View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

life** President*
Baclosad i s a briaf BK^or&ndura on
the Senate Fi&aaca Cotssittea* a tax proposal*.
I feel that they are so unsfttisf&etory froia
every gtaadpolntj economically, socially ws£
politically, and f a i l so eoapl^teiy to aeet
the objectives which you hate onunciatod tliftt
£ ipomld b« xr«sales in discli&rgiag the duties
af this offica and ia ^r layitty to you If 1
filled ta rt»^<wti agr opislcm &£ to the
effect* viiieh enactaeat of «ueh proposals
hare cm business., bonklag sad your ^irtiro r»->
I ea taking the
of burd^iing yoa with this aeeeesarily short
st&teiseat of ab|«etions to the Senate Goawit-

Honorable
President of tb« halted States,
The White House*




lay £?, 1956»

YQ THE Sffl&TS CQlfilITTl^fS TAI PROPOSALS
of the Senate Oosodttee's tax proposals would, (!)
penalise small corporations, (2) m k © the cost of the corporate form
of enterprise well-nigh prohibitive for snail business mmi9 (S) eon«»
atitute a departure fron the principle of taxing according to ability
to paj, (4) perisdt wealthy .stockholders to continue to erode their
fair share of taxation* (5) favor rather ttum ®h®ok the growth of at*economic oiga«ss, (S) be ineffectlv® 1 B forcing more porehasing power
into circulation*
the position of o«a«r@ of small corporations would be adversely
affected because the corporate Income tax would be raised from
percent to IS percent, && compared with only a 5 percent increase for
large corporations. If, owing to their lack of access to the capital
aarkets, saall corporations retained earnings for d#bt retirement parposes or for expansion, they would be subject to an additional tax of
7 percent, or 25 percent in all, M contrasted with 12§ percent now*
If they distributed earnings a© dividends, the owners would have to
pay a 4 percent normal personal income tax, or 22 percent in all*
Such a tax, besides being unjust* would practically deny the benefits
of incorporation to thousands of small busln@$s men, would lessen coatpetition and encourage the growth of large corporations*
Th© income of stockholders in corporations retaining earnings
would be subject to 10 percent aiore in taxes than under existing law
(increase .fro® IS to 13 percent in the corporation income tax plus 7
percent)* This Is very much less than the surtax rates that would



•

2

•

apply to the incomes of many wealthy stockholders If earnings were
distributed in dividends, but very much more than stockholders with
low Incomes now pay* Consequently our tax system would be graduated
downward rather than upward, contrary to the accepted principle of
taxation in accordance with ability to pay*
Furthermore, the r<ute of 7 percent applicable to undistributed
earnings is so low that it would continue to be in the interest of
wealthy stockholders to l<mve earnings undistributed with corporations* Since dividends would be subject to the 4 percent normal tax,
the additional penalty upon retaining earnings would be only 5 percent* as against much higher surtaxes that would have to be paid if
the income war© distributed* This means that nothing wuld have been
accomplished in closing up the loophole through which the wealthy
evade surtax rates. Consequently there would be no impetus to the
disbursement of accuaulating idle corporate balances, to the flow of
purchasing power, or to the recovery sioveiaent*
In order to overcome just such objections I previously proposed!
(1) retention of the present corporate tax structure* (2) exemption
of eose $15*000 to relieve email corporations which compose 90 percent of the total. (5) a rate of 8 percent on earnings held back to
oeet debt and statutory obligations* (4) a sufficiently high rate on
undistributed earnings to induce corporations to pay them out to
stockholders so that proper taxation would not be escaped*




dear Sr« Secretary*
i s & copy of & brief
rtwd\m vhioh I tarn ssat to tiie Pre«io<wit#
1* »«lf-«3K>lsoatory «sd accords sdth viiat
I h&ve pretlottsly discussed*
Sincerely yours,

the Hoaor&fci©
SAeret«rj of the Troasury,

ET:b