The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
U3£:?t : ; OLi * COLLEGE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, NO. 76 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES AND LIMITED-PRICE CHAIN DEPARTMENT STORES [Public—No. 259—66th Congress] [H. R. 13229] An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be established in the Department of Labor, a bureau to be known as. the Women’s Bureau. Sec. 2. That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director, a woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall receive an annual compensa tion of $5,000. It shall be the duty of said bureau to formulate standards and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage earning women, improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and advance their opportunities for profitable employ ment. The said bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said department upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time publish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe. Sec. 3. That there shall be in said bureau an assistant director, to be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an an nual compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as shall be prescribed by the director and approved by the Secretary of Labor. Sec. 4. That there is hereby authorized to be employed by said bureau a chief clerk and such special agents, assistants, clerks, and other employees at such rates of compensation and in such numbers as Congress may from time to time provide by appropriations. Sec. 5. That the Secretary of Labor is hereby directed to furnish sufficient quarters, office furniture, and equipment, for the work of this bureau. Sec. 6. That this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved, June 6, 1920. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR JAMES J. DAVIS, SECRETARY WOMEN’S BUREAU MARY ANDERSON, Director BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, NO. 76 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES AND LIMITED-PRICE CHAIN DEPARTMENT STORES By MARY ELIZABETH PIDGEON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1930 For sal© by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - Price 10 cehts CONTENTS Page Letter of transmittal Part I. Introduction Scope and method of investigation_________________________ Summary of outstanding facts II. Personal information Nativity Age----------------------------------------------------------------Living condition Marital status 10 Time in the trade 11 Summary of personal data_____________________ III. Scheduled hours*______________________________________________ Daily hours 13 Lunch period 13 Saturday hours 13 Weekly hours 14 Relation of hour schedules to hours legally permitted in States"_________________________________________________ Hours in different chains 16 Summary of hour data 18 IV. Earnings, 1920 to 1925______________ Week’s earnings 19 Earnings and rates of pay_____________ ____________________ Proportions of women earning certain amounts_____________ Earnings and time in the trade 20 Earnings in limited-price stores compared to those in other industries 21 Year’s earnings 23 Summary of earnings, 1920 to 1925 V. Earnings in 1928 Week’s earnings 25 Earnings and days worked 25 Earnings and rates of pay 27 Rates by size of town or city 30 Rates in various chains 31 Earnings in 1928 compared to those in earlier years________ Summary of 1928 findings 37 Appendix.-—General tablesJ_____________ v 1 4 6 9 9 9 9 11 13 15 19 19 20 24 25 35 39 TEXT TABLES Table 1. Scheduled daily and weekly hours, by chain or other class of store 16 2. Relation of daily and weekly hours to hours legally established, by chain or other class of store 17 3. Relation of median earnings in limited-price stores to those in other industries, by State 22 4. Medians of the weekly rates and of the week’s earnings, by State or city—1928 figuresj______________________________________ 5. Extent to which actual earnings were less than lowest rate reported, by State or city—1928figures______________________ 6. Highest rates and earnings, by State or city—1928 figures______ 7. Number of women in the various chains and the medians of their rates, by size of town or city and both including and excluding California—1928 figures 32 8. Proportions of women with rates in the various ranges, by chain and both including and excluding California—1928 figures__ 9. Median rates in Florida and in Ohio, by size of town or city and by chain—1928 figures 34 hi 27 29 29 34 IV CONTENTS APPENDIX TABLES Page Table I. Age of women employees who supplied personal information, by State 39 II. Living condition of women employees who supplied personal information, by State 39 III. Marital status of women employees who supplied personal information, by State 40 IV. Time in the trade of women employees who supplied personal information, by State 41 V. Scheduled daily hours, by State 42 VI. Scheduled Saturday hours, by State 43 VII. Scheduled weekly hours, by State 44 VIII. Relation of scheduled daily, Saturday, and weekly hours to hours legally established, by State 45 IX. Weekly rates and actual week’s earnings, by State and year___ X. Median of the week’s earnings, of the weekly rates, and of the year’s earnings, by State and year__________________ _______ XI. Median of the week’s earnings and time in the trade, by State and year1 XII. Median earnings of all women and number of women receiving $10 and over and $15 and over, according to time in the trade, by State and year 50 XIII. Earnings of women who worked on six days, by State or city—1928 figures 51 XIV. Week’s earnings, by State or city—-1928 figures________________ XV. Weekly rates in the various chains, by size of town or city and both including and excluding California—1928 figures54-55 XVI. Weekly rate, by size of town or city—1928 figures______________ 46 48 49 52 56 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL United States Department op Labor, Women’s Bureau, Washington, August 14, 1929. I have the honor to submit the report of this bureau’s study of women in 5-and-10-cent stores and limited-price chain department stores. In 18 State surveys in the past nine years information has been secured on the earnings, hours, and personal history of several thousand girls and women employed in these industries, and this is brought together and analyzed in the present bulletin. Because of the differences in date of the various surveys, the material on earnings has been supplemented by figures for a week in the closing months of 1928, more than 6,000 women being reported upon. The cooperation of the employers and of the workers in supplying the information is gratefully acknowledged. The report has been written by Mary Elizabeth Pidgeon, assistant editor of the bureau. Respectfully submitted. Mary Anderson, Director. Hon. Jambs J. Davis, Secretary of Labor. \ Sir: WOMEN IN 5-AND-IO-CENT STORES AND LIMITEDPRICE CHAIN DEPARTMENT STORES PART I INTRODUCTION An outstanding development that has taken place during recent years in the field of retail merchandising has been the organization and growth of the chain store, which is directed in policy from a central office through district managers, purchases in large quantities, and sells over a wide area at comparatively low prices. One of the oldest and best-known types of chain is the 5-and-10cent store, which began its rise 50 years ago and which, unlike most other large chains, did not originate in a large city, such as New York or Chicago, where it would be subject to higher rents and other costs greater than in smaller cities. The rapid growth in the sales of 10-cent chains, a growth that ordinarily outruns that in other lines of distribution, may be seen from figures published by the United States Department of Commerce. According to these, the increase in business from 1923 to 1924 was— Per cent For wholesale trade 9. For department stores 4. For 5-and-10-cent chains 10. 7 0 6 From 1924 to 1925 the increase was almost negligible in wholesale trade; sales in the department stores increased 6.7 per cent and sales in the 10-cent chains increased 16.7 per cent.1 From the same source may be obtained the figures of the monthly sales in four 10-cent chains up to 1923 and in five chains since that time and, in addition, index numbers that show the relation of the average monthly sales in each year to the average for 1919. The latter are comparable for the entire period, since allowance for the extra chain was made in the base begmning in 1923. A summary of the average monthly sales and of the index numbers relative to 1919 is as follows:2 Average monthly sales 1919________________________ _________-...........$17, 100 1920 20, 491 1921 21, 160 1922 23, 875 1923 28, 172 1924 31, 574 1925 35, 761 1926 39, 112 1927 43, 008 Index* * 100 120 124 140 165 185 209 229 251 1 U. S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business, February, 1925, p. 9, and February,' 1926, p. 9. * Ibid., February, 1928, Table 95, p. 118, and Table 96, p. 119. 1 2 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES The per cent of increase, in thousands of dollars of sales, may be followed from year to year from the same source and thus sum marized :3 Per cent 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 to to to to to to to to 1921-.................... 1922_____________________________________________ 1923 1924------1925_ ___________ 1926______ _____ 8. 9 1927 Nov. 1, 1928, cumulative monthly------------------------- 4.8 13.6 17. 9 12.2 13.4 10. 2 7. 