View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Internal Memorandum
February 16, 1954
Introductory Interview with Mr* Eugene Meyer
This interview was held in the new modern building of the Washington
Post of which Mr* Meyer is publisher* With this new building the Post has been
moved out of the ordinary business center of Washington and put directly behind
the Statler Hotel* It is a curious move for it means that the newspaper is at
a greater distance away fr©$ both the Capital and the White House than it was
before* Mr* Meyer undoubtedly had his reasons, he has for most things,but like
many of his reasons these are not clear on the surface*
The building is entirely modern*even the elevators are self-service
or at least they were in the morning* Mr* Meyer1s own office is not large* It
the
a
is furnished in modern taste except for/a huge desk which is/e# carved and heavy
piece that might have delighted Theodore Roosevelt* Behind Mr. Meyer is a book
shelf and above that a shelf which holds somethings of his chief interests, a
painted head of a horse, a small statuette of Prime Minister Churchill, and in
glass cases a huge ear of coitn and a model of an aircraft carrier? Interspersed
with these are medals which I could not look at closely but which appeared to
be tokens given him in recognition of this or that.
Mr* Meyer came in twenty minutes late* He had been at the doctors
as he ha£ been having a bad cold for about a week* He was cordial, articulate
and disjointed in his talk* His attention jumped from one subject to another
very rapidly* Also he is an elliptical talker and frequently the connecting
links slip away from anyone who has not had all the experience that he has*
One must guess at what it was in one sentence that reminds him of another* For
that reason the interview will be more than usually sketchy. This, combined
made
with an obvious liking for the s/£hock technique/aay the interview interesting
if not as productive as one might have liked*


-2-

Mr. Meyer began by saying that in his opinion the Federal Reserve
Board had for much of its life been weakly administered inadequate to its
task, unaware of the possibilities which as a Board it might have developed.
When Woodrow Wilson was nominated Henry Morgenthau, Sr. came to
Mr. Meyer, then a private banker, to ask who would be the best person to
recoiamend for the Board •
feis father had been a partner in Lazard Freres* Mr. Meyer admires
that firm as it was in his father's day but regards the second generation as
tending toward the mediocre.) He suggested Paul Warburg, and acting on that
suggestion Mr. Warburg was put onto the Board as vice governor. He was a man
of European upbringing, born in Germany, educated in Europe and much more at
home in European ways than in those of the United States. It will be remembered
that the First World War started in the summer of 1914 and the Federal Reserve
Regional banks were opened in November of that year. United States had not yet
taken sides in that war. Public opinion was widely divided and people of German
nationality were outspoken in their partisanship. Early in Mf* Warburg1 s tenure
as vice governor it began to be rtamored that he was a German sympathizer•
As public opinion moved more and more toward the allied side this roused questions, and in spite of his talents as a banker and his obvious usefulness to the
Board he did not last very long.
Warburg1 s theme,, and one which is echoed in the discussions of that
day, was that the United States needed an elastic currency* It was this ideal
toward which he worked. Mr. Meyer complain^ that the Board never went west of
the Mississippi to see what was needed in the United States. Besides elastic
-\yas
currency the member banks were making a great deal of money, but nobody/interested in agriculture (two continuing threads in this talk were Mr. Meyer1 s
interest in the West—he cdme from California—and his interest in agriculture)



had anything to say about what the Board was doing.

-3-

When Mr. Meyer came to the Board the members were split three to
three in the famous discount row.
He seems not to hare admired Mr. Strong whoa he called an ignoramus
in international banking. Other people confirm the possibility that the two
men were headstrong and energetic; that a conflict was inevitable. More about
this will probably develop•
The net result of the eligibility policy as described t$r Mr. Meyer
was that a vast amount of industry was not helped but injured. He had in
mind particularly animal husbandry which again has been one of his
interests. The banks could accept commercial paper but no matter how good the
paper for cattle loans it was not eligible for them. This in his opinion was
an injustice which played a part in the crisis of 1920 (see Mr. Meyer's testimony in the banking and currency committee on the agricultural hearings).
In 1921 Mr. Meyer (check this date and find out what he was with at
the time) took over three million dollars worth of slow loans of the country
banks. Papers were passed along with the endorsement of the wealthy

In 1922 Mr. Meyer headed the War Finance Administration (check this
title) and it is his firm belief that the War Finance Administration saved the
Federal Reserve Board. Mr. Meyer had at his command a billion and a half dollars
and the necessary machinery for closing what was then equivalent of the dollar
gap. He went all over the country educating people. David Boston was then
ex officio head of the War Finance Corporation as he was of the Federal Reserve
(Was he then secretary of the Treasury?). He went around cutting down, tightening up in the period when the only thing that would save the country was
expansion. His chief desire was to get the money out of places where he thought
it weak. He called loans too fast. It was a period when cotton dropped from 20



