View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Ftfrin No* 131

Office Correspondence
Chairman Ecdes
From

FEDERAL RESERVE

Date October 18, 1955»
Subject:.

Laudhlin Currie

Attached are my recommendations in connection with research in the
Division, with accompanying comments by Mr. Goldenweiser* I should
very much like to have the opportunity of discussing these recommendations with you sometime•




Fpym No, 131

Office Correspondence
"->

Chairman Bcdes

From

Mr*^(loldenweis€

FEDERAL RESERVE

Date

October 18, 1935

Subjects

opo

I transmit herewith a memorandum by Mr. Currie on the problem
of research necessary for the formulation of monetary policy* This
memorandum may be considered as a supplement to the one I sent you
the other day on the work of the Division of Research and Statistics•
I am in general agreement with Mr* Currie on the fact that the
particular lines of inquiry which he recommends should be developed
and that for that purpose economists with high qualifications will be
necessary* I suggested the appointment of one in my memorandum* while
Mr. Currie thinks we will need two. I think that there will no doubt
be room for two such men if we can find them.
With regard to the particular individual whom Mr. Currie recommends, Mr. Silverman, I wish to reserve judgment until I have had an
opportunity to look into the matter further, although Mr. Curriefs
high opinion of him is, of course, in his favor.
I am in complete accord with Mr. Currie about the fact that this
research should be in general his particular field of work and that
there should be close cooperation in the matter between all the members
of the senior staff.




16—852

RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO RESEARCH IN CONNECTION WITH
THE FOBMDLATION OF MONETARY POLICY
Submitted by Lauchlin Currie
I

- The Board1 s Interest in Monetary Research*

II - The Inadequacy of Current Data*
III - Outline of Type of Research Recommended*
IV - Specific Recommendations»

I - The Board*s Interest in Monetary Research*
While research carried on by the Division is complementary to and
coordinated with research carried on by private agencies, it is more
pragmatic in nature; that is, it is primarily directed towards aiding
the Board in the formulation of monetary policy* Hence, not as much
help can be obtained from private agencies as would be expected, since
their research is confined mainly to interpreting past developments while
ours must be concerned more with interpreting present developments and
forecasting future trends*
The Board1s responsibility for the formulation of appropriate
monetary policy outweighs that of any other agency, and the Division
should take the lead in initiating and coordinating research designed
to provide, improve, and extend the data upon which monetary policy
must be based* The responsibility of the Board in this matter has been
more widely recognized since the passage of the Banking Act, and this
recognition should make it easier for it to obtain new information than
was the case hitherto* Its public character and the general importance




-2-

of its objective place the Board in a key position in coordinating,
guiding and influencing public and other agencies in the collection
and analysis of the requisite data.
The Board needs as full information as possible, not only as a
basis upon which to formulate its own policy but also to place it in
a position to be consulted by the Administration in the formulation
of the Government1s monetary and fiscal policies* It should be so
much better informed than any other agency that the Administration
will naturally consult with it in any matters affecting business activity.
In order to coordinate and adapt monetary means to the attainment
of the basic objective of policy

—

the promotion of conditions

enabling as full utilization of the productive resources of the country
as can be continuously sustained under conditions of stability —
the Board must have currently available as full information as practicable
on:
a. The national income and its distribution.
b. The degree of capacity at which the country is producing.
c. The nature and the relative magnitude of the forces which
will tend to increase or decrease business activity in
the immediate future.
d.

The changing conditions of stability.

In deciding upon a course of monetary action, the Board is
actually compelled on some basis or other to assess the relative effects,
as quantitatively given, of a large number




of

forces very often in

-5-

conflict, and, as I shall indicate in a moment, information currently
available is an inadequate basis for such evaluations, both with
respect to coverage and proper convergence on the problem of monetary
policy. At present, mistakes in forecasting, and hence in monetary
policy, are almost inevitable*
One of the chief objectives of monetary research in the Division
is to obtain and coordinate data in a manner significant for policymaking purposes, so that the general picture may be shown by a comparatively few series which measure the total and net effect of hundreds
of factors. The general picture can then be readily broken down into
its component parts and changes in particular series having special
business-cycle or forecasting significance singled out as guides for
the formulation of monetary policy.
II - The Inadequacy of Current Datft
Current information on the national income and its distribution.
There are at present no reliable estimates of current national
income and its distribution. The estimate compiled by the Department
of Commerce is too late to be significant for current purposes*
There is some information currently available on various component parts of the national income, but it is defective. Information
on wages* the largest single element in national income, is provided
principally by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in cooperation with
other Federal and State agencies* The reports received cover only
about 3OJ6 of all gainfully employed workers. Reporting is on a voluntary basis, which means that the number of establishments reporting