7 It will be seen that even from the year of peak high prices, 1920, to that of heavy depression, 1921, there was an increase in sales of 4.8 per cent. That the chain store is less subject to fluctuations due to business depression than are independent establishments is common knowledge, since in hard times more people are likely to patronize the limited-price stores. In an investigation made by the New York State Department of Labor it was found that one of the chains included had declared a special dividend on common stock in addi tion to its regular dividend in February, 1921, when the country was suffering from heavy business depression.4 In relation to the same period, a representative of a banking firm that has financed six large chains is quoted as having made this statement: During the first half of 1921 the decrease in sales prices was so rapid that the problem was to take in enough for operating expenses *• * *. _ The price declines in 5-and-10-eent stores have been nearly as drastic as in the grocery stores. By an increase in the rapidity of turnover, however, the 5-and10-cent chains have been able to side-step losses which occurred to others during the price decline.6 In this connection the fact must not be overlooked that only one large chain was able to come through the war period and still main tain its 10-cent price-limit. A sales increase marvelous in its proportions is testified to by the figures published in the golden-anniversary booklet of the pioneer chain. These indicate that for this chain, in the years 1920 to 1927, inclusive, the increase was 93.6 per cent and in the period since 1912 it was 350.4 per cent. The book cites the existence of over 2,100 stores of this chain, located in 1,500 cities in five countries of the world, and claims a sales volume for 1927 exceeding the receipts of each of five large railroad systems, of a well-known mail-order house, and of each of three great manufacturing, corporations.9 The explanation of the continuous growth in the profits of these limited-price stores includes savings in overhead and rapid sales turnover. Overhead savings are effected by centralized purchasing and quantity buying; by paying cash, which enables taking advan tage of discounts; by selling for cash, which eliminates bad sales and makes drastic reductions in clerical forces; and by abolishing the cost of delivery and much of the expense of advertising. i jbld . March, 1922, p. 32; February, 1923, p. 40; February, 1924, p. 52; March, 1925, p. 44; March, 1926, p 42; March, 1927, p. 51; March, 1928, p. 43; and December, 1928, p. 43. < New York State. Department of Labor. The Employment of Women m 5 and 10 Cent Stores, 1921, P'^Hayward, Walter S., and White, Percival. Chain Stores. McGraw-Hill Book Co. (Inc.), 1922, p. 144. • Weir, Catherine McNelis-Hugh, for F. W. Woolworth Co. Ftfty Years of Woolworth. The Cuneo -Press (Inc.), 1929. INTRODUCTION 3 One of the telling maxims of Frank W. Woolworth was, “Small profits on an article will become big if you sell enough of the article.”7 His stores exemplify this principle, and it has been stated of them that—in one year they sold nearly 90,000 pounds of candy, enough to fill a train of freight cars 24 miles long. This was not inferior candy. But the enormous volume of sales enabled the manufacturer to make a profit on pure candy even at the low prices. Illustrating this point further, in one year Woolworth sold more than 9,000,000 yards of curtain material, 350,000 barrels of glassware, 20,000,000 pieces of enamelware—enough to load a freight train 7J^ miles long. In 1918, the year of the influenza epidemic, they sold 54,000,000 handkerchiefs at the regular price limit.8 Many factors combine to produce these extensive sales, not the least of which is the choice of goods. It has been stated that over 90 per cent of the stock of such a store consists of everyday necessities.9 These include such staple articles as sewing thread, elastic, tape, pencils, screws, bolts, and nuts; goods of well-known and advertised brands, which may be manufactured under contract, such as certain tooth pastes, soaps, and facial creams; articles especially made to draw trade, such as kitchenware, china, or other things, giving the impression of a great deal for the money and proving a continual fascination and marvel to the consumer unacquainted with sales methods. Another element conducive to the large sales of the limited-price store is the selection of a strategic location, usually in a recognized shopping center and often near a large department store or other point of attraction for many people. In addition to choice of location, other methods that the limitedprice stores employ to attract the attention of possible buyers are in their general appearance, both external and internal. The stores usually are painted in brilliant colors and a similarity exists in those of the same chain in different cities. The windows are conspicu ously dressed, the most telling location for different departments within the store is carefully studied, and goods are arranged on the counters in such a way as to meet the eye and thus to sell themselves. All the factors just enumerated—type of goods, location, appear ance, and manner of display—aid in producing the enormous sales of these well-known chains. The 5-and-10-ccnt store, and later the limited-price department store, usually has had to contend with inefficient sales forces. The idea that the arrangement of goods was such that little skill in selling was required has, in the past, induced the payment of a low wage, with consequent lack of interest and high labor turnover. However, there are indications that this condition is improving in many chains. In the New York study already referred to 10 it was found that—Selection of the girls for the job was governed by what type of girl could be obtained at the particular time she was needed for the lowest wage the market could stand. * * * A few progressive local managers were trying out schemes of their own, how ever, even though no direct stimulus came from the central office. ’ Hayward, Walter S., and White, Pereival. Chain Stores. McGraw-Hill Book Co. (Inc.), 1922, p. 144. «Ibid., p. 75. “ Ibid., p. 106. w New York State. pp. 13, 14, 15. Department of Labor. 67294°—30------2 The Employment ol Women in 5 and 10 Cent Stores, 1921, 4 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STOKES In two of the eight chains studied in New York it was found that effort was being made to teach salesmanship, and this “showed results at least in the prevailing spirit in their stores.” In one of these the type of salesgirl “was strikingly higher than in any of the other stores visited.” Of this chain it was stated in addition that— The frank and open desire of the central executives and of the local managers in this chain to talk over their problems and to secure ideas from other progressive establishments on hours, wages, and methods of employment was in striking contrast to the hidebound, overorganized spirit shown in some other instances. SCOPE AND METHOD OF INVESTIGATION In studies of industries in 18 States, all but one of which were sur veyed in the years 1920 to 1925, inclusive, the Women’s Bureau has included investigation of 5,282 women in 253 limited-price depart ment stores. Most of these were 5-and-10-cent or 5-10-and-25-cent chain stores, but a few were independent establishments and a few sold goods up to 50 cents or a dollar. Definite information as to numbers of employees, hour schedules, wages, and working condi tions was recorded by investigators from interviews with employers and managers, from time-book records of hours worked and amounts paid, and from personal inspection of the plants. In order that com parable material should be secured, records ordinarily were copied directly from pay rolls by the agents of the Women’s Bureau. In every store included the agent took down the actual amount paid to each woman employed in a week that fell within the same current month or season for all firms studied in the same State. Every effort was made to insure that the week taken represented normal business conditions and contained no holidays and that no unusual circumstances had affected earnings or time worked. Employees were asked to furnish information as to nativity, age, living con dition, marital status, and experience in the trade. In some cases this was supplemented by facts obtained from home visits. The States included, dates of surveys, and numbers of establishments and of women studied were as follows: Number of— Number of— State Year of survey i1920-1925 1922 1922 1924 1928 1920 and 1921 1924 1920 1920 State Estab lish Women ments Year of survey 2 253 5, 282 1921 13 11 7 24 11 206 163 99 516 258 20 9 35 546 301 287 1921 1924 1922 1922 1922 1924 1920 1921 1925 Oklahoma-------- ------ -- Estab lish Women ments 9 8 4 14 11 13 15 20 6 9 14 236 145 194 442 309 420 341 213 207 335 i See footnote on p. 5. * Includes some stores selling goods at 25 cents to a dollar. * Excludes Baltimore, which see. The hours of work and the character of the personnel as regards nativity, age, marital and living condition, and experience in the trade are factors that ordinarily differ but little during a period of 5 INTRODUCTION years. Earnings, on the other hand, are likely to show a considerable variation from year to year, though the chain stores are less subject to severe financial fluctuations than are most other industries. The data on earnings in any one State are comparable as far as that State is concerned, but various surveys were made over a period extending from 1920 to 1925, inclusive.11 For this reason the original data have been supplemented by securing a week’s earnings in 1928. In most cases the week selected was in October. These figures were obtained for 6,061 women in 179 establishments in 18 States and 5 additional cities. Of the women reported, 3,387 were employed in the same States, and in most cases in the same cities, for which earnings had been taken at an earlier period, many identical establishments being included; the remaining 2,674 women were in States and cities not before surveyed by the bureau. In addition, earnings were ascer tained for 1,776 women whose regular work was on Saturday only. The following summary shows the States and cities included and the number of establishments and of women whose earnings were ascertained in 1928: Number of— State or city All places.................................. 179 6,061 Arkansas.......... ........................... California.................................... 6 35 4 24 5 13 2 5 5 3 114 916 46 516 88 205 65 97 549 45 Kentucky......................... ........... Maryland........................ . Michigan _ ....................... ....... Mississippi-................................ State or city Estab lish Women ments State: Florida_________ __________ Georgia Number of— Estab lish W omen ments State—Continued: New Jersey.