View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Office Correspondence
To.

Governor hr.f\~\an

From

Miu JTyatt,- G«a«F«i4 Counsel

FEDERAL RESERVE
BOARD

Date

Subject:

April Zot

BEC'D IN FILE

TON

MAR 2 21933
rnr- ic-tr,?

In accordance with the request which you made during our conference last night, I am handing you herewith the following:
1« Copy of letter written by Honorable Carter Glass, then Secretary of the Treasury, to the Attorney General holding that the Board has
the power to initiate changes in discount rates, and copies of opinions
to same effect by Acting Attorney General and Board*s Consulting Counsel.
2. A memorandum regarding additional changes in the bill which
you asked me to list for further consideration,
3* Quotation from the provision of Section 4 of the federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Banking Act of 1933, which authorizes the
Federal Reserve Board to suspend from the credit facilities of the Federal Reserve System any member bank which makes undue use of bank credit
to finance speculation in securities, real estate or commodities, or for
any other purpose inconsistent with the maintenance of sound credit conditions.
I invite your especial attention to the following paragraph near
the bottom of page 3 of Senator Glass1s letter:
"Section 14 of the Act, dealing with open market operations,
authorizes Federal reserve banks, in accordance with rules and
regulations prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board, to engage
in a variety of business transactions, the purpose being to enable these regional banks, by the permission or under the direction of the Federal Reserve* Board, to exercise a power on discount rates throughout the various regions or throughout the
country tantamount to the power exercised over the money market
by the Bank of England when it goes into the open markot to enforce its discount rates."

This is excellent authority for the view that, under the original
Federal Reserve Act, the open market powers were supplementary to the power overdiscount rates and that the Federal reserve banks could not engage in
such operations without the permission of the Federal Reserve Board and
must do so when directed by the Federal Reserve Board. I do not think the
language of the law was adequate to carry out this intent; but this paragraph of the letter furnishes an excellent answer to any objection which
Senator Glass might make to vesting such power in the Board.




c
Governor Eccles

—

2

I also invite your attention to the following statement commencing at the bottom of page 3 of the opinion of the Acting Attorney General;
"The scheme of the entire act is to have Federal reserve
banks in different parts of the-country so that their operations may be accommodated to the business needs of each section,
and to vest final power in the federal Reserve Board, so as to
insure a conduct of business by each bank which will not be
detrimental to the carrying out of the entire plan,"

Respectfully,

Walter Y^yatt,
General Counsel

Attachments.




(Copy)

X- 4 9 45
(See X-3107a)
Desamber 4 , 1919*

Dear Mr. Attorney-3-eneraI:
I am attaching a copy of an opinion of M, C. E l l i o t t , Consulting Counsel of the Federal Reserve Board, concerning the powers of the
Board with respect to discount rates, with a viev: to asking you to investigate the question and to let me have your opinion on tha subject as
At torney-Gener a l .
I ai 'iy say that, while I concur fully with the opinion of M.T, E l l i o t t
as far as i t goes, I think i t could have "been made even stronger had he
known the facts as I know them.

I,:y recollection is especially clear in

regard to a l l of the circumstances connected with this feature of the
Federal Reserve Act and there can "be no question of the intention of Congress
to feive the Federal Reserve Board complete power in tha matter of fixiiqg
the rate of rediscount.
Since the rate was not necessarily to "be uniform throughout the
country, the right to i n i t i a t e and propose rates was given to the regional
banks respectively upon the presumption that each "bank would have intimate
knowledge.of usages and conditions in i t s own territory; but it was also
intended that the Federal Reserve Board should have complete jurisdiction
over the whole subject of r a t e s , as i t wa3 realized by the proponents of
the act that rate-making might, and frequently would, affect the co./_ &rc<
and industry of the entire country.

As originally drawn, the Federal Rese:

B i l l , enumerating the povers of the Federal reserve "banks (subsection (d),
Section 14), made rediscount rates "subject to review" ~oy the Federal Reserve
Board.

This term was thought by some members of the committee to bo broad




ihc Attorney-General.

X-4-91-5
(See &-3107a)

enough in that definition of Webster's Dictionary, which says: " "eviov
looking over or examination with a view to amendment or Laprovumeat."

