View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

April 13, 1945
To:

The Chairman

From:

Mr. Hammond

/

Attached are two ribbon copies of the
memorandum on the foreign missions of the Federal
Reserve System which Mr. Szymczak asked to have
prepared for use by you and him in a discussion
with Mr. Sproul. The memorandum is based on one
which he addressed to you under date of February
26 and was discussed at a Board meeting. It
reflects changes based on that discussion and
upon subsequent suggestions and has Mr. Szymczak1s
approval in its present form.

Attachment




ft

March 29, 1945.
FOREIGN MISSIONS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Summary
1. Since international economic developments affect the
Board1s responsibilities directly and are also of general Governmental concern, the foreign activities of the System should
be unified under the Board's direction.
2. Officers and employees of Federal Reserve Banks as well
as of the Board going abroad should have prior approval and
credentials from the Board, and reports of their missions should
be made to the Board*
3* Personnel for foreign missions should be drawn from the
Board and from the Banks according to individual qualifications
and the purposes to be served by the missions.

There appear to be two types of foreign mission in which the System
may be called upon to engage: one dealing with operational problems incident
to the correspondent accounts carried on the books of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York; and one dealing with broader matters of monetary or banKing
policy in the international field. With respect to the first, it will undoubtedly be expedient for members of the staff of the Federal Reserve Bank
of ~ew York to visit other countries from time to time to confer with its
correspondents on operating problems and in furtherance of correspondent relationships. With respect to the second, it seems equally clear that there
will be occasion for representatives to be drawn from the staffs of the
Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and perhaps of other Reserve
Banks, for missions going abroad both on invitation and at our own initiative
in order to obtain information, cultivate good relationships, and give technical counsel.
New Yorkys Foreign Missions
The tasks in which the System has already participated indicate what
we should be prepared for in the future* Those tasks began in the twenties,
when Mr. Benjamin Strong was frequently abroad, and there were numerous consultations with foreign central banks and finance ministries* Other officers
of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York assisted both directly and indirectly
in the organization and work of the reparations commissions abroad, Mr* Randolph
Burgess on the Young Commission particularly and Mr. Shephard Morgan on the
Dawes Commission. Mr. Woodlief Thomas also participated in reparations work




- 2 in Europe. Mr. J. E. Crane participated informally in the organization of
the B.I.S. More recently Mr* Knoke and Mr. Despres visited European central
banks in 1938* Mr. Roelse, Mr. Collado, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Roche, and Mr. Moore
have made various more or less prolonged trips to Latin America. Mr. Johnson
is no?f on leave with a mission to Iran. Officers of the Bank have frequent
occasions for trips to Canada.
The Board1s Foreign Missions
On the part of the Board1s staff, participation in activities abroad
has included Mr. Goldenweiser1s attendance at the Central Bank Statistical
Conference in London in 1928; Mr. Gardner1s European trip in 1932 and attendance
at the London Economic Conference in 1933; later trips by Mr. Goldenweiser,
Mr. Morse, and Professor Hansen to Europe; work on five separate missions to
Latin America (Costa Rica, Cuba, Honduras, Paraguay, and Venezuela being the
main objectives) participated in variously by Mr. Vest, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Triffin,
Mr. Grove, Mr. Krost, and Mr. Hammond; the work on the Joint American-Canadian
Economic Committee by Professor Hansen, Mr. Kindleberger, and Mr. Thome; and
participation—formal and informal—in conferences, etc., held within the United
States, of which Bretton Woods is the latest prominent example. The military
government handbooks and material on reparations and other international financial problems prepared for the State Department for government use in foreign
countries have utilized experience and study abroad without which their preparation would not have been possible.
Missions in Prospect
Since our missions in Paraguay were first undertaken, we have had
requests for technical assistance from other Latin American countries. Paraguay has asked that Mr. Hammond return to Asuncion and help with a reorganization of her internal administration. Bolivia has asked that Mr. Triffin
help her revise her banking laws. El Salvador has asked for someone to help
reorganize her mortgage bank. At the request of the Philippine Government,
the services of Mr. Goodman, of the Board1s examining staff, have been made
available in work on the rehabilitation of the Philippine banking system.
Another type of mission now in prospect is the contemplated periodic
conferences of representatives of the central ban^s of the western hemisphere.
These conferences, which are intended to bring together economists arid operating officers from the Americas in small, informal meetings, should be the
means of effectively helping the Latin American central banks to improve monetary practice, research, and operating methods; of developing mutual understanding; and of arranging for cooperation among the central banks in the
exchange of employees for study and training and in the formulation of better
monetary laws and procedure in those countries requiring technical assistance.
Specifically, these conferences should provide means by which the burden of
furnishing technical assistance can be divided so that the Latin American
central banks themselves can help one another instead of depending wholly
on us. The conferences, the first of which may be held this spring in Mexico,
should be useful to us, both in maintaining friendly relations with the rest