--_________ ___ City: 4 161 317 380 .11 In the case of Florida the State survey was made in 1928, but its data on hours and personal informa tion have been tabulated with those of earlier surveys because, as described at ove, a difference in date ordinarily does not make such material noncomparable. SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING FACTS Scope. 1. State surveys: States visited_______*____________________ Stores visited_______________________________ Women employed in these stores____________ 2. Earnings in 1928: Stales in which earnings wore taken_________ Additional cities in which earnings were taken Stoies reporting_____________________________ Women for whom earnings were reported____ The workers. 1. Nativity, reported by 2,946 women: American-born______________________________ Foreign-born___________________________~~~ " 2. Age, reported by 3,086 women: Under 18 years______________________________ 18 and under 20 years___________________ 20 and under 26 years______________________ 25 years and over__________________________ 3. Living condition, reported by 3,047 women: Living with relatives________________________ Living independently_______________________ 4. Marital status, reported by 2,938 women: Single______■_______________________________ Married_______________________________ _ Widowred, separated, or divorced_____________ 5. Time in the trade, reported by 2,730 women: Under 1 year______________________________ 1 and under 2 years______________________ 2 and under 3 years________________________ 3 and under 4 years______________________ _ 4 and under 5 years________________________ 5 and under 10 years______________________ ~ 10 years and over_________________________ Hours. 1. Daily hours, scheduled for 5,224 women: . Under 8 hours__________________________ - 8 hours_______________________________ Over 8 and under 9 hours________________ 9 hours________________________________ 2. Saturday hours, scheduled for 5,219 women: 8 hours and under_______________________ _ Over 8 and under 9 hours_______________ ' 9 hours_______________________________ Over 9 and under 10 hours__________________ 10 hours_______________________________l l Over 10 and under 11 hours__________________ 11 and under 12 hours_________________ ■ 12 and under 12)4 hours_____________ "" u Excludes 1,776 women whose regular work was on Saturday only. 6 Number 18 253 - 5, 282 18 5 179 12 6, 06 x Per cent 96. 7 3. 3 28. 28. 26. 17. 3 3 2 1 92. 0 8. 0 82. 1 11. 4 6. 5 41. 21. 14. 8. 4. 8. 1. 2 8 4 0 9 3 5 5. 32. 32. 30. 0 5 0 6 3. 18. 19. 4. 24. 7. 14. 7. 9 0 9 3 1 3 5 9 7 INTRODUCTION Hours—Continued. Per cent 3. Weekly hours, scheduled for 5,224 women: 5.9 48 hours and under------------------------------------------------------------57. 9 Over 48 and under 54 hours-----------------------------------------------11. 8 54 hours 8. 7 Over 54 and including 55 hours------------------------------------------15. 8 Over 55 and under 60 hours-----------------------------------------------4. Relation of hour schedules to hours legally permitted in the Number State: 14 States that restricted daily hours----------------------------- .'VUI States restricting daily hours in which all women included 10 had a daily schedule shorter than the legal maximum-----States in which the legal maximum was less than 10 hours... 1 13 States that restricted weekly hours.-----------------------States restricting weekly hours in which all women included 7 had a weekly schedule shorter than the legal maximum----- . 3 States in which the legal maximum was less than 60 hours------ Earnings. 1. Week’s earnings in States studied from 1920 to 1925: States in which week’s earnings were taken .. .......................... States in which more than one-half of the women reported earned under $9------------------------ ----------------------------------- States in which more than one-half of the women reported earned $10 or over---------------------------------2 Week’s earnings and weekly rates in States studied from 192U to 14 3 States in which earnings and rates were taken.. -----------Id States in which the median of the earnings of the women included fell (by 1.1 per cent to 7.8 per cent) below the median of their rates----- -------- ------------------------------12 States in which more than one-half of the women reported had rates under $9------ -------- --------------------------------------2 States in which more than one-half of the women reported had rates of $10 or over-------------- ■ ----------------------- - -,y-5 States in which more than one-half of the women reported had . rates of $12 or over--------------------------2 3 Week’s earnings and time in the trade in States studied from ' 1920 to 1925: , , , , Percent Women who had been in the trade less than 1 year who re ceived $10 and over.-------- ---------------------------------24- 4 Women who had been in the trade 5 and under 10 years who received $10 and over---------------------- ----------------- :,U" 78' S 4. Earnings in limited-price stores compared to those in other industries: . ,, . • ■* j „ Per cent by which median of the earnings in limited-price stores fell below highest median in other industries m same State or city--------------------------r-------y---.-- 3?' 4 to 53' 7 Per cent by which median earnings in limited-price stores rose above lowest median in other industries m same State or city--------- ---------------- ----------------------------------------- Llt° V Number States in which median earnings in limited-price stores were lower than those in any other industry in the State............. 6. Year’s earnings in States studied from 1920 to 1925. States in which year’s earnings were taken.. -.-----------------States in which the median of the earnings of the women re ported was under $500--------------------- -------- ----------------------States in which the median of the earnings of the women re ported was over $600------------------------------------------------------- 4 4 8 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Earnings—Continued. 6. Week’s earnings in 1928: Number States in which week's earnings were taken_____________ 18 Additionai cities in which week’s earnings were taken 5 Establishments reporting__________________ 179 Women for whom earnings were reported111111""”"“ Median of the earnings of these women-----^ 6, 061 $12 Per cent of the women reported who earned" under $10"I" Per cent of the women reported who earned $15 and over’""" 25. 6 btates m which more than one-half of the women reported 29. 8 earned under $10______________________ __ _ 1 7 States in which more than one-half of the" women "reported earned $12 or over__________________ _ ___ 6 Cities in which more than one-half’ of "the women’ "reported earned $12 or over____________________ _ 5 States in which the median of" the earning's of" the'women "in cluded fell (by 2.2 per cent to 10 per cent) below the median of their rates_____________ 11 4 11 Esdudes 1,776 women whose regular work was on Saturday only. PAST II PERSONAL INFORMATION Before considering scheduled hours and earnings in limited-price department stores it is of interest to know something of the personal history of the women involved, to ascertain whether most of them were American or foreign born, were young or old, lived, at home or independently, were single or had been married, and had been in such stores for longer or shorter periods. Nativity. The proportion of foreign born among the 2,946 women reporting on nativity was very small, only 3.3 per cent. In five States Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma all those reporting were American born. In Delaware and in Kentucky only 1, in Alabama and in Tennessee only 2, and in Maryland and in South Carolina only 4 were reported as foreign born. The other States had the following numbers of foreign born: Ohio, 8; Florida, 9; Missouri, 10; Illinois, 16; New Jersey, 19; and Rhode Island, 20. A very few of those in each of five States were negro women, as follows: 9 in Alabama, 2 each in Arkansas and in Missouri, and 3 each in Kentucky and in Ohio. Age. . The data on age reported by 3,086 women may be seen in Table I in the appendix. As was to be expected, the proportion of young women was large. Of the total number reporting age nearly 60 per cent were less than 20 years old and well over a fourth were under 18. Nearly 83 per cent were under 25 years of age, and of these nearly the same proportions were 16 and under 18, 18 and under 20, and 20 and under 25. More women were found in each of these groups than were 25 years and over. In 12 States more than one-half and in 3 other States nearly onehalf of the women reporting were under 20. The largest group of those reporting in each of the following 9 States was 16 and under 18 years: Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and South Carolina, the largest proportions being in Kansas, Maryland, and New Jersey—43 per cent in each case. In the States of Florida, Illinois, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Ten nessee the largest group was 18 and under 20, the proportions at these ages ranging from 29.6 per cent in Illinois to 44.3 per cent in Oklahoma. In each of the following States the largest group was 20 and under 25: Arkansas, 40.7 per cent; Mississippi, 35.1 per cent; and Delaware, 34.5 per cent. Living condition. Living conditions of the women are reported in Appendix Table II. Of the 3,047 women reporting living condition only 8 per cent lived independently, that is, boarded and lodged with people to whom they 9 10 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES were not related. The remaining 92 per cent lived with relatives, a proportion that is not surprising, since so many of the women were girls under 20. Some of the women lived with parents, sisters, or other relatives and some were married. The data for one State showed the relationship of the women to those with whom they lived and in this case more than 85 per cent of the girls with relatives were daughters living at home. • In this connection attention should be drawn to a matter recognized by economists—that it is very poor social economy to proceed on the theory that the unmarried woman at home should be paid a low wage because she can live more cheaply at home. While it is true that the family life can effect some saving, the amount thereof often is greatly exaggerated. To the extent