•ft

V

to 8 (presumably this is 20 cents) and cattle dropped from 120 to 20•

-4Mr* Meyer here interpellated a story that Dr. Adolph Miller came
East with Franklin Lane acting as his secretary. Miller had been an economics
professor at the University of California. Lane grew tired of him and passed
hi® on as an economist to head the Board. (This story would need to be ciarifled* It also might be worth finding out what were the relations between
Miller and Meyer in California)
Mr. Meyer qlaims to have written the law which created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation in his office at the Federal Reserve. He says
that Hoover never even saw it before he signed it. He claims also to have
written the $arm 4oan act.
In his period of service at the Board the latter was constantly
torn by strife. There was ill feeling between the Board and Mew York and
Chicago. Everyone k n w that the Sew York Bank had built up its power entirely
out of proportion with the intent of the Act. The Board should be in public
business what the president of a bank is in private banking but at that time
each governor had two districts under him which meant that at devisive inthe '
fLuence was written into the act. Each governor became/champion of his two
among
districts and competition was automatically created ke^^een the members of the
Boards
Mr. Uejer ended this, had the act corrected in this detail and worked
to make the Board a unit with the districts Signed to 4fee members of the
technical staff. He made it a rule that he would bring Board business before
the Board and not handle it within his private office.
The First National Bank in Hew York was then in trouble because it
had an affiliate which owned &nd handled stock. The situation seemed not to
have been as bad as that in %he~Bank-e# at least one other bank in which the
affiliate traded in the Bank stock and borrowed from the bank to keep up the



stock market price. levertheless there was difficulty. Mr. Meyer wrote the law

-5-

abolishing affiliates* (Did Mr* George F. Baker leave papers?)
The Board was at that time scattered all over Washington. Mr*
Shoreh^m
Meyer hired space in the gb&mm building to gather it together and bring
its various departments in touch with ®m&km9%fet!@& one another* He made it
a live organization aad gave it a sense of unity. Up to that time the
secretary of the Board had not amounted to much* Mr* Meyer brought in Mr*
Chester Morrill who had been with him in jfarm loan days and made him the
Board secretary*
Dr* Miller wanted Mr* Meyer to fire Mr. Goldenwiser who had come
on to the research staff* Mr* Meye^ who claims to have had the first
statistician in Wall Street and to have hired him as early as 1904 had a
very firm belief in the value of research and a high estimate of Mr*
Goldenwiser1 s ability. He did not fire M m .
In those days the major problem was one of division* Mr* Meyer
brought in Mr* Floyd Harrison who had been his assistant in war finance
days and made him his assistant on the Board* He describes Mr* Harrison
as a fine detail man* The job of Board head he regards as largely one of
human relations* He says that the Board and the System had been kept weak
by the member banks who found it conviM#nt to pass along their older directors when they ceased to be of value within the working banks and get
them appointed to the Board* Mr* Meyer who was himself a young man in those
days phoned Robert Hutchins in Chicago asking for five young able young men
who could be educated in the ways of the Board* Mr* Hutchins found him the
five including £d ^yerson who has since become very powerful in Chicago
banking* But then came the panic and Hoover would not make these changes*
Mr. Meyer1 s characterization of the then governors is not flattering*
The Chicago man (who was this) he describes as a mere bookkeeper* George Reynolds




knew nothing about monetary affairs. George James was all right but had no
financial ability.
Mr. Meyer organized the National Credit Corporation* Himself a
Republican he was popular with the Democrats because he did so much for
cotton, sugsr and rice. Times were so bad that,Mr• Leffingwell was having
trouble selling 90 day treasury notes bearing 6% interest. Mr. Meyer saw
that 60 million was loaned to small banks in the northwest and faas since been
hailed as the saviour of the northwest. They loaned 20 million to 700 banks
in lorth Dakota and out of it lost only 200,000. The System was to carry the
banks until they got a good crop and then #Mr* Meyer collected like hell11.
In Kansas City they took over slow loans to the extent of 44- 1/2
million. Mr. Meyer says that the'RFC saved the Federal Reserve. The northwest had only 4-0 per cent of a normal crop. There were runs in Sioux City.
(Mr. Clarence Wooley was an old family friend of Mr. Meyer. Mr.
Meyer calls Mr. Leffingwell no wizard on finance but a good lawyer.) In Mr.
Meyer1s view the Federal Reserve did not save the situation but it was saved
for them by other activities.
The Federal Reserve paid little attention to the non-member banks
although at that time non-members made up two-thirds of the banking community
and held one-third of the banking resources.

Mr. Meyer says that timing in

economics has been ignored whereas it is as important in economics as in war
in football.
He also s&ys that credit is like a drug, in good hands it is a healing
drug in bad hands it may be habit forming and devastating.