View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Form F. R. 131

BOARD OF

5

GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL

RESERVE

SYSTEM

Office C o r r e s p o n d e n c e
jQ

Chairman Eccles
Lauehlln Currle

Date m?
Subject:

W« P. A. Labor Subsidy
Proposal

Attached is a draft of the W. P. A* labor subsidy proposal




iwe.

3

May 4, 1938*

THE MGB8SLTZ 0? STIMOLATDfe PRITAIE HOUSIMG

1, the Continuance of Deflationary Forces
(a) Iven after the liquidation of the final quarter
of 1937 we entered the year with $5 billion more inventories
than at the end of 1935. As retail sales fall, the desire to
work down inventories increases and the ability diminishes. It
will be months before the process of working off inventories
ceases. The most potent force here would be the arresting of
the decline in retail sales,
(b) Consumer credit was built up by 1937 to levels
approaching those of 1929, Liquidation in this field is taking
place and will probably continue throughout the year. This means
that part of current income is not being spent in current purchases,
but in payment for past debts.
Both these factors militate against an upturn in business
activity,
(c) The completion of work on projects carried over
from last year will bring about further declines in production
unless offset by new orders,
(d) On a seasonally adjusted basis, exports, while still
high, are declining,
(e) The stickiness of certain prices and wage rates
at high levels tends to restrict production.




-2-

(f) Profits have declined drastically*

la the past

this has forecast drastic declines in eapenditures for new plant,
replacements and maintenance*
(g) The repeal of the undistributed profits tas will
result in an even greater decline in dividends than would otherwise have occurred, and in increased hoarding of cash by business*
(h) Nothing is being done to remedy the desperate railroad situation*

Shis means that maintenance is beizg starred in

order to meet fixed chargesf a substantial portion of which is
probably saved and withdrawn from the incoa&e stream*
(i) Lower prices for wheat and other agricultural crops
are in prospect*

2* The Recovery Spending Program
The prospects are for little increase in spending in the
next six

Months*

V* P* A*

is

apparently near its peak* P* V* A*

and XT* S* H* A* will be slow in getting under way* The Federal
net monthly contribution to cciiixianlty expenditures this calendar
year to date has averaged only #60 million* In 1954 it averaged #270
million monthly and yet business did not start a sustained upward
movement until nine months after a sizeable spending program was
initiated by C* V* A* in the last quarter of 1933*

3* The necessity of More Spending in the Hext Six Months
The combination of (1) and (2) above indicate the need for
acre spending if the business situation is not to deteriorate further*



-3-

4, How This Can Be Secured
(a) Use of E# F. C» to secure new equipment expenditures
by railroads and utilities by offering to loan on exceptionally
favorable tens for a limited period*
(b) Speeding up of Goyenanent expenditures on public
buildingsf armaments and supplies. Double shifts should be
resorted to*
(c) The stimulation of private expenditures on low-cost
housing through a subsidy in the foxm of W* P. A, labor*

5* A Labor Subsidy for Housing
Private housing expenditures won't make a dent in the picture
in the next half year* In March, F. W. Dodge figures of residential
building contracts awarded were 12 per cent below March 1937*

In

the first three weeks of April they ran lower than in March and 35
per cent lower than in the corresponding period in 1957* Building
permits outside of New York in March ran 28 per cent below March
1937* Bents are falling*

Building material prices have not declined

since February*
In these circumstances it appears hopeless to expect a sub*
stantlal volume of expenditures on residential construction unless
further inducements are offered to builders* A cash subsidy is
out for various reasons* Therefore, the only feasible means of
creating this inducement is to offer W. P* A. labor free up to 15
per cent of the appraised cost of new low-cost housing for a limited
period*




-4-

1. This would be a subsidy but if limited to low-cost bousing
units it would be defensible on social ground*. The Government is
already coiaaitted to a subsidy of lowcost housing.
2. The subsidy should be given to the builder as the object
is to get more building. In order to sell more houses, builders in
general will be compelled to pass along much of the subsidy in lower
prices*
3. The labor subsidy should be based on an F. H. A. appraisal,
regardless of whether the property is actually insured by the F. H. A.
4. The offer should be limited to construction started, say,
in the remainder of the calendar year, in order to drive in business*
It would be a bargain year for houses.
5. It would be desirable, to secure labor support, to couple the
subsidy with certain administrative changes.
(a) W. P. A. workers now receive prevailing rates of pay,
but for a short work week. Permit the workers to be employed by the
builder for the remainder of a normal working week. This would promote
efficiency, and would enable a W. P. A. worker to secure the same
weekly remuneration as though he were enjoyed in private industry.
(b) In places where the demand for W. P. A. workers for
this purpose exceeds the supply, certify unemployed who are not destitute.
(c) Supply workers directly, rather than through the
V. S. 1. S.
6. The subsidy could be made available to public housing projects
and thus act as a valuable stimulus in getting the U. S. H. A. program
under way.



-5-

She subsidy would result in muck additional spending in
the remainder of the year at no additional cost to the Government
(with the exception of additional expenditures under 5 (b) above)*
8* The sudden and fairly drastic stimulus proposed can be
justified on the basis of the April building contracts, which clearly
indicate that the recent aaendsents to the F* H, A. are not creating
sufficient inducement to give us the housing we need*