that the employed girl is unable to maintain herself entirely she becomes dependent upon her family, and thus contributes materially to any precarious financial condition existing within the family while actually spending her time and energy in work that should afford her a living. More than this, in the case of the girl receiving somewhat more adequate return for her labor it has been shown repeatedly that a large majority of those living at home must contribute to the support of others besides them selves if the family is to be maintained above the subsistence level. It is interesting to compare the proportions of the workers in the limited-price stores who lived with relatives with the proportions of the women in the same States who were in general mercantile estab lishments and who lived with relatives, women who tend to be some what older in years than those in the limited-price stores. The Women’s Bureau studies include 16,003 women in general mercantile establishments in the 17 States under consideration, and in every State a larger proportion of those in the limited-price stores than of those in general mercantile establishments lived with relatives, the proportions differing by more than 10 per cent in Maryland, Illinois, and Kansas, and by more than 9 per cent in Missouri and Delaware.1 Of the total number of women in general mercantile establishments 84.5 per cent lived with relatives; in three States more than 90 per cent were with relatives. Marital status. Of the 2,938 women who reported upon whether they were single or had been married, 82.1 per cent were single. Only 6.5 per cent were widowed, separated, or divorced. The largest proportions of single women were in New Jersey and in Kansas, in each of which more than 90 per cent were unmarried. Between 85 and 90 per cent were single in the States of Oklahoma, Delaware, Tennessee, Missis sippi, Rhode Island, and Alabama, and between 80 and 85 per cent in Arkansas, Florida, and Maryland. Women who were or had been married predominated in no State, but the largest proportion was in Georgia, in which more than a third of those reporting had been married. In Ohio, Missouri, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Illinois approximately a fourth were or had been married. The marital status of the women reporting may be seen in Appendix Table III. 1 In Alabama and Georgia women in all stores were included, those in 5-and-lQ-eent stores being thrown with others. There were 1,263 women included in these States. PERSONAL INFORMATION 11 Tims in the trade. The time 2,730 women reporting had worked in the trade appears in Appendix Table IV. Frequent change is indicated, since more than two-fifths had been in the trade for less than a year and nearly a fourth had worked for one and under two years. About a fourth of all the women reporting had been in the trade less than six months, and less than 10 per cent had worked for as much as five years. In South Carolina and in Illinois the largest group of women, 33 and 29.5 per cent, respectively, had been in the trade for one and under two years. In every other State the largest group had worked for less than a year, and this group included more than half of the women reporting in Oklahoma, Maryland, and Kansas. In the last named, two women in three had been at work less than a year and practically half the women reporting had less than six months’ experience. More than 30 per cent of the women included in Mary land and Kentucky, more than 25 per cent of those in Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Missouri, New Jersey, and Ohio, and more than 20 per cent of those in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Delaware had worked in these stores less than six months. While such large proportions of the women studied had been in the trade for only a short time, in 3 States from 12 to 15 per cent and in 11 others'from 5 to 10 per cent had been in the trade for 5 and under 10 years. In no State had more than two of the women studied been in the trade for as long as 15 years, and in only three States had as many as six women done such work for 10 years. SUMMARY OF PERSONAL DATA Of 2,946 women reporting nativity 96.7 per cent were American born. In five States none were foreign born, and in each of the five States in which negroes were found they were few in number. Of 3,086 women reporting age 82.9 per cent were under 25, 56.6 per cent under 20, and 28.3 per cent under 18. In each of 12 States more than half of the women and in each of 3 States almost half were under 20. Of 3,047 women reporting living condition 92 per cent were with relatives. Only 8 in every 100 women were living independently. Of 2,938 women reporting marital status more than 8 in every 10 were single. In two States over 90 per cent and in six other States over 85 per cent were single. In one State over a third and in three States about a fourth were or had been married. Of 2,730 women reporting time in the trade 41.2 per cent had been in their trade for less than a year and practically a fourth for less than six months. In 15 States the largest group had worked less than a year and in no State had one-half of the women reporting worked for as much as two years. 67294°—30------ 3 PART III SCHEDULED HOURS Daily hours. The regular schedules of working hours were reported for 252 estab lishments, employing 5,224 women. Three-eighths of these women, in nearly a third of the establishments, had a day of 8 hours or less. A 9-hour day was scheduled for about 30 per cent of the women, em ployed in almost half of the stores included. The remaining women had a day of over 8 and under 9 hours. There was considerable difference among the States in regard to the proportion of women who had a day of 8 hours or less. Appendix Table V shows by State the daily hours scheduled in the establishments and the numbers of women affected. All the women in Baltimore, 92.9 per cent of those in Delaware, over four-fifths of those in Ohio, about three-fourths of those in Illinois and Kentucky, and approximately two-thirds of those in Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, and Rhode Island had a schedule of 8 hours or less. A schedule of over 8 hours applied to all women in the States of Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, and South Carolina, and to the following respective pro portions of those in 'Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, and Kansas: 98.1, 91.9, 90.5, 84.2, and 63.1 per cent. In all other States less than one-half of the women had hour schedules so long. Lunch period. The time allowed for lunch and rest in the middle of the day was one hour for about 90 per cent both of the establishments and of the women studied. It was less than an hour in only 8 of the 218 estab lishments reported, running as short as 30 minutes in four of these, three of which were in Maryland and one in Oklahoma. The longest period was an hour and a half, allowed in two stores in Rhode Island. More than an hour was allowed by two other establishments in that State and by seven in other States. About 6 per cent of the women studied had less and 4 per cent had more than one hour for lunch. Saturday hours. As mercantile establishments have shown a tendency to shorten their hours and to introduce a shorter Saturday in the summer, a very real problem has been created in the management of the limitedprice stores, for which Saturday is almost always the big trading day. While none of the women had a Monday-to-Friday schedule of oyer 9 hours, nearly 60 per cent of them, in about the same pro portion of the establishments studied, had a schedule of more than 9 hours on Saturday. Table VI gives, by State, the Saturday hour schedules in the establishments studied and the number of women affected. About a fourth, both of the establishments and of the women, had a schedule of 10 hours on Saturday; more than a fifth worked more than 10 but loss than 12 hours. The women in 15 stores in four 13 14 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES States had a 12-hour day on Saturday and those in 8 establishments in two States a Saturday of over 12 and under 12}£ hours. As in the case of daily hours, there was considerable difference among the States in the proportions of women with a relatively long Saturday. In Ohio and Missouri, which showed a tendency to short daily hours for the larger groups, Saturday hours showed a similar tendency, and the same was true for the city of Baltimore. In Illinois, while considerable numbers of women had a Saturday of 10 hours, well over half had a shorter schedule. In Mississippi, Kentucky, and New Jersey most workers had a 10-hour Saturday. While the women in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma generally had more than an 8-hour day, only one store reporting in these States had a Saturday of more than 9 hours. In three States in which many women had short daily hours—Delaware, Iowa, and Maryland—considerable numbers had long hours on Saturday. However, only one of the Baltimore stores reporting had a long Satur day. In Mississippi, while all had more than an 8-hour day and none had a Saturday shorter than It) hours, a few had a schedule of more than 10 hours on Saturday. In Tennessee more than half the women had a Saturday longer than 10 hours. Daily hours were above the average and Saturday hours were very long for large groups in the States of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Weekly hours. In any industry the total time worked during the week is perhaps of greater significance than is the length of the day. In the limitedprice department store this is of especial importance, because the Saturday hours ordinarily are longer than those on other days and give insufficient time for recuperation from fatigue. In addition, most of the workers in these stores are quite young, and, while their recovery from fatigue may for the time being appear more rapid, the constant drain on their physical powers is, because of their youth, more likely to be communicated to the race. Appendix Table VII shows the weekly hour schedules applying to the stores and to the women studied. Only about 3 per cent of the women included had a weekly schedule of 48 hours, the equivalent of 8 hours on 6 days of the week; another group of almost the same size had a