View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Testimony of Samuel Molinaro
Before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
May 5, 2010
Chairman Angelides, Vice-Chairman Thomas, and Members of the Commission,
my name is Samuel Molinaro and I am the former Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Bear Stearns. I appreciate the invitation to appear before you today.
The past two years have seen unprecedented events reshape the financial services
industry. The freezing of the credit markets resulted in the fall of our company, Bear Stearns, as
well as the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the consolidation of many other institutions.
However, there is still no complete understanding or consensus about the causes of this crisis.
To develop stronger financial institutions and better economic policies, the public needs—and
deserves—a deeper understanding of the facts. This Commission was established to examine the
causes of the financial and economic crisis in the United States. It is a vital task.
You have asked me to address several wide-ranging topics in my testimony today.
I will attempt to address those topics by providing you with an overview of Bear Stearns and
how we managed our organization, our funding policies and their evolution during 2006 to 2007
and the events leading up to our sale to JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Like many Bear Stearns employees I enjoyed a long career with the company,
working there for twenty-two years. In 1996 I was appointed Chief Financial Officer, and, in
2001, I became an Executive Vice President and joined the Company’s Executive Committee. In
August 2007, I became Chief Operating Officer as well. I remained with Bear Stearns until after
the completion of the Company’s sale to JPMorgan in June 2008.
I am proud to have been a part of Bear Stearns. Despite having been a public
company since 1985, Bear Stearns clung to its partnership culture, characterized by its high level
of employee stock ownership, risk aversion, hands-on management, and entrepreneurial spirit.
Indeed, Bear Stearns was approximately 1/3 owned by its employees, of all ranks. All
employees were encouraged to think and act like owners and safeguard shareholders’ money like
their own, because it was. Thanks to our culture, Bear Stearns became one of the world’s
leading financial institutions, employing 14,000 people in offices in the United States and abroad
and operating business lines in: research, sales and trading of institutional equities and fixed
income; investment banking; global clearing services; asset management; and private client
services.
The life blood of an investment bank is liquidity. Over the course of my tenure as
the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, we worked to develop a liquidity strategy that would
ensure the continuity of our funding during periods of market stress. Historically, we financed
our operations through a combination of equity capital, short term and long term unsecured debt,
and secured debt. We obtained secured financing through repo facilities, which permitted
borrowings secured by a broad range of collateral under repo agreements with a wide variety of
counterparties. We also obtained secured financing through securities lending agreements and
secured bank loans. Unsecured debt was obtained through the issuance of commercial paper (a
short term debt instrument that in some cases can have an overnight maturity), unsecured bank

loans, medium term notes and other long term borrowings. Beginning in 2006, we made a
deliberate decision to reduce our use of unsecured short term funding and materially increase our
use of secured financing. Specifically:
o we increased the use of secured repo funding, because we believed that secured
funding was inherently less credit sensitive and thus more stable due to the
collateralized nature of the borrowing;
o we introduced substantially greater amounts of longer-term secured funding into
the repo and bank loan portions of our secured funding mix;
o we reduced reliance on short term unsecured funding sources, thereby lessening
both exposure to rollover risk and dependence on backstop lines of credit; and
o we expanded the size and scope of the Company’s liquidity pool, which consisted
of cash and cash equivalents held at, or available to, the parent company for
deployment as needed.
The tenor of our repo facilities matched the perceived liquidity of the assets that they were
intended to finance. So, for example, short term overnight repos were generally used only for
the most liquid securities; longer-term repos were used for less liquid assets; and long term debt
and equity financed those assets that could not be rehypothicated in the repo and bank loan
markets.
Prior to these changes, the Company’s alternative liquidity protocols depended on
our ability to pledge unencumbered securities as collateral under the terms of committed and
uncommitted loan facilities. However, this approach had the risk that in a major liquidity stress
event these backup lines might not be available. Accordingly, the purpose of these changes was
to protect Bear Stearns’ balance sheet from tightening in the credit markets or other market
stresses. In fact, Moody’s cited our liquidity management as a strength in its May 2007 and
September 2007 reports on Bear Stearns.
Bear Stearns was one of the initial participants in the SEC’s Consolidated
Supervised Entities program. By virtue of Bear Stearns’ participation, the SEC had broad access
to information about Bear Stearns’ finances. Indeed, from the summer of 2007 on, Bear Stearns
provided the SEC with continuous updates on the status of the Company’s liquidity position, risk
profile and capital levels. As of March 2008, our liquidity and regulatory capital levels were
strong. As the SEC has stated:
o As of the morning of March 11, Bear Stearns had a pool of high quality, highly liquid
assets of over $18 billion.
o Throughout the week of March 10, Bear Stearns had a capital ratio well in excess of
the 10% level used by the Federal Reserve Board in its “well-capitalized” standard.
o In addition, the Bear Stearns’ registered broker-dealers were comfortably in
compliance with the SEC’s net capital requirements.
In light of all this, I was shocked by the dramatic events of the week of March 10,
2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company was engaged in a successful leadership
transition process. In addition, during the first week of March 2008, we were finalizing our
quarterly earnings and expected to report a profit in the first quarter. However, on Monday
morning, unsubstantiated and inaccurate rumors were circulating in the market to the effect that
2

