View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Y. M. C. A.
Nashville, Tern.

9, 1951..

Hon, Marriner 8. Eccles,
Federal Res^n&e Board,
Washington, D. C.
Dear Sir:
Will you kindly aaswer the follow ing, question^.
1, What would be the «f^ect on our economy if all purchases
were required to be paid for in full with ca sh? Would
it not stop inflation?
2.

Since the Government issues both paper money and interest
paying bonds and since neither would be worth anything if
the Government did not back them up, what is the. sense in
issuing bonds and paying interest on same? Why not i§sue
.erough currency to run the Government?
Please be assured that these questipng ar$ asked in go<3d
faith and are not intended tfo be catch questions.




VAIIT»O

fwiltf

T* D. cpffey

February 23, 1951
Mr. T. D. Coffey,
Y. M. C. A.,
Nashville, Tenn.
Dear Mr. Coffey:
In your letter of February 9 you raised two questions; first,
whether requiring all payments to be made in cash would not stop inflation, and; second, whether the Government wouldn't be better off if it
just issued currency, rather than interest bearing bonds, in financing
its deficits:
In answer to your first question, I would say that greater
self-restraint in the use of credit, rather than its abolition, is what
we need to stop inflation at this time. Credit is an essential part of
our complex economic system—without it, we should never have achieved
the tremendous agricultural and industrial development of the past hundred
years, nor would our people enjoy the high standard of living that we all
accept as part of the American way of life. If the central monetary and
credit authority had adequate powers to curb unnecessary credit expansion
and were free to use them as it saw best, and assuming the Government were
to operate on a pay-as-you-go basis, we could successfully prevent any
further depreciation in the purchasing power of the dollar*
History provides nB with a number of examples of inflation of
the currency where the only credit involved was that of the government
that issued the money. Unless appropriate steps are taken to regulate
the supply of currency in relation to the quantities of goods and services
produced you are just as likely to have inflation with cash as you are with
credit.
In answer to your second question, the financing of Government
deficits through the issuance of paper money rather than bonds would result
in tremendous inflationary pressures. Bonds provide an outlet for savings—
for money which people do not wish to spend to meet current living expenses •
In the absense of such outlets for their savings, people might spend that
money on goods and services or use it to bid up the prices of real estate
and corporate bonds and stocks, while the paper money issued by the Government would swell the supply of funds in the country and cause prices to
rise even faster than they.iiave already.
Furthermore, a substantial part of the interest paid on Government bonds is subsequently returned to the Government in income taxe&^so.
the cost of bond financing is not really as large asrsF^^^
\ QfW. XtijyBP* OFFICE
Very truly yours,
FEB 12 1951

M. S. Eccles*

CEanf



"" "

. .

>

iii II lift •ii*^