week shorter than 48 hours. Approximately 70 per cent of the women had a week of more than 48 and including 54 hours, roughly the equivalent of a 9-hour day for 5% or 6 days. For about a fourth of the women studied the weekly schedule was longer than 54 hours. The proportions of women having reasonable schedules of weekly hours differed greatly among the States. All the women in Rhode Island, over 90 per cent of those in Baltimore, and more than threefourths of those in Ohio had a week of less than 50 hours. In Ohio and in Baltimore no woman had a schedule in excess of 50 hours. Other States in which the schedule for all was 54 hours or less are Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. In Illinois and Kentucky between 70 and 80 per cent of the women had a week of 50 hours or less and in the former nearly 60 per cent had a schedule of less than 50 hours. In Iowa nearly 70 per cent had a schedule of less than 52 hours and nearly 60 per cent had one of less than 50. In Arkansas over nine-tenths of the women and in Okla SCHEDULED HOUKS 15 homa about three-fourths had a schedule of 54 hours. From 60 to 100 per cent of those in Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama had a week of more than 54 hours. In Mississippi over 90 per cent of the women had a schedule of 55 hours. In Florida more than 80 per cent, in South Carolina and in Alabama nearly 60 per cent, and in Georgia about 25 per cent of the women had a schedule of over 55 hours. Relation of hour schedules to hours legally permitted in States. In spite of the somewhat difficult adjustment between the needs of its business and the shifting hour standards, the limited-price department store in many cases appears to have given employees the advantage of hours shorter than those legally permitted, even in respect to the Saturday schedule. Appendix Table VIII shows the number of women with schedules shorter than the legal maximum of daily and of weekly hours in 14 States in which standards had been established by law. Of the 3,988 women studied in these States 86.7 per cent had daily, 36.6 per cent had Saturday, and 70.6 per cent had weekly hours shorter than the legal maximum. A number of these States allowed a day of 10 hours or more, but no store had hours in excess of 9. Five States fixed a daily maximum of 9 hours and also a weekly limit, and of the 1,640 women reported in such States 67.6 per cent had a day, 62 per cent a week, shorter than the limit permitted. In the 9- hour States 33.5 per cent of the women had a Saturday shorter than the legal day, and this was true of 27.1 per cent of those in the 10- hour States. Thus, in 10 of the States under consideration the women in all the stores included had a daily-hour schedule shorter than that permitted by law. One of these, Ohio, had a legal limit of 9 hours, while seven fixed a 10-hour limit and two permitted a day of longer than 10 hours. It has been noted that Saturday tends to be the longest workday in the stores. About half of the establishments studied in Ohio, and about three-fourths of the women, had a Saturday hour schedule shorter than the legal limit of 9 hours. Of the women in the 10-hour States none in Mississippi nor in New Jersey had less than 10 hours on Saturday; in one-half of the establishments in Illinois and Rhode Island the Saturday schedule was shorter than the legal limit; and a Saturday of less than 10 hours was scheduled for about nine-tenths of the Baltimore women, about a third of those in other Maryland towns, and about a tenth of those in Kentucky, and for a few women in Delaware. For the two States that allowed a day of more than 10 hours it will be seen that in Tennessee the Saturday schedule in about a third of the establishments was less than the 10% hours allowed by law, affecting 43 per cent of the women studied, and in South Carolina somewhat more than a fourth of the women, in about half of the stores included, had a Saturday schedule of less than the 12 hours legally permitted. When weekly hours are compared with the legal requirements in the various States it is found that many limited-price stores showed a tendency to be well ahead of the laws in the shortening of hours for their employees. In Ohio, where the legal maximum was 50 hours, 76.2 per cent of the women, found in slightly over one-half of the stores included, had a week of less than 50 hours. In the 54-hour 16 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES States all the women in all stores included in New Jersey and Rhode Island, 93.4 per cent of the women in Missouri, 68.2 per cent of those in Kansas, 24.9 per cent in Oklahoma, and 6.7 per cent in Arkansas had a schedule of less than the legal maximum, and in Kansas and Missouri well over one-half of the establishments studied had adopted a shorter week than the law permitted. In Delaware 55 hours was the limit fixed, but the women in all but one establishment, 99 per cent in all, had a shorter week. The legal standard was 57 hours in Ten nessee, 60 hours in the States of Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, and South Carolina, but every store included in these States had fixed a shorter schedule. The States of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and Illinois had no restriction on weekly hours in stores," although Illinois fixes a 10-hour day. A week of 54 hours or less was observed in all establishments in Iowa, in 17 of the 20 in Illinois, in 4 of the 13 in Alabama, in 2 of the 11 in Georgia, and in 2 of the 24 in Florida, and this affected respectively 100, 95.4, 38.3, 25.6, and 15.5 per cent of the women studied in these States. Both in Iowa and in Illinois nearly 60 per cent of the women had a week of less than 50 hours, although neither of these States fixes a legal limit to weekly hours and the 10-hour daily limit in Illinois would admit of a 70-hour week. Hours in different chains. An explicit hour policy to be applied to all its branches is not fixed by the management of the limited-price-department-store chain, but hours differ somewhat with the locality and with other conditions. In some States all the stores in one or more of the cities showed the same hour schedule no matter what chain they belonged to, while those in other parts of the State, although belonging to the same chains, had different hours. Some variation among the different chains in the shortening of hours may be indicated by the table fol lowing, which also includes the independent stores and a few in smaller chains. Table 1.—Scheduled daily and weekly hours, by chain or other class of store Establishments in which daily hours were— Chain or other class Chain I________ _____ ___________ Chain 11...................... .............. ............ Chain III*...... .............. ......................... Chain IV......................... ................. Chain V Smaller chains and independent stores.................................. ................ Number of estab lish ments Under 8 1119 » 50 25 19 5 7 2 2 J 28 1 Over 8 and under 9 8 30 3 16 6 3 27 16 7 8 9 55 36 Establishments in which weekly hours were— Over 50 55 54 48 48 and and and and and under under under under under 54 55 60 50 7 2 13 3 42 12 1 24 22 1 12 1 4 11 7 34 18 10 6 i Details aggregate more than total, because some firms appear in more than one hour group. A daily schedule of 8 hours or less was the practice in more than 70 per cent of the stores in Chain III, in 60 per cent of those in V, in about 30 per cent of these in I and IV and the independent establish ments, but in less than 10 per cent of those in Chain II. A day of 9 hours was the schedule in widely different degrees in the various chains, 17 SCHEDULED HOURS 04 per cent of the stores in Chain II having 9 hours, 58 per cent in IV, 46 per cent in I, 43 per cent in the independent stores, 20 per cent in Chain V, and only 4 per cent in III. In weekly hours, also, the chains varied. The weekly schedule shows that less than 54 hours prevailed in 23 of 25 stores in Chain III, in 4 of 5 stores in Chain V, and in more than half the establish ments in Chain I and the independent stores. A week of 55 hours and over was the schedule in more than a fourth of the establishments in Chain I, in nearly a third in II, in more than half in IV, in more than a fifth in smaller chains and independent stores, but in no establishment in Chains III and V. A tendency in all chains to fix hours shorter than the maximum permitted by law is indicated in Table 2. In the establishments affected by legislation hours were shorter than the legal maximum in about 60 per cent of the stores in Chain II, in 70 and under 80 per cent of those in Chains I and V, and in 80 to 100 per cent of those in Chains III and IV. Both daily and weekly hours were shorter than the legal maximum in about three-fourths of the independent and smaller chain establishments affected by legislation. Table 2.—Relation of daily and weekly hours to hours legally established, by chain or other class of store Establishments for which Establishments for' which weekly hours were— daily hours were— Restricted bylaw Chain or other class Chain IIT__................................................... Smaller chains and independent stores.. Number of estab lishments 119 56 25 i9 5 28 Restricted by law Not Not Having Having restrict restrict hours hours ed by Num shorter ed by Num shorter law law ber than legal ber than legal maxi maxi mum mum 24 13 4 10 1 5 95 43 21 9 4 23 74 26 20 9 3 17 39 14 8 10 1 5 180 2 42 8 17 9 4 23 57 25 14 8 3 17 1 Excludes 15 establishments in Illinois, in which the law limits daily hours only. 2 Excludes 1 establishment in Illinois. 