A
But

some meters of the committee contended that the power of the Board should
be stated as even more explicit and final; hence we added the words "and
determination," so as to make the subsection road:
"To establish from time to time, subject to review and
determination of tho Federal Reserve Board, rates of discount
to bo charged by the Federal reserve bank for each class of
paper, which shall be fixed with a view of acsommodating
commerce and business."
In my report to Congress on the rill itself (H. R. 7837) I said, in
elucidating this power of the Federal Reserve Board:
"The powor granted in subsection (d) to fix a rate of discount is an obvious incident of the existence of the reserve
banks, but the power has been vested in the Federal Reserve
3oard to review this rate of discount when fixed by the local
reserve bank at its discretion. This is intended to provide
against the possibility that the local bank might be establishing
a dangerously low rate of interest, which the reserve board,
familiar as it would be with credit conditions throughout the
country, would deem best to raise."
If the Federal Reserve Board has tho power to alter a rate of discount proposed by a Federal reserve bank for the reason that it might ce a
dangerously low rate, it would, by the same token, have authorit" to reduce
the discount rate for the reason that it might be dangerously high.
Furthermore, in subsection (b) of Section 11 the Act confers even
greater power upon the Federal Reserve Board than that of reviewing end
determining the discount rate of the Federal reserve banks. It authorizes
the Board:




"To perrr.it, or, on the affirmative vote of at least five
members of the reserve board, to require Federal reserve
banks to rediscount the discounted paper of other Federal
reserve banks at rates of interest oo be fixed by the
Federal Reserve 3oard."
It is inconceivable that a board having complete authority to

O

3. The Attornoy-General.

X-4945
(Sos X-T.l i
regulate the rediscount rates "between Federal re63rv8 ban/rfl themselves should

not have the lessor authority to regulate the discount rates tentatively fixed
and proposed by Federal reserve o.*nJco.
A^ain in paragraph 2 of Section 12 of. tho Federal Reserve Act it v/ill
"be noted that among the authorised functions of the Federal Advisory Council
is power "(3) to call for information and to make recommendations in regard
to discount rates, rediscount business, note issue8, etc."

If the Federal

Reserve Board is not authorized to alter and amend and finally determine discount rates, vrhy should the ra&oral Advisory Council have been empowered l!tc
make recommendations in regard to discount rates" to the Federal Reserve
Board?

Hour idle it would be for the Federal Advisory Council to be making

recommendations to a board 'which hr>s no authority to apply or carry into
effect the recommendations thus made!

It ^ill be observed that the Federal

Reserve Council is not authorized to make recommendations as to discount
rates or anything else to Federal reserve banks, but only to the Federal
Reserve Board*
Section 14 of the Act, dealing with open market operations, authorizes Federal reserve banks, in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Federal Reserve 3oard, to engage in a variety of business
transactions, the purpose being to enable these regional banks, by the permission or under the direction of the Federal Reserve Board, to exorcise c.
pouer on J.icccunt rites throughout the various regions or throughout the
country tantamount to the jcver exercised over the money mrrtoot by the B?-nk
of England vhon it gees into tho open market to enforce its discount rates*
Finally, in Section 13 of the Act, it is provided:



I

X-4945
(see x-j&xyr-cs

4 . The Attorney-General

"The discount and rediscount and the purchase and sale by
any Federal reserve "bank of any bills receivable and of domestic
ani. foreign "bills of exchange and of acceptances authorized by
this act shall bo subject to such restrictions, limitations and
regulations as may be imposed by the Federal Reserve Board."
Thus all through the Act this complete power of review and determination and regulation of discount and rediscount rates is explioitly and implicitly given the Federal Reserve Board. Without it the Board would be
poncrless to control operations of any rogionnl bonk in the system which
might engage in transactions perilous to the entire system and to the commerce
and industry »f the country.
I would be obliged if you would carefully consider the matter and
give me your conclusion at as early a day as possible.
Sincerely yours,
(s) Carter Glass,
Secretary of the Treasury.

The Honorable,
The Attorney General,
Washington, D. C.




