View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Off GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Oottfeer 6, 19U7
To Ghairman %ooles and Gov

From ^oodlief Thomas
MESSAGE:

* o r y ° u r information*

Message delivered by.

F.R.
468
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/
Rev. 1/47
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
DFTHE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Office Correspondence
To

Mr* Thomas

Date October 6,1947
Subject: Advisory Steering Committee

From A. Gerschenkron
The Advisory Steering Committee met again on October 2, 1947*
It was pointed out that Senator Vandenbergfs recent statement emphasized
the need for coordination between the interim-aid program and the longrange plans* It was agreed, therefore, that the working groups of the
Advisory Steering Committee which are concerned with the appraisal of the
Paris report should sufcmit their reports within three weeks* Thereupon,
these reports will be integrated into a long-range program to be made
available to Congress simultaneously with the request for the interim-aid
program* As far as the latter is concerned, only an informal bill for
Congressional benefit will be drafted, but it is expected that the formal
drafting will be done by Congress*
European technical experts have arrived; conversations are beginning
today on the basis of lists of questions which have been prepared by the
working groups*
Under Secretary Clayton and Ambassador Douglas visited the Committee
and spoke about their experience in Paris* Most of their statements turned
upon the French situation* They said that it had required considerable
pressure to convince the French of the need for monetary and fiscal reforms*
The original draft of the Paris report on these questions had been altogether
inadequate, and simply stated that no steps toward monetary and fiscal reconstruction could be taken until the amount of aid has been determined. However,
the French revised it after several conversations with Messrs* Clayton and
Douglas* The present statement was considered reasonably satisfactory, and
both Mr* Clayton and Mr. Douglas took a moderately optimistic view of the
degree of success that can be attained in the field by the French although
they envisaged that a period of 12-18 months would elapse before stabilization
is achieved* Both gentlemen expressed their conviction that without such a
stabilization no recovery of production, particularly in the agricultural
field, can be expected, and Ambassador Douglas stated that we should not
tolerate any half-way compromise solutions in this respect* He also added,
rather emphatically, that a devaluation of the franc would be fruitless unless
accompanied by a radical change in domestic policies* In reply to a question
concerning our attitude to socialization in Europe, Mr* Douglas stated that
any attempt on the part of the U.S. to interfere with this problem would be
ill-conceived and ill-received in Europe. Mr. Clayton concurred, but remarked
that socialization and threat of socialization constituted a considerable
barrier to the recovery of output.
After the departure of Messrs. Clayton and Douglas the Committee
discussed briefly certain sources of funds that may be available for interim
aid to France and Italy* The possibilities for speeding up the liquidation
of army accounts in France and prison-of-war payments in both countries were
mentioned.