View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

CARTER GLASS. VA., CHAIRMAN
FREDERICK HALE. MAINE
KENNETH MC (CELLAR. TENN.
GERALD P. NYE. N. DAK.
CARL HAYDEN, ARIZ.
JOHN G» TOWNSEND, JR.. DEL.
ELMER THOMAS. OKLA,

Senate

^Croieb
ADAMS, COLO.
I P P k l C K MCCARRAN, NEV.
JOHN H. OVERTON, LA.
JOHN H. BANKHEAD, ALAJOSEPH C. O'MAHONEY, WYO.
HARRY S . TRUMAN, MO.
EDWARD R. BURKE. NEBR.
THEODORE F. GREEN, R. I.
FRANCIS T. MALONEY. CONN.
DENNIS CHAVEZ, N. MEX.

COMMITTEE O N APPROPRIATIONS

Washington, D. C
March 3, 1939
yVOLOiJ.J.11^ U U U

EVERARD H. SMITH. CLERK
JOHN W. R. SMITH, ASST. CLERK

,

**

Honorable Marriner S. Eccles, Chairman
Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Washington, D* C»
Dear Mr. Eccles:
In reading over the debates on silver in the Congressional Record of February 27 and February 28, I find the
following statement on page 2867 in the remarks of Congressman White of Idaho * The Congressman states that by the issuance of silver currency "the American people are relieved
of the interest charges as the cost of the issuance and
circulation of this money*1 • The Congressman continued with
the follwing remarks:




If thlf the eminent Republican from New
York and his Republican colleague from
Illinois are successful in their campaign
to retire the interest-free silver certificates— legal-tender currency—and replace
them with Federal Reserve notes in the amount
now outstanding—$1,614,143,513—he will force
business to pay the banks an annual interest
yield of $48,424,305*39, calculated at 3 percent; but we all know that current rates of
interest are more than 3 percent. If we calculate the interest at 6 percent, then the
Federal Reserve notes that would replace the
silver certificates now in circulation would
yield the banks $96,848,610.78.
Nov/, what are these eminent gentlemen
fighting for? Is it not the interest income
to the banks of this country to be laid on
the backs of the people by retiring the interestfree silver certificates now in circulation and
replacing this money with Federal Reserve
interest-yielding notes—something for these
Republican gentlemen to fight for—money to come
right out of the pockets of everyone every time
a purchase is made from a business firm that has
a note—eligible paper—made to the local bank
and rediscounted by the Federal Reserve bank, or
which interest must be paid if their kind of

Mr, Eccles

- 2 -

March 3, 1939

money is to remain in circulation?
Speaking of economy and Government
assistance to business, these gentlemen
move in mysterious ways their wonders to p
perform. When business is already carrying
an interest load of $282,463,796.16, computing interest at 6 percent on the #4,707,729,936
in Federal Reserve notes, which is the bulk of
our currency that is now in circulation, is not
there any limit to the interest load that these
eminent gentlemen would lay on thetoacksof the
American people, when this country is already
$44,000,0.00,000 in debt as a result of this
faulty and unworkable monetary system with
which the Government and the business of this
country is struggling?
I should like very much to have an analysis of these
statements by Congressman White, particularly answers to
the following questions;
1.- Do Federal Reserve notes involve the payment
of interest on the part of the public using them and
to the benefit of the banking system?
2
Does the issuance of silver currency reduce the
interest burden on the general public which uses the
currency of this country?
3*- Does not the issuance of silver currency increase' the interest earning capacity of the banking
system?
May I have your cooperation in enlightening me on
these questions as soon as possible?




Sincerely

March 10, 1939*

My dear Senator:
I acknowledge receipt of your personal letter to
me of March 3 in which you quote remarks of Congressman
Miite of Idaho and ask certain questions.
Your first question is whether Federal heser*ve
notes involve the payment of interest on the part of the
public using them and to the benefit of the banking system*
The issuance of Federal Reserve notes as such
does not involve interest payment any mor.e than the issuance
of any other kind of currency, A personfthohas a bank deposit can withdraw it in currency and does not have to pay
interest; a person who has no deposit and, has to borrow must
pay interest on his loan, regardless of the kind of currency in
which he withdraws the proceeds, or whether he leaves them on
deposit and checks against them.
Your second question is whether the issuance of
silver certificates reduces the interest burden on the
general public.

m

* 1B




The issuance of silver certificates in payment for
silver purchases by the Treasury in no way diminishes the interest burden on the general public. It is true that if the
Treasury paid for silver purchased.otherwise than by issuing
silver certificates it would have to increase the public debt
by the amount of these payments, but that is not, I believe, what
is meant by the question. There has never been a proposal that
the Treasury pay for silver out of general revenues or out of
Aside from this, the issuance of silver cert^f^ates has no bearing whatsoever on the interest burden.

xsx peAteoea

Your last question is whether the issuance of
silver currency increases the interest earning capacity
of the banking system.
There is no connection whatsoever between the
issuance of silver and the interest earning capacity
of the banking system. The only connection under present conditions is highly indirect and exactly the
opposite of that implied in the question. The -issuance
of silver certificates adds to excess reserves, and this
in turn would tend to reduce interest rates were it not
for the fact that they are already at the lowest level
on record3 and for short-term paper are at the vanishing
point.
1 hope that these explanations- will be of help
to you.
Sincerely yours,

M. S. Eccles.

Honorable J. G. Townsend, Jr.,
United States Senate,
k.ashin^ton, D. C.

Ei,G:ET:b




CARTER GLASS, VA., CHAIRMAN
FREDERICK HALE, MAINE
KENNETH MCKELLAR, TENN.
GERALD P. NYE, N. DAK.
CARL HAYDEN, ARIZ*
JOHN G. TOWNSEND, JR., DEL.
ELMER THOMAS. OKLA.
H. STYLES BRIDGES, N. H.
JAMES F. BYRNES, S. C.
HENRY CABOT LODGE, JR., MASS.
ID E. TYDINGS, MD.
JD B. RUSSELL, JR., GA. RUFUS C. HOLM AN, OREG*
ROBERT A. TAFT, OHIO
>A B* ADAMS, COLO.
PATRICK MCCARRAN, NEV.
JOHN H. OVERTON. LA.
JOHN H. BANKHEAD, ALA.
JOSEPH C. O'MAHONEY, WYO.
HARRY S. TRUMAN, MO.
EDWARD R. BURKE, NEBR.
THEODORE F. GREEN, R. I.
FRANCIS T. MALONEY, CONN.
DENNIS CHAVEZ, N. MEX.
EVERARD H. SMITH, CLERK
JOHN W . R. SMITH, ASST. CLERK

^ICtiricb ^E>tciie&

J&erxaie

COMMITTEE O N APPROPRIATIONS

Washington, D. C
March 13, 1939

Honorable Marriner S. Eccles, Chairman
Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Washington, B. C.
Dear Governor Eccles:
I wish to acknowledge your letter of March 10
in reply to my communication of March 3.
The information you have sent me is exactly
what I wished.
Yours sincerely

JGT:LJ