View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

JI
...... •

HEARINGS ON BRETTON WOODS ENABLING LEGISLATION
BEFORE HOUSE BANKING.AND CURRENCY COMMITTEE
.,.•..-- '•• ] ' March 12, 1945 - 10:30 A.M., :
• ' >••" -: ; •' "
(Fourth day of hearings) .,• • .

• •:.;., Assistant Secretary of the Treasury White continued his testimony
before the Committee." Mr. White presented 6 additional charts!/ and explained
the organization and functions of the Bank and the Fund.
.... ,
In the discussion of,the.chart pertaining to the organization of
the International Bank,' he stressed the large voting power of the United
States which has 32,000 of'102,000 votes.. .,
:.; ,
Explaining the composition of the. resources of the Monetary Fund,
he pointed out that the gold and currency contribution of the United States
woulsd be deposited with the Federal Reserve. Banks which would act as the depository for £0 per cent of the total gold holdings of the Fund.
The.4/5 vote r-equired for changes in the-quotas of member countries
assures in effect a veto power for the,United States over any changes. Final
decision-on .a change'in the United States quota is left up to Congress. He
emphasized the provisions of the Articles of Agreement which increase the vote
of members whose currency is used, and decrease;the vote of members which use
t h e

F u n d .

.

•

•

•

.

•

:

•

•

•

-;

Commenting on the' chart on tho charges levied by the Fund, Mr. White
stressed the revolving character of the Fund and the fact that, its assets
must always remain the same in terms of gold (except for accumulated reserves
and undistributed earnings). The scale of .the charges is one important safeguard to assure that the Fund is kept revolving. The charges, rising with
the period and the extent, of borrowing, servo the purpose of putting increasing pressure en the borrowing countries to restore the Fund to its original
position. The necessity :of consultation when the charges roach 4 per Bent,
and the right to .impose additional charges at 5 per cent, emphasize the
objectives of the scale-.of charges.
Referring to a chart depicting the operations of the Fund, Mr. White
remarked .that the operations were complicated in appearance only and very
"simple in reality* In the discussion of the.repurchase provisions for countries with favorable balances of payments, Mr. White was reminded by Representative. Thorn (D. 0.) th;it the;repurchase obligations apply only to countries
which previously had used the Fund.
. ; : Pointing to the fact that "the resources of the Fund may be used only
tor specific purposes1 enumerated in the Articles of Agreement , • the witness
anticipated the contention that the Fund grants access to its resources as a
right of the member countries. He granted that•a: member when applying for
foreign currencies doos not have to prove that it will use the funds in the
proper fashion', 'tout stressed that it was tho task of tho executive directors
and the technical staff of the Fund to follow the international transactions
of each country. If they find that the funds are improperly used they can
stop the member in question at once. Ho said there would not bo large purchases of currency by member countries at the outset of the operations of the
Fund, but rather than central banks, anticipating immediate demands, would



,-..V.,

•'•' '

•"-

2

~

buy relatively small amounts of currency once or twice a month. If members
should ask for an extraordinary amount, the Fund would have, the right to refuse the transaction. The fact that it is not important to know in advance
the purpose of a loan has been proved in the operations of the Stabilization
Fund of the United States. Mr. White considered it inrprobable any country
• should ask f,or one year's share of its quota at once. Central banks do not
act that way.

•

' .

. •

•Mr. White then elaborated at^great length the relatively long period
which the correction of balance of- payments difficulties may toke. He contended that proper adjustments should take, a long time. Only restrictive
measures such as exchange controls, depreciation, etc., can bring about rapid
adjustments. The purpose of the Fund is to balance international payments by
means which are not restrictive. He predicted that during the early post-war
years few countries will have favorable balances of payments and that the U.S.
dollcr and the Canadian dollar will be sought from the Fund. The Fund will
function as a second line of.' reserves to moot the deficiencies of that period
of emergency. He took issue with the opinion that operations of the Fund
should be postponed until after the emergency period and stressed that the
purpose' of the Fund is to meet emergencies and primarily the emergency caused
by the present war,'
In an extended interrogation Representative Brown (D. G-a.) inquired
about the contribution which the Fund will make to the stabilization of exchange rates and the free internntional movement of capital. Mr. White
answered that stabilization of exchange rates was precisely the main function
of the Fund. Stable exchange rates would make private investors less reluctant to make foreign investments particularly since the Fund would assure the
freedom of withdrawal of dividends and interest from foreign investments.
Representative Brown then asked whether there would be any necessity to increase our contribution to the Fund. In the answer, Mr. White voiced his
disagreement with the opinion of some circles that, with the passage of years,
other'countries-will need more dollars and that the dollar resources of the
Fund would be-, used up. He pointed out that gold which the Fund would receive
•would be used to buy additional dollars. If the dollar should become scarce,
our reaction to such a situation could depend upon what we regard as our best
interests. Under the provisions of the pending bill, Congress would have to
make this decision. If we should prefer not to lend dollars to the Fund, the
FUIK>. still would operate and the members would still be bound to adhere to
its principles. If there should be a scarcity of dollars the Fund would be
able t'j expedite the adoption of proper policies by foreign countries.
To a question by Representative Brows as to whether or not the benefits which we may derive from the Fund and the Bank outweigh the risks which
we incur, Mr. White answered that the Bank could lose substantial sums on
account of the risky nature of its loans but losses, if any, would be shared
by other countries. The risks in the Fund are much smaller. The Fund may
suffer losses in the event of a new war or if a country should refuse to
abide by its obligations under the Agreement but governments are very reluctant to break international obligations.




- 3 -

Representative Crawford (R. Mich.) inquired about the provisions
concerning the profit distribution of the Fund. Mr. White read the pertinent
provision (Article XII, Sec, 6). To the question-whether it is correct to
say that the Fund would make short-term loans, Mr. White answered that he
prefers the term "exchange operations" which differ from short-term loans because the currencies received in payment for foreign exchange can be used by
the Fund, no definite term for repurchase is agreed upon and the charges of
the Fund are less definite than interest charges. Moreover, the use of the
Fund may last as long as 5 to 8 years, or longer than the life of ordinary
short-term loans.
Representative Crawford then asked for an explanation of the operational procedure of the Bank. In the answer Mr. White brought out that the
existing private channels of international lending would not be interfered
with by the Bank unless interest or other charges were too high, in which
case the Bank could guarantee the loan and thereby make the terms of lending
more favorable. Before recess, Representative Crawford asked Mi*. White to
bring to the next hearing a list of all government agencies which are permitted and likely to make foreign loans after the war. Representative.
Patman (D. Tex.) asked for a list and explanations of the reservations which
foreign countries had made to the Articles of Agreement. Representative
Sumner (R. 111.) inquired whether a transcript of the Bretton Woods Conference
was available. Mr. White answered that the sessions were of a confidential
nature and that the government of the United States was not at liberty to
publish an international document without the consent of all participants.
Representative Sumner then asked for the presentation of the original proposal of the United States delegation and a comparison with the Articles of
Agreement. Mr. White promised to present this tomorrow,
•The hearings will be continued tomorrow with further questions to
Mr. White.




Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System
Division of Research and Statistics
March 10, 1945