CO^Y.
X-310?a

EB^BTMENT OF JUSTICE,

December 9, 1919•

Dear Mr. Secretary:
In response to your request for my opinion
concerning the powers of the Federal Reserve "Board to regulate discount rates of the several reserve banks, I reply as
follows:
By section 14 of the Act of Congress, designated by the
short title "Federal Reserve .Act" (Act of Dec. 23, ±'jl}, j6
Stat.251), it is provided that "every Federal reserve bank
shall have power" (d)to establish from time to time, subject to review and
determination of the Federal Reserve Board, rates of
discount to be charged by the Federal reserve bank for
each class of paper which shall be fixed with a view
of accommodating commerce and business.
By section k of said act each Federal reserve bank is
under the supervision and control of its own board of directors, subject, however, to the provision of section 11 of
said act which provides, in part, that




The Federal Reserve Poard shall be authorized and
empowered * * * (j) to exercise general supervision
over said Federal reserve banks.

I
-2-

Said Federal Reserve Board i s a l s o further authorised arid empowered to examine a t i t s d i s c r e t i o n tne
accounts, boo .s and a f f a i r s of each Federal reserve
ban* * • * and to require such statements and reports
as i t may iee*a necessary.
(Sec.11. subdiv.a.)

/ ,

By section 12 thore i s also created a Federal Advisory
Council composed of representatives chosen in tne manner prescribed
in said section, which i s to confer d i r e c t l y with the Federal Reserve Board.

Among i t s powers i t i s authorized to " c a l l for

infor-

mation, to make recommendations in regard to discount r a t e s , r e d i s count business",, e t c .
The question for determination i s whether, taking into
consideration the language of section 14 (d), giving the power
to the Federal reserve banks to e s t a b l i s h from time to tiias r a t e s
of iisc^unt, "subject to review and determination of the Federal
Reserve Beard", and the further power of the Federal Reserve Board
to exercise general supervision over said Federal reserve banks,
the power of the Federal Reserve Loai1 i s limited to reviewing and
approving or disapproving r a t e s of discount made by such bank8j or
whether said Board /ray, in tne exercise of i t s powers, from time
to time review the r a t e s of discount in use and direct

specific

changes and a l t e r a t i o n s thereof.
The l e g i s l a t i v e history of the a c t shows t h a t a s originally
drawn section 14, suosec. (d) conferred the power upon the Federal
reserve banks to make discount r a t e s "subject to review" by the
Federal Reserve Board, and that said section was amended in committee by adding the words "and determination" a f t e r the word



ao as to make said section read a s now enacted^

-3.

X-31O7a

It is quite evident tnat if tne Federal Reserve Beard is con-

fined to the povver to review and approve or disapprove rates of
discount rrade by the Federal reserve banks, and is without power to

it,

itself direct specific cnanges, the words "and determination" are
wholly without significance.

The ver/ signification of tne ;;ord

"determination" used in such a connection, carries with it the right
to pass upon and to decide and fix, and thus determine what should be
done.

Coupling this with the power given the Federal Reserve Beard

to supervise the business of eacn

Federal reserve ban*., taking also

into consideration tne recommendations contemplated by tn© Advisory
Council to the Federal Heserve Beard in regard to discount rates,
such pc.jr would be futile if such Federal Reserve Board could not,
if agreeing to such recommendations, direct them to be carried out.
I think it is quite clear that tne Federal Reserve Board is the ultimate
authority in regard to rediscount rates to be charged by tne several
Federal reserve banks and may prescribe such rates.
This is in ail cases necessarily a review of rates existing at
the tine in the bank,, and tnerefore strictly calls for tne exercise
of this power; the determination reached by tne Beard carries with it
the exercise of tna power of determination specified in sec. 1~,
subdiv. (d); and also exercises the power of supervision granted in
sec. 11, subdiv. (j).
Tne scheroe of .. 3

; :ire act is to riiva Federal reserve banks in

different parts of tne country so tnat their operations nay be
accommodated to the business needs of each section, and to vest final



*

•

power in the Federal Reserve Beard, GO as to insure a conduct of
business by eacn bank which will not be detrimental to the carrying
out of the entire plan.

