Cent Charge on Gold Transactions
The 1/4 per cent charge which by Treasury regulation has been
levied on purchases and sales of gold since 1934, has served to deter capricious shifts back and forth between gold and dollars by foreign monetary
authorities and has provided revenue for the U. S« Treasury (and the U. S.
Stabilization Fund)• On the other hand, the elimination of this charge
would seem to give the international gold standard a "fixed point of
reference" (i.e. a flat and unqualified price for gold in terms of dollars),
and the elimination or reduction of the charge would tend to reduce the
volume of requests for loans on gold.




- 2 Some members of the Group believe that the latter arguments
warrant asking the Treasury to consider elimination or reduction of the
charge. Other members of the Group, however, feel that there are no
strong grounds for so doing and that the loss of revenue in particular
is a sensitive point. They point out also that the whole subject of gold
charges by the International Fund and tey all member countries has been
under discussion in the Fund, and consider that no action should be taken
until the Fund has at least formulated a tentative proposal.
3. Sections 8 and 9 of the Gold Reserve Act
These Sections appear to delegate to the Secretary of the
Treasury certain administrative freedom of action in fixing the price of
gold in terms of dollars, and their existence seems to have nourished
some of the speculative rumors in the market concerning a possible change
in the dollar price of gold. Some members of the Group believe that in
order to allay some of these rumors legislation should be sought repealing
these Sections and providing that notwithstanding the provisions of any
other law, no agency or instrumentality of the United States Government
may deal in gold at prices differing from the official parity by more than
the established handling charge«

Other members of the Group believe that

under present circumstances, as a result of the Bretton Woods legislation,
the Secretary of the Treasury has no real freedom of action under Sections
8 and 9, and that to seek legislation would be sn unnecessary catering to
the unfounded and not very significant market sentiment.




- 3 4, Gold Operations by U» S» Banks in Foreign Markets
The Staff Group is agreed that participation by U« S. commercial banks in transactions in gold against dollars at premium prices in
foreign markets, whether directly or through the financing of such
transactions, is undesirable as a matter of national policy. It recommends that the Treasury and the Federal Reserve System issue a joint
statement to this effect,
5. Efoffel Bill Regarding Gold Transactions
The Staff Group is agreed that the purposes of this bill are
contrary to the public interest. It sees no reason for conferring a
special bounty upon domestic gold production and it considers that the
creation of a dual price for gold in the United States, such as would
result from the bill, would be inconsistent with our national gold
policy and would stimulate highly undesirable speculative activities.