8 Excludes 4 establishments in Illinois. As has been pointed out, most of the States in which these stores were located had a legal day of 10 hours or over; a few had no limit. In the five States that had a 9-hour day and a 50-hour or a 54-hour week were 68 stores belonging to Chains I and II. Of those in Chain I, somewhat loss than half had a day shorter than the legal maxi mum and nearly three-fifths had a week shorter than was allowed by law. In Chain II, about two-fifths had both a shorter day and a shorter week than was permitted by law. The foregoing discussion indicates that while there may have been some difference in the degree in which various chains were in advance of the legal standard in shortening their hours, all had introduced into many of their stores hour schedules shorter than the maximum permitted by law. This principle was applied even in the States in which legislation required hour schedules shorter than those per 18 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STOKES mitted in the majority of the States included, and in the State regu lating daily hours but fixing no maximum for the week (Illinois) nearly 60 per cent of the women had a week of less than 50 hours. SUMMARY OF HOUR DATA Scheduled hours were reported for 5,224 women, of whom 37.4 per cent had a day of 8 hours or less and 30.6 per cent a day of 9 hours; the remainder had a day of over 8 and under 9 hours. The lunch period was one hour for about 90 per cent of the women reported. About a fourth of the women had a Saturday schedule of 10 hours, more than a fifth a schedule of over 10 and under 12 hours, and practically a twelfth a schedule of 12 to 12% hours. The weekly schedule of about 70 per cent of the women was in the groups of over 48 and including 54 hours, and four-fifths of the remainder had hours longer than these. In the States having legislation regulating hours 3,988 women were reported. The daily, weekly, and Saturday schedules were shorter than the legal maximum for, respectively, 86.7, 70.6, and 36.6 per cent of the women in these States. In five States in which the law restricted hours to 9 daily, with a weekly limit, 67.6 per cent of the women had daily, 62 per cent had weekly, and 33.5 per cent had Saturday hours shorter than the maximum permitted. The data show that all chains had introduced into many of their stores hour schedules shorter than those allowed by law. PART IV EARNINGS, 1920 TO 1925 Week’s earnings. Week’s earnings were ascertained for 3,444 women in States studied at some time from the second half of 1920 to early 1925, inclusive. The data for the stores in any one State are comparable, but figures for the various States can not be considered so, owing to differences in business conditions at the different dates and sometimes to other reasons as well. Table X in the appendix gives the median of the earnings of the women studied in each State, with year and month. The median means that one-half of the women included earned more and onehalf earned less than the figure given. The highest median—$11.90 for 157 women in Rhode Island—was of earnings toward the end of 1920, just at the close of the postwar high-price period in Rhode Island and before the heaviest effects of the ensuing depression had been felt there. In September, 1922, when prices had again reached practically their 1919 level, 309 women in New Jersey had a median of $11.30 and 420 women in Ohio had a median of $10.55. In none of the other States was the median so high as $10, although in seven of them practically all the women were full-time workers. In five States the medians were less than $9. Three of these were based on earnings during the severe business depression in effect in these States in 1921 and early 1922. Mississippi’s median was of earnings at the end of 1924 and practically all the women included were full time workers. The remaining median, that of Kansas, was based on the earnings of workers nearly 30 per cent of whom were not on full time. Earnings and rates of pay. Obviously, the amount earned may differ from the rate of pay bargained for if overtime is worked or if time is lost through illness or other cause. During the 5-year period both earnings and rates were reported for 3,051 women. The extent to which the amounts actually earned by these women varied from their rates may be seen from Tables IX and X in the appendix. In every State but one the median of earnings was below that of rates, the variation ranging from 1.1 per cent in South Carolina to 7.8 per cent in Georgia. The highest median of rates was that of $12.30 in Rhode Island, where wages were secured at the end of 1920. In New Jersey, sur veyed in September, 1922, when business recovery from depression was practically complete, the median for 281 women was $12.25. The median of the’actual earnings of the Rhode Island women fell 3.3 per cent below that of their rates, that of the New Jersey women 3.7 per cent below their rates. The lowest median of rates was $8.20, that of 193 women in Mississippi, at the end of 1924, and the median 67294°—30 19 4 20 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES of their earnings was 2.4 per cent above this figure though below earnings in every other State except one studied early in 1922 while still suffering from the effects of depression. Proportions of women earning certain amounts. Even more telling than the medians of earnings discussed in the foregoing are the proportions of women who earned certain amounts or who had certain rates. The distribution of women at the various ranges of earnings and of rates in 13 States may be seen from Table IX in the appendix. Of the 3,051 women included only 14 had rates of as much as $20. These were distributed among 10 States, 2 of them being in each of the States of Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey, and Rhode Island. Three of these women had rates as high as 125. There were 38 women who had rates of $18 or over. These included 2.5 per cent of those in New Jersey and in Rhode Island and 1 per cent or more of those in each of six other States. Altogether, 151 women had rates of $15 or over. Neither Delaware nor Mississippi had any women earning so much, but in the other States the proportions ranged from less than 2 per cent in Tennessee, Alabama, and Oklahoma to 8 per cent in Ohio and New Jersey and 12.1 per cent in Rhode Island. In eight States more than half of the women had rates less than $10. There were 343 women with rates less than $8 and 52 in nine States with rates below $7. In the remaining five States more than half of the women included had rates of $10 or over. These were in New Jersey, Rhode Island, Ohio, Georgia, and Missouri, in which respectively 92.9, 80.3, 71.4, 55.7, and 53.2 per cent of the women had such rates. In New Jersey 59.8 per cent and in Rhode Island 58.6 per cent of the women had rates of $12 or over. As is generally the case, larger numbers of women had low earnings than had low rates. In every State but two, in one of which the numbers were equal, more women earned under $10 than had rates as low as this. The proportion having earnings of less than $10 exceeded by more than 10 per cent the proportion having rates of less than $10 in Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio, and Oklahoma. Rates and earnings each less than $10 applied to over 90 per cent of the women studied in Mississippi, to over 80 per cent of those in Alabama, and to over 70 per cent of those in South Carolina. Figures for the last two States were taken in a period of depression. Rates and earnings each $10 or more applied in Ohio to over 60 per cent of the women included, in Rhode Island to over 70 per cent, and in New Jersey to over 80 per cent. Rates for nearly 60 per cent of the women and earnings for nearly 50 per cent were $12 or above in New Jersey and Rhode Island, and both rates and earnings of over a third of the women in Ohio were $12 or more. Of all the women for whom rates and earnings -were obtained just over one-half had rates of less than $10, but about 57 per cent had earnings that fell below that figure. Earnings and time in the trade. It is of interest to know to what extent the women who had remained in the limited-price stores for a considerable time received higher wages than were paid to those who had worked for shorter periods. Earnings and time in the trade as reported for 2,065 women in 14 States are given in Table XI in the appendix. EARNINGS, 1920 TO 1925 21 In 11 States enough of the women included had worked for as much as two years to make possible a comparison of their medians with those of women having less experience. In nine of these there was a continuous increase in the medians with increased time in the trade. In three States a .general increase up to 10 years of service was indicated. In four States the medians of the earnings of women who had been in the trade for one and under two years were 13 per cent or more above those of women who had worked less than a year. It is of especial importance to consider the earnings of women who had been in the trade 5 and under 10 years in relation to those of women with experience of less than a year. The former represent the more stable workers and those who might be expected to receive the highest payments made, while the latter include the beginners. In Table XII in the appendix may be found data for such a comparison. Of the 2,065 women for whom earnings and time in the trade were reported, 872, or about 42 per cent, received $10 or over, and 69, or about 3 per cent, received $15 or more. In no State did any woman who had been in the trade less than a year receive as much as $15, and in two States no woman in this service group received as much as $10. Of the remaining 824, in 12 States, who had been in the trade less than a year, about a fourth received as much as $10; of these none received as much as $15. Of the 165 who had been in the trade 5 and under 10 years more than three-fourths received at least $10 and nearly a fifth received as much as $15. Of 28 women who had been in the trade for 10 years or longer more than half earned at least $12 and a fourth earned as much as $15. Eight earned less than $10, the rate in some cases running down to $9 or less. . In 12 of the 14 States for which earnings and time in the trade were reported the highest earnings in each case went to the women who had worked 5 and under 10 years, although in 4 of these States other women who had worked for shorter periods earned the same amounts. The largest sum paid for a week’s work was $25, earned by a woman in South Carolina in 1921; a woman in Kentucky in the same year received over $24. Both of these workers had been in the trade 5 and under 10 years. The largest sum earned by any woman who had been in the trade for less than a year was $14 and under $15, and such an amount was received by five women in three different States in 1920 or in 1922. Earnings in limited-price stores compared to those in other industries. A study of the earnings of women in limited-price stores in compari son with those of women in other industries may be made from the data in Table 3. 