Bear Stearns was facing a liquidity crisis. Unfortunately, the rumors persisted through Thursday,
with our credit spread widening dramatically and share price declining. By Thursday evening,
these rumors, which were magnified by press reports, had escalated into a panic. In this panic,
an increasing number of prime brokerage clients began to request that their available cash and
securities be moved to other brokers. Moreover, late on Thursday, a significant proportion of our
repo counterparties informed us that they would no longer lend to us, even on the basis of
secured collateral. As a result of these conditions we experienced a significant cash outflow
which reduced our liquidity pool dramatically.
With significant uncertainty as to our ability to obtain financing from our
traditional lenders, Bear Stearns was faced with the risk that we could not conduct business on
Friday. Although we had significant quantities of highly-rated securities available for loan
collateral, we needed to arrange for backup liquidity for our ongoing business operations.
Consequently, we approached JP Morgan, our clearing bank and an institution we believed had
the capacity to open a secured liquidity line of the size Bear Stearns needed. We were not
looking for a bailout. Rather, we asked for a liquidity line secured by highly-rated securities.
Although our negotiations with JP Morgan began as an opportunity to find a commercial solution
to our liquidity issue, they ultimately resulted in a funding facility backstopped by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York. This facility was announced on Friday. Unfortunately, the
announcement, in the context of that week of panic and rumors, made matters worse by
appearing to confirm the rumors that the Company was insolvent. Moreover, we suffered
downgrades by the ratings agencies late on Friday and on Friday evening were informed that the
JP Morgan facility would mature on Monday morning. Accordingly, on Sunday, March 16,
2008, with few remaining options, Bear Stearns announced an agreement for JPMorgan to
purchase the Company.
Bear Stearns’ experience the week of March 10, 2008 was surprising and
unprecedented. While our capital ratios and liquidity pool remained high by historical standards,
market rumors, coupled with our rapidly declining share price, served to increase investor
concerns. As a result, we experienced a quintessential run on the bank. Prime brokerage
counterparties increasingly withdrew assets; derivative counterparties moved aggressively to
assign away our trades, causing market disruptions and margin calls; and, finally, repo
counterparties ultimately refused to roll over repo facilities, resulting in a material draw-down of
our liquidity pool at the end of the week.
Our liquidity and capital planning models failed in the face of these
overwhelming market forces. Bear Stearns’ reliance on secured funding markets, which had
proven durable over many other financial cycles and market shocks, proved to be insufficient in
this instance. Market fears surrounding mortgage-backed securities and rumors and innuendo in
the end resulted in fear-induced, irrational behavior that caused a run on the bank at Bear Stearns
and then at Lehman Brothers and others during the financial crisis. In this environment, without
a lender of last resort or the stability of a deposit base, neither we nor the independent investment
banking model itself could survive.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.

3