View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, No. 55

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI
INDUSTRIES
A STUDY OF HOURS, WAGES, AND
WORKING CONDITIONS




[Public—No.

259—66th Congress.]

[H. R. 13229.]
An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the
Women’s Bureau

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United, States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be
established in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as
the Women’s Bureau.
Sec. 2. That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director, a
woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and
consent of the Senate, who shall receive an annual compensation of
$5,000. It shall be the duty of said bureau to formulate standards
and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women,
improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and ad­
vance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said
bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said de­
partment upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in
industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time publish
the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such
extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe.
Sec. 3. That there shall be in said bureau an assistant director,
to be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an
annual compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as
shall be prescribed by the director and approved by the Secretary
of Labor.
Sec. 4. That thore is hereby authorized to be employed by said
bureau a chief clerk and such special agents, assistants, clerks, and
other employees at such rates of compensation and in such numbers
as Congress may from time to time provide by appropriations.
Sec. 5. That the Secretary of Labor is hereby directed to furnish
sufficient quarters, office furniture, and equipment for the work of
this bureau.
Sec. 6. That this act shall take effect and be in force from and
after its passage.
Approved, June 5, 1920.




U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
JAMES J. DAVIS, SECRETARY

WOMEN’S BUREAU
MARY ANDERSON, Director

<4

I

BULLETIN

OF

THE

WOMEN’S

BUREAU,

NO.

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI
INDUSTRIES
A STUDY OF HOURS, WAGES, AND
WORKING CONDITIONS




WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

1926

55




ADDITIONAL COPIES
OF THI3 PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
AT

1* CENTS PER COPY

CONTENTS
Page

Letter of transmittal
Vi
Part I. Introduction
Scope and method of investigation___________
Summary of facts
Conclusion
II. .Wages
Methods of payment
Week’s earnings
Earnings and time worked
Earnings of full-time workers
Earnings and rates_______
Weekly rates and scheduled weekly hours______________
Year’s earnings
10
Earnings of night workers
17
Earnings of negro workers
IS
III. Hours
21
Scheduled hours
21
Daily hours
2]
Weekly hours
23
Saturday hours._
Lunch periods
Hours of night workers
Actual hours worked
Time lost________________________________________ _____
Overtime
2S
IV. Working conditions
'
General plant conditions
Arrangement of rooms
Condition and type of floors
Stairways
Cleaning.-----------------Ventilation;
Heating—---------------------- -------------------------------------....
Lighting.--------------------Seating:
Sanitation_________________________________________________
Drinking facilities
40
Washing facilities
42
Toilet facilities
43
Service equipment
50
Lunchrooms
50
Cloakrooms
SiRestrooms
52
Health equipment
63




hi

1
1
2
5
7
7
g
JO

l;!
14
16

25
26
27
27
2S
29
29
29
30
31
32
33
35
35
38
40

IV

CONTENTS
Page

Part V. The workers__________________________________________________
Nativity
Age
Conjugal condition:________________________________________
Living condition________________________________________...
Extent of schooling...
Time in the trade
Appendixes:
General tables_______ ________ ____________...______________________
Schedule forms___________________________________________________

55
55
56
57
57
58
58
61
85

TEXT TABLES
Table 1. Number of men, women, and children employed in the estab­
lishments visited, by industry______ ________________________
2. Extent of timework and piecework, by industry_______________
3. Median earnings, by industry—1925__________________________
4. Median earnings', by industry—1924
5. Median earnings of women for whom time worked was reported
in hours, all industries—1925
6. Median earnings of women for whom time worked was reported
in days, all industries—1925 __
7. Median earnings of women who worked the firm’s scheduled
week compared with those of all workers, by industry—1925. _
8. Median rates and median earnings, by industry—1925_________
9. Median weekly rate by scheduled weekly hours, all industries—
1925.............
10. Scheduled daily hours, by industry____________________________
11. Scheduled weekly hours, by industry
24
12. Relation of Saturday hours to daily hours, by industry group__
13. Time lost and overtime, by industry
28
14. Lighting of workrooms, by industry group__________________ __
15. Type of drinking facilities provided,by industry..._____ _______
16. Inadequacy of washing facilities, byindustry_____________________
17. Adequacy of toilet equipment, by industry and race of women__
18. General conditions of toilet equipment, by industry and race of
women
46
19. Cleaning of toilet rooms, by industry and race of women_______
20. Nativity and race of the women employees wTho supplied per­
sonal information, by industry
55
21. Age of the women employees who supplied personal informa­
tion, by race
56
22. Conjugal condition of the women employees who supplied per­
sonal information, by race
57




2
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
22
25
37
40
42
44

48

CONTENTS

V

APPENDIX TABLES
Table I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.

Week’s earnings, by industry—1925
Week’s earnings, by industry—1924
Week’s earnings and time worked, all industries—1925________
Week’s earnings and time worked, all industries—1924_______
Week’s earnings of women who worked the firm’s scheduled
time, by industry—1925
VI. Weekly rate and actual week’s earnings, by industry—1925______
VII. Weekly rate and scheduled weekly hours, all industries—
1925 ■ 70
VIII. Year’s earnings of the women for whom 52-week pay-roll
records were secured, by industry and race__________________
IX. Week’s earnings of negro women, by industry—1924 and
1925
X. Week’s earnings of negro women by time worked, all in­
dustries—1925____________ ________________ ___ ______
_
XI. Week’s earnings of negro women by time worked, all in­
dustries—1924
XII. Weekly rate and actual week’s earnings of negro women,
by industry—1925;_________
_
XIII. Scheduled daily and Saturday hours, by industry group_______
XIV. Length of lunch period, by industry_______________ ____________
XV. Hours worked less than scheduled, by industry_____________
XVI. Hours worked more than scheduled, by industry_______________
XVII. Age of the women employees who supplied personal in­
formation, by industry and race _
gj
XVIII. Conjugal condition of the women employees who supplied
personal information, by industry and race.;_______ __________
XIX.Living condition of the women employees who supplied
personal information, by industry and race__________________
XX. Extent of schooling of the women employees who supplied
personal information, by industry and race___________
XXI.Time in the trade of women employees who supplied per­
sonal information, by industry and race_____________________




Page

62
63
64
66

68
69

71
72
74
70
77
78
79
so
go

82'
82
83
S4

*
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
United States Department of Labor,
Women’s Bureau,

Washington, March 16, 1926.
Sir: I am submitting herewith the report on women in Mississippi
industries, a study of hours, wages, and wmrking conditions, compiled
in a state-wide investigation conducted in 25 cities and towms of the
State. The generous cooperation given by the State factory inspec­
tor and by the employers and employees of the establishments
visited greatly facilitated the survey.
The report was written by Ruth I. Voris, assistant editor, and the
statistical material was tabulated under the supervision of Elizabeth
A. Hyde.
Mary Anderson, Director.
Hon. James J. Davis,

Secretary of Labor.
VI




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
This survey of the hours, wages, and working conditions of women
in Mississippi industries was made by the Women’s Bureau of the
United States Department of Labor upon the invitation of the gover­
nor of the State. The State factory inspector had also requested that
the work be undertaken, and during the survey officials of the State,
because of their acquaintance with local problems and conditions,
were of considerable service. The work was facilitated also by the
courtesy and generous cooperation of the employers and employees.
The field work was carried on during January and February of 1925.
Mississippi is not primarily an industrial State. According to
census figures the majority of the people in the State who were gainfully
employed in 1920 were engaged in agriculture, forestry, and animal
husbandry. Only a little over one-tenth of them were in manufac­
turing and mechanical industries, and the total number of women
reported in these industries was only OjOO?.1
SCOPE AND METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

Not all Mississippi establishments that employed women were
included in the survey, but a representative number of plants in the
various women-employing industries were chosen. Stores, laundries,
and manufacturing establishments were visited in 25 cities and towns
of the State:
Biloxi.
Columbus.
Corinth.
Crystal Springs.
Glancy.
Greenwood.
Gulfport.
Hattiesburg.
Hazlehurst.

Jackson.
Laurel.
McComb.
Meridian.
Moss Point.
Natchez.
New Albany.
Pascagoula.
Starkville.

Stonewall.
Tupelo.
Utica.
Vicksburg.
Water Valley.
Winona.
Yazoo City.

Definite information as to numbers of employees and their hours
and wages was scheduled by investigators in interviews with employ­
ers, managers, and foremen, and on examination of the pay rolls.
1 U. S. Bureau of Census. 14th Census, 1920: Population, v. 4, Occupations, page 75, table 15.




1

2

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

All information concerning wages was copied from pay rolls by the
agents of the bureau. Records were taken for a week in January,
1925, and, wherever possible, for a week in January, 1924, also. An
effort was made to secure information for a week in which no unusual
situation had affected the number of hours which the women had
worked. Facts as to age, nativity, experience in the trade, education,
and conjugal and living condition were obtained from question­
naires distributed in the plants and filled in by the employees. For
a limited number of women record was made of earnings for the calen­
dar year 1924. The number of establishments included in the survey,
the industries covered, and the number of employees are given in the
following table:
Table 1.—Number of men, women, and children employed in the establishments

visited, by industry

Industry

All industries-------------------Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer___
Textiles..... ......................... ........

Number
of estab­
lishments
visited

Total
number Num­
of em­ ber of
ployees men

Num­ Num­
ber of ber of
boys
girls
(under
Negro (under
16)
10)

Number of women
Total

White

81

6,5G2

3,621

2,853

2,314

539

39

10
4
3
11
9
10
14
14

1,492
132
323
2, 522
848
622
227
396

1,202
68
28
1,300
698
217
33
75

272
64
295
1,156
150
401
194
321

125
37
295
1,080
122
397
194
64

i 147
27

2 18

76
28
4

17

49

49

4

257

1 Exclusive of the women in one establishment who were paid off in groups, their names not appearing
on the pay roll.
2 Exclusive of the boys in one establishment who were paid off in a group, their names not appearing on
the pay roll.

The 2,853 women included in the survey were employed in fac­
tories, stores, and laundries, 81 plants in all. Over two-thirds of the
women were engaged in manufacturing, practically one-fifth were in
stores, and the rest worked in laundries. Not far from one-fifth of
the women workers surveyed were negro women.
SUMMARY OF FACTS

Extent of survey.
Number of cities and towns visited_________________
Number of establishments visited__________________
Number of women employed in these establishments
Workers.
1. Proportion of negroes___________________________
2. Distribution of women in industry group—
Manufacturing_____________________________
Mercantile_________________________________
Laundries__________________________________




25
81
2, 853
Per cent

18. 9
67. 9
20. 9
11.3

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTBIES

3

CC




O O

W orkers—Continued.
3. Conjugal condition of—1,028 white women—
per cent
Single------------------------ ........................ ............. .......................... 60.9
Married 22. 4
Widowed, separated, or divorced 16. 7
219 negro women—
Single------------------------------ -------------------------- ------------- 41.6
22. 4
Married___________ ___________________________________
Widowed, separated, or divorced________ ___________J__ 36. i
4. Age of—
1,022 white women—
Under 20 years of age 31. 4
20 and under 30 years of age__ _
38. 6
30 years of age and over 30. 0
238 negro women—
Under 20 years of age 25. 6
20 and under 30 years of age 38. 7
30 years of age and over 35. 7
5. Living condition of—
1,059 white women—
. Living independently H. 4
Living at home. g2 2
Living with relatives.._____________
6. 4
233 negro women—
Living independently_______________________ ___
15
Living at home_____________________________________
79
Living with relatives..
5
6. Nativity was reported for 1,282 women, only 4 of whom were foreign born.
Hours.
Hour data for 79 factories, stores, and laundries may be summarized as follows:
1. Daily hours.
A schedule of 8 hours or less for 3.1 per cent of the women.
A schedule of over 10 hours for 35.8 per cent of the women.
2. Weekly hours.
A schedule of less than 54 hours for only 14.9 per cent of the women.
A schedule of 60 hours or more for 26.4 per cent of the women.
Hours less than scheduled worked by 49.4 per cent of the women for
whom time worked was reported.
Hours more than scheduled worked by 6 per cent of the women for
whom time worked was reported.
3. Saturday hours.
No Saturday work or hours shorter than the daily schedule for 90.2
per cent of the women in factories.
No Saturday work or hours shorter than the daily schedule for 51,3
per cent of the women in laundries.
Saturday hours longer than the daily schedule for 89.9 per cent of
the women in stores.
4. Hours of 182 night workers.
A shift of more than 10 hours for all night workers.
A weekly schedule of more than 55 but less than 60 hours for 76.9
per cent of the women.

4

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Wages.
M age data for 81 factories, stores, and laundries may be summarized as follows:
1. Week’s earnings.
Median week’s earnings for all industries—
January, 1924—
White women $g. 75
Negro women______________________
5, 90
January, 1925—
White women____________________________________
8. 60
Negro women
5. 75
Median week’s earnings offull-time white workers_________
9. 80
2. Year’s earnings (January, 1924, to January, 1925).
Median year’s earnings for all industries.
White women 464. 00
Negro women---------------- ------------------- ----------------- 300. 00
3. Earnings of night workers.
Median week’s earnings for January, 1924, $8.40; for January,
1925, $8.85.
Median year’s earnings, $434.

Working conditions.
For the 81 factories, stores, and laundries visited:
1. General workroom conditions were as follows—
(o) 30 establishments with aisles either narrow or obstructed.
(b) 16 establishments with cement floors in part or all of plant, only
4 with platforms provided.
(c) Of 59 establishments with stairways, only 11 satisfactory in all
respects.
(d) 31 establishments with insufficient natural light for some or all
of the workers and 13 establishments with glare from natural
light.
(e) 12 establishments with insufficient artificial light provided and
32 with glare from artificial lights.
(/) 28 establishments in which no seats were provided for women
w'ho stood at their work; 16 establishments in which seats
without backs were furnished for women who sat at their
work all the time.
2. The need for improved sanitation is shown by the following—
(а) 34 establishments with no drinking cups, 19 establishments with
common cups, and 14 establishments with insanitary bubblers.
(б) 11 establishments with no washing facilities; 39 establishments
with no towels, although equipped with washing facilities;
18 establishments with common towels.
(c) 24 establishments with an inadequate number of toilet facilities
for white women, 7 establishments reporting no toilet facilities
for negro women.
3. The record of service facilities disclosed—
(а) No lunchroom in 69 establishments.
(б) No cloakroom in 45 establishments.
(c) No restroom in 67 establishments.




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

5

CONCLUSION

On the whole, the investigation indicates that much remains to be
done to improve the condition of the women workers in Mississippi.
There is no reason to suppose that the working conditions in the
establishments visited were worse than the average for all the plants
in the State that employed women, for no effort was made to search
out unsatisfactory conditions, and those establishments were selected,
in general, in which women workers assumed most importance.
Over one-third of the women employed in the plants surveyed were
expected to put in a regular working day longer than 10 hours, though
there is a law in the State limiting the working day of women in
practically all occupations except domestic service to 10 hours.
For over a fourth of the women 60 hours or more represented the
normal weekly schedule. Only in one of the 13 States from which
the Women’s Bureau collected hour data for the fall of 1922 and in
none of the other States surveyed since that date was so large a
proportion of the women reported on a schedule of 60 hours or more.
The wage standards also were lower than those of the other States
in which the Women’s Bureau has conducted similar surveys, when
the median earnings are taken as the basis of comparison. The
median earnings of the white women were only $8.60 for the pay-roll
week taken in 1925, and only a little higher for the week in January,
1924. In other words, one-half of the white women employed in the
establishments visited actually earned less than $8.60 during the week,
while only one-half earned more than that amount. The earnings
of the negro women fell even farther below what might be considered
a reasonably adequate wage, for their median earnings in the two
periods were $5.75 and $5.90.
In respect to plant conditions, also, there was much to be desired.
Too many plants were reported with no washing facilities or with
equipment that was inadequate, with no towels or common towels.
In not far from one-fourth of the establishments common drinking
cups were found, while in others no cups were provided. Toiletroom conditions were frequently most unsatisfactory, and in a
number of cases the equipment was inadequate.




r




PART II
WAGES
In studying hours there are certain definite standards, the result
of legislation and of custom, which serve as a basis for comparison.
The study of wages, however, is much more involved, as there is no
definite standard for wages, even in the States in which there is mini­
mum-wage legislation, and the current practices vary from industry
to industry, and from one locality to another. Wages fluctuate in
any one community with such factors as changes in the cost of living,
the length of experience of the wage earners, and the difference in
their bargaining power. A report of the type herewith presented can
consider but a few of the conditions which may affect wages. The
data given in the following pages are based on a study of actual
wage records of women employed in Mississippi industries. Corre­
lations have been made of earnings and some of the various factors
which might be expected to affect them, in order to present a more
complete picture of the situation of the women workers in the State.
Two main types of information on earnings were obtained—a
record of week’s earnings for all the women employed in the plants
visited, for two different weeks approximately a year apart, and a
record of year’s earnings for a limited number of women who had
been with the firm during the 52 weeks previous to the late pay-roll
date. Because of the marked difference in the earnings of white
and of negro women the figures for these two groups have been kept
separate throughout the present study, and the earnings of the
negro women are discussed in a separate section.
METHODS OF PAYMENT

Wages are paid according to two general methods, the one basing
earnings on the time worked and the other on the amount of work
done. In a few cases an employee may be working under a combi­
nation of the two systems. Table 2 presents the figures on the meth­
ods of payment followed in the industries surveyed in Mississippi.




7

8

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
Table 2.—Extent of timework and 'piecework, by industry
Number and percent of women in each specified industry
who were on—
Industry

of
women
reported

Timework

Both timework and
piecework

Piecework

Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent
All industries
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer.
Candy_____________
Clothing, men’s____
Textiles______ _______
Miscellaneous_________
General mercantile..................
6-and-10-cent stores..... ..........
Laundries_______

2,016

993

49.3

998

49.5

25

1.2

121
23
294
878
42
397
194
64

6
23
18
259
32
397
194

4.8
100.0
6.1
29.5
76. 2
100.0
100.0
100.0

111

89.5

7

5.6

275
602
10

03.5
68.6
23. 8

l
17

.3
1.9

i
‘ '1................

Of the 2,016 women for whom method of payment was reported,
practically half were on a piece-rate and half on a time-rate basis,
for only a negligible proportion were working- under a combination
of the two systems. However, within the various industries there
was no such even division of workers so far as method of payment
was concerned. All of the women reported in stores and all in laun­
dries were timeworkers; the women in these groups combined com­
prised practically one-third of the number for whom report was made.
Of the women in the candy industry for whom a definite report on
method of payment was obtained, all were on a time basis, but there
was one plant—not included in the table—where it was difficult to
determine whether the output or the number of hours was taken as
the standard. The majority of the women employed in the manufac­
ture of boxes, clothing, and textiles were pieceworkers, while over
three-fourths of those in the miscellaneous manufacturing group
were paid on the basis of time worked.
WEEK’S EARNINGS

The data on week’s earnings were copied from the pay rolls of the
establishments visited. Figures on the actual earnings of each woman
employed were taken off for a week in January, 1925, and for a cor­
responding week in 1924. So far as possible the records in each plant
were taken for the first, pay-roll week in January.1 There is some
variation from that date, however, either because the week specified
was not a normal one in the plant or because the pay roll for that
week was not available.
Records of week’s earnings for the late pay-roll period were ob­
tained for 2,136 white women, and the figures on the distribution of
1 Since it was the purpose of the survey to secure data for a normal week without a shutdown or a holi­
day, in no case did the week selected cover the 1st of January, if that day were a holiday.