-4-

varies from month to month and that only the best organized industries
and the best firms tend to report, thus obscuring the nature and
extent of changes* It also means that there are no means of checking
the accuracy of reports from individual establishments• Information
relating to the service industries, private construction, wholesale
and retail trade, and finance is particularly poor* Information on
wage rates* which is essential for monetary policy-making purposes, is
very unsatisfactory*
Only recently have attempts been begun to collect information as
to the employment and earnings of salaried workers. No current data
are available on the employment and incomes of managerial employees,
corporate executives, and proprietors of non-corporate establishments*
Nothing is known about the current incomes of professional people and
other persons who are self-employed.
In the field of qroflt^« several series on corporate earnings are
published by investment services and newspapers. All of these are
deficient as indicators of the course of profits for business as a whole,
because they cover only corporations which are very large relative to
the typical American corporation and in addition include no figures for
non-corporate enterprise* In these two fields of small-scale corporate
enterprise and non-corporate enterprise there are no current data on
profits* Information on the rate of profits is particularly poor*
Information as to interest payments also relates primarily to large corporate business units* There is no current information on the aggregate
volume of reqts and Royalties received*




-5-

The use of the index of industrial production as an indicator
of current income is unsatisfactory on several groimds. It is compiled from a sample of the output of industries, which industries in
turn account for only about 4056 of all manufacturing measured in
terms of value added by manufacture, and 7756 of mining* Since manufacturing contributes only about 23$ and mining about 3% to the national income, the index is an indication of the physical output of activities which contribute only about 1Z% to the national income. The
index is based upon less than 60 series out of the thousands of goods
and services in the production of which the national income is earned•
Moreover, the importance of various series in the index is proportionate to their importance relative to total manufactures, rather than to
their importance relative to economic activity as a whole. While this
basis of weighting is the proper one for an index of physical volume
of manufacturing and mineral production, it seriously impairs its value
as an indicator of current income*
Actual comparison of the index with annual estimates of national
income reveals that while the trends of the two series over a number
of years agree fairly well, the year-to-year percentage changes show
marked differences. Between 1925 and 1924 and again between 1926 and
1927 the two series moved in opposite directions, national income rising
and the production index falling. Monthly changes in the index are
probably even more unreliable as a measure of changes in income than




-6yearly changes* Thus* in 1953, it is extremely improbable that the
national income rose 69% from March to July, as did the index of
production*
Production as a percentage of maximum and stable" capacity*
No estimates are available except for isolated industries*
Current informatiojq on business trends* Much scattered information exists but with the exception of the production index it is not
consolidated or rearranged in a manner significant for our purposes.
No estimate of current business and government expenditures is
available* The same is true of consumers* expenditures*
One type of expenditure which is of major importance is expenditure on construction* A private agency, F* W* Dodge and Company,
compiles current figures on building contracts awarded* These figures
are deficient in two respects* In the first place, they are of contracts awarded, and not of expenditure* In the second place, they
cover only a portion of the field and this portion varies* Contracts
awarded as compiled by Dodge, amounted to fifty-four percent of total
construction in 1928, as estimated by Kuznets, and thirty-one percent
in 1932*

Current rent and building costs series are unsatisfactory,

as are also the data on interest rates and the availability of mortgage
money*
Scattered data on consumers1 expenditures, such as department
store sales (about 5% of the total), gasoline sales, automobile sales,
chain store and mail order sales, etc*, have not been consolidated*




