View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

NORTHWEST BANCORPORATION
MINNEAPOLIS 2, MINN.
J.C.THOMSON
PRESIDENT




July 1* 1947

Jhe Honorable Marriner S. Eccles, Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Washington, D» C.
Dear Marriner:
Enclosed is a memorandum dated July 1, 1947, prepared by
Mr# Faegre, which points out the amendments to the Bank
Holding Company Bill which were made by the Senate Committee
on Banking and Currency and are shown in Committee Print
No• 2 of that bill dated June 13* 1947, a copy of which is
also enclosed herewith*
It will be recalled that Mr« Eccles, Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Board, inquired regarding the general
attitude of the bank holding companies respecting the
original bill and that representatives of holding companies
in response to such inquiry conferred with hinu To enable
further response to be made to Mr. Eccles, if requested by
hinj, regarding the Bill as now amended, it is suggested
that you review the enclosures and promptly communicate
to the undersigned any comments or suggestions you may care
to make*
It is reported that Senator Bricker will attempt to bring
the bill up in the Senate for consideration and vote at an
tfrly date*
Very

J* C« Thomson
President
Marriner: This is for your information.

July 1, 1947
BANK HOLDING COMPAMY BILL - S. 829
COMMITTEE PRIHT NO* 2
June 13, 1947
^
The Senate Committee on Banking and Currency has unanimously
recommended the passage of S*. 829 with the amendments adopted by the
Committee, all of which amendments we are advised are set forth in
italics in the printed copy of "Committee Print No* 2ft dated
June 13, 1947, which accompanies this memorandum*
In a memorandum entitled "Suggested Amendments to Bank
Holding Company Bill - S»829" and further identified by the le gend
"For conference consideration on May 5, 1947" there were set forth
numerous amendments to the bill which had theretofore been suggested*
In a further memorandum prepared following a conference with re<present^tives of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
and dated May 19* 1947, there were reported the conclusions of the
Board with respect to the suggested amendments of May 5th and in
addition (beginning at page 8 of the memorandum of May 19th) there
were set forth additional suggested amendments*
At several points in the within memorandum reference is made
to the memorandum of May 5th or the memorandum of May 19th to facilitate
comparison of amendments requested with amendments made by the Senate
Committee* An examination of the two memoranda above referred to will
disclose the nature of and in some instances the wording of numerous
amendments which were requested by the bank holding companies but
not made by the Senate Committee*
The amendments shown in Committee Print No* 2 are set forth
below and in some instances comments thereon* References to page
and line of the bill refer to the Committee




Seotfoa ff
Page 2, line 20 - In subsection (a) defining "bank holding company" the required percentage of stock ownership is increased
from 10 to 15*
Page 2, lines 21-24 - adds to the definitioni
tt

or any company which is a bank and which directly or
indirectly owns, controls, or holds with power to vote
15 per centum or more of the voting shares of one or
more other banks,11
This amendment had heretofore been suggested by the bank holding
companies*

(See memorandum of May 5thfpage 2*)
Pa^e 2, line 25 - page 5» line 5 - In the same definition

and immediately following the clause above quoted there has been inserted
the following?
"or any company which directly or indirectly owns, controls, or
holds with power to vote 15 per centum or more of the voting
shares of one bank provided such bank operates one or more branches*11
This is a new provision of undetermined origin which may bring within
the definition of bank holding company a large number of companies
(as defined in section 3(c) of the bill) by reason of their ownership
of 15 per cent of the stock of a single bank having a branch* The
word "branch", in the absence of a definition in this bill, may be
construed, ip accordance with the definition of "branch" contained in
the federal statutes dealing with insured banks and national banking
associations, to include offices or stations having limited banking
powers*
Page 3, lines 19-20 - In the paragraph authorizing the
Board to declare that a company is not a bank holding company the
words "two or more" preceding the word "banks" have been stricken and
there has been inserted in lieu thereof the words "the stated number of"*



2.

This ^ e f l ^ n i ; %^ ma4^ \n re9P£j}it}pn of thp

P^UP?

«M?pve referred to

under which a company may be a bank holding company although i t holds
stock in only one bank*

It is to be noted that in at least two other places in the
bill where a corresponding change might have been made no such change
has been made* These places are as follows:
(1) Page 3,lines 9, 10 - in the provision permitting the
Board to determine that even in the absence of the required per*
centage of ownership a company exerciees such a controlling
influence as to make it necessary to treat the company as a
bank holding company, and
(2) Page 10, lines 1 -9 (Section 6(a)), prohibiting the consummation of any plan, undertaking or agreement which would
result in a company owning 15 per cent or more of the voting
shares of each of two or more banks*
Page 4, line 15 - In the definition of "subsidiary" specifying the requisite percentage of ownership the figure n10lf has been
changed to ft15"#
Page 5 S lines 8-16 - The following new subsection (f) has been
inserted:
11