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTBIES

9

their earnings are given in Appendix Table I, a summary of which
appears in Table 3.
The figures on earnings relate to all the women who appeared on
the pay rolls during the weeks recorded, without regard to the length
of time which they had worked. As a result their earnings ranged
all the way from less than $ 1 to over $40. However, the earnings of
almost three-fourths of the women included fell between $5 and $15,
Only one-eighth of all the women had earned as much as $15 during
the week surveyed, and for only 5 per cent were earnings of $20 or
more reported.
Table 3.—Median earnings, by industry—1925

Median
Number week’s
of
earnings,
women pay roll
reported of Janu­
ary, 1925

Industry

All industries...........................
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer.
Candy. ..........................
Clothing, men’s...................
Textiles___ ________
Miscellaneous. _ _
General mercantile.....................
5-and-10-cent stores..........
Laundries______

______

2,136

$8.60

125
37
295
902
122
397
194
64

9.05
9.30
6.95
7.85
8.75
14.90
8.40
9.25

________________________ ___________ _

The median earnings for this group 6f 2,136 women were only
$8.60; that is, one-half earned less and one-half more than that
amount. Judged on the basis of a comparison of median earnings,
the general mercantile establishments had higher wage standards
than had any other class of establishments surveyed. Not only were
the median earnings for this group of women $14.90 but nine-tenths
of all the women in the survey who were reported as having earned
$20 or more dm-ing the week were employed in this ndustry. No
other industry had a median as high as $10.
The lowest paid industry, the median again being used as the
basis of comparison, was the manufacture of men’s clothing. There
were almost 300 women reported in this group, and the fact of their
low median is the more noteworthy because in none of the other
States surveyed by the bureau has any branch of the clothing industry
stood at the bottom of the list in respect to median earnings. Ordi­
narily the median for women in this industry has been somewhat
above that found for the State as a whole. The textile mills, which
employed over two-fifths of the women reported, had next to the
lowest median, with one-half their women workers earning less than
$7.85 and one-half more. Only 3.9 per cent of the women textile
workers received as much as $15.




10

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

For the 1924 pay-roll period records were obtained for a somewhat
smaller number of women, but women were reported from the same
industries throughout. Table 4, which is a summary of Table II
in the appendix, gives the median earnings for the various industries.
There is very little difference in the wage levels of the late and early
pay-roll periods. The median for the 1,772 women reported in 1924
was $8.75. On this date, as well as on the later one, the highest
median earnings were those of the general mercantile workers. In
1924, however, the lowest median was found in the candy industry,
and the median earnings in both textiles and 5-and-10-cent stores
were lower than the median earnings of the women working in the
men’s clothing industry, although the median of that industry even
for the earlier date was only $7.90.
Table 4.—Median earnings, by industry—1924

Industry

Manufacturing:

Median
Number week’s
of
earnings,
women pay roll
reported of Janu­
ary, 1924
1,772

$8.75

93
25
229
877
24
352
131
41

10.05
7. 25
7.90
7.80
9.75
14.55
7.85
8.40

Only to a limited extent does the cheaper rent afforded by mill
villages tend to offset the low earnings found in Mississippi. The
textile industry was the only one iu which company houses were
common, although three box and veneer plants made some provision
for houses. On neither pay-roll date, however, did the textile
workers have the lowest median earnings, although in each case this
median was next to the lowest. The general median for the State
was not reduced materially by the standard of the textile industry,
for earnings were low for the women in all of the industries surveyed
except for those in the general mercantile establishments.
Earnings and time worked.
Up to this point the discussion on earnings has not taken into
consideration the length of time worked during the week by the
women for whom wage data were recorded. Figures which give only
the actual sums earned without regard to the length of time which
it took the women workers to earn those amounts tell only part of
the story. Obviously information on hours worked is not available
for all of the women for whom earnings were reported. Often no



11

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

record is kept of the number of hours, or. even days, which piece­
workers put in, since such a record is not necessary in making up the
pay roll. Even for timeworkers records are not always complete,
for they frequently show only the number of days or half days on
which a woman worked, rather than the number of hours of actual
employment, and she may or may not have remained at work the
full half day.
A definite record of hours worked was found for only 557 women,
and detailed distribution of their earnings may be found in Appendix
Tabic IIIA. A summary of the facts relating to earnings and hours
worked is given in Table 5.
Table 5.—Median earnings of women for whom time worked was reported in

hours, all industries—1925

Hours worked during the week

Number of
women re­
ported

Total .......................................................... .........
Under 30..-................................................... .
30 and under 36.......................... ............................
36 and under 42________ ____________
42 and under 48 ..........................................
48 and under 54 _........................ ................
54 and under 60 ................ ...............
60............ ........ ......................................... ...........
Over 60..................... ......................................

Median
week’s
earnings
$7.80
4. 95

8.45
15

10. 65

...

A glance at the preceding table indicates that for the women for
whom complete information was available, earnings did increase in
general with hours worked, although not in regular steps. The
highest earnings were those of the women who had worked 60 hours
during the week, with a median of $11.80. However, the women
who had worked 54 but less than 60 hours had lower median earnings
than had the women who had worked 48 but less than 54 hours, and
the median for those who had worked over 60 hours was less than the
median for the women, who had put in just 60 hours during the week
reported. Not all the women who had worked long hours had earned
the higher wages. There were five women reported who had worked
over 60 hours during the week, and, in spite of their long week, had
received less than $10 in pay. The largest group of women was
made up of those who had worked 54 but less than 60 hours, and there
were women even in this group who had earned less than $4 during
the week reported.
Earnings showed more of a tendency to increase with increase in
the number of hours of employment in Mississippi than in the other
States where the Women’s Bureau has considered earnings in that
relation. In fact, in several States the highest median earnings were
those of the women who had worked only 44 or 48 hours. In those
States, however, there were enough women employed on a regular
2S72°—26f----- 2



12

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

weekly schedule of such length that many of the women actually
working such a week had put in their full scheduled time. In Missis­
sippi, however, the number of women who had a weekly schedule of
44 or 48 hours was insignificant. Thus most of the women reported
as working such hours during the week had worked less than their
schedule and would certainly have earned less than the sums received
by most of the women who put in a full week. Differences in the
amounts of time lost affected the findings more than did differences in
weekly schedules.
Although the material was tabulated separately for each industry
in which there were plants reporting wages and hours worked for
their women employees, but little comparison can be made within
industry groups because of the small number of women involved.
Only 7 women were reported in the manufacture of wooden boxes,
and 14 in laundries. The majority of the women for whom complete
information was returned were employed in the textile mills, and this
industry shows very much the same tendency for earnings to increase
with increase in hours of employment as do all the industries taken
together. Almost 100 women were reported in men’s clothing, but
the majority of these women were in one hour group, so that no com­
parison of earnings on the basis of hours worked could be made.
Similar material was obtained for the week in 1924 (Table IVA in
the appendix), but there is no marked contrast between the figures
obtained then and those for the later date. Median earnings pro­
gressed regularly with the increase in hours worked during the week.
In the establishments visited in Mississippi record of time worked
was more often kept in days and half days than in hours. On the
1925 pay rolls there were 1,155 women with earnings reported for
whom time worked was given in terms of the number of days on
which they had been present. The detailed figures on the distribu­
tion of the earnings of these women are printed in Appendix Table
IIIB, while the same facts are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6.—Median earnings of women for whom time worked was reported in days,

all industries—1925
Number of days on which work was done

Number of
women re­
ported

Total........... ........... ........... ...............................................................................

1,155

1............................................... .....................................................................................
i y2................................................ ........................ .............. ............ ................. .........
2................ ........................................................................................................ ..........
2A________________ _______________________ __________
3......... ........................................................................................................ ............ ......
3 y>.............................
4....... ......................... ..................... ................................. .............................................
4 y2-........................................... ........... ........................................................................
5......................................................................................................................................
5M-—............................. ................................... .........................—............................
6.............. ............ .......................... .............. ................ ............. .................................
7.......................... ......

18
12
19
11
25
13
29
29
141
106
747
5

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.




Median
week’s
earnings
$8.90
m
(t)
(l)

L 00
2.80
3. 95
a 10
5. 75
7. 65
8. 95
9.70

13

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTHIES

As is the case in most correlations of earnings and days worked,
median earnings advanced with an increase in the number of days
worked. Any time under 5)4 days is less than a full scheduled week,
and, up to that point at least, earnings would almost certainly increase
with some degree of regularity. In this case the earnings of those
who worked 6 days were higher than those of the women who worked
days.
Similar figures were obtained for 885 women on the earlier pay­
roll date-, and there was no striking difference in the two sets of
material. (Table IVB in the appendix.)
Earnings of full-time workers.
Even in Mississippi the comparison of earnings with time worked
was affected to some extent by the fact that of those who had worked
for the same number of hours, some had put in a full week while
others had worked less than the scheduled week of the plant. As the
amount earned is apt to bear more relation to the proportion of the
full week for which the worker was present than to the actual number
of hours in attendance, it has seemed worth while to tabulate the
records of those who had worked the scheduled time of the firm.
The number of full-time workers and their median earnings are given
in Table 7. The detailed frequency distribution of the earnings of
these women is given according to industry in Table V in the
appendix.
Table 7.—Median earnings of women who worked the firm’s scheduled week com­

pared with those of all workers, by industry—1925
Women who worked
the firm’s scheduled
week

Industry

Median earnings of—

The per
cent that
full-time
workers con­ Full-time
Number
stitute of
women for workers
whom time
record was
available

All
workers

Per cent
by which
median
earnings of
full-time
workers
exceeded
those of all
workers

All industries......................
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer................
Candy.......... ............
Clothing, men’s.................... .

980

57.2

$9.80

$8.60

41
J8
51

40.6
48.6
52.0

10.50
10.00
10.10

9.05
9.30
6.95

16.0

Miscellaneous.....................
General mercantile.................. .
5-and-l 0-cent stores.......
Laundries________

68
263

55. 7
84.3
85.6
74.1

9.25
15. 45
8. 55
10.25

8. 75
14.90
8.40

5.7
1.8

As already stated, some of the time records of the women em­
ployees were given in terms of hours worked, while others were ex­
pressed only in terms of the number of days or half days on which the
women had been present. A woman who had been present on six
days in an establishment which had a six-day schedule was counted



14

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

as having worked a full week. Actually she might have left early
on one day, and thus the record would have been inexact. Because
it was felt that this difference in method of handling might have some
effect on the final figures, the material was tabulated separately for
the women reported on the two different bases. As there was no
appreciable difference, however, either in medians or in the fre­
quency distribution, the figures for the two groups of workers have
been combined in the printed table.
Time records were secured in some form for 1,712 women. Of
this number, 980, or 57.2 per cent, had worked the normal week of
the firm in which they were employed. Only 33 women had worked
longer than their scheduled week.
In all cases the median for the full-time workers is compared with
the,median for all of the women for whom wage records were ob­
tained rather than with that of the smaller number for whom a report
of time worked was given in addition. When all of the industries
surveyed are grouped as one unit, the median earnings for the full­
time workers exceed the median for all workers by 14 per cent.
The industry which shows the greatest difference between the
medians for the two-groups of women is the manufacture of men’s
clothing. This situation is not due to the possible clement of more
time lost in the industry as a whole, for in three other industries a
smaller proportion of the women for whom time records were avail­
able had worked the full week of the establishment in which they
were employed. However, attendance records were available for a
much smaller proportion of the total number of women reported in
this industry than in any other industry, and it appears that the
firms which kept no time records had the lower wage standards.
Both in the textile mills and in the 5-and-10-cent stores the median
earnings of even the full-time workers were less than $9.
Earnings and rates.
In order to give a more complete picture of the wage situation
the weekly rate—the amount which the worker could look forward
to receiving if she put in a full week—also has been considered. Un­
fortunately data on rates could not be secured for all of the women
for whom earnings were reported. Obviously, no weekly rates were
obtainable for women who are paid according to output. By con­
verting wage rates quoted on the basis of hours, days, or months
into terms of the weekly period, figures on rates of pay were made
available for the majority of the timeworkers.
A comparison of rates and earnings therefore was possible for only
973 women. As such data were reported for only 6 women in the
manufacture of wooden boxes and veneer, that industry has been
omitted in Table 8, in which is presented a comparison of median




15

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

rates and median earnings. The detailed figures on which the me­
dians were based may be found in Table VI in the appendix.
Table 8.—■Median rates and median earnings, by industry—1925

Industry

Number
of women
reported

Median
weekly
rate

Median
week’s
earnings

Per cent by
which actual
earnings fell
below (—)
or exceeded
(+) weekly
rate

i 973

$9.85

$9.35

-5.1

23
18
256
31
388
193
58

8.30
7. 65
8. 50
10.15
13. 55
8. 20
10.10

8.15
7.30
10. 85
14. 70
8. 40
10.00

—9. 6
+6.5
— 14.1
+6.9
+8.6
+2.4
-1.0

Manufacturing:
Textiles__________________ ______

1 The manufacture of wooden boxes and veneer reported rates for too small a number of women to make
medians significant and does not appear separately, but the women in that industry are included in “ all
industries.”

The median rate for the 973 women for whom this nformation
was.given was $9.85, and the median earnings for the same group of
women were $9:35. It is interesting to note how little difference
there was between the median rate for these women and the median
earnings of (he full-time workers ($9.80), although the groups of
women represented are not identical. The women for whom rates
could be given were all timeworkers, while both timeworkers and
pieceworkers make up the total of those who worked the firm’s sched­
uled week.
The women for whom wage rates were available show higher
median earnings than do the more inclusive group of all of those for
whom earnings were reported. To some extent this may be due to
the fact that the general mercantile workers form a larger pro­
portion of the women with rates than they do of the total number
with earnings reported; thus the smaller group is weighted by the
most highly paid group of women surveyed in the State. In four in­
dustries the median earnings exceeded the median rates of the same
women, while in three they fell short of the rates. The greatest
difference between earnings and rates was found in the textile in­
dustry where the median earnings fell short of the median rate by
14.1 per cent. Even the rates, however, were low, for one-half of the
textile workers reported had weekly rates falling below $8.50, while
the other half had rates above that amount. The lowest median
rate was found in the men’s clothing industry, but there were only
18 women in the industry for whom this material was reported.
Almost 200 women were reported in the 5-and-10-cent stores, and
their median rate was only $8.20.




16

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Weekly rates and scheduled weekly hours.
In Appendix Table VII figures have been compiled to discover
whether in the case of the women surveyed there was any positive
relation between the weekly rate of wages and the number of sched­
uled hours in the week. A summary of the material is presented in
Table 9.
Table 9.—Median weekly rate by scheduled weekly hours, all industries—1925

Scheduled weekly hours

Number
of women
reported

Median
weekly
rate
$0.85

964

Total.............

2

Under 44___ ______
44________________
Over 44 and under 48.
48.................. .............
50________________
Over 50 and under 52
52________________
Over 52 and under 54.
54________________
Over 54 and under 55.
55........................ ........
Over 55 and under GO.
60. —..........................

7
27
4
15
19
8

(*>

$8. 50

0)

7. 85
7.75

86

3

C1)12.00

31
429
147
186

15.50
9.95
9. 05
8.95

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.

For the women for whom weekly rates were reported in Mississippi
a long week did not necessarily mean a high weekly wage. The
highest median rate ($15.50) was that of the women whose regular
week was over 54 but under 55 hours, while the next highest median
($12) was that of the women with a 54-hour week. The median
rate for the small group of women who had a regular week of between
44 and 48 hours was only 45 cents lower than that of the women with a
00-hour week, in spite of the fact that the latter group were expected
to put in from 12 to 16 hours more of work time.
The figures were too scattered to make comparison within industry
groups of much value.
YEAR’S EARNINGS

The wage figures quoted in the foregoing discussion have repre­
sented the earnings for only two sample weeks. The weeks for which
records were taken were ones in which there had not been an excessive
amount either of overtime or lost time, with no holidays and no
shutdowns. Such figures furnish a satisfactory cross-section picture
of the wage condition of the women included, but seldom is a year
made up of 52 normal weeks. Holidays, slack work, illness—all
these may reduce the amount in the pay envelope for some weeks,
but the worker has expenses throughout the year whether she work
all that time or not. In addition to the week’s records, therefore, an
attempt was made to obtain for about 20 per cent of the women on




WOMEN IK MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

17

each pay roll, records of earnings for the year preceding the later
pay-roll date, only those women whose names appeared on the pay
roll for at least 44 weeks having been included.
The detailed figures on year’s earnings by industry are presented
in Table VIII in the appendix. Data were obtained for only 330
white women in all. None of these women had worked less than 44
weeks and, of the 233 for whom reports on the number of weeks
worked as well as on the year’s earnings w ere available, over seventenths had worked 50 weeks or more, although these weeks may or
may not have been full ones. The figures on year’s earnings con­
tained in this report, therefore, refer to the steady workers. The
median year’s earnings for the group as a whole were only $464.
Actual earnings ranged from less than $200 to between $1,800 and
$2,000, but only 5 women had received less than $200 and only 19
more than $1,000.
In only five industries were reports obtained for enough women to
make possible the computation of a median, but those five are
listed below in descending order according to the median year’s
earnings:
General mercantile $845
Laundries 463
Men’s clothing 438
5-and-10-cent stores_________ __________________________________________
Textiles------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

431
390

The general mercantile, with a median of $845 far surpasses the
other four industries listed, no one of which shows a median of year’s
earnings of as much as $500.
There were only three white women in the manufacture of boxes
and veneer for whom year’s records could be obtained and who had
worked as many as 44 weeks. For 17 others the pay record was
obtained for a year, but they were employed in establishments which
had been closed from 11 to 18 weeks during the year. These estab­
lishments closed regularly for long seasons each year, and the prob­
lem was particularly serious because there was no other work avail­
able for their employees during the time that the plants were closed.
EARNINGS OP NIGHT WORKERS

There were 178 white women working on night shifts in the tex­
tile mills visited in Mississippi in 1925, the textile industry being the
only one of those surveyed in which white women were reported as
working at night. In 1924 the same establishments reported 218
women on their pay rolls as night workers. The median earnings
for the earlier date were $8.40 and for the later were $8.85, in both
cases higher than the median for the women employed during the
day in the same establishments.




18

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

A record of hours worked during the week was obtained for 105
of these night workers in 1925, but the figures were too scattered to
make possible any comparison of medians for the hour groups. How­
ever, the range in earnings for some of the highest hour groups is
interesting. For example, there were three women who had put in
60 hours of night work in one week and yet had earned only between
$5 and $6.
Year’s earnings were recorded for only 21 white women working
at night, and the median for these women was $434. All of these
women had lost some time during the year through the closing of the
establishment or the department.
EARNINGS OF NEGRO WORKERS

The negro women formed a considerable proportion of the women
employed in the Mississippi establishments included in the survey.
For the late pay roll, records of earnings were obtained for 535 negro
women employed in all of the industries in which white women were
reported except 5-and-10-cent stores and the manufacture of men’s
clothing. The data on their earnings are presented in Table IX in
the appendix.
The median week’s earnings for the negro women as a whole were
only $5.75. There was less difference between the various industries,
so far as earnings were concerned, for the negro than for the white
women. The highest median ($7.45) was that of the women in the
miscellaneous manufacturing group. The medians for each of the
other four groups fell between $5 and $6.
Because it was felt that difference in occupation might have some
effect on earnings, the material was tabulated separately for the negro
women employed as sweepers and cleaners and for those in all other
occupations. There were 32 women reported as sweepers and clean­
ers, the majority of whom were in textile plants. The median for
this small group was $4.90, while the median for the other textile
workers was $5.40. There were so few women employed as sweepers
and cleaners, however, that separate tables for the two groups of
workers have not been printed. Therefore the figures for the sweepers
and cleaners are included with those for other workers in all further
discussion of the wages of negro women.
The median for the 420 negro women reported in 1924 was $5.90, a
slightly higher sum than that for 1925, as at the later date textiles
had the lowest median and miscellaneous manufacturing the highest.
The figures on earnings and time worked for the two pay-roll dates
are given in Table X and XI in the appendix. Although the earnings
were lower than those of the white women, the same general tendency
was found and the same factors entered in. In the 1924 pay-roll




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTKIES

19

figures there was more regular progression of earnings with hours
worked than in the 1925 figures, the median for the women who had
worked more than 60 hours at the later period falling below that of
the women who had worked an even 60 hours. The median earnings
of the 54-to-60-hour group were also lower than the median for the
women who had worked 48 but less than 54 hours.
The median earnings ($5.60) of the negro women workers fell short
of their median rate ($6) by only 6.6 per cent. (Table XII in the
appendix.) There were 314 women for whom information on rates
and earnings were available, and their weekly rates of pay ranged
from less than $5 to between $14 and $15. In this group of women
were included all women whatever their occupation, but among the
number were 29 sweepers and cleaners, and their median rate ($5.40)
was somewhat lower than that for all the negro women. The rates—
the maximum amounts which the workers could expect for their
week’s work—of as many as four-fifths of all the negro women
reported, however, were less than $7 a week.
Records of year’s earnings were obtained for only 58 negro women.
According to the unpublished figures, practically the same proportion
of the negro as of the white women had worked 50 weeks or more dur­
ing the year. Their median earnings for the year, however, were only
$300, some earning less than $200 and only one earning more than
$500. (Table VIII.)







