View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

February 16,1951.
Mr. R. W. Herzog,
6912 S.W. Alden Street,
Portland 19, Oregon.
Dear Mr. flerzog:
I t was very thoughtful of you to take time to write me about
my testimony on January 25, before the Joint Committee on the Economic
Report in its hearings on the President's Economic Program.
In your letter of January 26 you indicated that there is a
scarcity of jobs at the present time and that a longer work-week is
not desirable. Statistics on the employment situation indicate that
for the nation in general there is a shortage of workers rather than
a scarcity of jobs, although perhaps in the local area where you live
conditions may be somewhat different. In any event, as the rearmament
program progresses there w i l l certainly be a general shortage of manpower.
No doubt what you saw was a newspaper report which did not give
the correct interpretation of what I said about the 44-hour work-week.
I am enclosing herewith a copy of the f u l l text of sqt statement.
I believe you w i l l feel differently about my remarks on the 44-hour
week after you have read the entire statement. The only way to solve
this basic problem of inflation is to reduce incomes generally t>y
higher taxes, curtail buying on credit, increase personal savings,
and at the same time, expand the supply of civilian goods as much
as possible by everyone working harder and longer hours. A 44-hour
work-week w i l l help to add to supplies and i f i t is paid for at
straight time i t w i l l not add to the cost and prices. I f the longer
hours are paid for at premium rates, however, they w i l l raise costs
and by increasing incomes more than output is increased raise prices
generally. I f by longer hours, higher taxes, and other means we
can hold down the cost of living, everyone w i l l be better o f f .
Workers especially w i l l be better off because they always lose when
living costs rise sharply. They lose not only because their wages
can not rise as fast as prices but also because their pensions and
savings become worth less.
Sincerely yours,

M. S. Eccles
enclosure

VE:dls