View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD o r OOVBDfOM o r THE rEDEML M m tV B STITEM

MEMORANDUM
FROM THE O FFICE OF GOVERNOR M. S. SZYMCZAK

TO:.

Honorable John W. Snyder




f>
PAXMEMT OF DIVIDMDS 01 HATIOMAL SKftVIGS
U P E ISSOTUSCE POLICIES
(Special report of Task Fore© No. 5# established by Defense
Mobilisation Director C. E* Wilson*8 letter of March 12, 1951)
Hi© Director of Mobilization, the Ohaimaa of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systea, and the Secretary
of the treasury have received identical letter© under date of
April 3, 1951* from the Administrator of Veterans* Affair® re­
questing an expression of opinion regarding a proposed, distri­
bution of about #6#§ million of dividends on National Service
Life Insurance policies* The letter© were sent pursuant to
a request of the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations
of the Halted States Senate and relate to the questions of in­
flation involved in the proposed payment.
The Task Force has considered this matter and has dis­
missed it with Mr* H. ¥* Breining, Assistant Administrator of
Veterans1 Affairs for Insurance* The conclusions of the Task
Force are set out belowi
1« The exact status of the funds represented by the
proposed dividend Is a matter on which there may be some
difference of legal opinion* In view of the fact that it has
been detewdned and announced publicly that there is a surplus
in the insurance fund, there are strong reasons of law and of
felrness for making the payments at this time* Vhile the law
appears to give the Administrator of Veterans* Affair® wide
latitude in the tiiaing of the distribution, especially since
the dividends which accrued from 1940 to 194$ were not distri­
buted until about two years ago and the distribution here in
question would cover the dividends from 194® through the anni­
versary date of the policies in 1951, the fact that he has
already declared that there is a surplus in the fund may be a
barrier against a postponement of a distribution which will
require farther study*
2* It is clear that the payment of the proposed divi­
dend of about $685 million would be inflationary. Bel sing the
funds would increase the demands on the Treasury and on the
Government securities markets* Even though veterans could be
expected to save some part of the dividends they receive, the
distribution would add appreciably to the spending stream.
These facts do not necessarily mean that the payment should not
be made — there are some payments that must be made even though




they are inflationary, the most important being payments for
plan©®, tanks and other defense materials.' It is clear, however,
that the payment would add appreciably to inflationary pressures,
and therefore should be scrutinized with special care.
3» The Veterans* Administration proposes to spread
the payment fairly evenly over the coming 12 months. Such a
spreading out of the payment would help to minimise its in­
flationary impact*
A* It is understood from the Veterans* Mai n! strati on
that about fl,5 million to |2.5 million has already been spent
preparing for the distribution, and that virtually all of the
time, money, and effort thus far emended would be wasted if
the distribution is 'not mad© as planned by the Veteran** Admini©**
tration.
, 5* One reason for the size of the dividend at the present
time is the faet that for various reasons beyond the control of
the Veterans* Mministration, distribution of the dividend®
heretofore has not been on am annual tesla, k #2.5 billion
distribution was made about two years ago to bring the payments
down to 19-4$. The presently proponed distribution would bring
the payments tip to the anniversary date' in the calendar year
1951. The Veterans* Administration proposes to mate® any pay­
ments annually that may fall due thereafter.
6. If the payment herein considered were postponed,
it is not clear whether a less inflationary period could be
expected to exist in the near future. The present defense
program is likely to last for sevens! years. Accordingly, while
a postponement of the payment might avoid an increase in
inflationary pressure* at this time, the delay would add to the
sis© of the payments — and hence to the inflationary potential
which would have to be released at some future time.
7. The Task Force gave some consideration to the possi­
bility of making the distribution in some form which woisld itself
constitute savings or would encourage the recipient to add it
to savings. It has seemed to the Task Force that at the present
time it would not be feasible or desirable to substitute a bond
for the cash payment. Tbs Veterans* Administration has indicated
that great expense would be involved in offering to veterans an
alternative of .accepting c&ah or adding the amount of the distri­
bution to the value of their policies. It is recognised that,
whatever might have been the expense of such a procedure as an
origins! proposition, it would undoubtedly be greater at the
present time in view of the work that ha® gone forward toward
the different type of distribution.



-

3

-

8 . The Task Force suggests that the Veterans* Adminis­
tration and the Treasury Department explore every possibility
vfbr encouraging the saving of the largest possible am o u n t of
the dividend distribution n e t only generally, but particularly
in the form of United States Savings Bonds. It might be helpful
to enclose specially designed literature wi th t he check. Con­
sideration might be given to going further and including
order blanks and return envelopes for investing the payment in
savings bond*. As a further means of facilitating and sim­
plifying such investment by t h e veteran, consideration might
even be given t o enclosing two separate checks, one representing
the cost of the largest savings bond p u r c h a s a b l e with the
dividend end the other representing the remaining part of the
dividend. This, however* would involve serious administrative
difficulties and the additions! cost to the Treasury Disbursing
Office in making the payments would be substantial. This proposal
would add materially to the expenses of the Treasury Division
of Disbursement for the reason that under existing procedure
checks are inscribed through a method known as the “
Transfer
Posting Process,® through which the inscription of the check is
accomplished by means of the transfer of a carbon deposit on
the back of the schedules prepared \sy the Veterans Administration
to the face of the checks, thus avoiding the manual typing of
the checks* Further special considerstion should be given to
the question whether these or any other steps that could be taken
to encourage the saving of the dividend would justify the addi­
tional expense involved.
9.
The Task Foree suggests that the Veterans* Adminis­
tration give further consideration to the relative advantages
fnd disadvantages — from the standpoint of cost, convenience,
and other aspects — of making provision in the future for allowing
veterans the alternative of adding the ©mount of future dividends
to the v a lue of their policies. Even after the dividends are
placed on an annual basis, such an option offered to the veterans
might be worth while for helping to attract more of these funds

to the Treasury and for provic
policy-holding veterans.

Mw a r d F, Bartelt

April 11,



1951

.