PART III
HOURS

In a consideration of hours of work attention should be given to
three phases of the problem: The standard established by the law
of the State, the scheduled hours of the plants studied, and the
number of hours actually worked by the employees of these plants
during a definite period of time.
So far as the legal hours for women workers are concerned Missis­
sippi has not set a high standard. Although practically all occupa­
tions in which women are engaged except domestic service are
covered by the law, the 10-hour day is permitted with a weekly
limit of 60 hours. No longer is a work day of that length looked
upon as a step forward.
SCHEDULED HOURS

Data in regard to the number of working hours for women, obtained
from managers of the various establishments included in this study
form the basis for the tables on scheduled hours. The hours tabu­
lated are those for which the women were employed under normal
working conditions, irrespective of variations due to overtime, under­
time, and slack periods. Hours actually worked obviously do not
always tally with scheduled hours.
Daily hours.
The hours scheduled for the normal working-day, Saturday or
other shortened days not being included under this term, are shown
in Table 10.




21

1

Table 10.—Scheduled daily hours, by industry

bO

Number of establishments and number of women whose scheduled daily hours were—
is umoer
reported

7

Over 8 and
under 9

8

Industry

Over 9 and
under 10

9

Over 10 and
under 11

10

11

All industries ...........
Per cent distribution.........

79
100.0

2,613
100.0

1
1.3

14
0.5

3
3.8

67
2.6

10
4

270
64
295
976

1

14

1
1

27
34

1

6

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and

11
9
14
12

401
194
263

i

3
3.8

52
2.0

2

16

1

36

• 39
49.4

777
29.7

3
3.8

1
1

14
13

3
16
14
4

93
401
194
i 62

1

203
7.8

18
22.8

564
21.6

10
12.7

880
33.7

2
2.5

56
2.1

1

15

209
10
80
92
8

26

1

6

181

6
1
1
2
1

1

1

8
1

834
20

1

50

7

2 165

1 Includes 9 women in one establishment having a 5-hour day on Monday.
2 Includes 11 women in one establishment having a 5-hour day on Monday, 18 in one establishment having a 7-hour day on Friday, and 22 in one establishment having an
8-hour day on Friday.




¥

4

*

<

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

EstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstablisb- W omen lish- W omen lish- Women lish- Women lish- Women lish- ■Women lish- Women lish- Women lish- Women
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

23

There were 79 establishments, employing 2,613 women, for whom
information on scheduled daily hours was available. The length of
the working-day in these establishments ranged from 7 to 11 hours,
but the largest single group of women consisted of those who regularly
worked more than 10 but less than 11 hours a day. One-third of
the total number of women reported had a day of such length. There
were more establishments on a 9-hour schedule than on any other,
although less than three-tenths of the women included in the survey
were employed in these establishments. Only 133 women of the
2,613 for whom information on daily hours was available had a
working-day of less than 9 hours, while 56 were expected to work
regularly 11 hours a day.
The only establishments in w'hieh a day of 8 hours or less was re­
ported were the candy factories, the clothing factories, and some of
the plants in the miscellaneous group. Even in the men’s clothing
industry, which ordinarily has short hours, there was only one plant
with an 8-hour day while the other factories visited had daily sched­
ules of over 9 but less than 10 hours, and of 10 hours. Of the candy
establishments, two had a regular day of 8 hours or less, one a day
of 9, and the other of 10 hours.
All of the stores visited, both general mercantile establishments
and 5-and-10-cent stores, had a 9-hour day.
The 10-hour day was the standard for the majority of the box and
veneer plants, and over three-fourths of the women reported in the
industry had a regular day of that length, although one establish­
ment had a daily schedule as short as 9 hours, and another employed
its women operatives 11 hours a day.
In laundries, also, the 10-hour day was the practice of the majority
of the firms reporting scheduled hours, and these firms employed
62.7 per cent of the women included in the industry. All the other
laundries, however, had a day shorter than 10 hours, and three of
the 10-hour plants regularly worked less than 10 hours on Monday or
Friday. In two of the laundries visited the hours of work were too
irregular to tabulate.
The industry with the worst record for long hours was the manu­
facture of textiles, and more women were reported in this than in any
other industry surveyed. Of the 11 plants visited, none had a day
of less than 10 hours and only 2 employed their women operatives for
a day as short as that. A day of over 10 but under 11 hours was the
regular schedule of 85.5 per cent of the women in the industry, and
5.1 per cent were expected to work 11 hours daily.
Weekly hours.
The report on daily hour schedules tells only part of the story.
The grind of long hours day after day has its cumulative effect in
fatigue and decreased energy. Consequently, in conjunction with a
consideration of daily hours an analysis of weekly schedules is sig­
nificant. The accompanying table shows the number of women and
of establishments in each industry with the specified weekly hours.



Table 11.—Scheduled weekly hours, by industry
Number of establishments and number of women whose scheduled weekly hours were—
Under
44

Over 44
and
under 48

44

Over 48
and
under 50

48

Over 50
and
under 52

50

Over 52
and
under 54

52

. Over 54
and
under 55

M

Over 55
and
under 60

55

Over 60

60

W

G

a
©
s
©
£

2<3
CO

d
5
o
6

2

b

d
©
S
£o

2<3

CO
b

G
©
a
O
£

%
a
S
m
3
CO

so
d
©d
d
©g
o

co
Tr
b

12
a
©S
G

G
©
a
c
>

.CO

23

b

©
a
o

3
©
a

G

G
a
o
£

to

23

B

fl
a
o
£

©
o
£

12
G
©
1

g
£
©

co

12
G
©
a

12
G
©
a

G

a
o

G

G

cs
to
B

?
a
£©

23

So
B

©
I

Establishments

2

d
©fi
g

j

B

d
5
6
s

©B
g
to

Establishments

co

©
B

G

G

2Cv

12d

12d

|

co
d
©B

All industries___ ‘79 2. 613
14 684
1
4
1 36
1
7
1
3
3 31
2 23
3 33
2 183
25 719
13 563
3 67
3 33
1
11 221
Per cent distribution___ 100.0 100.0 2.5 0.9 3.8 2.6 3.8 1.3 1.3 0.2 1.3 1.4 3.8 1.3 2.5 7.0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0.1 13.9 8.5 3.8 1.2 31.6 27.5 16.5 21.5 17.7 26.2 1.3
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and

10
4
11
9
116
14
1 12

270
64
295
976
150
401
194
203

1

1

14

9

1
1

27
34

1

..6.

....

1

12

2

21

1

4
1

36

1
1

18
4

1

11

1 181
1
1

2

7

1

3

1
1

14
13

2
4

89
57

3

48

....

__
3

3 128
"T SO
74

3
1

83
10

2

39

2

365

7

6 243
12 1 178
2 I 16
1

4
2
1

67
16
22

519
28

31

1 Details aggregate more than total because some establishments appear in more than one hour group.




ft

*

2
3
•

98

1

G
©
E
©
ps
6

0.2
6

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

&
c
©
1

Establishments

Industry

Establishments

|

Number
reported

25

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Only a small proportion of the women reported had a scheduled
week of less than 55 hours. The majority of all the women employed
in the plants surveyed were working on schedules of 55 to 60 hours,
inclusive. Only one establishment regularly employed its women
workers more than 60 hours a week, and only five establishments
employing 3.5 per cent of the total number of women, had a week of
44 hours or less.
The only industries in which any plants reported a schedule of 44
hours or less were laundries, the manufacture of candy, and of men’s
clothing, and one industry in the miscellaneous group. This does
not mean, however, that these industries as a whole had progressive
hour standards. One candy factory had a 54-hour week and one a
week of over 55 but less than 60 hours. One of the men’s clothing
factories had a 55-hour week, and weekly hours in the miscellaneous
manufacturing group ranged as high as 60. There were three laun­
dries, also, with a week of 60 hours, and more women laundry workers
were employed on such a schedule than on any other.
In the other industries surveyed, however, long weekly hours
were found more frequently than in the industries discussed in the
preceding paragraph. None of the box and veneer mills had a week
shorter than 54 hours, and in one plant the women worked 66 hours a
week. While one small textile mill had a 50-hour week, over onehalf of the women in that industry had a scheduled week of 60 hours,
and approximately three-eighths were expected to work more than 55
but less than 60 hours in a week. Weekly hours in the general mer­
cantile establishments ranged from between 52 and 54 to between 55
and 60 hours, with the majority of the women in these stores (60.6
per cent) on a 55-hour weekly schedule. None of the 5-and-10-cent
stores expected less than 55 hours a week of their employees, but in
only two were the women on a schedule longer than that.
Saturday hours.
The number of hours regularly worked on Saturday often differs
from the schedule for the rest of the week. The figures on Saturday
hours are presented in Table XIII in the appendix.
Table 12.—Relation of Saturday hours to daily hours, by industry group

1,755
595
263

.




1

Manufacturing.......... .
Mercantile.___
Laundries........... ....................

Number of women whose Satur­
day, in relation to regular daily Number of
hours, was—
women
with no
Saturday
work “
Shorter
Same
Longer
'

Industry group

Number
of women
reported

172
57
128

535

18
30

26

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

In the majority of the factories visited in Mississippi Saturday
working hours were shorter than those for the rest of the week.
Nine-tenths of the women in the manufacturing industries had a
short Saturday. Over one-half of those with a short Saturday were
expected to be at work 5 but less than 6 hours on the last day of the
week, but another large group, 28.9 per cent of those whose Satur­
day was shorter than the other days of the week, were required to
work over 8 but less than 9 hours even on Saturday, their hours on
this day being only about 2 hours less than on the other days of
the week. Unpublished material shows that the manufacture of
men’s clothing was the only industry in which no establishment had
a Saturday as long as 6 hours. None of the textile mills had a Satur­
day as long as the other days of the week, but almost one-half of the
women in the mills were expected to work 8 but less than 9 hours.
One textile mill did not operate at all on Saturday.
Two laundries were not open regularly on Saturday, some had a
shorter schedule on that day, but almost one-half of the women
working in laundries had a full-length day on Saturday.
In the stores the situation is ordinarily the reverse of that in fac­
tories or laundries, and the question here is whether the women have
a regular day on Saturday or one of more than normal length. For
the most part the stores in Mississippi stayed open on Saturday
evenings. Two establishments remained open only until 7 o’clock
and one closed at 6.30 on Saturday, but the rest were open later than 7
for Saturday-evening shoppers. In most stores the hours of the
women were staggered on Saturday, so that the day was not much
longer than for the rest of the week. In fact, 57 of the mercantile
workers had no longer hours on Saturday, and for three women the
hours were slightly shorter on Saturday. The majority of the women
employed in stores had a 10-hour Saturday, although practically onetenth of the mercantile employees regularly worked 11 hours on the
last day of the week.
Lunch periods.
A study of Table XIV in the appendix shows that the 1-hour
lunch period was more common than any other, 52 of the establish­
ments visited having such a lunch period, while 12 allowed 30 minutes
and 13 between 30 minutes and 1 hour. In no plants was there a
lunch period of less than 30 minutes, although two plants allowed no
definite time for lunch. In one establishment the time allowed was
longer than 1 hour.
In general, the length of the lunch period may be adjusted.to the
convenience of managers and employees, but no arrangement is
satisfactory which does not allow some definite time off for lunch.




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

27

For the most part, however, the establishments visited in Mississippi
made adequate provision for a break in the middle of the day.
In certain stores a different arrangement was made on Saturday
in order to make an adjustment of hours because of the evening work,
some stores allowing periods of 2 or 3 hours to shorten the day’s work.
Such an arrangement does not obviate all the disadvantages to the
workers of the long over-all period.
Hours of night workers.
There were 182 women in the establishments visited who worked
on night shifts—178 white and 4 negro women. They were employed
in five textile mills and one veneer factory. The women in the textile
mills worked on only five nights a week, while the two in the veneer
plant worked six nights.
The shifts were very long, ranging ill length from over 10 but less
than 11 hours to 13 hours. The two women in the veneer factory
went on the job at 6 o’clock in the evening; and their shift ended at
7 in the morning with no break allowed for meals. The majority of
the night workers in the textile mills were on a schedule of over 11
but less than 12 hours. Night shifts in this industry began from 5.15
p. m. to 6.30 p. m. and the workers went off duty at various times,
from 4.15 a. m. to 6 a. in.
For the majority of the women on night shifts the regular weekly
hours totaled to more than 55 but less than 60. Of the two women
in the veneer factory, however, an extremely long weekly schedule
was required, one of 78 hours.
ACTUAL HOURS WORKED

In many cases the hours which the women actually worked were
not the scheduled hours of the firm. Variations in the running of the
plant or personal reasons of the workers themselves served to bring
about such differences. Information concerning actual hours worked
was not available for all of the women for whom wage data were
supplied, since many firms using the piecework basis of payment did
not report the number ol hours worked by their employees but kept
a record only of the days on which they worked. Even in establish­
ments where women were employed on a time-basis record was some­
times kept in terms of days rather than of hours. As a result figures
on time lost and overtime are available for only a limited number
of the women included in the survey. So far as such material is
available it is assembled in Tables XV and XVI in the appendix,
while facts from those two tables are summarized in Table 13.
2572°—26t—3




28

WOMEN- IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
Table 13.—Time lost and overtime, by industry
Women for whom hours worked were reported who-

Industry

All industries............

Num­
ber of
women
for
whom
hours
worked
were
report­
ed

Worked overtime

Per
Per cent of those who
cent of
lost—
all for
whom
hours
5
10
15
worked Un­
and and hours
der under
under and
were
10
15
report­ hours
ed
hours hours over

Per
Per cent of those who
cent; of
worked overtime—
all for
whom
hours
10
5
15
worked Un­
and and hours
der under
under
were
5
and
report­ hours 10
15
ed
hours hours over

551

49.4

11.0

30.1

16.9

41.9

6.0

57.6

27.3

7
98
408
23
7
8

(l)
38.8 10.5
52.9 7.9
30.4 . 0)

(l)
15.8
34.3
(0

5.3
19.4

0)
68.4
38.4
C1)

- (l)
9.2
3.7
34.8

«
60.0

«
33.3
(>)

Manu factu rin g:
Boxes (wooden) and
Clothing, moil's
Textiles .........................
Miscellaneous........... .
General mercantile..............
Laundries................ .............

Lost time

- (>)

(0

(■)

9.1

6. 1

6.7

"ci" 0)

100.0

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.

Time lost.
Hours worked were reported for 551 women in the State, and the
majority of these were employed in the manufacture of men’s clothing
and of textiles. Practically one-half of the women reported had
worked less than their scheduled hours during the week for which
records were taken. The amount of time lost was quite considerable
as well, for only a little over a tenth of those who fell short of a full
week had lost less than 5 hours, while over two-fifths of those who
had lost time had lost 15 hours or more.
Records were available for only 7 women in the box and veneer
industry, but of these, 3 had lost time to the extent of 30 hours or
more during the week. Less than two-fifths of the women employed
in the manufacture of men’s clothing for whom figures were given had
fallen short of their weekly schedule, but of those who had, over
two-thirds had lost 15 hours or more. Of the textile employees
reported, over one-half had lost time and of these, 38.4 per cent had
lost 15 hours or over. Lost time assumed somewhat less importance
for the 23 women reported in the miscellaneous manufacturing group.
Only 7 had worked less than the normal week, and 3 of these had lost
less than 5 hours. Data on this subject were available for only 8
laundry workers, and, while 6 of these lost some time, none lost as
much as 5 hours.
Overtime.
Only a small proportion (6 per cent) of the Mississippi women
workers for whom information on hours worked was avai able had
worked any time in excess of their scheduled hours during the week of
the survey. The majority of those who had worked more than the
regular week had exceeded it by less than five hours. One textile
worker and one woman in the miscellaneous manufacturing group had
worked as much as 15 hours in excess of their scheduled hours.



PART IV
WORKING CONDITIONS

In every factory, store, or laundry, groups of men and of women
are spending half or more of their waking hours, day in and day out.
The minimum that should be expected of plant management is that
all possible protection should be afforded against hazards to life or
health. Consideration of the workers’ health and convenience
should go further than that and should look to the elimination of
such unnecessary causes of fatigue as poor lighting and ill-adjusted
working conditions.
Too frequently less thought is given to the comfort of the workers
than to the care of the mechanical parts of a plant. Sections of the
country in which industrial life has developed least are often unprogres­
sive in regal’d to equipment that affects the workers, because the man­
agers are out of touch with what can be done and with what others are
doing, even though they may have fewer handicaps in other respects
to overcome than have those located in large industrial centers.
The agents of the bureau, in visiting the establishments of various
types in Mississippi, made a general survey of plant conditions so
far as they affected directly the women employed. Unfortunately
the standards of conditions of employment were not high throughout
the State as a whole.
GENERAL PLANT CONDITIONS

Arrangement of rooms.
Efficient routing of work and management of production is made
more difficult when workrooms are crowded and poorly arranged.
If narrow aisles are combined with poorly guarded machinery, the
danger of accidents is greatly increased. Aisles obstructed by piles
of material or of refuse are an extra hazard in case of fire. Of the
80 1 factories, stores, and laundries visited £here were 24, or threetenths of the total number, in which the aisles were too narrow in
either some of or all the workrooms. In these plants rooms would
have been too crowded even if the workrooms had been kept in
perfect order, but in some instances the aisles were obstructed by
piles of material or refuse or by continuous shaftings. Of the 11
1 One factory visited has been excluded in description of workroom conditions because all of work was
done out of doors.




29

30

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES.

plants in which the aisles were too narrow throughout, there were 5
in which the aisles of all the workrooms were obstructed as well.
In the majority of the plants visited the aisles were adequate in
width and unobstructed, although in 6 establishments in which the
placing of machinery or worktables gave sufficient room for passage­
ways, the aisles had not been left open.
In one plant, not only was machinery crowded into the room so
closely that there was scarcely space to turn, but the entrance to the
firsUfloor workroom was obstructed by rows of small steam pipes
which formed a barrier about 4 inches high in the doorway. In
another case the workroom was large for the number of people working
there, but the product was piled about unsystematically, giving the
room a generally cluttered and crowded appearance.
Two workrooms in a textile mill were described as follows on the
schedule:
Aisles were narrow, caused by crowding of machinery. In addition aisles
were obstructed by belts from looms going to floor below. The belts were not
guarded, and it was necessary to watch one’s step and keep in the center of the
aisle so as not to trip on them.

When a business has expanded too rapidly for its physical equip­
ment, there is some reason for a temporarily crowded condition, but
when lack of clearly defined and open aisles is due only to poor man­
agement, there is no excuse.
Condition and type of floors.
The character of a workroom floor means a good deal to the man
or woman who is standing on it all or most of the working day. Con­
crete floors often are used because of their substantial character and
the ease with which they can be kept clean, but they are very trying
to stand on continuously. Often this difficulty is recognized, and
wooden platforms are placed in front of worktables or machines.
Wooden floors were found more commonly than those of any other
material in the Mississippi establishments; in 56 cases the floors were
of wood throughout the plant; in 7 stores there were plain wooden
floors in some of the salesrooms and floors covered with carpet,
linoleum, or straw matting in the others; in one factory the ground
formed the only floor in one workroom, while wood was used in the
others. In 11 establishments there were cement floors throughout
and in 5 more some of the floors were of cement and some of wood.
None of the 5 plants with cement floors in part provided any sort of
platform for the employees who worked on such floors and only 4
of the other establishments with cement floors furnished wooden
platforms for the women to stand on as they worked.
Both wooden and concrete floors can become unsatisfactory after
years of wear if they are not kept in repair. In one-fifth of the plants



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

31

visited floors were out of repair either in part of or all the plant.
As the public comes in direct contact with store salesrooms, floors
in such establishments seldom are allowed to get in poor condition.
The records show that when this group is eliminated from the total
and only factories and laundries are considered, floors were in poor
repair in at least some of the workrooms in nearly one-third of the
establishments.
The following reports were given of floor conditions in two plants:
The floors in all workrooms were in very bad condition, very much worn,
dirty, and uneven. They had been repaired, but very poorly, and were worn
to the point where there was danger from slipping or stumbling. The floor near
the spoolers had never been repaired during the mill’s existence and was extremely
hard on workers’ feet.
Plant had the worst floors I have ever seen. They were almost in shreds,
and their safety seemed questionable. New pieces of wood flooring had been
put down several times in parts of the plant. Although a negro man swept
continuously, the floors were in such terrible condition that it was hard to keep
them decent.