(f) For the purpose of this eection there shall be exeluded from consideration all voting shares of banks or other
companies acquired or held by a bank in a fiduciary capacity,
except where such noting shares are acquired cr held for the
benefit of all or a majority of the persons beneficially
interested in such bank or except where the Board, after notice
and opportunity for hearing, finds that such acquisition or
holding is being employed as a device for avoiding the provisions of this Act*"
This is in substance the provision heretofore suggested by the holding
companies for the exclusion of stock held in a fiduciary capacity*
(See memorandum ot May 5th,page 3#)



Sectjpn 5t

Interests infloflbankiqgOrganisations t
***&* V H B O £3» •* In th? first sentence of subsection (a),

prohibiting bank holding companies from owning shares or securities
of companies other than banks or from engaging in any business other
than that of managing or controlling subsidiary banks, there has been
inserted after the words "other than that of11 the words "banking or11*
This amendment is for the purpose of permitting a bank which is a holding company by reason of its ownership of stock in one or more other
banks to continue in the banking business. The amendment as originally
suggested ty the holding companies contained a qualification to the
effect that a holding company could engage in the business of banking
only if it were so authorised under existing law*
Page 8, lines 5-12 - There is inserted in subsection (b)
specifying certain companies, to the stock of which the prohibitions
of section 5 shall not apply, the following $
lf

or engage(d) in the business of furnishing managerial, auditing*
supervisory, purchasing,and other similar services solely to such
bank holding company and its subsidiaries, or in the business of
procuring and servicing solely for such bank holding company and
its subsidiaries investments and paper eligible for bank investment, or in the business of liquidating assets acquired from
such bank holding company and its subsidiaries,"
This amendment is in substance as requested by the holding companies^
(See memorandum May 5th,page 6*)
Page 8, lines 18-23 - 5n subsection (c) of section 5, exempting from the prthilltion of that section voting shares or securities
acquired by a bank holding company from any of its subsidiaries at the
request of supervisory authorities the words "at the request of" have
been stricken and there has been inserted in lieu thereof the following:




"which have been requested to dispose of such voting shares*
securities or obligations by" (the supervisory authority)

and "ttfter? hp.% T?een
ft

or which have teen acquired from such subsidiaries with the
prior approval of the BoardjM
These amendments make no substantial change in this subsection and
appear to improve the original provision by permitting the bank holding
company to purchase such securities v/hen the supervisory authority shall
have requested the bank to dispose of the same* This appears to conform more closely to the normal course of banking practice than to
require a direct request by the supervisory authority to %he holding
company as provided in the bill as originally introduced*
Page 9, lines 8*25 - There has been added a new subsection
(d) reading as followsi
11

(d) Nor shall the prohibitions of this section apply to
voting shares or other securities or obligations which are held
or acquired by a bank, which is a bank holding company,in a
fiduciary capacity or which are otherwise lawfully owned by such
bank or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries on the effective
date of this Act; nor shall t&a prohibitions in this section
apply to investment securities of the kinds and amounts eligible
for investment by national banks under the provisions of section
5136 of the Revised Statutes* If, while such bank or bank
holding company owns or controls such shares, securities or other
obligations, the Board, after notice and opportunity for hearing,
determines that the ownership or control of such shares, securities
or obligations is being employed as a device for avoiding the provisions of this Act, is may by order require such bank or bank
holding company to dispose of all or any part thereof forthwith*11
The first clause (lines 8*15) deals with a special situation
of a bank which is a holding company and presently owns securities of
nonbanking organizations*

This clause would permit the continued hold-

ing of such securities, subject, however, to the provision in lines 17
to 23. This amendment is the Boardfs answer to various requests for the
exception of listed securities, assets eligible for investment under
applicable state law*etc*




(See memorandum May 5th, page 6«)

This clause dealing with investment securities eligible
5*

under R« S« 5^$6 is pne requested t?y $te holding companies*

(§ee

memorandum May 5thf page 6«) It is to be no ted, however, that the new
provision on investment securities limits investments to the "amounts11
as well as the "kinds1* eligible under section 513<j>« The only limitation
as to amount seems to be a limitation to 10 per cent of capital surplus
with respect to the total amount of investment securities of any one
obligor or maker and the limitations do not apply to obligations of the
United States and certain other securities*
Section 6« Acquisition of Bank Shares pr Bank Assets:
Page 10, line S - In subsection (a) of section 6, prohibiting the acquisition of bank stock which would result in a company owning
more than a stated percentage of voting shares of each of two or more
bajnks, the required percentage has been changed by striking the figure
tf