22 Women in 5-and-io-cent stores Table 3.—Relation of median earnings in limited-price stores to those in other industries, bij State Per cent by which median in limitedprice stores— Total industries stud ied and rank of limited-price stores as regards median earnings Number of Median of the women reported earnings in limited- in limited- Was below Was above price stores price stores highest lowest Number of Rank of median median limitedfor other for other industries price studied Industries industries stores studied studied State Rhode Island. _. New Jersey___ Atlanta 1_____ Ohio..______ Florida 2______ Missouri____I_. Delaware_____ Arkansas______ Oklahoma_____ Georgia 3______ Tennessee_____ South Carolina.. Kentucky......... Mississippi......... Kansas................. Alabama............ 157 309 40 420 516 440 99 137 340 190 317 155 215 194 237 194 $11.90 11.30 10. 85 10. 55 10.05 9. 80 9. 75 9. 50 9. 45 9.25 9.20 8.90 8. 75 8.40 8. 10 8.05 42.5 50.9 32.4 40.2 44.5 38.4 40.5 39.3 46.6 41.8 42.9 42.6 37.7 43.6 53.7 53.5 1.9 7.5 20.4 11.8 1.1 10.8 17.1 16. 7 20.9 17.5 9th. 29th. 6th. 23d. 7th. 15th. 11th. 8th. 9th. 8th. 22d. 8th. 17th. 6th. 10th. 7th. 1 See also Georgia. fn generalVnJyTn'thifsection mornings in'lda’®01' of industries- but earnings in Florida are discussed Excludes Atlanta, which see. in n!k'luin ',a,''',nn- ln limited-price stores fell below the highest median in 3 States and in AtW« hl?h,®st lndustrieswere general mercantile n 2 clotW in 3 i l printing and publishing in 3 States, cigars packingInstate’ e“ h ’ “‘riC81 applUm!es' ™bber, *nd meat IF--s:£s improvement.* °r that ma^ P«* out potties fa EARNINGS, 1920 TO 1925 23 In a discussion of the low wage scale it must be remembered that in the limited-price stores goods often of a high grade are sold at a very low price, and this in itself forms a considerable service to the com munity, provided that it can be done without taking the legitimate profits of the business out of the pay envelopes of the employees. The great majority of the girls working in these stores are young and inexperienced, and it is possible that in many cases they could find other employment with difficulty. Since it must contend with a high labor turnover and often with poor salesmanship, the manage ment is not unlikely to consider the low wage a sufficient payment where so little sales ability and initiative is required. The managers of the single stores in the chain have a responsible job and often they are well paid for it, but women were not found in these positions. Where the heads of companies have been able to rise by their own initiative from small financial beginnings, their experiences have accustomed them to the strict personal and business economies that were necessary for their advance. Therefore, it is not unnatural for them to consider that their employees can live as cheaply to-day as they themselves did at the time of their start. These are factors particularly characteristic of this industry that may offer some explanation of the low wage paid. On the other hand, attempts are being made to mitigate the low wage by the installing of a form of bonus plan or vacation system, and a very real pride is taken by some chains in the success of such plans. These systems supplement, in a small degree, the low earnings of some of the workers, and undoubtedly could be extended with profit to employees in health and to employers in the good will and renewed effort created. The successful existence of limited-price stores is due in large part to the rapid turnover of enormous quantities of goods and to various economies of organization, the payment of a wage below that paid in most other industries being only a contributing factor. The financial reports of these chains usually show very high profits. This would indicate the possibility of paying a considerably better wage and of improving the selling standards within the business without raising the price of the goods. That at least one chain is making efforts in this direction is evidence of its practicability. Year’s earnings. More significant than the earnings during a single week are those during a 12-month period, since the expenses of the worker continue throughout the year whether or not she receives normal payments every week. Medians of the year’s earnings of women in 14 States may be seen in Table X in the appendix. In every State but one the earnings for the 52-week period preceding the week for which current earnings were reported were taken for a representative number of employees in each establishment.1 To be included the women must have worked during at least 44 of the 52 weeks. On the whole, the earnings of these women may be consid ered the best possible ones in the limited-price stores in the State and period in which taken, since they are the earnings of the steadier and* * A very few establishments that had been operating for less than a year were omitted. The exceptional State was Kansas, in which the figures taken were based on 50 or more weeks instead of a 52-week period chd, consequently, are not entirely comparable with those in other States. 24 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES more responsible workers. The medians rose highest, $613, $622, and $667, in Ohio, Missouri, and New Jersey, respectively. Since these States were studied just after an abnormal business period, a good deal of the time included in these figures was during the depression, but business fluctuations appear to influence a high or low wage in the limited-price department chain, and, in fact, in all chain stores, less than they do in many other industries. The medians in seven States ran from $506 to $604, and of these two were surveyed in 1920, two in 1921, two in 1924, and one in 1925. The States having the lowest medians of earnings for the 52-week period were Mississippi, Alabama, and Arkansas, and in these one-half of the women included received more, one-half less, than $431, $438, and $496, respectively. The year for which earnings were taken in Alabama and Arkansas ended early in 1922 and thus included the depressed time of 1921; that for Mississippi closed at the end of 1924 and the figure, therefore, is based on earnings for that year. SUMMARY OF EARNINGS, 1920 TO 1925 Week’s earnings were ascertained for 3,444 women in 14 States studied from 1920 to 1925, inclusive. The highest median was $11.90, and in 11 States the median was less than $10. In one State earnings were above rates; in all others they fell below by from 1.1 to 7.8 per cent. In eight States more than half the women had rates of less than $10; only 151 women had rates of $15 or over. The median of the earnings ordinarily showed an increase with length of service, although in most cases the proportion of increase was not continuous in relation to the time worked. Of those who had been in the trade less than a year none received as much as $15 and all but about a fourth were paid less than $10. Of those in the trade 5 and under 10 years, nearly a fifth earned $15 or more and more than three-fourths received at least $10. The median of the year’s earnings ranged from $667 to $431. In 4 of 15 States the median of the week’s earnings was lower than that in any other industry surveyed; in 5 it was next to the lowest and in the remaining 6 it was from 8 to 21 per cent above the lowest median for any industry.2 In each State the median for women in limited-price stoYes fell from about 38 to about 54 per cent below the highest median in any other industry. It was 32.4 per cent below' in the city of Atlanta.* * See Table 3 and footnote 2, p. 22. PART y EARNINGS IN 1928 Week’s earnings. While giving a true picture of the situation in any one place at the time taken, the earnings discussed in the foregoing section are not necessarily representative of present conditions. For this reason the earnings of women during a week in the last quarter of 1928 were secured for limited-price stores in 18 States and 5 additional cities.1 These data, covering 6,061 women in 179 establishments, are shown in Table XIV in the appendix. One-half of the women included received less than $12, one-half received more, for the week’s work. The medians differed consider ably in the different States. The lowest was that for 97 women in five establishments in Maryland, and was $8.80; over a third of these women earned less than $8. The median was $9 in the six States of Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennes see. The State having the highest median was California, and the figure was $16, which is the minimum permitted by law for experi enced workers. The median in Michigan was $15, that in Kentucky was $14, but in each of these States the stores included were located in the largest cities. Of the separate cities studied Boston had the lowest median, $12, and this was based upon 376 women in three stores. In New York City the median for 380 women in seven stores was $14. The highest was in Chicago and was $18. While this was based upon but two stores, they were of different chains and employed 223 w'dmen, and the figures may bo taken as representative. In every locality but Georgia, Rhode Island, and South Carolina there were women whose earnings for this week were less than $5—■ as many as 21 in one State and 14 to 16 in several others. At the other end of the scale, two saleswomen in Boston earned $40, and a floor woman in Ohio $45, three women in Chicago received $35 or more, and three each in Michigan, Boston, and Chicago earned $30 or more. These very low or very high figures, however, were excep tional. The highest amount earned in any other State was under $30; in nine States it was under $18, in four of these under $15, in Georgia under $14, and in Mississippi under $12. Of the women studied only 7 per cent earned as much as $18, 70.2 per cent earned less than $15, 44.1 per cent less than $12, and 25.6 per cent less than $10. Earnings and days worked. More than 80 per cent (81.8) of the women studied had worked the full week of 6 days, and more than 85 per cent had worked on 5% or 6 days. While the median for all women reported was $12, it was $13i i Most of the data apply to a week in October, 1928, but in the case of a few establishments the figures are for a week early in 1929. 