Stairways.
There were 28 factories, 27 stores, and 4 laundries, a total of 59
establishments, in which there were stairways used by .the women
employees either in going to their place of work or in going from
workroom to cloakroom or toilet room. Of these, there were only 2
factories and 9 stores in which all stairways in the establishment
were satisfactory in all essentials; that is, the stairways were not too
steep, too narrow, winding, inadequately lighted, unprotected from
the weather, lacking in suitable handrails, nor out of repair.
There were 30 establishments, over one-half of those reported, in
which some or all of the stairways in the plant were too narrow. In
20 cases there were stairways that were too steep and in 8 plants
the situation was particularly bad because the stairways were also
inadequately lighted. In the majority of the establishments the
stairs were kept in repair, and in only 8 cases were any of the stairways
in poor repair. A stairway in poor repair is obviously more dangerous
when not adequately lighted and in 5 of the plants visited these two
conditions were found for the same stairways. There were 3 estab­
lishments with winding stairways, and in addition 1 of these had no
artificial light. In 20 establishments handrails were either lacking
or unsatisfactory throughout the plant or in part. In 10 there were
stairways which were outside the building and unprotected from the
weather.
Lighting has already been referred to in connection with other
factors. Stairways were considered adequately lighted only when
artificial lighting was satisfactory, because natural lighting alone
could not be depended upon at all hours of the day and under all



32

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

weather conditions. There were 7 establishments in which all
stairways were inadequately lighted, and 10 others in which some of
the stairways lacked sufficient light.
Frequently one stairway combined many bad features, as in the
following report for a factory:
No artificial light; handrail only part way, stairs narrow and steep, open
risers. Stairway used regularly by 15 girls.

Almost as bad are two stairways—the first in a mill and the second
in a wooden-box plant—described as follows:
The stairway was so steep and treads so narrow, with open risers, as to ba
precipitous. The treads were so worn and sagging that it was hard to get down.
Fortunately this stairway was used by only a few workers.
Stairway gets some natural light, but not enough. Handrail was rough and
worn and so near the wall as to be of little practical use. Risers were high. Just
at the landing the ceiling was low and one had to duck one’s head in order not to
get bumped as one started up from landing or reached landing from upper part
of stairway.

Cleaning.
Standards of workroom cleanliness varied considerably from plant
to plant, both in the results achieved and in the type of arrangements
which were made for keeping plants clean. There were 80 estab­
lishments for which report was made, and of these, 05 were scheduled
as having floors satisfactorily clean throughout the plant. In 11 the
floors in all the workrooms were dirty and in 4 some of the floors were
so described. Floors were clean in all the stores and in 12 of the
14 laundries. Of the manufacturing establishments visited, however,
less than two-thirds were reported as having floors clean through­
out. In 9 factories all the workrooms and in 4 others some of the
workrooms were unsatisfactory in this respect.
The frequency with which workrooms were swept ranged from
continuously to once a week or irregularly. Obviously sweeping was
more essential in some types of plants than in others, and it is sur­
prising how little direct relation there seemed to be between the
condition of the floors and the frequency with which they were
scheduled for sweeping. There were 10 establishments which were
swept more than once a day, and yet of these 16 there were 4 in which
the floors were dirty in at least some of the workrooms. The ma­
jority of the establishments visited, or 52, were swept once a day,
and in only 5 of these did any of the workrooms have floors that were
dirty. Also, several plants which reported irregular or infrequent
cleaning were in satisfactory condition at the time of the inspection,
probably because of a recent cleaning.
In 58 establishments the sweeping was done by persons engaged
primarily for that kind of work, while in the other 22 establishments
the men or women employed for the regular work of the industry



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

33

were expected to look after the sweeping as well. Although it might
seem that plants in which definitely assigned persons were responsible
for sweeping would stand more chance of being kept clean, the reports
did not bear this out, for the work of charwomen or janitors was as
apt to prove inadequate as was the cleaning of workers employed
primarily for other jobs.
Of the 80 establishments visited, there were 30 in which the work­
room floors were scrubbed with more or less regularity, 22 in which
floors were oiled but never scrubbed, and 28 in which there was no
cleaning other than sweeping, being neither scrubbed nor oiled. All
of the establishments in which floors were oiled were stores, and this
arrangement was found in the majority of the stores visited. As
would be expected, floors were scrubbed in practically all of the
laundries, although one was reported without such system. Of the
36 factories included, only 11 reported that floors were scrubbed,
either frequently or infrequently.
One-half of the establishments reported as being scrubbed with
some degree of frequency were scrubbed once a week. In 3 cases
scrubbing was done once a day, in 1 once a year, and in 3 at irregular
intervals. In 19 of the 30 establishments in which the floors were
scrubbed some one employed specifically for such work was respon­
sible, but in the other 11 cases it was done by men or women regularly
employed for other work.
•
Ventilation.
To keep the air always fresh in a room where a number of people
are working all day and where the industrial processes carried on
tend to heighten the need takes special thought and attention.
Methods that may be adequate under some weather conditions may
fall short during other seasons.
In 58 of the establishments visited the ventilation appeared to be
satisfactory at the time the inspection was made, so far as the change
of air was concerned. In 14 of these, however, toilet rooms were
ventilated through the workrooms, making the air of the workrooms
less satisfactory. In one-half of the establishments with sufficient air
movement there was some form of artificial aid in all of the work­
rooms, while in 10 others artificial means of ventilation supplemented
the natural in part of the plant.
In 8 of the establishments reported only some of the workrooms
were satisfactorily ventilated in spite of the fact that in half of them
there was some form of artificial ventilation throughout the plant.
In one establishment, however, there was a workroom with no
natural ventilation except that which came through other rooms and
without artificial means of ventilation. The air was unsatisfactory
in all the workrooms of 14 establishments, although there was some




34

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

form of artificial in addition to natural ventilation throughout 8 of
these plants, and in no instance were there any rooms with no natural
air supply. There were 5 cases in which the air of the workroom
not only was stuffy but was made even more undesirable because of
a toilet room with no other means of ventilation except through the
workroom.
Some type of artificial ventilation was found in some of or all the
rooms of practically two-thirds of the establishments visited. In
most cases, however, there were no elaborate general systems. In
the majority of the establishments with artificial ventilation (38 out of
53) the only type provided was either a large ceiling fan or small fans
on walls or tables. Exhaust fans, ranging from the small window
type to one 8 feet in diameter, were found in 11 establishments, and
in 3 of these the exhaust fans were supplemented by vents or hoods
or both. In 3 establishments sawdust and fumes from a paint
sprayer were carried ofF by local devices. In 3 textile mills there
were humidifiers, but these have not been included among artificial
means of ventilation. It is true that they may be of some value in
regulating temperature and in keeping down lint, but they are used
primarily for the sake of the product rather than of the worker,
more often creating an atmospheric problem than solving it.
In practically three-fifths of the establishments there was some
special atmospheric problem, 'rtie most usual trouble was excessive
heat, and there were 14 establishments in which it was sufficient to be
oppressive. Steam or excessive humidity made workrooms unsatis­
factory in 8 establishments, and cold was a problem in 7 instances.
Dust in 1 case and lint in 2 others created bad air conditions.
Poor atmospheric conditions found in 3 textile plants are de­
scribed below:
Steam from sizing machine very heavy, and no hood or exhaust over it. Walls
were sweating, and the superintendent himself said, “The ceiling is rotting; I
just can’t keep a ceiling.”
Ventilation was inadequate. There were large windows with transom-like
openings at the top, but the operators complained of lack of air. There wras
steam from the sizing machine in spite of hood.
In one room there were many humidifiers, and the air vras heavy and dank on
the day of the visit. In the other room there was lint over everything—ceilings,
walls, floors, rafters, and lights. The lights and rafters were brushed down once
a week.

In one laundry visited the washing was done in the same room
with the rest of the operations. In that part of the room where the
washing was done the ceiling was lower, and although there were
many small flat skylights, these served only to furnish light; as there
was no form of artificial ventilation, the room was full of steam.
In some instances, however, a naturally difficult situation had been
overcome by means of artificial devices. For example, in one estab­



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

35

lishment blowers attached to each machine took care of all sawdust
so that there was very little dust in the room. Suction fans were
connected with the paint sprayer so as to render it unobjectionable.
Heating.
In a State with a climate as mild as Mississippi’s the heating of
establishments might seem to offer no problem at all. But often in
regions where there is no severe weather provision for heating is
inadequate, largely because of the mild climate. In the box and
veneer plants especially, too little attention had been given to the
question of heating, since only 2 were reported as being satisfactorily
provided for in this respect. In 1 case there were no work sheds nor
rooms, and the women worked out of doors all day, rain or shine, and
if it rained too hard, they stopped work and went home. Some of
the other plants were semioutdoor, and while work under these con­
ditions would be pleasant in good weather, it would be unpleasant at
other times. In two plants where there were neither stoves nor
other source of heat, the manager reported that the women simply
went home when it got too cold. The heating was adequate in all
the plants visited in the manufacture of candy, of men’s clothing, and
of textiles. In the miscellaneous manufacturing groups there were
more establishments with inadequate than with adequate methods of
heating. In some cases there was no stove and the girls wore sweat­
ers; in other cases the stoves were inadequate and only the people
working near them were warm enough, often too warm. The stoves
in one plant were supplemented by an unsatisfactory gas heater
which added to the ventilation problem. The heating was satisfac­
tory in the majority of the stores, although in 3 cases the number of
radiators installed was insufficient, and in 4, stoves were unsatisfac­
tory. Reliance on oil stoves was usually unwarranted.
Lighting.
The limitations of a general survey do not permit of a detailed dis­
cussion of such a technical subject as lighting. There should be ade­
quate natural lighting wherever possible, but this should always be
supplemented by carefully planned artificial lighting. In planning
the scheme of lighting, either natural or artificial, attention must be
given both to adequacy and to avoidance of glare. Obviously the
satisfactoriness of any one type of light is dependent largely upon the
work at which it is to be used and upon its arrangement in relation
to the work place.
There.was sufficient natural light under normal conditions through­
out 49 of the establishments visited, employing almost two-thirds of
the women reported in the survey exclusive of those on night shifts.
In 9 plants natural light was inadequate for some of the workers, and
in 22 establishments reporting almost one-fourth of the women none



36

tVOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

of the workrooms had sufficient natural light. This condition was
more common in stores than in factories, since the former were more
inclined to rely upon artificial light. The majority of the establish­
ments in which the natural light was inadequate had sufficient arti­
ficial light, although one establishment visited was inadequately
lighted by either means and 3 others with too little natural light for
some of the workers also had failed to provide for them adequate
artificial lighting.
In 13 establishments, or practically one-sixt’n of the total number,
there was glare from natural light for at least some of the women
employed. In 4 of these there were shades or awnings, but they had
not been so installed as to prevent all glare, while in the others no
attempt had been made to avoid glare from windows or skylights.
The majority of those establishments with no glare reported from
natural lighting had neither shades nor awnings, but workers were so
placed in relation to the source of light that there was no undesirable
glare in their eyes.
There were 42 establishments in which the natural lighting was
satisfactory in both respects throughout the whole plant; that is, it
was adequate and there was no glare.
One establishment with satisfactory conditions as to natural light
was described as follows:
Natural light on three sides in three of the workrooms, and on one side in the
other, with large windows of opaque glass. There were canvas curtains on the
sunny sides. The natural light was good throughout.

In another plant where there was plenty of light the situation
could have been made satisfactory:
Large sash windows on four sides of all rooms; glare from windows where
girls faced light. Otherwise the natural lighting wTas good, but curtains were
needed.

In one establishment there were only open spaces instead of
windows in the wall, and these were boarded up in bad weather, an
arrangement which cut off light from out of doors.
Whether natural lighting is adequate or not, careful attention
should be given to artificial lighting. On cloudy days and on
winter afternoons when it begins to get dark early, artificial light has
to be resorted to even with the best planned rooms. Where the
arrangement of the room or the type of work is such that artificial
light has to be used most of the time, it is even more essential that
it be satisfactory. Considerable attention has been given to the
problems of industrial lighting, and there is very little excuse for not
providing artificial lighting satisfactory for most work.
There were 42 establishments in which the artificial lighting was
satisfactory. In these establishments there was a sufficient amount
of light for the work to be done, and there was no glare in the workers’



37

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

eyes. Two establishments had failed to supply any artificial light
at all, although in both cases the natural light was ordinarily satis­
factory. In one it was said that artificial light was seldom needed,
but when it was, “they have to make out as best they can.”
Although there was artificial light in 10 establishments, it was
insufficient for the work. In one plant where the artificial light was
inadequate, the machine operators had no lights near their ma­
chines. In another the fixtures were far apart, high and dirty, so
that they furnished an insufficient amount of light.
For the most part, however, the artificial lighting in the plants
inspected was unsatisfactory because of glare rather than because of
inadequacy. In 32 establishments there was glare from the artifical
lighting, and of these, 6 had too little light as well as glare from such
sources as there were. In the majority of the cases glare was from
general lighting rather than from lights provided for each worker.
Individual lights were not commonly used in Mississippi industries,
for in only 19 establishments were such lights provided, and in only
6 of those were they adjustable and shaded. In 7 instances lack of
shades or poor placing caused glare for the workers.
Table 14 summarizes some of the outstanding facts concerning
lighting.
Table 14.—Lighting of workrooms, by industry group
NATURAL LIGHTING
Number of establishments in which
lighting was—
Number
of estab­
lishments Satisfac­
reporting tory
through­
out

Industry group

All industries.........-......................................
Mercantile___________________ _________
Laundries...................................................

i 80
30
14

42

Uusat sfactory d ie to—
Inade­
quacy
25

Both In­
adequacy
and glare

Glare

7

6

6
9

3

1

1

ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING
All industries........................................................

180

42

26

26

6

M anufacturing......................................... .....................
Mercantile...... ............................................................
Laundries-.....................................................................

i 36
30
14

12
24
6

25

14
6
6

5

1

1

> Excludes 1 establishment in which the women all worked out of doors and there were no workrooms.
3 Includes 2 establishments in which no means of artificial lighting was provided.

The following descriptions of artificial lighting taken from the
schedules may serve to give a more concrete picture of the kinds of
situations which existed:
Every variety of shaded drop lights found throughout the plant—metal,
opaque glass, flat reflectors. All were hung just above the eye level. There



38

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

were no good lights. There were individual adjustable lights at some machines,
but the bulbs were unshaded The girls had pinned paper shades around them.
Rags were tied onto some of the drop lights also to lessen glare.

This type of equipment was in a clothing establishment where
good light is more essential than in most industries. There was
excellent daylight, however, in this case, so that artificial light was
not needed regularly.
In one room in the laundry there were ceiling lights with reflectors; in the
other there were ceiling lights and drop lights, neither with shades. The light
was fair in some places, but it was not satisfactory on account of low-hung,
unshaded bulbs. Also there was not enough light in the section of the room
where the starchers were at work.

In one textile mill there were unshaded bulbs hung on the eye level
at the drawing-in machine and in the finishing room. Except for
these two cases the artificial lighting in the plant was good.
Seating.
Satisfactory seating of industrial workers can not be achieved
without study of what good posture is and of how the seat and the
work can be adjusted to each other so as to make possible a normal
and healthy position. The arrangement is most desirable when
the work place and the seating equipment are so adjusted that the
worker can either sit or stand to work. Often, however, the factory
manager accepts the idea that workers must stand to do certain
jobs and sit to perform others, without realizing that the poor
arrangement of material and machine or the lack of a seat may be
the only factors responsible for such accepted posture.
For the sake of summing up the facts in regard to seating in
Mississippi the women workers have been classified according to
whether they sat or stood to operate or whether they could work in
either position. In determining in which class any one occupation
should be put the practice within the plant was taken as the cri­
terion. If the women who did a certain job in one factory always
stood at their work, they have been classed as working on a standing
job even though women employed on the same job in another plant
stood part of the time and sat part of the time as they worked.
There were 41 establishments visited in Mississippi with women
employees who regularly sat at their work. In one-half of these
plants there were ordinary chairs of normal height either with
wooden, cane, leather, or split-bottom scats. Of these 41 establish­
ments, 16 had provided seats without backs for some of or all the
workers. Stools, boxes, and benches were made use of even for
women who sat at their work all day. In some of the box and veneer
plants there was a type of seat that served as a rack for material
and product as well. The whole was much like a good-sized but
very low table with a square hole cut in the top on one side, and a



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

39

heavy canvas webbing fastened over the opening to form a seat.
Material was piled on this seat at one side of the worker, while the
finished product was piled on the other side and behind her. The
seat seemed moderately comfortable but afforded no support for the
back.
In one establishment there was only one woman who sat at her
work, and she was provided with no regular seat but used the corner
of a truck for lack of anything else.
In the Mississippi establishments surveyed very little attempt had
been made to adjust the scat to either the work or the worker even
for those women who spent their whole day at a sitting job.
In 74 establishments of the 81 inspected women were employed
at jobs where they had to stand when they worked. Ordinarily,
however, the, standing worker has some time when she can sit down
for at least a few minutes, provided there is a seat available. In 28
establishments, however, there were women employed for whom no
seats at all were furnished. In 16 others although seats were provided
for standing workers the number was insufficient. In the majority
of cases the seats supplied were without backs.
Sometimes the lack of seats in a plant is due to thoughtlessness
on the part of the management, but in one plant visited there was a
definite policy against the use of seats. The owner of this establish­
ment told the agent, “The nigger women are paid to work, not to sit
down,” and the foreman’s statement confirmed the policy, “If I
catch them sitting down I will teach them to sit down.”
A few examples of inadequate and unsatisfactory seating provision
are cited below:
Girls were sitting around on trucks. There were long waits between the putting
of veneer on the driers, and the women could have sat down part of the time if
they had had any chairs.
No seats of any kind for standing workers. The piles of veneer were not
usable as seats because the sheets of veneer were too fragile.
All workers but one stood at their work, and there was not a seat to be seen.
There were no platforms of any kind for the workers to stand on, and the floors
were of concrete.
Girls sat on large tables in leisure moments.
laundry.

There were no chairs in the

In the majority of the 5-and-10-cent stores there were sliding-shelf
or hinged seats for the salespeople. In the other stores the women
employed there often made use of seats primarily provided for other
purposes. Shoe departments seemed to offer convenient seats.
Store was small with a shoe department on the first floor, The saleswomen
sat there or dragged the shoe salesmen’s stools over near the stove and sat there
when not busy. Also there was a 6-inch shelf projecting beyond the wall-shelves,
and the girls leaned on this.



40

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Girls were not tied down to any department but went all over the. store.
Consequently, they stayed near the front of the store, sitting in the shoe depart­
ment and on drawers for merchandise. There were no seats behind the counters.

Ordinarily the women employed in the stores visited were permitted
to sit down when they were not busy, but on one schedule there was
this note:
There were sliding-shelf seats, but the girls were not allowed to use them
they were not even permitted to lean against the counter.

There were only 9 establishments in which women were so employed
that they could sit for part of the time as they worked and stand for
part. In one establishment this was accomplished by having the
women change jobs.
SANITATION

The general conditions of plant sanitation are of tremendous
importance in maintaining the health of employees. The standards
of drinking, washing, and toilet facilities mean much in any place
where people are spending regularly a large proportion of their work­
ing hours. Not only should such facilities be suitable in type,
adequate in number, and conveniently located, but they should bo
kept clean and in repair.
Drinking facilities.
The following table gives information concerning types of drinking
equipment provided:
Table 15.—Type of drinking facilities provided, by industry
Number of establishments which provided—

Industry

All industries...........................
Manufacturing:

Num­ Drinking fountain—
ber
of estabPart
lishinents Sani­ In­ sanitary
and part
tary sani­
tary insani­
tary
81
10
4
3
11
9
10
14
14

4

10

31
1

2

4

2
35

i2

3

Pump or pail,
with—

Indi­
Indi­ Com­
vid­
No vid­ Com­ No
ual mon cup ual mon cup
cup cup
cup cup
9
I

1
1

Tank, cooler, or
faucet with—

1
2
4

*1

17
»5

1
3
4
4

32

1

3
1

36

8

2

2

1

2

1

1

6

8

1 Includes 3 establishments in which other equipment was supplemented by pail and dipper for some of
the workers.
* Ircludes 1 establishment with faucet and no cup for some of the workers.
3 Ircludes 1 establishment with pail for some of the workers.
* Includes 1 establishment with cooler (no cup) in addition.
* Establishment has pail in addition.