10ff and substituting " 1 5 %
Pa^e 10, lines 9-13 - At the end of the same subsection there

has been added the following proviso?
"Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply to the acquisition by a bank holding company of
any additional voting shares of a bank in any cas* where such
bank holding company, prior to such acquisition,owned a majority
of the voting shares thereof•"
This is in substance as requested by the holding companies,

(See

memorandum May 5th* page 7»)
P&ge 11, lines 11-23 - There has been added to subsection (d)
of section 6, specifying factors to which consideration shall be given
in determining whether to approve any acquisition of bank shares or
assets under the preceding subsection, the following provisos




"Provided, however,That nothing herein contained shall be con
strued to authorize the approval of any acquisition subject to
paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section where,regardless of
its competitive or other aspects, the effect of such acquisition
6.

may be to expand the size and extent of a bank holding company
system beyond
limits consistent with adequate and soua4
banking and the public interest* The factors stated in this
seotion shall likewise be considered by the Board, the Comptroller
of the Currency or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in
determining whether to approve an application of any bank, which
is a part of a bank holding company system, to establish a branch
or branches of such bank*11
The first sentence of the proviso is in substance as suggested by the
Association of Reserve City Bankers with reference to the size and
extent of a bank holding company system*
Representatives of at least one bank holding company object
to the concluding sentence of the proviso and have urged that there
should be inserted in line 21, following the word "whether" the following?
H

, having regard to the expansion of the size and extent of a
bank holding company system beyond limits consistent with
adequate and sound banking,"
It is felt that such an insertion would make clear that the supervisory authority considering an application for a branch is to consider
the national policy against restraint of trade, etc*, only in so far
as it affects the entire operation of the bank holding company and
not apply this test to the purely local situation at the point where
a branch is sought to be established, and where no such test would be
applicable to the application of an independent bank*
Seotion 7» Borrowing by Bank Holding Company or Its Subsidiaries*
Page 12,lines 6-10 » There has been added to subsection (b),
prohibiting a bank from accepting as collateral stock of its bank
holding company or of another subsidiary of such bank holding company,
the following proviso:




"Provided, however, That any bank i»y,with the prior approval
of the Board, accept such capital stock as a security for
debts previously contracted*"
7,

The hpiding companies had requested a$ exception for debts previou&ly
contracted and the Board added the further qualification of prior
approval of the Board*
Page 12, line 83 - The figure "10" has been changed to ft20fl,
increasing the percentage of capital stock and surplus of the bank
which shall be the limit of the aggregate amount of loans by any bank
to a bank holding company of which it is a subsidiary, other subsidiaries of that bank holding company, investments in securities of
such bank holding company or subsidiary, and loans against collateral
consisting of securities of such bank holding company or subsidiary*
This increase from 10 to 20 per cent had been requested by the holding
companies and the limitation to 20 per cent conforms to the present
limitation imposed by section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act*
As noted in the memorandum of May 5th at page 11, national
banks are limited under Revised Statutes Section 5200 to a 10 per cent
limitation on aggregate loans to a holding company and its majority
owned subsidiaries if the aggregate includes any loans to the holding
company*
Page 12, line 24 - page 13, line 4 - There has been inserted
in subsection (c) the following:
^Non-interest-bearing deposits to the credit of a bank shall
not be deemed to be a loan or advance to the bank of deposit*
nor shall the giving of immediate credit to a bank upon unoollected items received in the ordinary course of business
be deemed to be a loan or advance to the depositing bank.'1
This provision was requested by the bank holding companies to make it
clear that the specified types of normal banking transactions between
correspondent banks would not be held to be extensions of credit for
the purposes of this section*



(See memorandum May 5th, page 11*)
8.

Section* 9. Reserve Fund?
Page 14, line 25 - The word "book" has been substituted for
fl

parft in the first sentence of this section*providing that corporate

bank holding companies shall use all their net earnings ever 6 per cent
per annum of the par value of its own shares to accumulate a reserve funcU
Page 15, lines 10-12 «» There has been inserted in the sentence
specifying pennissable uses of the assets in the reserve fund the follow^g:
"and, with the prior approval of the Board, to increase the
capital or surplus of its subsidiary banks,ff
This amendment had been requested by the holding companies but the re*
quirement of prior approval of the Board was inserted by the Board.
(See memorandum May 5th, page 1S#)
Section 13. Technical Amendments*
Page 22, line 10 - At the beginning of subsection (d) the
"(1)" has been stricken, apparently for the reason that the subsectiop
contains only one paragraph and no paragraph number is therefore required.
Page 23, line 24-page 24, line 5 - In subsection (f) paragraph (l) has been stricken in its entirety and the subsequent paragraphs have been renumbered accordingly.
The stricken paragraph purported to amend a provision of
section 14 of the Revenue Act of 1936 which no longer appears in the
Internal Revenue Code.
Page 24, lines $-23 • is an amendment to subsection (d) of
section 26 of the Internal Revenue Code. The provision in the bill
with respect to this amendment has been revised in the following respects 1




The reference to section 26 of the Revenue Act of 1936
has been changed to "section 26 of the Internal Revenue Code11*
which amendment is proper.