The powers of the Federal Reserve Board

are therefore to be exercised in regard to each reserve bank as
the conditions surrounding said bank may dictate, keeping in view
the general purpose and plan of the Federal Reserve Act.

Bearing

in mind such general purpose, I am of the opinion tnat the Federal
Reserve Board has the right under the powers conferred oy the
Federal Reserve Act, to determine what rates of discount should be
charged from time to tirce by a Federal reserve bank, and LL^der their
powers of review ar.d supervision, to require such rates to be put
into effect by such bank.
Very respectfully,
(Signed) Alex. C. Kin
Acii--- Anton 3 • General.

Hon. Carter Glass,
The Secretary of the Treasury,
Washington, D. C.




)
'-(Copy)

(See

X-4945-a
x-7lD7-a - Dec. S, 1919)
October 30, 1919.

My dear George:
I have your memorandum of the 29th, which refers to the ri^ht of the
Federal Rescve Board to i n i t i a t e and control discount ratos of Federal rcoorve
banks, and note that the Board desires my opinion on this subject:
The determination of this Question involves ::r Interpretation of
that part of Section 14 which reads as follows:
"•Every Federal reserve bank shall have po'.ver ****(d ) to establish fron: time to time, subject to review and determination of the Federal Reserve Board,

rates of discount to b ; charged by the Federal reserve
bank for each class of paper which has been fixed with
a view of accommodating commerce and busiiess."
It i s , of course, clear froffl this that any rate established, by ; Fo&er
reserve bank is subject to review and determination of the Federal Reserve ID; r i ,
but the qu.estion you havo under consideration is whether the Board, on it3 c--:.
..otion, my i n i t i a t e or establish discount rates for Federal resarve b,x.:kd, or 1:1"
a rate has 7been established, reviewed and approved by the Board, "hethc-" the 50' subsequently " may require the bank to change this rate. This involves a considor tion of the relative Dowers of the Federal Reserve Board and of the bo?ad of directors of a Federal reserve bank to control and supervise the operation;: of fh
bank. Sectioi- 4 of the Federal Reserve Act provides in part a.s follows:
"Every Federal reserve bank shall be conducted under supervision and control of a Borjrd of Directors. The Board of
Directors shall perform the duties usually appertaining to
the office of directors of banking .- ssociations, and a l l
^
such duties as are prescribed by law. 3aid board shall
administer the affairs of said bank fairly and impartially
a .d without discretion in favor of or against any member
bank or banks, and ^^XXr subject to the provisions of law
Kid the orders of the Federal Reserve Board, extend to each
member bonk such discounts, advancements and accommodations
as may bo safoly and reasonably merle, with due regard for
the claims and donaiids of other banks."
Section 11 of the Federal Reserve Act, -rhich deals with tho pov/eru of
the Federal Reserve Board, "orovidos in part as folio.'a:
"The Federal Reserve Board shall be authorised and empo'vered
*****(j) to exorcise general supervision over said Federal
reserve banks."
Considering these two provisions of the Act v/hich relate to the supervision rnd control of tho operations of the Federal reserve banks, i t appears
that the directors of the bank are intrusted with the operations or management
of the bank's affairs; that they arc vested with the po\7er to perform the usu.-rl
ordinary duties of bonk directors. In the exercise of these porers, hov.cver,
they are subject to the orders and to the general supervision of the Federal 7



T.-4945-a
(See X-3107-a - Deo.9,1219)