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

41

The type of drinking arrangements provided in a large proportion
of the Mississippi establishments visited allowed opportunity for
the spread of disease. There were 34 establishments in which the
only water supply was from faucet, cooler, tank, or pump with no
cup provided, and the workers either brought their own or drank
directly from the faucet.
Two suc.h cases were described on the schedules as follows:
There was a faucet from flowing artesian well in the yard. No cups were
provided, and the workers simply put their mouths over the faucet, which was
turned up part way.
There was a pipe from an artesian well. It was outside the plant and not
convenient for anyone, even for the women who were working out of doors at
stacking. The faucet was used by men and women, white and negro, and they
put their mouths over the faucet in drinking.

It is not possible to say in how many of the 34 plants providing
no cups this method of drinking was common. In three other estab­
lishments which had bubble fountains in part, some of the employees
relied upon a faucet or cooler, for which cups were not supplied in
all cases. The common drinking cup was found in 19 establishments,
and in 3 of these the cup was used not only by the employees but
by the public as well. In only 10 establishments were individual
drinking cups provided.
In 18 establishments where more attention had been given to mak­
ing a satisfactory supply of water available, there were drinking
fountains either throughout the plant or in part. In only 8 of these
were there any drinking fountains of the sanitary type, fountains
from which the water emerges at an angle of from 15° to GO0 so that
it can not fall back upon the orifice. As the sanitary fountain sup­
plied only part of the drinking water in 6 of these establishments,
there were only 2 plants providing sanitary drinking fountains for
all of their women employees.
Thus, out of 81 establishments visited in Mississippi, there were
only 12 in which sanitary drinking facilities were provided for all
the women employed.
In the majority of the establishments visited the drinking water
was cooled for at least part of the year. In 9 cases the water came
from deep wells and was always cool. In 14 other establishments
the water was cooled throughout the year, while iu 41 it was cooled
during the summer months only. Of the 41 establishments supply­
ing cooled water during the summer, there were 19 in which the
regular faucet was used during the rest of the year, and coolers or
tanks were put into operation during the summer.
The practice of putting the ice directly into the container as a
means of cooling the water is undesirable from a sanitary point of
view, and yet that was the method used in 30 of the 64 establish­



42

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

ments which supplied cool water at least part of the time. For the
14 establishments in which the water from drinking fountains was
cooled it is not reported whether ice surrounded the water coils or
whether the water flowed through a tank containing ice. In cases
where pails of water were kept filled from deep wells, ice was some­
times put in the pails to keep the water cool on hot days.
Washing facilities.
The standards of the Mississippi establishments visited were low
so far as the provision of washing equipment was concerned. Of 81
establishments visited, 11 provided no washing facilities for any of
the women employees. Of the 70 establishments where the workers
had some opportunity to wash, only 7 had hot water for all the
women, and 4 others furnished it for some of the women. In 59
cases only cold water was available for personal use. Approxi­
mately two-fifths of the establishments giving some attention to
washing facilities supplied no soap. In 39 of the establishments
with some washing facilities there were no towels, and in 3 others
towels were furnished for only some of the women. The spread of
disease was made possible in 18 establishments by the use of the
common towel. Individual towels were supplied for some of or all
the women employed in only 13 establishments.
Table 16.—Inadequacy of washing facilities, by industry
Number of establishments providing—

Industry

All industries—.................
Manufacturing:

Washing facilities with—
Number
of estab­
Common
lishments
No
towels—
reported washing No hot water—
facilities
No
soap
For
For
For
For
all
all
part
part
81

11

10
4
3
11
9
16
14
14

4

4

1

4
1

1

2

2

59

29

5
3
3
7
7
16
14
4

6
1
2
7
5
2
2
4

1

No
towels

17

1
1
1

5
10

39
6
2
2
7
5
3
3
i 11

i In 6 of these establishments workers used articles being laundered, in 1 the net sacks used in washing,
and in 4 they had nothing.

In the manufacture of wooden boxes only 6 of the 10 establish­
ments afforded any opportunity for the workers to wash at the plant.
None of these 6 supplied either soap or towels and in only 1 case
was there any hot water. An equally bad situation was found in




WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

43

the textile mills. Of 11 establishments, only 7 provided any wash­
ing facilities, and none of these 7 supplied hot water, soap, or towels.
Even in the candy establishments visited washing facilities were un­
satisfactory. While all 4 of the plants provided an opportunity for
the workers to wash, hot water was available for only some of the
workers in 1 establishment. A common towel served in 1 case, and
in 2 establishments no towels were provided. Although in all 3 of
the men’s clothing plants there was a place for the women to wash,
none furnished either hot water or individual towels and only 1
provided soap.
In all of the stores, both 5-and-lO-cent stores and general mer­
cantile establishments, there was some place for the women to wash,
but in 11 of the general mercantile establ shments and in 1 of the
5-and-10-cent stores the equipment was shared with the public.
However, in none of the stores was there any hot water. In 3 of the
general mercantile establishments there were no towels and in 5
others there were common towels. In 3 cases where common towels
were supplied, they were used by the public as well as by the women
employed in the stores. Individual towels were provided in 8 of the
general mercantile establishments, paper towels in a public washroom
being the only ones supplied in 7 of these stores. Three 5-and-10cent stores provided no towels at all, and 10 furnished only common
towels.
Although there are plenty of sources of water in laundries, never­
theless in 2 of those visited there was no basin at which the workers
could wash their hands. In 11 of the 14 laundries there were no
regular towels. In 6 of these the workers used the clothes to be
laundered and in one the net sacks provided to hold the clothes.
In the majority of all the establishments reporting on the subject
the wash basins or troughs were satisfactorily clean, although some
of or all such facilities n 10 plants were reported as dirty. Unfortu­
nately 2 of these establishments were candy factories where clean­
liness was of direct importance to the public as well as to the workers.
The basin in 1 candy establishment was reported black with dirt,
looking as though it had never been cleaned.
Toilet facilities.
>
In too large a proportion of the establishments visited in Mississippi
the toilet facilities provided were below standard. For the most
part managers had failed even more in their responsibility toward
the negro than toward the white women. Because of the conspicu­
ous difference in the provision made for these two groups of employees
the material has been tabulated separately.
2572°—26t----- 1




44

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
Table

17;—-Adequacy of toilet equipment,

by industry and race of women

WHITE WOMEN
Number of establishments and number of toilet rooms in which the
number of women per toilet seat was—
Number
reported
Industry

15 and
under

16 and
under 21

21 and
under 26

26 and
under 30

30 and over

Estab­ Toilet Estab­ Toilet Estab­ Toilet Estab­ Toilet Estab­ Toilet Estab­
lish­
lishlish­
lish­
lish­
lish­ Toilet
ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms
All industries..

i 73

103

54

72

10

8
3
3
11

8
3
3
37
8
20
14
10

6
2
1
9
7
11
9
9

6
2
1
23
7
15
9
9

2
1

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden)
and veneer.......
Candy
Textiles._____
Miscellaneous___
General mercantile...
5-and-10-cent stores...

1

8
*16
3 14
10

4
3

17

7

7

3

3

2
1

2
1

2

2

4

4

2
1
ii

3

4
2
1

4
2
1

5

5

1

1

1

1

2
1

1

1

1

3

3

1

1

NEGRO WOMEN
All industries..

24

26

11

12

6
t
*2
2
« 13

6
1
2
3
14

4

4

3

4

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden)

Miscellaneous___

2
g

3

3

4

1

1
1

1

1

1 Details aggregate more than total because conditions in some establishments were not uniform.
* In 14 of these establishments the toilet room was used also by the public.
3 In 3 of these establishments the toilet room was used also by the public.
* In 4 textile establishments, as in 3 general mercantile establishments, negro women were employed but
no toilet facilities were provided for them.
6 In 2 establishments negro women used same toilet as white women.

There were 73 establishments employing white women and furnish­
ing 103 toilet rooms for the use of these employees. So far as pos­
sible reports on adequacy of the equipment were based on the number
of women working in the portion of the plant served by one toilet
room rather than on the average number per toilet room for the plant
as a whole. Equipment has been considered adequate when the
number of women per seat did not exceed 15. In seven-tenths of
the toilet rooms provided for white women the number of seats
was adequate for the number of women. On the other hand, how­
ever. there were 4 establishments with 4 toilet rooms in which the
number of women per seat was 30 or more. In one of these there
was only one facility for 45 women. In one of the establishments
the number of women employees per seat was 32 and the toilet room
was used by the public as well. Of the 16 general mercantile es­
tablishments, only 2 provided toilet rooms for the exclusive use of
the women employed therein, a fact to be borne in mind in noting the
figures on adequacy of toilet equipment in stores. The 5-and-10


WOMEN IN' MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

45

cent stores were not so bad in this respect, for in only 3 of them was
the toilet room provided for the employees designed to serve the
public as well.
There were 32 establishments in which negro women were em­
ployed, in 7 of which no toilet facilities were reported for them. The
employer in one case said that the negro women went outside the
establishment somewhere, but he seemed a little vague as to where.
In 2 other plants the negro women used the same toilet room as did
the white women working there, but in the majority of cases where
negro women were employed, separate toilet facilities were provided
for them.
There were 24 establishments with 26 toilet rooms for negro
women for which information was available on the number of women
using the equipment. In one plant no record could be obtained of
the exact number of women employed. A considerably larger
proportion of the toilet rooms provided for the negro women than
of those for the white women were inadequate for the number of
women using them. Only a little over a third of the toilet rooms
reported for the negro women were equipped with an adequate num­
ber of seats in relation to the number of women served. In 3 out
of 26 toilet rooms there were 30 women or more to each seat, in one
case as many as 48 women to one facility.
The failure to provide an adequate number of toilet seats not only
inconveniences the workers by keeping them from the job longer
but makes it much more difficult to maintain the toilet room and
equipment in a sanitary condition.




Table

18.—General conditions of toilet equipment, by industry and race of women

4^
05

WHITE WOMEN
Number of establishments having toilet rooms as specified and number of toilet rooms—

Number
reported

Not desig­
nated

Not ceiled

Not
screened

Window
only

Artificial
light only

Ventilated—

Both nat­
ural and
artificial
light

Neither nat­
ural nor
By outside
artificial
window
light

By artificial
means

Through
other room

EsEsEsEsEsEsEsEsEsEsEs­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab- Toi­
tab­ Toi­
let
let
let
let
let
let
let
let
let
let
let
lishlishlis'hlishlishlishlishlishlishlishlishments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms ments rooms
All industries
Manufacturing:
Boses (wooden) and
veneer_
Candy.....................
Clothing, men’s.........
Textiles_____ ______
Miscellaneous
General mercantile
5-and-lC-cent stores.........
Laundries.............. ......

73 * 103
8
3
3
11
8
lfi
14
10

8
3
3
37
8
20
14
10

42

49

6
2
3
8
5
7
3
8

6
2
3
14
5
8
3
8

15

20

1

1

3 •
2
4
3

3
7
4
3

2

2

19

23

1
4
2
5
4
3

1
8
2
5
4
3

9

11

1

1

14

19

1

1

2
1
5
3
2

2

2

2
3
1

3
1

2

2

44

03

7
1
5
3
2

4
2
3
8
3
11
11
2

2
3
26
3
12
11
2

7

7

4

4

1
2
1
3

1
2
1
3

2

2

1
1

1
1

6

6

51

72

2
3
27

2

2

2
3
8
6
12

3

3

4

14fi
11
*

3

3

6

6

2

2

1
3

1
3

1

3

1

3

1

17

24

1

1

5

i
5

5

5

10

10

2
1
6

6

NEGRO WOMEN
All industries

25

3 27

19

20

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and
veneer ____
Candy................ ......
Textiles....... ...............
Miscellaneous
Laundries..........................

7
1
2
2
13

7
1
2
3
14

7

7

1
1
10

1
1
11

9

10

14

14

1
1
1
6

1
1
2
6

3
1
1
1
8

3
1
1
1
8

2

2

3

3

......... 1

1 Includes 4 privies which are not included in report on lighting and ventilation.
3 Includes 6 privies and 5 other outdoor toilets which are not included in report on lighting and ventilation.




4

1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Industry

Lighted by—

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTBIES

47

In regard to the general character of the toilet room provided,
conditions were unsatisfactory for a larger proportion of the negro
than of the white women. That is not meant to suggest, however,
that the toilet rooms for white women were in all cases satisfactory.
Of the 103 toilet rooms reported for white women, 4 were privies.
Approximately one-half of the rooms were not designated, practically
one-fifth were not ceiled, and over one-fifth were not screened from
either a workroom or a hall. As neither lighting nor ventilation was
reported for privies or other outdoor toilets, there were only 99 toilet
rooms for which this information was available. Of these the
majority (63.6 per cent) had both natural and artificial lighting.
However, there were 11 rooms which had no artificial lighting to
supplement the natural on dark afternoons and 6 had no light at all,
either artificial or from windows. Almost three-fourths of the rooms
were ventilated by an outside window, but not far from one-fourth
were ventilated only through some other room—workroom, cloak­
room, or stockroom.
There were 27 toilet rooms reported for negro women, of which 6
were privies and 5 were outdoor toilets with plumbing. Of this small
group (27), 20 were not designated, 10 were not ceiled, and 14 were
not screened. Only one-fourth of the 16 for which lighting was
reported had both natural and artificial lighting. In 3 cases there
was neither natural nor artificial light, except when the door was
open. Ten of the toilet rooms were ventilated only through other
rooms in the plant.




Table 19.—Cleaning of toilet rooms, by industry and race of women

00

WHITE WOMEN
Number of establishments having toilet rooms as specified ana number of toilet rooms—
Scrubbed by—

Swept by—

Number
reported

WTomen em­
ployed for
other work

Men em­
ployed for
other work

Persons
specially
employed for
such work

No one

Women em­
ployed for
other work

and

173

103

13

14

,55

85

>8
3
3
11
8
16
14
10

8
3
3
37
8
20
14
10

2

2

1
3
3
1

1
4
3
1

3

3

3
1
3
11
5
15
12
5

3
1
3
37
5
19
12
5

8

8

5

5

4

4

55

84

1

1

2
1

2
1

2

2

3
1

3
1

1
1

1
1

2

2

1C
0
15
14
4

35
5
19
14
4

___
5

5

2
5

2
5

5

5

No one

Toilet
rooms

a

All industries................
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden)

iijja

EsEsEsEsEsEsEs­
Estab­ Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet tab- Toilet
lish rooms lish- rooms iish- rooms lish- rooms lish- rooms lis’n- rooms lish- rooms lish- rooms
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments
ments

Men em­
ployed for
other work

ES'
tab- Toilet
lish- rooms
ments

2

2

1C

11

1
1

1
1

3
1

3
1

1
3
1

2
3
1

1

1

7

9

1

1

1
2
3

1
3
4

...........

NEGRO WOMEN
All industries
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden)
Textiles. .

and

27
1
21
2
13

27

12

13

10

11

9

10

7
1
2
3
14

3
1
2
1
6

3
1
2
2
0

2

2

1

1

1
1
6

1
2
6

1

1
8

1

1

1

1

2

2

7

7

7

7

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

4

4

1

1

1 Includes 1 establishment in which condition was reported, but sweeping and scrubbing schedule was not reported.
1 Includes 3 establishments in which condition was reported, but sweeping and scrubbing schedule was not reported.




4

___

6

6

1

1

1

1
I

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDTTSTF.TES

Persons
specially em­
ployed for
such work

Dirty
Industry

WOMEN 1ST MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

49

Also in the plans for sweeping and scrubbing, managers had given
less attention to the toilet rooms for the negro women than to those
provided for the white women, although even for the latter the
arrangements were not altogether satisfactory.
•
In approximately three-fourths of the establishments employing
white women the sweeping and scrubbing were done by some one
especially employed for such jobs—a janitor, porter, or scrubwoman.
In 8 cases, however, the women regularly employed for other work
were expected to assume the responsibility for this cleaning as well,
and in some of these instances the cleaning consisted of only sweeping.
In 10 plants, as no one was responsible for scrubbing toilet-room
floors, they were never scrubbed, while in 4 they were not even swept.
There were 14 rooms which were reported by the agents as definitely
dirty.
In the majority of the establishments visited the toilet rooms were
swept daily; in 10 cases they were swept less frequently; and in 10
others more than once a day. Eight of the 14 toilet rooms reported
as dirty were supposed to be swept daily by some person especially
assigned to that job, while some for which the system seemed less
adequate were in better condition. Twenty-one establishments
with 32 toilet rooms reported that the floors of these rooms were
scrubbed once a day, but once a week was the frequency most com­
monly found.
There were 22 plants employing negro women for which the clean­
ing arrangements were reported, and in less than one-half of these
were the toilet rooms swept by persons employed as janitors or
scrubwomen. In 9 cases the women employed for other work were
responsible for sweeping and in 7 cases for scrubbing. In 2 plants
no provision was made for sweeping and in 7 none for scrubbing.
There were 13 toilet rooms in 14 plants which were described as dirty.
In 9 of the plants where negro women worked, their toilet rooms
were swept once a day, but in 5 there was no schedule for cleaning,
and they were swept at irregular intervals. The majority making
any provision for scrubbing had it done once a week.
In 12 of the 103 toilet rooms for white women the toilet seat or
plumbing was out of repair, in 13 the seat or bowl was reported as
dirty. Of the 27 toilet rooms provided for negro women employees,
the toilet seat or plumbing was out of repair in 12 cases, while in 14
the seat or bowl was dirty.
Hand-flush toilets predominated in the toilet rooms provided for
both groups of women, although there were 18 toilet rooms serving
the white women which were flushed automatically at intervals
varying from less than 10 minutes to 30 minutes.
In an enumeration of the number of establishments or of rooms in
which specific evils existed, the picture of any room as a whole is apt



50

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

to be lost. Only when one realizes that in many cases one toilet
room combined all or several of the bad features can one appreciate
the situation in its fullest relation to the workers. The descriptions
which follow are taken from the schedules of the bureau’s agents and
represent some of the outstanding cases.
Apparently no one looked after the privy. The woman who took the agent
around said, “It is terrible, and no one cleans it out. It is nearly full, and sinee
the Italian women came to work here it is filthy, because they use the floor.”
An outdoor privy, in absolutely indescribable condition. Vault was filled to
the brim. The girls did not use it but waited until no one was looking to run
down near the river.
Privy itself very neat, but rain was relied upon to wash away the waste, which
ran into a large ditch.
Service facilities located on first floor of building which was used as huge store­
room. It was dark, dirty, and dismal, with dirty sawdust on floor. Three little
toilet rooms, one for white men, one for negro men, and one for negro women,
were adjoining. Toilet room of women wan filthy and full of papers.
Floor of toilet room sagged in the middle like a bed. There was no drain, and
floor was swimming in water. No -wooden seat on one toilet. In weave depart­
ment toilet seats were filthy, and wood was slimy and rotten from moisture.
There was an outside side light, but there wore no bulbs in the electric-light
fixtures.

As a contrast to the foregoing is the following:
Toilets well kept and cleaned systematically. Room swept twice daily and
scrubbed twice daily. All toilet rooms in plant were designated and ceiled from
W'orkroom, with light and ventilation satisfactory as well.

SERVICE EQUIPMENT

The majority of the firms visited in Mississippi made but slight
provision for the workers’ comfort and convenience, especially m
regard to service facilities for use during intervals, such as a lunch
or rest period, when the women were not at their job and yet at the
plant.
Lunchroom.
The majority of the plants visited had given no attention to the
convenience of their employees during the lunch period, for in 68
of the 81 establishments visited, no provision whatsoever had been
made. In fact, only 12 plants had provided any place other than
the workroom where the women employees might eat their lunch.
Only one manufacturing establishment had any lunchroom, and that
one was a cafeteria, located in a textile mill which employed about
450 people. The other 11 lunchrooms were found in stores, and with
one exception they were rooms equipped merely with chairs and
tables, neither cooking conveniences nor hot food being supplied.



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTBIES

5]

In one of the stores there was a lunchroom in which food was served;
although this convenience was provided primarily for the public,'
the women employed in the store made extensive use of it.
The lunchrooms provided in ten 5-and-10-cent stores served in
each case more than one purpose. Six of these rooms combined
the functions of lunchroom, cloakroom, and restroom, 2 were used for
lunch and for wraps, and 2 as lunchroom and restroom. However,
in all cases but one, the rooms were clean, and that one exception is
described as follows on the schedide:
the combination lunch, rest, and cloak room was very dirty; papers, left-over
lunches, old shoes, dirty aprons, powder puffs, empty boxes, and all sorts of
litter were on floor and table. Girls were supposed to take care of room, but
did not have time or did not care to do so.