Q

In lines 15-18 the references to cash or readily market*able assets of the kinds eligible for investment by national
banks under the provisions of section 5136 of the United States
Revised Statutes, and to compliance with section 10 of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1947, have been amended to refer only to
"readily marketable assets11 and to compliance with section 9#
These amendments are proper to bring this section into conformity
with the provisions of section 9 and had been suggested by the
holding companies.

(See memorandum May 5th, page 16«)

Page 24, line 24-page 25,line 8 - The amendment to a provision of section 102 of the Revenue Act of 1936 has been changed to
refer to the present form of the provision in question as it now appears
in section 27 of the Internal Revenue Code«

The changes made appear to

be proper•
Page 25, line 9-pa^e 26, line 14 - At this point there have
been added to subsection (f) of section 13 two new paragraphs reading
as follows:




tf

(3) Section 112(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (relating
to the recognition of gctin or loss upon certain exchanges) is
amended by inserting at the end thereof the following:
f

(ll) DISTRIBUTION PURSUANT TO BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT
OF 1947* - In the case of a distribution of stock, securities,
or other obligations held by a bank holding company on the
date of the enactment of the Bank Holding Company Act of
1947 or thereafter lawfully acquired pursuant to such Act*
made pursuant to the order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System directing* approving,or permitting
such distribution as tending to effectuate the policy of the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1947, to a shareholder in a
corporation which is a bank holding company as defined in
such Act, without the surrender by such shareholder of stock
or securities in such corporation, no gain to the distributee
shall be recognized*f

<f

(4) Section 113(a) of the Internal Revenue Code is amended
by inserting at the end thereof the following*
»(23) PROPERTY ACQUIRED IN DISTRIBUTION PURSUANT TO BANK
HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1947* - If stock, securities, or other
obligations were acquired in a distribution subject to the
provisions of section 112(b) (11)# then the basis in the case
of the stock in respect of which the distribution was made
shall be apportioned, under rules and regulations prescribed
by tie Commissioner with the approval pf the Secretary, between such stock and the stock,securities, and other obligations acquired in such distribution* fff
These amendments to the Internal Revenue Code are in substance
as requested by the bank holding companies for the purpose of providing
for tax-free distribution of securities of non-banking organizations.
(See memorandum May 5th, page 17.)
Page 26,lines 20-21 and page 27, lines 2» 3 - At these two
points in the paragraphs of subsection (g) amending the definitions
in the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, respectively, to exclude from the companies covered by those
act& bank* holding companies as defined in the new bill rather than
holding company affiliates, there has been added the following:
ft

or any subsidiary thereof as defined in said Actft«
This amendment was made to provide for situations in which

certain services are rendered to bank subsidiaries of a bank holding
company by a service subsidiary of the bank holding company rather than
by the bank holding company itself*
by the bank holding companies^

These amendments had been requested

(See memorandum May 19th,page 8«)

Page 27, lines 4-X6 - There has been added to section 13 a new
subsection (h) reading as follows:




"(h) Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Banking Act of 1933,
as amended,is amended by adding the following paragraphs:
r

(4) which owns or controls,directly or indirectly,
either a majority of the shares of capital stock of a
member bank or more than 50 per centum of the number of

shares voted for the election of directors of any one bank
at the preceding election, or controls in any manner the
election of a majority of the directors of any one bank; or
1

(5) for the benefit of ?vhose shareholders or members
all or substantially all of the capital stock of a member
bank is held by trustees** w
The effect of this amendment is to make any holding company
affiliate as defined in subsection (c) of section 2 of the Banking Act
of 1933 an "affiliate" as well as a "holding company affiliate11*
It is reported that the purpose of this amendment is to
make applicable to bank holding companies the provision of section 20
of the Banking Act of 1933 as amended* with respect to securities
affiliates and the loaning provisions of section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act«

Ho such amendment is necessary with respect to section 23A

as that section specifically provides that for its purposes the term
"affiliate" shall include holding company affiliates as well as other
affiliates*

Section TO of the Banking Act of 1933, however, prohibits

affiliation "in any manner described in section 2(b)" of the Banking
Act of 1933 with a securities company*

This amendment will bring within

the affiliations specified by section 2(b) a holding company affiliate*
This amendment will also have the effect of extending to
holding company affiliates the present provisions permitting federal
supervisory authorities to examine, and obtain reports from,affiliates
of the banks directly under their supervision*