-7Quarterly corporate income figures available, as pointed out
above, are not representative of the profits of all businesses.
Inventory figures have not been consolidated in such a manner
as to enable a generalized picture of the current inventory situation
to be obtained. The index of the Department of Commerce has many
defects.
No information is currently available on changes in the distribution of money in the country.
Current information on orders on the books of business firms is
extremely scanty.
The index of production appears to be a reliable indicator of
the current trend of production« but is not so reliable as a measure
of the degree of change.
Almost nothing is known of the magnitude of current saving out
of income.
Existing price indexep are not compiled in such a way as to
throw light on profit margins by showing changes in the cost and selling prices of important industries. Neither do they distinguish
between monopoly or inflexible prices and competitive or flexible
prices.
The list could be greatly extended but the above indicates
sufficiently the general paucity of the material.
In view of the inadequacy of existing data, forecasts can be
little more than guesses, and the possibility of error is great. The




-8record of business leaders and the financial press has been notoriously
bad* The various forecasting services have had likewise, on the whole,
a poor record, particularly since 1929* This is attributable not so
much to their lack of economic insight as to the inability with existing material to assess the relative magnitude of the many forces that
affect business spending in the immediate future•
III - Outline of Type of Research Recommended
Research in the Division should be continuously directed in the
future, as it has been in the past, towards the extension, improvement,
and arrangement of data in a manner significant for policy-making purposesI suggest, in particular, the desirability of doing more work at this
time in developing a framework of analysis, in investigating to what
extent current data can be utilized to fit into and fill out the framework,
and in determining the most feasible way to supply missing information
in connection with the following subjects:
4,* The National Income and Its Distribution* Knowledge of current
movements in the national income is of basic importance to the Board for
two reasons• In the first place, to encourage through monetary means
a steady increase in real incomes is the very object of the Board1s
policy* In the second place, the movements of income between industries
and between economic classes are of importance in marking transitions
between phases of the business cycle and hence as indicating the nature
of future developments*
The special interest of the Board in the national income can best
be served by the construction of a current index which will measure



monthly or quarterly changes* An extensive program of research is necessary as a preliminary to the construction of such an index, both to determine the concepts of income most significant for the Board1s purposes and
to explore the possibilities of obtaining current quantitative approximations to such concepts* There are two approaches to the general problem
of measurement, both of which need to be explored. Income can be measured
directly as it passes into the hands of those who receive it in the form of
wages, profits, etc*, or income can be measured indirectly t>y adding together the value of goods and services produced by each kind of activity
in which income is earned*
These two methods should, with certain qualifications, yield the same
results*

If the two kinds of information necessary to make complete esti-

mates were available, the two methods could be used to check each other.
In the present state of our knowledge it is necessary in each industrial
field to use the method for which the most reliable information is available*
g*

The Degree of Utilization of Productive Resources* Knowledge of

the extent to which the industrial capacity of the country is being used
is important not only as an indication of the extent to which the general
objective of the Board is being achieved, but also as a guide to monetary
policy*

As long as there is a substantial measure of slack in the system

an increase in demand for goods can be met with but little if any rise in
prices* When, however, industry is operating at capacity, an increase in
demand cannot be readily met by an increase in goods, and drastic price
rises with accompanying speculative phenomena are likely to occur*




-10-

The determination of the productive capacities of specific industries , and of the country as a whole, constitutes an extraordinarily
difficult problem• The concept of capacity itself involves many difficulties, and must be carefully explored*
eers and the technocrats —

Thus, the concept of the engin-

the theoretical capacity of various industries,

regardless of the labor supply and of costs —

is not relevent to our

problems* Likewise irrelevent is the capacity envisaged by socialists
and communists, which involves a drastic change in the organization of
economic society. Our problem, rather, is to determine, under the existing organization, (a) the current capacity of various industries, (b) the
current capacity of industry as a whole, and (c) the degree of capacity
that can be sustained under conditions of general stability*
It will be seen that the problem of productive capacity is closely
bound up with the problem of nnormaltt employment and unemployment*

The

concept of normal employment and unemployment is familiar, but little
attempt has been made to arrive at it empirically owing largely to the
poorness of our employment figures*

The inauguration of unemployment

insurance offers an opportunity to secure better information on the number
of hours worked and the slack in the labor market than has hitherto been
available*
If approximations to maximum capacity and "stable capacity11 can
be obtained, the figures of course must be continuously revised*

This

may be done by determining and projecting long-term trends of production,
supplemented by current figures on output per worker and new additions
to the labor market.