Frequently in 5-and-10-cent stores this sort of situation is avoided
by making one girl responsible each week for the orderliness of the
room, and several of the other establishments in Mississippi had such
an arrangement. Where responsibility is not defined, conditions
such as that described are very likely to exist.
.
the
lunchrooms which existed the majority had outside
ventilation, but the public lunchroom in the general mercantile
establishment was without such ventilation as were also those in
two of the five 5-and-10-cent stores which had provided a special
lunchroom for employees. In one case the situation was made even
less desirable because the toilet room was ventilated through this
room.
Cloakrooms.
Ihe provision of an adequate place for keeping wraps and lunches
seems an obvious necessity in an industrial establishment, but ap­
parently many of the managers of the plants visited in Mississippi
were not of such opinion. There were 31 establishments in which
cloakrooms were provided for the use of all women workers, but in
only 2 of these were there lockers. In 5 establishments cloakrooms
were available for only some of the women working there, and in 45
there were no cloakrooms. Nails or hooks in the walls of the work­
rooms were the only places provided for wraps in 32 of the establish­
ments visited, while in 4 establishments there was no definite place
for workers’ coats or hats.
The cloakroom provisions were entirely inadequate in a larger
proportion of the wooden box and veneer plants and in the textile
mills than in any other industries. Of 10 establishments in the first
gioup, 8 had no cloakrooms for any of the women employed. In 3
of these the women threw their wraps on any convenient pile of
lumber, and in the other 5 nails in the wall were the only provision
for wraps. One establishment in this group had a cloakroom with



52

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

lockers for all of the women employed. Another one provided a
cloakroom with wall hooks for the white women working there, but
the negro women in the plant either worked with their wraps on or
left them lying on piles of veneer.
Nails might almost be said to represent the standard equipment
for wraps in the textile mills visited. Although 2 of the 11 mills
had cloakrooms for some of or all their workers, rows of nails furnished
the only means for hanging up wraps. In 9 establishments there
were no cloakrooms, and in 7 of these nails driven into workroom walls
were the only equipment. Lockers and hooks were provided in the
other 2.
Although there were cloakrooms in 6 of the 16 general mercantile
establishments, in others the workers relied on makeshifts. In or.e
instance the women had to fold up their wraps and put them under
counters. In all but one of' the 5-and-tO-cent stores visited there
were cloakrooms for the women employees, but none of these rooms
were equipped with lockers.
The mere fact that a cloakroom is provided does not indicate
necessarily that the women’s possessions are taken care of satisfac­
torily during the workday or that the women have an adequate place
for changing from street to work clothing or back again. There
were cloakrooms in 36 of the establishments visited, and 13 of these
had no windows but relied entirely on artificial light; in one there
was neither artificial nor natural light, except when the door was
open.
The following description of a thoroughly unsatisfactory cloak­
room applied to conditions in a candy factory:
Room filthy; floor caked with everything and littered with dirty papers.
Room was scarcely used as a cloakroom because the girls were afraid to leave
their possessions so far away from them.

As suggested in this description, the women often do hestitate
to leave their clothes in an unsupervised cloakroom with no lockers.
One store had taken care of this side of the problem by providing a
place behind the cashier’s desk wdiere wraps could be hung, so that
the cashier could be in charge of them.
Restrooms.
It would seem that Mississippi employers had failed to realize the
importance of having a place in which workers might rest. In most
cases the worker who was sick or exhausted had to go home and
lose the rest of her day’s work. In only 14 of the 81 establishments
visited was there a cot where anyone could lie down to rest, although
one other establishment had a restroom without any cot. In one
instance the only provision was a couch in the office of an absentee
president which was used only in case of real emergency. In eight



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

53

establishments where cots were provided, the function of restroom
was combined with either lunchroom or cloakroom or both. Even
the provision of a cot does not mean necessarily that the problem
was adequately or efficiently met. The plain wicker couch with
no pad which was reported in one store was scarcely a comfortable
place for resting.
Of the 14 plants in which restrooms were reported, all but one
were stores, either 5-and-10-cent stores or general mercantile establish­
ments. One textile mill did provide a regular restroom which was
used for that purpose alone and was equipped with a cot.
In two of the stores the restrooms provided were shared with
the public and consequently were of less use to the workers. In the
words of an employee in one of the stores: “ This cot is of no use
to the women workers, because it’s too public. You wouldn’t get
any rest here if you needed it. If you have to lie down, the only
thing to do is to go home.”
Health equipment.
Greater effort should be directed toward the prevention of accidents,
but even with care, injuries are likely to occur, and there is always
the possibility of minor illnesses wherever any considerable group
ol people is located. In the Mississippi establishments visited,
however, but scant attention had been given to emergency equip­
ment. Only 1 establishment of the 81 had a hospital room. In
this plant a trained nurse was in charge regularly, and a doctor was
in attendance one hour each day.
First-aid equipment of some sort was provided in 42 establish- •
merits, and in most cases some one person was assigned to be in
charge of it, but frequently the first aid equipment was extremely
limited. Much less than half—18—of these 42 establishments
furnished what might have been called a complete kit. Iodine and
gauze formed the backbone of much of the first-aid equipment and
sometimes ointment and gauze for burns were the only things in
the first-aid cabinet. There were 38 establishments, however,
which did not provide even these limited supplies and had no equip­
ment whatsoever.
In a number of the plants visited the workers paid a certain amount
toward the support of a physician who, in some instances, came to
the plant regularly, and in others was on call. In such cases the
doctor gave his services in the workers’ homes as well as at the factory.
In six plants with first-aid equipment and in six plants without any,
the workers contributed to a fund which provided this form of
medical care.







PART V
THE WORKERS

Attention has been given to the earnings of women employed in
Mississippi industries, to the length of the day and the week for which
they were employed, and to the physical conditions under which they
worked. Thus far, however, there has been no discussion of personal
factors which characterize the group. Were the majority of the
workers young girls or middle-aged women? Were they married or
single? With what educational preparation had they come to their
work? Did they show a tendency to remain at the same kind of work
or did they shift?
In order to obtain a better understanding of the human side of the
problems concerning women in industry in Mississippi, the women
employed in the plants visited were given questionnaires on which
they were asked to furnish information concerning age, conjugal con­
dition, living condition, schooling, and time in the trade. Somewhat
less then one-half of both the white and negro women returned the
cards, although in some cases they were filled out incompletely, so
that the number of women reporting on the different subjects varied
slightly.
Nativity.
.
There were 1,282 women who returned information on race and
nativity.
Table 20.

Nativity arid race of the women employees who supplied personal
information, by industry

Number of women who were—
Industry

Number
of women
reporting

Native born
Foreign
born

1
White i Negro
All industries.......................
Per cent distribution.........
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer........
Gandy,.............. . ...........
Clothing, men’s.............................
Textiles.................
M iscel laneous.......... ..............
General mercantile..........
6-and-10-cent stores...............
Laundries.....................




1,282
100.0

1,039
81.0

128
44
125
461
41
207
112
164

54
21
125
461
23
204
112
39

’

239
18.6

4
0.3

73
23

1

3
125 1................

55

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

56

Foreign-born women did not constitute a factor in the industrial
life of Mississippi, sinco only four women of the total number reporting
had been born outside the United States. Even the negro women
assumed less importance than might have been expected, for less than
one-fifth of the workers returning personal history cards were negroes.
The pay-roll records for all women employed showed practically the
same proportion of negro women as did the smaller group which sup­
plied personal information. (See Table 1, p. 2.)
The majority of the negro women reporting were employed in
laundries, and they formed over three-fourths of the women workers
in that industry. The next largest group worked in the box and
veneer plants, constituting not far from three-fifths of the total num­
ber of women in the establishments visited in that industry. IS one
of the negro women supplying personal information were employed
in stores or in the manufacture of men’s clothing or textiles.
Age.
Information on age was supplied by 1,022 white women and 238
negro Vomen. The details by industry are given in Table XVII in
the appendix, while a summary of the material on age is given in
Table 21.
Table 21.—Age of the women employees who supplied personal information, by race

White women
Ago

Total.......................................................................................

Negro women

Number Per cent Number Per cent
1,022

100.0

238

100.0

321
394
159
97
41
10

31.4
38.6
15.6
9.5
4.0
1.0

61
92
41
31
11
2

25.6
38.7
17.2
13.0
4.6
.8
-

There was but slight difference between the age distribution of the
white women and that of the negro. In both cases the largest group
of women were those between 20 and 30 years of age. A somewhat
larger proportion of the white women than of the negro were less
than 20 years of age, and larger proportions of the negro than of the
white women fell in the 30-and-under-40 and 40-and-under-50 year
groups.
_ .
There was considerable variation among the different industries in
respect to the age of the women employed. While only a small
number of candy workers reported age, those who did were young
workers, whether white or negro. One-half of the negro girls and
not far from that proportion of the white girls reporting in this industry
were less than 20 years old, while the 20-and-under-30-year group



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

57

claimed most of the others. In the box and veneer plants almost
three-fourths of the women, whether white or negro, were less than
30 years old, while over three-tenths were under 20. Only white
women were reported in the 5-and-10-cent stores. Practically onehalf of them were under 20, and the majority of the others were
between 20 and 30 years of age.
The general mercantile establishments offer a contrast to the
5-and-10-cent stores in this respect, with only one-tenth of the women
reporting their age, less than 20. Almost one-half were between
20 and 30, and over four-tenths were 30 years or more of age. Of
the negro women employed in laundries a larger proportion (44 per
cent) were at least 30 years old than in most of the industries, but
only 28.9 per cent of the white laundry workers reporting were as
much as 30 years of age. A considerable proportion of the women
employed in the men’s clothing industry were mature workers;
44.0 per cent of them were 30 years of age or more, while over a
tenth were at least 50 years old.
Conjugal condition.
There were 1,028 white women and 219 negroes who reported on
conjugal condition. The figures are given by industry in Table
XVIII in the appendix and are summarized in Table 22.
Table 22.

Conjugal condition of the women employees who supplied personal
information, by race

White women

Negro women

Conjugal condition
Number Per cent Number Per cent
Total............. .
Single.............
Married........... _
Widowed, separated, or divorced...

' 626
172

91

41.6

1(1.7

A much larger proportion of the white women than of the negro
women were unmarried, three-fifths of the former as compared with
two-fifths of the latter. The proportion of the women who were
married and living with their husbands was identical for the two
groups, but over a third of the negro women were widowed, separated,
or divorced, while only a sixth of the white women reported such
marital status.
Living condition.
Report on living arrangements was made by 1,059 white and 233
negro women, and the facts are presented in Table XIX in the
appendix. The majority of all those reporting, 82.2 per cent of the
white and 79 per cent of the negro workers, were living at home.




58

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Those women were counted as living “at home” who lived with
parents, husband, brother or sister, or children. Only 6.4 per cent
of the white and 5.6 per cent of the negro women lived with other
relatives. A slightly larger proportion of the negro women than
of the white were living independently.
Figures on living arrangements, however, are not to be taken as in
any way indicative of the amount of financial responsibility assumed
by the women workers. It should not be assumed that the woman
reported as living at home has only personal expenditures to make
demands on her pay envelope. Often there would be no home for
the other members of her family and herself if she did not maintain
it. Often the financial burden of the woman who lives at home is
greater than that of the woman who lives independently, and the
fact that she is living with her family is no justification for a low wage
Extent of schooling.
There were 967 white women and 225 negro women who reported
on the extent of their schooling. (Table XX in the appendix.) All
of the white women reported some school attendance, while only 6.
of the negro women had never attended school. Of the white women,
56.8 per cent had at least completed the eighth grade, and 36.8 per­
cent had done some work beyond that grade. Only 4 women had
gone to business or commercial school. Almost one-fourth of the
negro women had attended school through the eighth grade or beyond,
and practically two-fifths of these had attended high school or college.
The largest proportion of white women who had continued in school
after finishing the eighth grade were found among the general mer­
cantile and 5-and-10-cent store workers, with four-fifths of the women
in general mercantile establishments and three-fifths of those in
5-and-10-cent stores reporting some education beyond that afforded
in the grammar grades. In. fact, over three-fifths of all the white
women who bad attended high school or college were in these indus­
tries. The majority of the white workers who had quit school before
the fifth grade were employed in the textile mills, and only among the
negro women working in laundries and in box and veneer factories
was there a larger proportion of women with only four years or less
of schooling.
Time in the trade.
Records of 997 white women and 212 negro women who reported
the number of years spent in the trade may be found in Table XXI
in the appendix. Among neither group was the proportion of new
workers largo, for only 16.9 per cent of the white women and 19.8
pei' cent of the negro women had had less than 1 year of experience
in the industry in which employed at the time of the survey. Fig­
ures for both groups of workers indicate that there was no great ten­



WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

59

dency for the women to shift from one trade to another or to remain
at work for only short periods of time. Of the white women report­
ing, over one-fifth had had 5 but less than 10 years of experience and
6.4 per cent 10 but less than 15 years, while over a tenth had been
in the same line of work for 15 years or longer. The negro women
showed somewhat less tendency to remain in the same trade over a
period of years, but over one-fourth of them reported 5 years or
more of experience in the industry in which they were working at
the time of the investigation.
The two mercantile groups present an interesting contrast in length
of experience. Only 10.3 per cent of the general mercantile em­
ployees reporting, as contrasted with 43.7 per cent of the women in
the 5-and-10-cent stores, had been employed in such establishments
for less than one year. Of the former group, 56.9 per cent had been
in stores 5 years or more, while only 5.8 per cent of the 5-and-10cent store employees had been employed at such work for that
period of time.
2572°—26f-----5










APPENDIXES
Appendix A—General Tables
Appendix B—Schedule Forms

APPENDIX A
Table 1.—Week’s earnings, by industry—1925

Number of women earning each specified amount in—
The manufacture of—

Total
....................................................-............... ...........
Median earnings.................... -..............................................................

$9 and under $10_______________________________ ------- --------$11 and under $12........................ ........... -........ -..........-..........-...........

$30 and under $35....................................................................................
$35 and under $40_....... ............................................................. ..........




All indus­
tries

Boxes
(wooden)
and
veneer

2,136
$8.60

125
$9.05

22
34
61
70
118
144
198
258
262
206
158
132
116
56
40
56
26
33
23
13
17
17
8
19
5
16
17

2
7
6
4
4
4
11
13
11
16
12
12
13
2
2
2
3
1

4

Clothing,
men’s

Candy

37
$9.30

295
$6.95

902
$7.85

4
9
13
18
26
35
45
40
29
15
19
13
5
7
6
3
4

14
12
27
40
71
84
96
129
104
79
73
63
45
16
14
6
9
6
5
4
3
1
1

■
2
7
1
3
4
5
5
4
4
2

Textiles

1
1
2

Miscella­
neous

122
$8.75
2
6
3
6
6
11
10
23
32
6
5
6
2
2
2

General
mercantile

397
$14.90
1
1
4
2
3
f
17
14
9
22
24
29
37
22
14
39
10
26
14
8
i?
16
6
19
5
15
16
4

5-and10-cent
stores

Laundries

194
$8.40

64
$9.25

3
3
3
2

2

13
42
74
33
3
6
3

1
4
5
4
8
4
4
2
4
I

1
J
l

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Week’s earnings

*

4

Table II.—Week’s earnings, by industry—1924

Number of women earning each specified amount in—
The manufacture of—
Week’s earnings
Boxes
(wooden)
and
veneer

1,772
$8.75

93
$10.05

Median earnings—.............. -................................... ...........................

So
86
$7
$8
$9

and under
and under
and under
and under
and under

$6------------- ----------- ----------------------- ---------------$7..... .............................. ............. .....................................
$8.......... ..................................... ......................................
$9.. ......... .........._........... --- - -........... ...... ........... ........
$10---------------------- ---------------------------- -------




'

26
29
.50
74
74
132
142
233
173
147
126
131
95
57
49
26
30
17
20
25
7
3
ii
4
15
13
4
4

2
3
3
4
2
9
11
3
9
14
8
5
6
3
2
5
I
2
1

Clothing,
men’s

Candy

25
$7.25

1
i
8
2
2
8
3

229
$7.90
6
12
14
12
23
17
34
25
24
15
14
11
9
4
6
1
1
I
1

Textiles

877
$7.80
25
21
29
.50
56
80
77
127
74
72
66
69
43
26
22
14
5
6
3
4
6
2

Miscella­
neous

24
$9.75

General
mercantile

352
$14.55

5-and10-cent
stores

Laundries

131
$7.85

41
$8.40

1
5

1
1

5
17
43
34
10
4
5
4
3

7
2
6
9
3
4
2
2

1

2
2
2
3
4
3
3
1
1
1
1
1

3
1
1
5
16
8
17
22
20
30
29
13
19
31
15
22
14
14
14
3
3
11
4
15
13
4
4

2

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

All indus­
tries

2

05
CO

Table III.—Week’s earnings and time worked, all industries—1925
A. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN HOURS
Number of women earning each specified amount who worked—
Number
of women
reported

Week’s earnings




30 and
under 36
hours

557
$7.80

44
$2.00

23
$4. 95

10
14
15
22
40
61
66
65
50
34
45
44
28
9
18
6
9
3
4
4
4
l
l
3

10
12
13
2
6
l

l
l
3
7
4
5
2

42 and
under 48
hours

3G and
under 42
hours
38
$6.15
l
6
8
3
6
6
l
3
l
2
l

73
$6. 55

54 and
under 60
hours

48 and
under 54
hours
93
$8.75

204
$8.45

67
$11.80

4
7
27
25
31
18
17
27
15
10
l
8
3
2

I

l ............
2
4
3
8
ll
14
IS
10
10
ll
14
9
2
6
ll
l
5
2
3
ll
3
3
2
2

2
3
3
l

l

•

1

4

Over 60
hours

60 hours

4

15
$10.65

I
1

1
2
5
6
4
1
17
4
4
6

1
2
4
3
1
1

7
2
2
2
1
1
1

1

i

WOMEN' IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Total.............................................................................................
Median earnings............................................... ....................................

Under 30
hours

ft.

»

♦

B. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN DAYS

Week’s earnings

Number
of women
reported

Number of women earning each specified amount who worked on—
1 day

1M days

1,155
$8. 90

18
$1.00

Under $1...................................... ................. .
$1 and under $2______ ______ ______ ___
$2 and under $3__....... .................. ...............
S3 and under $4________ _______ ______
S4 and under $5.............. ............................. .
$5 and unde; $0...................... ..................
$6 and under $7___ _____ _____________
$7 and under $8............................................
$8 and under $9.......... ............................ ......
$9 and under $10_________ ___________ _
$10 and under $11...................... ...................
$11 and under $12..........................................
$12 and under $13...........................................
$13 and under $14....... ..................... .............
$14 and under $15....... ...... ............................
$15.and under $16____ ___________ _____
$16 and under $17................. .........................
$17 and under $18____ ______ ______ ___
$18 and under $19.............. __.......................
$19 and under $20......... .................................
$20 and under $21...........................................
$2l and under $22____ ______ ______
$22 and under $23_____ __________ _
$23 and under $24................................ .........
$24 and under $25...........................................
$25 and under $30.................. ......................
$30 and under $35....... ........
$35 and under $40.......... ..................... .
$40 and over________ ______ _______

10
14
27
29
48
48
91
154
177
142
80
59
67
29
18
33
10
25
16
4
10
12
7
10
3
11
13
5
3

9
8
1

(*)

12

19
$2.80

1
3
6
2

12
3
3
1

2}/% days

(0

11

1
2
6
1
1

3 days
25
$3. 95
2
3
8
7
3
2

3 lA days

(■)

13

4 days
29
$fi. 10

4 A days
29
$5. 75

5 days
141
$7.65

5 A days

6 days

106
$8.95

747
$9.70
|

1
1
3
2
1
4
1

9
5
5
5
4

1
2
11
5
1
2

...i.

3

10
1

7 days

o

5

WOMBS' IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Total....................................................
Median earnings........... ................ ...............

2 days

1

___1 Not computed,
_
_______
______
_ . involved.
owing
to small
number




C7>k
O

Table IV.—Week’s earnings and time worked, all industries—1924
A. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN HOURS
Number of women earning each specified amount who worked—
Week’s earnings

Number
of women
reported

Under 30
hours

30 and
under 36
hours

490
$8.10

61
$1.95

21
$4. 70

16
15
12
12
4
1
i

1
6
5
4
3
2

$17 and under $18................................................ -...............................

