View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Lovie M. Hollis

3985 Limestone Way
Sacramento, CA 95823
Via U.S. Mail and Email

September 22,

2010

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006-4614
Re: Field Hearing, September 23, 2010, Sacramento,
Hollis, Former Homeowner

Dear Chairman

Angelides,

Vice Chairman

California; Testimony of Lovie

Thomas, and members of the Commission:

born in Sullident, Alabama on Sept. 7, 1931. My
husband Grafton and I moved to California in 1961 and we raised five daughters
while we both worked here in Sacramento. We purchased our own home and over
the years we paid offthe mortgage. In 2006 we had to sell our home and relocate
because Grafton was in a wheelchair and our home had several steps at the entry.
Grafton died two years ago but my daughter, my grandson and are still living in the
new home. The mortgage has been foreclosed and we have been notified to move
out. I went to the Senior Legal Hotline office in Sacramento and their lawyer got the
bank to postpone the eviction while they try to get the bank to put the home back in
my name and adiust the loan payments to an amount that I can afford.

My

name

is Lovie M. Hollis and I

was

I felt sure that we would be able to make the payments on the new mortgage
because we made a 50% down payment and the bank gave me a "First Payment
Notice" stating that the monthly payment would be $546.53. Since my husband died
2 years ago I have made all my mortgage payments on time out of my retirement
income of $1,600. However, on Sept. 1 of this year the payments iumped to $1,421
for the next 25 years. I answered an ad for a firm that offered to negotiate loan
modifications with the bank and I got a call back from a man I will call Tom who has
an office in my neighborhood.
to my home and told

that he would get my lender to reduce my
mortgage balance and my monthly payments for a fee of $4,000 payable in advance.
I told him that I had only $1,000 and gave him a check for that amount. Later Tom
came back to my home with a woman called Dorothy. He said that Dorothy was a
paralegal and that they worked together. He said Dorothy would buy my deceased
husband's Mercury Grand Marquis so I could use the money to pay him the
additional $3,000 he wanted to do the loan modification. Thomas wrote a bill of sale
for a $6,500 which he said was the blue book value. The bill of sale stated that
Dorothy would give me a $1,650 down payment. Dorothy also gave me a
Tom

came

me

promissory
car

but that

note for
was a

monthly payment.

$4,850 payable

year ago and she

$350 per month. Dorothy took the
gave me the down payment or any

at the rate of
never

Tom told me that it was not necessary for me to make loan payments while he
worked on the loan modification and I followed his advice. I continued to get letters
from the mortgage company and I gave them to Tom and he said he would take care
of it. The next thing I knew I found a notice of a foreclosure sale on my front door.
Again, Tom told me he would take care of it. Finally, a real estate agent came to my
door and told me that she was an agent for the bank and I would have to move out
because the house had been sold in foreclosure.

The lawyer at Senior Legal Hotline examined the papers from the 2006 loan and
showed me a lot of information that was never explained to us when we got this
loan: The new loan is what they call a pick-a-pay. The monthly statement shows a
regular payment (enough to pay off the loan in 30 years), an interest-only payment,
a minimum payment that covers one-half of the interest while the other half is
added to the loan balance. It is like was going to the bank each month to get a new
loan to pay half of the interest for last month. The "First Payment Notice" given to
me specified the minimum payment of $546 a month. The promissory note that I
signed stated an interest rate of 1.2500 and says: "The interest rate I will pay •
change." In fact, the interest rate was set to change after 30 days. The "annual
percentage rate" that we found in the loan papers was 8.08%.
The documents say that this was a "stated income" loan. My lawyer says that means
that the loan company had told the mortgage brokers that the loan company would
not verify the amount of the borrower's income as stated in the loan application by
the broker.

Thank you for

taking

my

testimony.

Sincerely,

Lovie M. Hollis

2