View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Lending During Recessions

Beginning in the fall of 2008, the United States Treasury along with other government agencies
put in place a series of financial initiatives to help lay the foundation for economic recovery.
One of these initiatives is the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). Through the CPP, Treasury
purchased shares of preferred stock from qualifying financial institutions. By strengthening the
capital bases of financial institutions through the CPP, Treasury aimed to increase CPP
participants’ capacity to lend to U.S. businesses and consumers and to support the U.S. economy.
Bank lending tends to be pro-cyclical, contracting with an economic slowdown and rising with
an expansion, and this has been the case in the current environment. In addition, in the current
recession, most of the securitization markets have greatly contracted, as has the availability of
many types of nonbank credit. Thus the CPP, along with other agency actions such as the Term
Asset Liquidity Fund, and the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, will be critical to
staving off a greater contraction in the economy.
A recent question has been whether the broad array of financial stabilization policies put into
place by the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and others has led to more lending than would have
been the case had nothing been implemented. Although it is too early to determine with
precision the influence of policy on the economy's evolution through the financial crisis, recent
studies from two leading government agencies released today examine different dimensions of
lending activity during current and prior recessions. The Federal Reserve Board’s article U.S.
Credit Cycles Past and Present examines how credit volumes have evolved in the current
economic downturn relative to previous business cycle downturns using the Federal Reserve’s
Flow of Funds data. Significant among the Federal Reserve’s findings was that, despite many
unprecedented aspects of the current financial and economic turbulence, movements in credit
volumes in the current recession are similar to historical patterns. The evidence shows (1) For
all categories of lending with the exception of home mortgages, there are at least two other
downturns that experienced more pronounced declines in lending than that following the
business cycle peak of 2007:Q4 and (2) Lending over the current downturn does not appear
especially weak relative to past recessions with the exception of home mortgages. The Federal
Reserve attributes these findings to the government’s active policy response, particularly with
respect to the banking sector. The study states “the likely path of the lending in the current
downturn without any policy response would have been notably more contractionary than after
1990:Q3.”
A key difference in this recession compared to past recessions is the greatly increased
importance of credit extension by non-bank entities, sometimes referred to as the shadow
banking system. In a study that complements the Federal Reserve’s more general consideration
of credit market conditions, the article from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, What
is Different about this Recession? Nonbank Providers of Credit Loom Large investigates the

growth and importance of nonbanks in overall credit provision. Of particular importance in the
current financial environment are structured finance markets, that is, credit extension based on
the issuance of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and consumer-credit and business-credit
asset-backed securities (ABS). These markets have become an essential component of lending in
the financial system, particularly for credit extension to households. Key findings in the study
are: (1) in the MBS market, credit provision supported by government sponsored enterprises’
MBS issuance is currently the only meaningful activity, and (2) in non-mortgage consumer credit
markets, the anemic rebound of ABS issuance leaves a large gap in credit provision to
households. The article finds that revivals of both the MBS and ABS markets are critical to the
overall recovery of credit extension to households, and hence economic growth.