16
16
16
28
25
49
36
56
37
43
39
44
25
19
13
16
2
5

$19 and under $20.............................. ........................................ ...........
$20 and under $21.......... ........................................ ................................

2
1
1

$25 and under $30.......... .................. .....................................................




1

26
$6. 45

63
$6.75

1
1
1
4
3
7
3
1
2
2
1

1
4
2
20
6
9
6
8
2
3
1

5)0. ro |
1
2
1
2
5
13
6
6
5
2
2
1
2
1

1
1

223
5>y. yu

'

3
9
17
15
25
21
24
27
30
18
14
3
10
2
1

Over 60
hours

60 hours

34
$12.00

0)

12

2
2
2
3
2
6
2
2
7
3
3

1
1
1
2
3
2
2

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Median earnings........ ............................................................................

54 and
under 60
hours

48 and
under 54
hours

42 and
under 48
hours

36 and
under 42
hours

4

t

*

B. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN DAYS

Week’s earnings

Total..................................................................... Median earnings------------------------ ------- ---------------

Number
of
women
reported
885
$8.70

$15 and under $16................................................ ...........

IK days

1 day

0)

12
9
1
2

(>)

7

4
3

2 days

«

7

6
1

2H days

(•>

3 days

7

(o

3
2
2

56
51
44
25
24
30
16
20
13
10
14
4
3
4
12
10
3
3

3H days

4 days

i'A days

5 days

14

19
$4. 90

33
$o. 30

58
$6.35

71
$7.60

7
3
2
1

4
2
4
4
3
1
1

2
6
6
9
1
3

1
4
8
12
11
7
8
1
3
2

2
10
14
16
11
8

3
1
1

1

2
1
1

1

152
$8. 80

4
7
3
17
31
18
21
8
10
9
6
3
6
6
1
1
1

1
|
I

6 days
505
$10.45

31
3

12

31
77
70
37
39
37
34
17

20

24

10

19

12

10

1

l.

5M days

13

2

3
4

11

10

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

9
5
19
30
35
54
78
135
108

Number of women earning each specified amount who worked on—

3
3

* Not computed, owing to small number involved.




O

*

f

Table V.— Week's earnings of women who worked the firm's scheduled time} by industry—1925
Number of women earning each specified amount who worked the firm’s scheduled days1
or hours in—
.
The manufacture of—

Week’s earnings

Total.. ... ________________________________
Median earnings________ ________ _______ . _____

____
___

980
$9.80

Under $4__................................... .....................................................
$4 and under *5_________ _____ ________ ______________ ____
$5 and under $6......................... .......... ...........
...............................
$6 and under $7.________ ___________________________________
87 and under $8.............. ........... ................................................... ......
$8 and under $9..... ..................................................................... ...........
*9 and under *10 $10 and under $11
$11 and under $12_____ _______________
$12 and under $13.....................................
$13 and under $14.....................
$14 and under $15.......................... ...............
$15 and under $1G_............................................ ........
$16 and under $17__________________
$17 and under $18.............. ................. .........
$18 and under $19.___ ___________
$19 and under $20__________________________
$20 and under $21____ ___________________ ________
$21 and under $22..........................................................
$22 and under $23..................... ........
.
$23 and under $24.....................................................
$24 and under $25................... ............... ..........
$25 and under $30..................
$30 and under $35.....................
$35 and under $40................. ........
$40 and over__________ _______

6
15
31
47
129
161
124
80
82
69
26
26
35
17
26
19
8
13
13
7
13
3
11
13
4
2

Boses
(wooden)
and veneer
41
$10.50

I
6
5
7
3
5
5
1
2
2
3
1

Clothing,
men’s

Candy

Textiles

18
$10.00

51
$10.10

330
$8.95

2
4
3
5
3

3
1
2
5
7
2
5
6
6
2
1
4
2
2

3
14
28
22
56
44
34
32
41
20
8
10
1
7
2
3
2
1
1
1

1

1
2

Miscella­
neous

5-and-10General
mercantile cent stores Laundries

68
$9.25

263
$15.45

1
3
23
31
3
1
3

11
11
4
9
13
21
29
12
10
26
5
23
13
5
10
12
5
13
3
10
12
4
2

1
2

166
$8.55

i For the purpose of tabulation, if a woman’s name appeared on the pay roll on each working day she has been classified as working the firm’s scheduled time.




4

i

5
37
72
331
7
3
6
3

43
$10.25
1
2
7
7
2
11
2
4
3

1
1
1

WOMEN IN M ISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

All
industries

#

4

*

Table VI.—Weekly rate and actual week’s earnings, by industry—1925
Number of women for whom amount specified was weekly rate and number for whom it was actual week’s earnings in—
The manufacture of—
Amount

All industries

Clothing, men’s

Miscellaneous

Textiles

General mer­
cantile

5-and-10-cent
stores

Laundries

Earn­ Rate Earn­ Rate
ings
ings

Earn­
ings

Rate

Earn­
ings

Rate

Earn­
ings

Rate

Earn­
ings

Rate

Earn­
ings

Rate

Earn­
ings

Rate

23
$8.30

23
$7.50

18
$7.65

18
$8.15

256
$8.50

256
$7.30

31
$10.15

31
$10. 85

388
$13. 55

388
$14. 70

193
$8.20

193
$8.40

58
$10.10

58
$10.00

2
4
4
5
1
7

2
7
1
3
4
1
5

2

1
1
2
3
1
7

9
2
2
13
42
74
33
6
3
6
3

2
2
6
7
7
4
13
3
4
1

1
3
3
3
7
8
4
12
3
4
2

4

4

1
1

1

1

1

1
1

1
1

973
$9.85

973
$9.35

9
25
65
166
148
88
76
66
87
35
11
50
13
37
14
9
8
6
C
20
2
12
13
4
3

49
39
45
70
130
123
83
59
60
60
27
23
44
11
27
18
7
12
15
7
17
4
15
17
7
4

m

6

6
o
4

1
5

» Not computed, owing to small number involved*




Candy

2

n
3
1
1

i
l
l

7
18
20
60
48
30
20
4
31
3
2
8
3
2

26
26
30
30
57
19
21
9
19
9
1
6
1
1
1

2
2
3
2
8
4
3
5
1
1
2

1
6
2
2
3
5
4
2
2
2

.

22
6
14
22
21
.50
43
29
9
37
10
36
9
9
8
6
5
20
2
11
12
4
3

8
3
1
17
14
9
22
24
29
37
20
14
38
10
26
14
7
12
15
6
17
4
14
16
7
4

6
75
72
23
8
6
3

Earn­
ings

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Rate

Boxes
(wooden)
and veneer

.......
Cl)

Table VII.— Weekly rate and scheduled weekly hours, all industries—1925

O

Number of women receiving each specified rate whose scheduled weekly hours were—
Weekly rate

964
$9.85
9
25
63
166
148
86
75
65
86
35

o

2

44

w

7

2
1
1
1
1
2
1

Over 44
and
under 48

48

27
$8.50

(>)

1
5
5
5
1
6
1

4

15
$7.85

19
$7.75

i

2

4
3
4
1
I

1
1
1

10
4
2
1

Over 52
and
under 54

52

8

w

0

3

I
1

1

9
8

1

6

1
1

13
4
3

86
$12. 00

2
10
9
17
4
6
5
2
5

1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
3
2
3

1

1
3
3
1

2
1
1
1
3

2
1

1

1

■ Not computed, owing to small number involved.




4

«

Over 55
and
under 60

55

31
$15. 50

9
4

2

o

Over 54
and
under 55

54

1

1
3

1

2
37

Over 50
and
under 52

50

i

429
$9. 95

147
$9. 05

i
33
74
73
36
19
44
40
24
5
19
4
20
5
5
2
2
1
10
2
4
6

19
9
22
23
11
6
6
5
1
2
10
4
4
2
3
5
4
5
4
2

60

186
$8.95
7
11
45
31
26
20
4
23
2
1
8
3
1
3

1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Total...................................
Median rate................................

Number
of
women
reported Under 44

«

4

4

Table VIII.—Year’s earnings of the women for whom 52-week 'pay-roll records were secured, by industry and race
Number of women earning each specified amount in—
The manufacture of—
Year’s earnings

All industries

Total....... .............................................................
Median earnings..........................................................

330
$464

58
$300

5
9
21
34
47
41
28
30
14
23
15
10
5
7
13
9
6
4
6
2

2
9
18
19
3
4
2

1
JNot computed, owing to small number involved.




White Negro

(0

3

1

1
1
1

16
$300
2
6
5
1
1
1

Cloth­
ing,
men’s

Candy

Textiles

White Negro White White Negro

(>)

6

m

5
5

2
2
2

38
$438

3
8
5
4
4
2
3
1
1

____ _____

General 5-andmercan­ 10-cent
tile
stores
Miscellaneous

145
$390
5
8
17
21
27
15
11
13
6
12
5
1
1
1
2

0)

6

White

(>)

12

Negro

White

3

73
$845

0)

White White Negro
34
$431

19
$463

28
$308

9
13
7
4
1

1
1
3
1
3
2
2
3
1
1

2
10
12

2
2
1
1

1
1
1
2
5

1
1

1
1
1

2
2
5
2
2
8
7
4
5
10
8
5
4
6
2
1

Laundries

1

3
1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

White Negro

Boxes (wooden)
and veneer

Table IX,—Week’s earnings of negro women, by industry—1924 and 1925
1925
Number of women earning each specified amc unt in—
The manufacture of—

Week's earnings

Total..-............................................................................................................... .... —.
Median earnings ............................................................................................................ .................

$8 and under $9.................................................... .................................................... ........ ............




*

C

535
$5.75
1
9
14
39
96
148
115
48
28
24
7
5
2
1
1

Boxes
(wooden)
and veneer
145
$5.60
2
7
15
26
38
17
14
9
7
4
5
1

Candy

Textiles

27
$5.65

1
20
6

Miscel­
laneous

74
$5.20

28
$7.45

5
2
6
19
23
10
6
3

1
1
1
5
2
9
2
5

General Launndries
mercantile

4

2
1

I

257
$5.95
1
1
4
14
50
62
84
19
7
12
2

2
1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

All
industries

4

4

4

1924

Total..______ __________ ________
Median earnings _________________

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.




■>

140
$6. 05

5
7
18
24

2
4

2
2

g

8

109
110
31

34
38
8

20

10

i
i

1
1

i

23
$5. 50

57
$5. 20

24
$7.45

o

2

9
6

■

i
1

174
$5.85

9
3

1

7

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Under $1_______________ _______________________
$1 and under $2________ ___________
$2 and under $3___________
$3 and under $4.................................. ...... ........ ...............
$4 and under $5_____ _______ :_______ .
$5 and under $6___ ____ ______ •____
$6 and under $7................................ .............
$7 and under $8________________
$8 and under $y__................... ...................................
$9 and under $10..... .........................
$10 and under $11............................... ......... .
$11 and under $12......................................... .
$12 and under $13_____________
$13 and under $14____ ______________
$15 and under $16.................................................

420
$5.90

\

03

*<r

Table X.— Week’s earnings of negro women by time worked, all industries—1925
A. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN HOURS
Number of women earning each specified amount who worked—
Number
of women
reported

Week’s earnings

214
$5.30
7
7
21
52
65
26
21
8
5
2

0)

13
7
6

30 and
under 36
hours

0)

6

1
3
1
1

36 and
under 42
hours

0)

42 and
under 48
hours

48 and
under 54
hours

54 and
under 60
hours

13

25
$5.05

53
$5.25

78
$5.40

6
4
1
1
1

6
6
9
4

6
16
18
4
8
1

25
33
13
4
3

*

«•

22
$7.75

<l)

4

■ „ „, ■

i Not computed, owing to small number involved.




Over 60
hoi^s

60 hours

4

2
3
8
2
5
2

1
1
2

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Median earnings...........-................................... ........... ........ ...............

Under 30
hours

»

4

B. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN DAYS

2572°— 26t

Total____
Median earnings.
Under $1_______
$1 and under $2..
$2 and under $3 .
$3 and under $4 _ _
$4 and under $5. _
$5 and under $6._
$6 and under $7 _ _
$7 and under $8..
$S and under $9..
$9 and under $10.
$10 and under $11
$11 and under $12
$!3 and under $14
$14 and under $15.
1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.




Number
of
women
reported
270
LOO I

Number of women earning each specified amount who worked on—
2 days

1 day

(>)

2

1

0)

3} 2 days

3 days
1

1

0)

5

4
1

w

4 days

3

1
1
1

<*>

4h days
9

3
2
3
1

5lA days

5 days

7

23
$5. .30

2
2
2
1

6
3
9
1
4

48
$6.60

6 days
172
$6.25

......... ...............................
1
23
5
46
16
67
5
12
5 \
12
6
7
3
2 i
3
5 i.
1 !
....................11
1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

i

Week’s earnings

Oi

Table XT.—Week's earnings of negro women by time worked, all industries—1924

o*

A. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN HOURS
Number of women earning each specified amount who worked—
Week’s earnings

of women
reported

Under $1...................................................... ................... ....................
$i and under $2.................................. .................... ................ ......
$3 and under $4_____ _________ _________ ________ ___________
$4 and under $5.............................. ................. .................... . . __

170.
$6. 05

17
*2.45

2
2
13
11
18
37
45
20
15

2
2
10
3

36 and
under 42
hours

7

o)

pi

42 and
under 48
hours

10

1
3
2
1

1
4
2
3

48 and
under 54
hours

Over 54
and under
60 hours

31
$6. 35

49
$6.00

4

4

13
5
2

10

15
*5. 10

Over 60
hours

60 hours

16
$8. 00

25
$6.65

__
1
6
3

19

B. WOMEN WHOSE TIME WORKED WAS REPORTED IN DAYS

T » CC* 3 Wti uiugc

Total...... ................................................................
Median earnings.............................................................
Under $1.

......... ............. ........................................... .

$9 and under $10.______ ________ _______________




Number
of
women
reported
243
$5. 80
3
5
5
12
39
70
64
11
10
13

Number of women earning each specified amount who worked—
1 day

o

1H days
5
3
2

o

1
1

2 days

<0

2H days
1

1

(■)

2
1
1

3 days

<■)

3

1
2

3J4 days

0)

5

2
1

4 days

(>)

4

1
1

iH days

(•)

5 days

5

33
* $5.15

5

7
7
18

1

4

5}4 days

6 days

40
$6.85

144
$6.20

6
2
7
6

7

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Total................................................................................. ..........
Median earnings................................................. ................... ..............

30 and
under 36
hours

Under 30
hours

fc

$10 and under $11.................... ...... .............................
$11 and under $12................................. -........ ................
$12 and under $13................................................ —r--$13 and under $14--- ------------------------------------------

7
1
1
1

$15 and

1

under $16................................. .....................

......... !

2j

1

4

i;.............. .
i

|

..........

I

> Not computed, owing to small number involved.
Table XII.— Weekly rate and actual week’s earnings of negro women, by industry—1925

The manufacture of—
Amount

All industries

Earnings

Rate

Rate

314
. $6.00

314
$5. 60

81
$5.45

Under $4.......... .................... ................... .............. ........
$4 and under $5—......... .....................-------- ----------- ...........-62
96
96
$G and under $7................. ............. ........-......................
20
$7 and under $8------------------------ ---------- -------------$8 and under $9________________________ ______
M
$9 and under $10--------------- ------ -------------------------S10 and under $11----------------- ---------------- ----------4

41
64
85
70
23
11
14
3

20
44
10
1
5
1

2

2

1

1

Median____ ____________ ________ ___________

$12 and under $13.--.......................................................

General
mercantile

Boxes (wooden)
and veneer
Earnings
81
$5.05
20
19
29
7
4
2

Textiles
Rate

(0

11

10
1

Laundries

Miscellaneous

Earnings

(>)

11
3
2
6

Earnings

Rate
28
$7. SO

28
$7.45

1
5
9
5
6

2
1
5
2
9
2
5

Earnings

Rate

(0

4

(0

4

2

2

1

1

1

i

Rate

i Earnings

190
$6.15

190
$5.80

42
41
78
10
6
9
3

16
42
45
59
10
6
9
2

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Number of women for whom amount specified was weekly rate and number for whom it was actual week s earnings in

■ Not computed, owing to small number involved.




“■J

Table XIII.—Scheduled daily and Saturday hours, by industry group

-a
oo

MANUFACTURING
Numbin' of establishments and number of women whose Saturday hours were—
Number
reported

None

4 and
5 and
6 and
7 and
under 5 under 6 under 7 under 8

Over 9
and
under
10

9

Over
10 and
under
11

10

11

Scheduled daily hours (Monday to Friday)
a
1
x:
3
5
w

©

1

37 1,755
7_________________________ ___________________ _____ _
S_______________ _________________ __________
Over 8 and under 9..................................................................

9___ __________________ _______________ ______ _
Over 9 and under 10_______ ________ ______ _____
10_________________ ________________ ____________
Over 10 and under 11..
____ _____ ...
11___ ___________________ _________________ _




1

3

_

2
5

3

n

10
2

14
07
16
120
203
399
880
56

3

<3

tb
a
i

a
©
18

co

EA

a©
g
.2
3
33
to
w

a

co
4-3
a©
S

3

tt

©3
©
£

XI
3

5

83

11 889

3

2
l

$
1

3

67
16

4
1
2 188
282
5
2 365
1 50

18

$

a
©
a
©
P

l

17

co

co

a©

a
©
a
3

.2
3

©

W

s
o
P'

3
o2
WCO

©
S
©
£

o

40

1

34

1

14

1

34

ca

©S
X
3
03
co

w

CO
a©
a
.a
.2
s
©
£

5 452

co

a

U
l ....

1

26

5 452

g

3

o
£

3
3
s

6 160

2

35

2

21

2

21

ce
wCO

S

2

44

1

15

1

20

3

31

C3

CO
a
©
3

a©

a
©
a
o

4 116
..

-2
a
©
g

a
a©
3

a
S

s

3
gJ
CO
w

ss

.a
.2

£

a
5
o

o

W

£

1

6

1

6

4

60

Mercantile

130

595

■

'

I

....

1

3

4

57

18 421

2

23

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Over 8
and
under 9

8

*

LAUNDRIES
Total......... -..................................................................... U2

263

1
14
7

36
62
165

2
2

2

30
30

2

27

27

2

38

1

36
2

1

18

1

22

-

1

18

1

22

;___

2

30

2

30

3

98

3

98

i Details aggregate more than total because some establishments appear in more than one hour group.

XIV.—Length of lunch period, by industry
Number of establishments and number of women whose lunch period was—

Number reported
No definite period

Over 30 minutes
and under 1 hour

30 minutes

Industry

Per cent distribution......................................................
Manufacturing:




Over 1 hour

1 hour

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

80
100.0

2,643
100.0

2
2.5

33
1.2

12
15.0

355
13.4

13
16.3

914
34.6

52
65.0

1.323
50.1

10
4
3
11
9
16
14
13

279

1
1

6
27

4
1

173
14

2

27

2

68

2
7
1

261
594
20

1

12

3
2
1
2
8
15
14
7

64
23
34
314
130
383
194
181

295
976
150
401
194
293

.

................
100

Estab­
lish­
ments

Women

\
1.3

18
0.7

i

18

1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Table

O

Table XV.—Hours worked less than scheduled, by industry

Industry

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer.
Clothing, men's.....................
Textiles____________ _____
Miscellaneous....... .................
General mercantile.......................
Laundries_________ _____ ___

551

98
408
23

272

Number of women who worked less than scheduled hours to the extent of—

I 2 hours

2 and
under
3 hours

3 and
under
4 hours

4 and
under
5 hours

U£J into

5 and j 10 and
under
under
10 hours 15 hours

15 and
under
20 hours

20 and
25 and 30 hours
under
under
25 hours 30 hours and over

49.4

1

14

8

5

2

82

46

36

23

15

40

100.0 _______

0.4

5.1

2.9

1.8

0.7

30.1

16.9

13.2

8.5

5.5

14.7

5
38
216

(l)

3

38.8
52.9
30.4

8

29

<*)

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.
Table XVI.—Hours worked more thorn scheduled, by industry

Industry

All industries_____ _____________
Per cent distribution of women who
worked over time.............................