-u5. Business Trends. In interpreting business trends and in
forecasting probable trends in the immediate future, it is essential
first to develop a framework of analysis so that the multitude of
forces affecting business activity may be consolidated and reduced to
a manageable number of factors*

It is then necessary to attempt to

assess in quantitative terms the magnitude of the activity-increasing
and activity-decreasing factors.
In addition to endeavoring to secure more information on the
current national income and its distribution and on the degree of
practicable capacity at which industry is operating, the possibility
of securing approximizations to the following consolidations should be
thoroughly explored: - series that measure factors that increase or
decrease incomes; series designed for use in forecasting increase or
decrease of incomes in the immediate future} sources of business and
government expenditures; series showing the value of goods produced,
goods sold, and changes in inventories; information by industries
classified according to their business-cycle significance#

In addi-

tion, the possibility of developing cost and price indexes throwing
light on changes in the profit margins of various industries and
indexes showing changes in the current rate of returns on capital in
general and in particular fields should be investigated.
This is not the place to set forth the framework of analysis
or to explore the methods ty which this framework may be filled out
in quantitative terms. I am merely indicating very briefly the type
of thing I have in mind.




4*

Conditions of Stability*

The determination of the changing

conditions of stability should be a subject for continuous study.
It involves difficult problems both of theory and of measurement*
I shall here merely indicate the general nature of the problem*
Ours is predominantly a profit economy*

The production of goods

and services is in the first instance not undertaken as an end in
itself, but in order to obtain money profits. Our economic development has been for the most part a by-product of the search for profits*
Business expenditures, the main source of incomes, are conditioned by
the expectations of profit* An investigation into the conditions of
economic stability and instability should, therefore, take as a starting point profits* The various factors making for instability may
conveniently and significantly be treated from the viewpoint of their
effect on profit expectations.
As is true of other aspects of our problem, profits must be
treated both individually and collectively* Whatever concept of profit
stability is adopted, it must allow for wide fluctuations in the profits
of individual firms and industries*

The goal of stability must not be

purchased at the price of static conditions* In the words of a recent
writer, H h e problem of economic balance is the problem of combining
stability with change and growth11, and change in the capitalist economy
necessarily is activated by changes in profits and profit expectations*
On the other hand, the extent to which a given average level of profits
and profit expectations will result in business spending will depend
in part on the composition of the average* In certain industries a




-13-

slight rise in profit expectations may lead to a considerable expansion
of spending; in others it may have very little influence on spending•
Complete information on all the factors bearing upon profits will
doubtless not be available for many years to come*

In the meantime*

the feasibility of obtaining as much of this information as possible
for (a) a representative sample of industry and/or (b) a group of industries having peculiar business-cycle significance, should be investigated •
Assuming that reliable approximations of current profits are
obtained, the next step would be an investigation into the probable
response in terms of expenditure of industry as a whole and of particular industries to an increase or decrease in profits* One factor
is, of course, the general state of business expectations. Another
is the degree of slack or unutilized capacity*
of competition that prevails*

Another is the degree

Still another is the cost and availabil-

ity of loanable funds*
Assuming that forecasts of business spending in the immediate
future can be made, the next problem is that of determining whether
the expected expenditure is deficient or excessive in relation to
stability. Ifeny economists believe that business expenditures should
increase only sufficiently to compensate for increases in population,
so that money incomes per capita remain stationery*

Still others

believe that business spending should increase sufficiently to permit
of a steady increase in wages and in the gross return accruing to
property owners, but not sufficient to increase the rate of return on




-14capital. Much more research is needed on this subjects
Conditions of stability cannot be treated solely from a domestic
point of view*

Developments abroad react on the domestic situation*

In studying conditions of stability, therefore, account must be taken
of unstabilizing developments abroad and measures devised to minimize
the effect of such developments on the domestic situation*
The reason why it is so important to arrive at as reliable forecasts as possible of the magnitude of desirable and of probable business expenditures is that allowance must be made for a time interval
between the Inauguration of monetary policy and its effect on business
activity* Monetary policy affects business activity as follows: Openmarket operations, or changes in reserve requirements, affect the
availability and the cost of borrowed funds, and hence affect one item
in business costs* The effect of changes in interest charges on future
business spending depends on the importance of interest charges in
relation to other costs and the degree of change that is concomitantly
occurring in other costs, in selling prices and the volume of businesses,
In certain types of business, interest charges are a negligible
factor although some spending might be deferred in such businesses by
the possibility of getting high returns on money invested elsewhere,
and vice versa*