serve Board. Considering *he context and the general purooses of the Act, i t may
be assumed that Congress did not intend that the Federal Reserve Board should perform the functions usually performed by the board of directors of a bcnk. Co^-osi
howevsr, did give the Federal Reserve Board very broad general porori to mrporvi^e the operations of a bank and to see thot these operations are conducted in
s t r i c t accordance with the provisions of the Act and with those regulations and
rulings which the Federal Reserve Board, under the terms of the Act, ia r.uth.,
orized to make and enforce.
I
It is hardly necess-.xy to call attention to the various provisions in the
Act which sustain the theory, "out «o i l l u s t r a t e the extent of the control over
the bank's operations that is Tested in the Federal Reserve Board, i t Till bo
recalled that (mo of the porcrs enumerated in Section 11, is the powor "to suspend
or remove any officer cr director of any Federal Reserve Bank, the cause of ouch
removal to bo forthwith communicated in writing to the Federal Reserve Board, to
the removed officer, or director, and to said bank."
To sum up briefly the relative powers of the Federal Reserve Board nad of
the Board of Directors of z bank, i t appears(a) That the Board of directors of a brink may supervise and
control the operations of the bank so long as i t s affairs
arc conducted in accordance with the provisions of law,
the regulations of the Board authorized by lav/, and such
orders issuod ^oy the Board as the Board is authorized by
la's to issue;
(b) Ihat the Federal Reserve Board is vested with pov/er to
see that the operations of the bank are conducted in s t r i c t
accordance 7<ith the law, itc authorized regulations and orders,
to impose penalties for violations of the law, even to the
extent of removing offending officers and directors.
Coming now to consider the particular provision of the Act involved in the
pending question, i t is necessary to determine f i r s t to v.rhat extent and subject
to -"hc.t limitations the Board of Directors of a bonk is given control over the
establishment of discount rates.
Sec.4, which prescribed the general corporate powers of the bonk, contains among others, the following
Seventh.- To exercise by i t s board of directors, or duly authorized officers or agents, all powers specifically granted by
the provisions of this Act, and such incidental powers as shall
be necessary to carry on tlio business of braking within the
limitations prescribed by this Act."
If no limitations '.;erc prescribed by the Act and no specific rcforci.ee
had been made to the fixing of discount rates, i t -.vould seem to be clear that
the Board of Directors would have power from time to time to establish discount
rates
 as an incidental power necessary to carry on the business of banking
within the limitations prescribed by the Act.


•*

X-4945-c
(Sec X-7107-a - Dec,
11'

-3If no limitations were prescribed by the Act ~nd no specific reference
had "ooon made to the fixing of discount rates, it would seem to be clear thr.t
the Board of Directors -ould have power from time to time to establish discount
rates as an incidental power necessary to carry on the business of banking within
the limitations prescribed by the Act.
4
Section 14, however, which enumerates certain special powers of the
Federal reserve banks, imposes two limitations or restrictions on the power to
fix discount rates. It provides in terms th^.t rates so established by th~ bank
(a) shall bo subject to review .and determination of the
Federal Reserve Board,
(b) shall be fixed with a view of accommodating commerce
and business.
Any rate established must, therefore, conform to those two conditions and if the directors of the bank fix a rate which fails to conform to
either of these conditions, the establishment of such rate becomes a violation
of the provisions of the act and the 3oard under its supervisory power may
clearly require the readjustment or reestablishment of such rate. In other
words, whenever in the opinion of the Board, on established rate docs not
accommodate commerce and busincss.it may require the directors of the bank
to change the rate so as to meet this requirement.
It may be argued that the discretion is vested in the board of directors of the bank to determine whether or not a rate fixed is fixed with
a view of accommodating commerce and busii-ess.
Considering, however, the context and general purposes of the Act it
is not believed that this view can be maintained. Congress clearly intended
this discretion to be vested in the Federal Reserve Board. To assist the Board
in the control of this and other matters, it created by Section 12, the Federal
Advisory Council, and authorized that Council "to confer directly with the
Federal Reserve Board on general business conditions * * *; to call for information and to make recommendations in regard to discount rates. A centralized
control of the discount rates is fundamental to the purposes of the Act and
provision v/as accordingly made to furnish the Federal Reserve Board with the
best possible information to enable it to exercise a proper discretion in this
important matter. It is hardly necessary to emphasize the importance of this
control. It affects international as well as our domestic banking and trade
relations.
My conclusions, therefore, arc, first, that the discretion is vested
in the Federal Reserve Board to determine whether nay discount rate of a Federal
reserve bank accommodates commerce and business; second, that the power to
review and determine discount rates is a continuing power, which may be exorcised at any time. It necessarily follows from this that the Board of its
own motion may require a Federal reserve bank to change an existing rate at
any time, if in the opinion of the 3oard such rate does not meet the requirements of the statute.

Very sincerely yours,