Number of
women for
whom time
worked was
reported
in hours
551

Number and per cent
of women who
worked more than
scheduled hours
Number
33
100.0

Per cent
6.0

Number of women who worked more than Scheduled hours to the extent of—
1 and
under 2
hours

Under 1
hour

2 and
under 3
hours

3 and
under 4
hours

3

5

4

9.1

15.2

12.1

9.1

4 and
imder 5
hours

12.1

5 and
under 10
hours

10 and
under 15
hours

27.3

9.1

15 and
under 20
hours

6.1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Per cent distribution of women
who worked less than sched­
uled hours...............................

Number Number and per
of wom­
cent of women
en for
w ho worked less
whom
than scheduled
time
hours
worked
was re­
ported
in hours Number Per cent

06
O

ft

*

Manufacturing:

Boxes (wooden) and veneer.
Clothing, men’s__________
Textiles_________________
Miscellaneous.... ..................
General mercantile.......... ..........
Laundries......... ........ ..................

*

i!

7

98
408
23
7

(>)

9
15 |
8 ;

9.2
3.7
34.8

8

1 Not computed, owing to small number involved.
Table

XYII.—Age of the women employees who supplied personal information, by industry and race

16 and under
18 years

White Negro

W hite

Negro

18 and under
20 years

20 and under
25 years

25 and under
30 years

30 and under
40 years

40 and under
50 years

50 and under
60 years

60 years and
over

White Negro

White Negro

White Negro

White Negro

White Negro

White Negro

White Negro

All industries
Per cent distribution____

1,022
100.0

238
100.0

135
13.2

15
6.3

186
18.2

46
19.3

269
26.3

54
22. 7

125
12.2

38
16.0

Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and
veneer.... ..............
Candy___ ... _____
Clothing, men’s
Textiles____
M iscellaneous
General mercantile
5-and-10-eent stores
Laundries...................... .

55
21
121
469
23
181
114
38

73
22

4
5
9
87
2
2
24
2

5
1

14
5
19
88
6
16
32
6

18
10

17
9
29
103

19
8

5
1
10
54
3
29
12
11

11
1




18
125

9

1
17

40
8

4
23

5
21

159
15.6

41
17.2

97
9. 5

31
13.0

10

9
2

3
1
14
38
2
32
4
3

9

27
76
3
34
2
7

5
25

3
19

41
4.0

11
4.6

10
1.0

2
0.8

1
6
10
1

10

1

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Number of women whose age wasNumber of
women
reporting

00

82

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Table XVIII.-—Conjugal condition of the women employees who supplied personal

information, by industry and race
Number of women who were—
Number of
w omen re­
porting

Industry

Per cent distribution............-........--.......
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer............... .
Candy----- ---------------------------Miscellaneous....... ........ ............. .....
Laundries_____ ___ _-................... .....

Widowed,
separated, or
divorced

Married

Single

White Negro White Negro White Negro

White

Negro

1,028
100.0

219
100.0

626
60.9

91
41.6

230
22.4

49
22.4

172
16.7

79
36.1

55
21
127
452
23
202
110
38

61
22

36
18
63
260
16
114
96
23

31
9

16
2
40
109
1
47
9
7

9
8

4
1
24
83
6
41
5
8

21
5

18
118

7
44

2
30

9
44

Table XIX.— -Living condition of the women employees who supplied personal

information, by industry and race
Number of women who were livin g—

Industry

All industries...................................... .
Per cent distribution.....................................
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer...................

Miscellaneous.........................................
Laundries......................................... ...... ........




Number of
women re­
porting

At home
(with imme­
diate family)

With other
relatives

Indep endent y

White Negro White Negro White Negro

White

Negro

1,059
100.0

233
100.0

870
82.2

184
79.0

68
6.4

13
5.6

121
11.4

36
15.5

55
21
130
469
23
207
115
39

72
22

43
16
105
407
18
161
90
30

59
21

3
2
10
29
1
7
9
7

5

9
3
15
33
4
39
16
2

8
1

16
123

12
92

1
7

3
24

ft

J

Table XX.—Extent of schooling of the women employees who supplied, personal information, by industry and race
Number of women reporting specified grade as the highest completed who were employed in—
All industries
Extent of schooling

White

Per
cent

Boxes (wooden)
and veneer

Negro

Num­
ber

Per
cent

Cloth­
ing,
men’s

Candy

1
Tex­
tiles,

General 5-andmercan­ 10-cent
tile
stores
Miscellaneous

White

Negro

White

Negro

White

White

White

Negro

54

67

20

22

81

453

23

17

White White

Laundries

White

Negro

_

Number of women reporting on
schooling. _________________
No schooling....................................................
First grade--................ ..................................
Second grade. ..................................................
Third grade.__.......................... ........ ............
Fourth Grade..................................................
Sixth grade.....................................................
Seventh grade................................................
Eighth grade............ .......................................
Ninth grade or first year of high school
Tenth grade or second year of high school._
Eleventh grade or third year of high school.
Twelfth grade or fourth year of high school.
College or other higher education_______
Business or commercial school....................
Indefinite.. . ___________________

967
4
6
18
47
80
102
154
196
135
97
54
58
18
4
4

100.0
0.4
.6
1.9
4.9
8. 3
10. 5
15.9
20.3
14.0
10.0
5.6
6.0
.8
.4
.4

225

100.0

6
4
8
16
26

2.7
1.8
3.6
7. 1
11.6

39
27
30
11
10
1

12.0
13.3
4.9
4.4
.4

1

.4

1
2
10
14
14
1
1
1
1

4
1
1
7

115

35

4

2
7
3
3
2

2
9
1
1

18
25
20
3
1

93
94
43
17
2

119
7

1

16
7
5
1
5

186

1
10
4
5

2
3

g -------■■
7
19
17
20
31
17
35
27
44
7

11

4
9
3
2

16
13
9
4

WOMEN IN M ISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

Num­
ber

The manufacture of—

1 Includes all those who attended college, whether graduated or not.




00

CO

F

I

Table XXI.—-Time in the trade of women employees who supplied personal information, by industry and race

Number of women who had been in the trade—

Industry

All industries.......................................
Per cent distribution....................................
Manufacturing:
Boxes (wooden) and veneer-------------Candy------------ --------------- ------ -----Miscellaneous____________________
Laundries.......................................................




Under 1
year

1

and under
2 years

2 and under
3 years

3 and under
4 years

4 and under
5 years

Negro

997
100.0

212
100.0

168
16.9

42
19.8

151
15.1

36
17.0

141
14.1

37
17.5

105
10.5

23
10.8

56
5.6

19
9.0

50
16
125
454
19
195
103
35

65
22

13
5
22
53
5
20
45
5

13
4

5
4
28
59
5
21
25
4

9
8

10
4
12
73
3
21
12
6

15
6

8
2
9
62
1
11
8
4

9
1

4
1
3
24
1
11
7
5

7
2

*

108

10 and under
15 years

15 years and
over

White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro

White

17

5 and under
10 years

4
21

2
17

3
13

3
10

2
8

106
10.6

13
6.1

3

1

1

8
31
1
18
1
2

18
50

206
2a 7

37
17.5

64
6.4

6

11
1

25
102
3
58
5
7

3
22

5
2.4

35
5

2

12

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

- ..

Number of
women
reporting

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES

85

APPENDIX B
SCHEDULE FORMS
Schedule I

This schedule was used for recording the firms’ scheduled hours, and the num­
ber of employees.

f

*
i

Factory Schedule
Sheet I.

U. S. Department of Labor
Women’s Bureau

3. Name of factory.................................
2. Product.................................... .........
3. Person inter............................... Pos
Person inter___ _____ _____ Pos
4. Number employed: Day.............. .
WThite

Col.

372

Address ........................
City.............................
—..................... Agent.
........ ................. Date .
-------- ---------- Night
Total

W'hite

Men..........................................
Women...
.
Girls.
Boys______ ...
Total. _ ___

Col.

Total

Men______

_

Girls..

—----------------------------------------------------------------

________________

5. Firm’s scheduled hours:
Begin

End

Lunch

Rest

Total

Begin

Lunch

Rest

Total
■

Day__________
Sat.___ _

Sat.

Eeg. wk. days------------; reg. wk. hrs.-----------6. Seasonal or overtime_______________
7. H. W. given out................. .

Keg. wk. days_______ ; reg. wk. hrs.

Same work done in shop Identical rates

8. Wages:
Length pay period ......................

t

End

Vac. without pay_______ _____

W'itli pay .

Deductions_ .......................................................... .........
Bonus or commission.......................................... ...... ........
Overtime pay.... .................................................... ..

0. Employment policy:
Empl. mgr.------------------ ------ oth. eentr. method.................................
Records kept___ ______ __ __________ _____
10. Stairways:
Location

Mat.

Wind.

Light Hand
0. K. rl.O. K.

11. Employees allowed to use elevators




Nar.

Stp.

Rpr.

Other

Other

Notes

86

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
WORKROOMS

Code

Workroom

14. Aisles

13. Floors

12. Rooms

Mat. Rpr. Cln. Other Obst. Nar.

FI.

16. Other

15. Ventilation
Nat.

Artif.

Special
problem Problem

'
Notes:
17. Cleaning: Sweep______________________________ Freq.
By whom: Scrub............................................. -........... Freq.
18. Natural light.... ........ ............................................................. .
Shades or awnings
In roof__________
Glare__ ________
General statement
19.

Art. light: Gen. light.
Indiv. hang, or adj. _
Glare______ ______
General statement ..

Footrests

Seats

Notes

20. Occupations

Sit

Kind

No.O.K.

Kind

Need

..........................

.

i

21. Heating.
23. Washing facilities

22. Drinking facilities

Towels
Share
with—
Floor

Kind
P.

N.
-

...

-

1
Notes:




Cln.

Hot
water Soap

Individual

Common

Kind Freq. No.

Freq.

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
24. Toilets: Kind........... ................... Paper...............Instrt.
Seatrpi........ Clean................. Handfl........ Seatfl.
PIbg. rpr---- Clean.................. Autofl
Freq..
No. using—

Room cleaned by—
Sweep-......... Freq
Scrub............ Freq.
Ventilation

Fir. Room
No. No. Seat Room
Women—
of per encl. deg. Scrn. non- ceil.
abs.
Out.
M. P. seats seat
wnd. Art.
W. Oth.

FI.

87

Light

Room
cln.
Oth. Out
Art.
rm. wnd.

—

.......
—

..... .... .....
....

....

....... -

—

......

——

:::::: -.......

—

...... ......

....... -

—

25. Service facilities:

Lunch

FI. Comb.
with Cln.

i
Artif. Out Toilet
Ck.
light wnd. ventii. Supr. Caf. Tab. Seat I*!?1 Hot
D. conv.
into
[■ •

......... ......
Rest

Cot

..............-.............. ....

...... - ......

.........

Chaii s

Bench

........ — ........ — — ::::::::

Cloak

...............
.
.............................. —

........ ... ”T"‘ ....
Comf. ch.

----- ---- -

Lokr. Shiv. Racks Wall
hk.

............

Seats

__
—----- ......... ............ -....... ............

.........

26. Uniforms req.byflrm.................. . Kind.....................Supplied by firm
by firm---------------Free.................... Cost to girl....... ............... .
27. Health service:
IIosp-------- ------- - First aid........................ Chg. of Dr. full time...
Other........ .................Noresp............................ Med. exam...............




—
Laundered
Dr. part time____
Other welfare.........

88

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
Schedule II

Pay-roll information was copied onto the card, one card being used for each
woman employee:
U. S.

Department

Employee's No.

Establishment

or

Labor, Women’s Bureau

Department.
Male

Name

Female

Age

Conjugal condition

Address

NR

M

Occupation Hour

Piece

Rate of pay
Days worked

I

Regular
weekly
hours

Week

Day

$
$0.
Overtime
ELours
worked
hours
this period

$
$
%
Earnings
Under time
hours
This period Computed
for regular
time

$
Began work j Time at work
I Age
_....I _
Board

At home

Month

Yi month

$

Additions
$
Deductions

*

! Fay-roll period
|___Days ending
Schedule III

This schedule was distributed in the factory to be filled out by each woman
employee:
U. S.

jo,

Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau

Establishment......................................... -..........Employee’s No.__ Department.................................... -or female....................... .
Name......................................................... .................................. ___________Male
Single, married, widowed, separated, or
Address:
___ divorced................ ................................
...................... ...Age........................................
Country of birth................... --......................................
How old were you when you began to work for wages
How long have you been in this trade or business---How long have you been working for this firm.------What is your regular work here. ...................................
Do vou live with your family----------------------------------------------with other relatives.
Do you board or room with persons not relatives---------------------------- -----------------Schedule IV

This schedule was used for the information secured during home visits to the
women employed in the establishments surveyed:
U.

S. Department or La><or, Women's Bureau, Washington
HOME VISIT SCHEDULE

Name of worker..............................................
Address__________-________________ --­
Age left school______________ _____ ........
Reasons for leaving school------------Length of time between school and first job
First job--------------------------------------- ----How secured.---..-....... ............................. Kinds of work done since.................. ..........Reason for leaving last job.
First job with present firm.




.Firm.................
Occupation........
Grade completed.
Pay.

WOMEN IN MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIES
Begin wage-------------------- --------------- ---------Job preferences (reasons)____ _________________

D .

89

'

General comments, working conditions'"accidents,"etc.’:"....... .................
Agent.

Date.
Schedule

V

This schedule was used to record earnings for each week in the year:

t

U.

a.

Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau

Firm..
Empl.
Occ__

City.
---W-N................................................................
..
W. N-:
-T. P. B. ............................................... ......... ...............T. P. B,

Date

Wage 1

Remark

Wage 2 Remark

Wage 3

|

Remark

Wage 4 Remark

l._.____ ______
2_______ ______
...... ....... ..... —
.......... . ..........
........... .............
.........— ............. ....... -........... .............
4....
.......... . ............. ............. ............. ............. .............
5.........
....... .
6____ ____
—Li"!...... .............
— .......... . .............
in:....::
— ............. ............. ............. .............
8___________
9______
.........
.........- - ............ ............. .......... —-....... —:::: .............
10...... ............
---------—
---------- __
12--..-..........
13............... .......' ............. ............- ......... .......... - — ....... ..
............. ---------15.......... .
" ::::::::::
—......
—
16____ ___
"
----- ------ -------------- — -........
17_____
--------—
— ______
19_____
--------::
::::::::::
_
::::::
20______
::::::::::
---I:
21-.-_......
-----......
22______
24______
""
—
............. in:::::;: —::::
25_____
26________I
_____ 11 .......... —-......
....... .....

J

■.......... ............. ............. ............. -............ .............
28_____
29_____
............. ...... ....... -.......... - -...... ..... ______
30______
----- ___ _ — ----31_____
........ — .......... - -----—
------33_______
EE ■.......... ::::::::::
- - ------ ----34.......... ........
----35___
36-..-.......
............. ........... —
37_____
___ ..........
.............
38______ I"....... ............. — ............. —-......... ............. IIIIIIIZII
39___
............. ---- ----- ............. ■ .......... .......... . .............
—...... .
41___ I"~
.
............. ............. ............. ............. ............. .............
42_____
—
.............
..........
.............
............. .............
43
44..........
—......... .......... — .........—- ............- ....... —- .........— ------45...... ............ ---....... .
............... . —......... ............. — ............. ______
46______
47_____
::::::::::
.............
48............I............ ......... ............. —
.............
49......................
---------- --------- so............... :.......... ....... ..... ............ _____
............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ______
51_____
___ __
52...........................
............
............. ........... .............
--------------------- -1 -------- ..........
.......... .
Amt____
Wks. clsd.




Wks. wrkd.
Wks. lost .

.......................... .— Wks. wrkcL.
Wks. clsd........................ Wks. lost...

O

PUBLICATIONS OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU
Any of these bulletins still available will be sent free of charge upon request:
No. 1. Proposed Employment of Women During the War in tho Industries of Niagara Falls, N. Y.
- . . 16pp. 1918.
.
- , - ; ■ • ■ ■:
■
:: ' . "
No. 2. Labor Laws for Women in Industries in Indiana. 29 pp. 1918.
No. 3. Standards for the Employment of Women in Industry. 7 pp. 1919,
No. 4. Wages of Candy Makers in Philadelphia in 1819, 46 pp. 1919.
No. 6. The Eight-Hour Day in Federal and State Legislation. 19 pp. 1919. (Out of print.)
No. 6. The Employment of Women in Hazardous Industries in the United States, 8 pp. 1919.
No. 7. Night Work Laws in the United States. 4 pp. 1919.
No. 8. Women in tho Government Service. 37 pp. 1920. (Out of print.)
No. 9. Home Work in Bridgeport, Conn. 36 pp. 1920.
No. 10. Honrs and Conditions of Work for Women in Industry in Virginia. 32 pp. 1920.
No. 11. Women Street Car Conductors and Ticket Agents. 90 pp. 1920.
No. 12. The New Position of Women in American Industry. 168 pp. 1920.
No. 13. Industrial Opportunities and Training for Women and Girls. 48 pp. 1920.
No. 14. A Physiological Basis for the Shorter Working Day for Women. 20 pp. 1921.
No. 15. Some Effects of Legislation Limiting Hours of Work for Women. 26 pp. 1921.
No. 16. See Bulletin 40.
No. 17. Women’s Wages in Kansas. 104 pp. 1921.
No. 18. Health Problems of Women in Industry. (Reprint of paper published in the Nation’s Health,
May, 1921.) 11pp. 192t.
No. 19. Iowa Women in Industry. 73 pp. 1922.
No. 20. Out of print.
No. 21. Women in Rhode Island Industries. 73 pp. 1922.
No. 22. Women in Georgia Industries. 89 pp. 1922. (Out of print.)
No. 23. The Family Status of Breadwinning Women. 43 pp. 1922.
No. 24. Women iii Maryland Industries. 96 pp. 1922.
No. 26. Women in the Candy Industries in Chicago and St. Louis. 72 pp. 1923.
No. 26. Women in Arkansas Industry. 86 pp. 1923.
No. 27, The Occupational Progress ol Women. 37 pp. 1922.
No. 28. Women's Contributions in the Field of Invention. 61 pp. 1923.
No. 29. Women In Kentucky Industries. 114 pp. 1923.
No. 30. The Share of Wage-Earning Women in Family Support. 170 pp. 1923.
No. 31. What Industry Means to Women Workers. 10 pp. 1923.
No. 32. Women in South Carolina Industries. 128 pp. 1923.
No. 33. Proceedings of the Women's Industrial Conference. 190 pp. 1923.
No. 34. Women iu Alabama Industries. 86 pp. 1924.
No. 35. Women in Missouri Industries. 127 pp. 1924.
No. 36. Radio Talks on Women in Industry. .34 pp. 1924.
No. 37. Women in New Jersey Industries. 99 pp. 1924.
No. 38. Married Women in Industry. 8 pp. 1924.
No. 39. Domestic Workers and Their Employment Relations. 87 pp. 1924.
No. 40. State Laws Affecting Working Women. 65 pp. 1924. (Revision of Bulletin 16.)
No. 41. Tho Family Status of Breadwinning Women in Four Selected Cities. 144 pp. 1926.
No. 42. List of References on Minimum Wage for Women in the United States and Canada. 42 pp. 1926.
No. 43. Standard and Scheduled Hours of Work for Women in Industry. 68 pp. 1925.
No. 44. Women In Ohio Industries. 136 pp. 1924.
No. 45. Home Environment and Employment Opportunities of Women in Coal-Mine Workers’ Families
61pp. 1925.
No. 40. Facts About Working Women—A Graphic Presentation Based on Census Statistics. 64 pp.
'- . 1926. ■ ■
' '
■ ’
‘
■ ■
’ ■ '
’
No. 47. Women in the Fruit-Growing and Canning Industries in the State of Washington. 223 pp. 1928.
No. 48. Women iu Oklahoma Industries. 118 pp. 1926.
No. 49. Women Workers and Family Support. 10 pp. 1926.
No. 60. Effects of Applied Research Upon the Employment Opportunities of American Women. 64 pp.
1926.
No. 61. Women in Illinois Industries. 108 pp. 1926,
No. 52. Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills. 203 pp. 1926.
No. 53. The Status of Women in the Government Service in 1925. 103 pp. 1926.
No. 64. Changing Jobs. . 12 pp. 1926.
No. 65. Women in Mississippi Industries. 89 pp. 1926.
No. 56. Women in Tennessee Industries. (In press.)
No. 67. Women Workers and Industrial Poisons. (In press.)
Annual Reports of the Director, 1919,1920. (Out of print.)
Annual Reports of tho Director, 1921,1922,1923, 1924,1925, 1926.
A. .
■
'
.