In others, such as residential and office building,

they are extremely important*

A classifies.tion of businesses accord-

ing to the importance of interest costs might be significant for the
purpose of testing the current effectiveness of monetary policy* The




-15-

effectiveness of changes in interest rates must also be considered
in relation to the movements in other costs and selling prices. It
is for this reason that the effectiveness of a monetary policy of
given magnitude varies. When other costs and selling prices are
generally stable, a given monetary policy will naturally be more
effective than when these conditions do not prevail. The importance
of the timing of policy is therefore evident. Action should be taken
while interest charges are still an important element of costs• If
deferred until other costs and selling prices are rising or falling
rapidly, it will be much less effective in achieving the desired result. Correct timing is dependent upon correct forecasting of future
business expenditures. It is, therefore, essential to improve the
basis of forecasting,
IV

— Specific Recommendations

As the organization chart of the Division indicates, the various
members of the senior staff are in charge of various fields of statistics.
One man, for example, is responsible for the work done in the field
of foreign and international trade statistics. The different members
of the senior staff are constantlymgaged in improving and extending
the material over which they have charge, in answering inquiries, and
in preparing current data for presentation. Such work is vital and
must always be a major pert of the work of the Division•
This organization of work, while necessary, has however a disadvantage. The senior staff is so occupied with the preparation and presentation




-16of current data that they have inadequate time for uninterrupted
research on their own account and, generally speaking, juniors are
not as yet qualified for advanced research. Consequently we are
not equipped at present to undertake research of the magnitude and
scope of that discussed above. I recommend, therefore, that two
senior economists be employed, who shall devote their full and uninterrupted time to such research.
Work of the type envisaged requires ability of the highest order.
The qualifications in general are a thorough training in economic
theory, and particularly business-cycle theory and statistics, and
knowledge of existing material and sources, combined with a high
degree of originality and intellectual independence* The latter qualifications are essential because the work in large part must be of a
pioneer nature*
There is one man I know who most fully meets these qualifications.
He is A* G* Silvenaaa, at present a senior economist with the Tariff
Commission* He is a Harvard Ph. D. and a former Research Associate
of the National Bureau of Economic Research. I have known him over
a term of years and he has, in my opinion, the finest analytical mind
in the field* He has in the past been heartily recommended by
Professors Williams, Schumpeter, Gay and Mitchell* I happen to know
that he was to be offered the post of chief economist of an important
Board if certain developments in the affairs of that Board took place.
If a senior economist is to be appointed to work in the fields of




-17national income and productive capacity, I urge most strongly that
an effort be made to obtain Silverman. He has at present a permanent
post and is doing responsible work. His interest in the field of
national income is such, however, that I think he could be induced
to join our organization to work in that field*
For research in the field of measurement of current and future
business trends I have another man in mind who is at present in charge
of a WPA project* He has had an exceptionally wide experience in the
field of business statistics and has concentrated in monetary theory*
He is most highly spoken of by people who are familiar with his work,
but I would prefer not to make a definite recommendation until I have
heard from Professor Viner, under whom he did most of his graduate
work*
If appointed, these men would need assistants* Upon completion
of our WPA project, Mr. Edmiston would be available for this purpose.
I should also like to suggest for consideration Mr. George Eddy, of
the Research Division of the Treasury. Both Mr, Goldenweiser and I
think very highly of him.
If the research here suggested is to be fruitful from the standpoint of the Board,it should be carried on in close cooperation with
the other members of the senior staff, with constant interchange of
information and ideas• Since I am the least burdened of the directing
staff and I am keenly interested in this type of research, I should
like to take an active part in directing and coordinating the work,
under the general direction, of course, of Mr. Goldenweiser.




Finally, I recommend that the suggested research be initiated
as soon as possible, since a year or more must elapse before the
work will begin to bear fruit. From the point of view of monetary
policy the Board is now enjoying a breathing spell, while the
Government is playing the dominant role. This breathing spell
should be utilized to prepare for the time when the Board must carry
the main responsibility for avoiding a boom and converting a recovery into a period of stable prosperity.




October 17, 1935.