View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

for?,2 N o . nil
FEDERAL. H ESERVE

;i C o r r e s p o n d e n c e
To
Vom

The Board of GoTernors „ .

B0ARD

Date ^y

12 1956

>

Subject: Presidentfs views on housing,

J. M. Daig^r

Attached is a copy of a letter sentfcyPresident Roosevelt
last week to the American Institute of Architects, together with a
copy of the Institute's response to the President.
The letter constitutes, I think, a clear sxammary of the
essential purposes that the President has in mind with regard to
housing, and is in fact the only formal statement on housing that
he has made, according to my recollection, in the past two years*




For circulation*
FROM

Chairman Eccles*

REMARKS:
Attached is a copy of a letter sent byPresident Roosevelt last week to the American Institute of Architects, together with
a copy of the Institute's response to the
President, i!r« Daiger prepared the letter
sent out by the President. T am sure you
will find both letters interesting.




GOVERNOR'S OFFICE

COPY
THE IK1TE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 6, 1936

Dear Mr. Voorhees:
I wish that it were possible for me to go dov;n to Williams burg
to take part in the discussion of housing viiich the American Institute of
Architects has arranged as part of its convention program; for the members
of the Institute know, I am sure, the great interest I have in this whole
problem of raising the standard of our human habitations. Since I cannot,
however, join directly in the housing discussion scheduled for tomorrow
morning, will you not convey to the Institute my good wishes for the success of its sixty-eighth convention and express my earnest hope that the
ideas developed in these current sessions will be directed toward one of
the most urgent tasks that private enterprise and government now have in
common.
Long years of neglect of much of our older housing, followed by
a severe depression during which the home-building industry remained
virtually at a standstill, hasJLeft us with an industrial and social
problem of the first magnitude — the problem namely, of providing enough
housing both to replace an enormous accumulated obsolesence and to take
care of a constantly growing population. It becomes necessary, therefore,
if the practical realities of this housing need are to be met, for the
'FOR C1RCJU':../Architect, along with the industrialist and financier, to think in terms
muc
•|
?AJ£$^
^ wicler range and a much larger volume of home building during
• I First to Mr. .JticA. .years immediately ahead than we attained during the misguided construe,/fc/pn boom of the 1920 ! s •
Mr, Brodor:c'< liK^^
Mr <^v <k V s
^nc^ ye^> if there is here in the field of housing a problem and
" "\ "V^^rieed of the first magnitude, there is also an opportunity of the first
fifl r*

IVI f*' \ (^ &

^br^^r

magnitude. Is it not obvious Iji^the most practical answer to the question of
I'ty&se who ask what private industry can do that it is not already doing to
Mr. Random |-mri>-our unemployed workers back into gainful occupations? Is it not the
Mr, Mor.1 ^^^yfreatest potential market for the unused resources and idle facilities of
Mr, Clay y/ydxxr. mines and forests and factories and railroads? Is it not a standing
Mr. Mo.-: ; ^.invitation and challenge to the imagination, initiative, and enterprise of
Mr. Be'"; >/. mejaTwith capital, men with a genius for production and marketing, men with
Jm/eye to the next great field of American industrial development and
r
Mr. v'dT\;ii s:\z

J

think it is all these things, and more; for it is also the means
the living standards of millions of our people, and in that process increasing the wealth and prosperity of the country as a whole.
!




- 2 -

It seems to me a happy circumstance that this year!s convention
of the American Institute of Architects is being held in the inspiring
setting of the City of Viilliarasburg and the College of Filliam and Mary;
and I think it is altogether fitting that on this occasion the Institute
should pay tribute to the persons who have made possible the restoration
of V.illiamsburg to the beauty and grace and dignity of its historic past.
Paradoxically, though, the Vvilliamsburg restoration is a triumph of modern
architectural skill, and it is in many respects a modern community and in
all essential respects a modern institution of learning that we now find
there•
Hence, I should count it fortunate if the members of the Institute,
returning home from an old American community that men of their profession
have lately made a new center of national interest and a new source of
national pride, would grapple vigorously with the problem of restoring the
parts of their own communities that have fallen into obsolesence and decay,
and with providing dwellings for the present and the future that are neither
crudely designed nor shoddily built, nor prohibitive in price for the family
of moderate means.
If we are to avoid now both the excesses and the shortcomings of
previous building activities our architects can perform no greater service, it seems to me, than by directing their efforts toward the small
house of moderate cost for occupancy by the wage earners and salaried workers in our urban communities. It is they who constitute the mass market
for housing, as they do for the other necessities of life.
To reach this market as we set about the rehabilitation of our
blighted and decadent urban areas and the building of the American home of
today and tomorrow, is as I see it the crux of the problem for which private
enterprise and government must find a solution in collaboration with men of
the architects calling.
Very sincerely yours,
(s) Franklin D. Roosevelt
Mr. Stephen Voorhees,
President, The American Institute of Architects
Phi Beta Kappa Hall
T/iilliamsburg, Virginia




COPY
WESTERN UNION MESSAGE

May 7, 1936

HON. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
THE T.-HITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON D C
DEAR MR. PRESIDENT:
YOUR CORDIAL GREETINGS TO THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
TORE RECEIVED Y.ITH ENTHUSIASM BY THE DELEGATES AND MEMBERS ASSEMBLED IN
SIXTY EIGHTH CONVENTION AT THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN WILLIAMSBURG.
THIS INSTITUTE, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GREAT PROFESSION OF
ARCHITECTURE, HAS FOR SOiffi TIME AND DURING THE PAST YEAR PARTICULARLY,
CONCENTRATED ITS BEST THOUGHT ON THE PROBLEMS V.HICH CONFRONT THE COUNTRY
IN THE ENTIRE FIELD OF HOUSING. THE PROFESSION IS WHOLE HEARTEDLY
DEDICATED TO SEEK AND TO FIND IN THE YEARS AHEAD A SOLUTION T.KICH MAY
BE OF SOCIAL VALUE AND OF ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE TO THE NATION AS A V;HOLE.
NOT ONLY IN THE FIELD OF MASS HOUSING, BUT IN THE V.IDER FIELD
OF THE SMALL INDIVIDUAL HOME, WE ARE STRIVING TO BRING TO THE SERVICE
OF SOCIETY THE TECHNIQUE, THE TRAINING, AND THE INTELLIGENCE OF OUR
PROFESSION.
ON BEHALF OF ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES, I PLEDGE YOU OUR UNFLAGGING
SUPPORT IN RAISING THE STANDARDS OF SHELTER IN THE COMMUNITIES FROM YiHICH
OUR MEMBERSHIP IS DRAM. AND IN THEIR BEHALF ALSO, I VJSH TO EXPRESS
THEIR GRATITUDE FOR THE INSPIRING CHALLENGE OF YOUR GREETINGS.




YOURS
STEPHEN F . VOORHEES
PRESIDENT, THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITICTS