The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
. ril 6 5 1355. Mr. Bobtcrt C. G. . \X Represent Fundaiae Corporatioii, 5 Delaware avenue, . lorkc Dear MJT. *p s I trust /ou will pardon tiiis belated answer to your letter of Iforch 11, in which you consented further upon criticism leveled oy various inaiviciual3 against The Bunking Bill of and -with eh you enclosed newspaper clip )lng& of articles by David Lawrence and Paul iacillon, r.nd letters received by ;'ou from Con en Andrews, Tfadsworth, Mead, beiter and Duffy, all of New York. While M Letters are non-co.amittal as is to be expected, I urn. sure your comments in favor o? the Banking Bill written to these Congressmen cannot help but do some //ood. lour interest in the matter Is very much appreciated. It is at times extremely discouraging to note the lack of intelligence on the part of the mblic with reference to this legislation. It is, of course, to be expected t eat mass of our )eov)le should not understnnri the rather teclmical reasons for lierable part of this legislation. But it is uite inexcusable t!;at uen o.C recognized cental capacity should aisa t}ie i^ark so far in discussing the iunort&nt features of the bill* In ;>uch cajes one is toapttd to bulieve that the of either impulse or policy and that the 1 niimilih is tp^xirt tlie foregone conclusioii. list be philoLn the. 1 . 11 _xroi :eets resist: 1 Le« f above aent I ail »n« setters from the /* M« 8« Lccles, Governor.
@FedFRASER