View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Friday
April 8, 1955
Internal Memorandum
Talley Case of 1927
(Dictated from notes made at Dallas, Texas, March 31, 1955)
(These notes are taken from clippings in the possession of Miss Henderson, secretary
to President Irons of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas• The date at the beginning of the paragraph is the date of the clipping)

October 12. 1927 - Associated Press Dispatch in the Dallas Morning Blews from Lubbock,
Texas:

Thirty-seven South Plains bank executives had passed a resolution saying

that the Federal Reserve Bank was responsible for the large cotton loss in marketing
the 1926 crop*

The complainant was Mr* J. P. Williams, President of the First national

Bank of Mineral Wells,. Texas• The bankers met from 10 in the morning until 5 in the
afternoon. The summary of their complaint was that, had the member banks in the Federal
Reserve District headed by Dallas been given the kind of cooperation they should have
had, the cotton planters would have been carried for 8 months and been able to sell
cotton at 20# a pound. Instead, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas retired the loans
from its member banks*

The planters were forced to liquidate, and cotton was sold for

6$ a pound. The loss amounted to #4,00,000,000.

(This is probably the time at which

Governor Talley is supposed to have said that this would be a 5i & pound crop. The
thing to do was to wipe the losses off and get rid of the whole business).
October 18, 1927:

Bankers of central west Texas, in the vicinity of Abilene,

called a meeting there. They resolved to ask that Talley be removed, as his policies
are ''destroying the usefulness of the bank11 and that he be replaced by a capable member
banker.

The meeting was led by Mr. J. P. Williams.

November 1* 1927:

In the matter of charges against Governor Talley, a new plan

was launched, headed by Myron A. Pease, Vice President of the City National Bank of
Corpus Ghristi. Mr. Pease and his friends have a slate of new directors whom, they
would like to elect to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, and presumably those directors
would then replace Mr* Talley with someone else.




~2~

A stockholders1 committee of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank

ftovember 2, 1927*

was appointed to hear the Talley Case. Mo date was set, but it was understood that
Governor Talley had been called to Washington for the regular Governors1 meeting on
November 7th•
November 18, 1927s

The Fort Worth Star Telegram says that 350 member banks may

quit the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.
November 22, 1927*

Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas met. It was,

understood that the Federal Reserve Board would take no part in the controversy concerning
Governor Talley.

The complaint of groups led by Mr. Williams would be presented on

December 7th (the date was postponed to December 12th).

In the election for directors,

the anti-Talley candidates were beaten.
December 12, 1927:

A hearing was held on the Talley matter (presumably this is

the date of the hearing in Dallas before the Congressional Committee, but the matter was
so taken for granted in the newspaper that not much detail was printed).

Complainants

alleged that the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank had lost heavily before Mr. Talley took'
office. A $500,000 loss wasffientionedat Hugo, Oklahoma, and a #100,000 loss at Celburn,
Texas due to bank failures among member banks. It was also stated.that small banks
found it very profitable to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas at 3 1/2%
and re~loan that money at 10%•
This hearing seems to hs.ve been not before the Congressional Committee, but
before the Board of'directors of the Dallas #ank.

(Check this date).

The clipping

stated that the directors heard testimony for 3 days and that they would reconvene on
January 6th •
January 12, 1928:

On January 13th a meeting was held at which Mr. Talley testi-

fied.
These clippings ended without any finality in the story. The assumption was
that Mr. Talley was winning, but either the clipping service ended or the newspaper




-3-

lost interest.
It has been suggested that on this whole matter we see Earl Sehvulst, President
of the Boveiy Savings Bank. Mr. Schwulst was manager of the Loan and Credit Department
at the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank'from 1922 to 1926*
It also is possible that the brief in this matter, prepared by the firm with
•which Mr. Dreibelbis was then working, is still in the office of that firm, but thus
far it has not been located in the Federal Reserve Bank of Texas•

MA: IB