- 3of this hemisphere and in avoiding disturbance by our neighbors of our domestic credit and monetary conditions•
Still another type of mission is in prospect as a result of the need
for collaboration on the problems of rehabilitation in Europe and elsewhere.
The System requires first hand information of these problems and it must also
expect, as has happened already, to be asked to participate in their solution*
Inquiries have been received regarding the possibility of members of the Board's
staff providing assistance to the Allied Control Commission in its work in occupied countries*
Unified System Program
It is impossible to go further and state exactly the scope of the
international program, but it is obvious that the System has in prospect a
wide range of activities abroad. Recent developments indicate large Board
and Bank responsibilities with respect to the proposed Monetary Fund and
International Bank, especially in view of the possibility that the Board
will be represented in a formal or informal consultative group. The Yalta
conference points to active participation by the United States in international matters, and with this will come active participation in formulating international economic credit and monetary policies.
In the Board1s opinion, a program of foreign activities of the range
and objectives indicated should be unified under the direction of the Board
as a System activity in which the staffs of the Board and the Federal Reserve
Banks participate; and officers and other Reserve Bank personnel, as well as
Board personnel, who go abroad on System activities should do so with credentials from the Board and should be prepared to report to the Board on the results of their missions. It is evident that unless the program is unified,
our resources in experience and personnel will not be put to the best use, and
efforts by the Board and the Banks will tend to parallel rather than complement each other. Furthermore, foreign activities are of Governmental concern
and require the full sanction of the State Department in all cases, and at
times of the Treasury and other Departments. Obtaining the necessary clearance
with these Departments of the Government is a function of the Board.
The importance of unity is the more apparent when it is considered
that our foreign activities constitute real responsibilities, since their purpose and tendency will be to improve banking legislation, central banking
policy, bank inspection, research, and internal operation, and since our success in lending assistance to these ends may reduce the disturbances to our
domestic credit situation that originate in foreign economies. Our success
will also work to the enhancement of American prestige and the cultivation of
friendly and mutually helpful international relations.




- 4The concept of a unified System activity should prevent confusion
and overlapping of functions. Without attempting to formulate rigid rules,
we may tentatively classify the foreign activities of the System into the
following groups:
1* Correspondent relations are clearly a direct responsibility of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and should be
carried out by it, subject only to the general siipervision of
the Board.
2. Missions relating to the establishment and reorganization
of monetary institutions and systems and to the improvement of
internal operations and bank examinations can draw upon personnel
available throughout the System, both at the Board and in the
Banks*
3. Long range research programs in the foreign field should
normally be carried out at the Board, since they do not relate to
the activities of any one Bank but interest the System as a whole.
Such work could not be efficiently parcelled out among the various
institutions comprising the System. It requires, in any event,
close coordination with other institutions and agencies, especially
in Washington.
4* Missions involving broad matters of policy and legislation must also be of primary concern to the Board itself, since
they are related both to long range research and to Governmental
policies.
Any assignment abroad will usually involve unaccustomed, expensive,
and sometimes unhealthful conditions, and work without the facilities and conveniences available at the Reserve Banks and the Board. Foreign assignments
require special aptitude and if possible a knowledge of foreign languages.
They require an understanding not only of the functions of central banking but
of its aims and purposes as well. For these reasons the selection of personnel
qualified by experience, education, and personality to meet the conditions of
foreign work and discharge it successfully is of vital importance.