25 26 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES for those working 6 days. The following summary shows the days worked during the week and the medians of the women’s earnings: Number of days worked Total..................... 1............ i H..................... -.......................... 2____ 214--__________ ___________ 3................ Number Median of women of the reported earnings 6,036 $12.00 71 13 76 14 104 2.00 3.00 4. 00 4. 65 6.00 Number of days worked 3%......... 4........... 4 y2-.5____ 53^__ 6 . Number Median of women of Ihe reported earnings 36 138 60 374 213 4,937 $7.00 8.05 9.00 10. 05 11.00 13.00 The foregoing shows a fairly regular progression of earnings with number of days worked. However, women who had worked on 4 or 5 days had a median slightly more than four or five times that for 1 day, and those who had worked on 6 days had a median six and a half times as great as that for the 1-day workers and considerably above that of the 5^-day workers. In effect, this puts the premium of an additional half-day’s pay upon work during a week that lacks an afternoon of freedom. For each State or city the proportion of women who had worked on 6 davs and their respective earnings may be considered from Table XIII in the appendix. In Rhode Island 93.2 per cent of (1 e women had worked on 6 days. In 4 other States over 85 per cent of them, in 8 States and 3 cities 80 to 85 per cent, and in 5 States and 2 cities less than 80 per cent had worked on 6 days. In States in which 6-day workers formed the largest propor tions their medians were not necessarily closer to the medians of all workers than were those in States having smaller proportions of 6-day workers. In 11 States and 4 cities the median was the same for all women and for those working on 6 days; in 7 States and 1 city those working on 6 days had higher medians than had the total number of women, usually by the amount of $1. Since those who had worked on 6 days may be considered the steadiest and most responsible workers, "the amounts they received may be taken as representative of the best actual earnings in a State or city. In each of 7 States the largest group of these 6-day workers earned less than $10. The range in the proportions of women having such low earnings ran from 47.9 per cent in Kansas, through South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Maryland, and Mississippi, to 85.8 per cent in Alabama. In 4 States—Oklahoma, Arkansas, Florida, and Rhode Island—the largest groups of 6-day workers earned $10 and under $12. In Florida the proportion was 42 per cent, and nearly as many earned less than $10. In five States—Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, and Delaware—the largest group of 6-day workers earned $12 and under $15. In Michigan 55.9 per cent and in California 77.6 per cent earned $15 and under $18. The State in which the largest proportion of the women who had worked on 6 days received $18 or over was Michigan, and these formed 28.4 per cent of the total in that State, in which, it will be remem bered, all the Stores surveyed were in large cities. 27 EARNINGS IN 1928 Except a very few women in New York, none of the 6-day workers in the separate cities earned under $10; none in Milwaukee and Indianapolis and only a few in the other cities received less than $12. In Boston 81 per cent, and in all other cities but one the largest group, earned $12 and under $15. In Chicago 62.5 per cent received $18 and over. The heavy trading on Saturday in the limited-price stores and the consequent long hours on that day often make it necessary to employ extra help for Saturday only. Earnings were ascertained for 1,776 women whose regular work was on Saturday only. The largest group of these—23 per cent—earned $1.50 for Saturday work, 18.9 per cent earned $2, 11.6 per cent $2.50, 9.5 per cent $1.25, and 8.4 per cent— women who were in California, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, and Chicago—received $2.67 or more, 2 women in Chicago being paid as much as $3.50. The remaining 28.6 per cent had earnings scattered in various ranges, 23 women in Maryland, Missouri, and Tennessee earning as little as $1 each. No women in any of the 5 cities were paid less than $1.75 for their Saturday’s work, and most of these earned $2 to $2.50. Earnings and rates of pay. Both actual earnings and rates of pay were secured for 6,001 women. In the main, the rates fixed may be expected to correspond quite closely to the earnings that have been discussed for women who had worked on 6 days. The medians of both rates and earnings are shown by State or city in Table 4. Table 4.—Medians of the weekly rates and of the week’s earnings, by State or city— 1928 figures Median of the— Number of women reported All places___ State: Alabama........... Arkansas.......... California......... Delaware_____ Florida.............. Georgia........ . Kansas_______ Kentucky____ Maryland____ Michigan.......... Mississippi....... Missouri........... New Jersey___ Ohio................. . Oklahoma____ Rhode Island.. South Carolina. Tennessee.......... City: Boston_______ Chicago______ Indianapolis__ Milwaukee___ New York......... Weekly rates Week’s earnings 6,001 $13.00 $12.00 144 114 916 46 516 88 205 65 97 549 45 521 161 598 347 73 100 317 9.00 10. 00 16.00 11.00 10.00 9. 00 10.00 14.00 9.00 16.00 9. 00 13.00 13. 00 12. 00 10.00 11.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 16.00 11.00 10.00 9.00 9. 00 14.00 8.80 15.00 9. 00 13.00 13.00 12.00 10. 00 11.00 9.00 9.00 376 210 84 49 380 12.00 18.00 13.00 14. 00 14.00 12.00 18.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 Per cent by which the median of the earn ings fell below that of the rates 7.7 10.0 2.2 6.3 10.0 28 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STOKES The median of the rates of all the women included was $13, but the median of the earnings fell 7.7 per cent below this. Rates and earn ings medians were the same in all but four cases, the exceptions being that earnings fell below rates by 10 per cent in Kansas and South Carolina, by 6.3 per cent in Michigan, and by 2.2 per cent in Mary land. The relative proportions of women having rates and earnings in the highest range and in ranges considerably lower may be seen from the following: Women having— Range of payment Rates as specified Earnings as specified Number Per cent Number 101 1,053 3,942 224 1.7 17.5 65.7 3.7 487 1,518 4,203 214 Per cent 8.1 25.3 70.0 3.6 From the foregoing it appears that the proportion of women having rates of $20 and over is similar to that of women having earnings in the same range—in both cases less than 4 per cent of the total. While 17.5 per cent of the women reported had rates below $10, considerably more—25.3 per cent—had earnings as low as this. The highest or lowest rates fixed for individual workers are of less importance than is the foregoing consideration of groups of women earning certain amounts, and they have little value as representing numbers of women; nevertheless, it is of interest to notice their in dications as to the differences among States in earning possibilities for the lowest paid and for the exceptionally well paid. The entire range of the rates set ran from under $6 to $45. The lowest rate ranged from less than $6 for a woman in Ohio (although only one other woman in that State had a rate below $8) and from less than $7 in Tennessee and Florida to $11 and under $12 in California and Kentucky of the States, and to $12 and under $13 in Indianapolis and $13 and under $14 in Milwaukee of the cities. The lowest rate was as much as $10 in only four States; it was below $10 in only one city, New York. In seven States and two cities 10 per cent or more of all the women reported had actual earnings below the lowest rates fixed. Table 5 shows the lowest rate found in each State and city and the number and per cent of women who earned less than this. EARNINGS IN 1928 29 Table 5.—Extent to which actual earnings were less than lowest rate reported by State or city—1928 figures Amount at or above which all rates fell Women whose earnings were less than lowest rate reported State or city i Number $5............................ $6_......................... 12 16 22 15 Florida............... ............. Arkansas................ Delaware................ . Kansas____ _____ ____ Maryland..................... ....... Mississippi................ ....... Missouri. ................. $8................. ......... 21 13 Oklahoma___ South Carolina.......................... $9................. $10........................... $11--........ -..................................... 13.4 30 5 36 10.4 9.0 27 28 23 37 New Jersey....................... Boston................ ............ Chicago....................... 5.1 61 Kentucky......................... $12................................. $13........................... Per cent 11 11 13.1 24.4 --------------------------------1 In Rhode Island no earnings fell below the lowest rate, which was $7. — At the other end of the scale, in every State but one and in every city, the highest earnings found equaled but did not exceed the high est, rate. In Kansas the highest rate was under $18, in Delaware and Oklahoma under $17, in Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina under $16, m Maryland and Arkansas under $15, and in Mississippi under $12. In every other State some women had rates of $20 or over; m five States and four cities some had rates of $25 or over, lable 6 shows the numbers of women having rates and earnings of $20 or over and the highest ranges of rates and earnings found. Table 6.—Highest rates and earnings, by State or city—1928 figures State or city Number Women having rates and earnings of— of women reported $20 or over $25 or over State: California. 916 11........................... 4. Florida__ Kentucky. Michigan. 516 65 549 2............................ 2_______ ______ Rate 66................. Earnings 63 Missouri............ 521 Highest rates and earnings above $25 Rate and earnings, $27.50 for 1 woman, $26.50 for 1. 1 woman had a rate of $33, earnings of $34.73; 1 a rate of $30, earnings of ton co New Jersey___ 161 Rate 19............ . 4..................... Earnings 16. ... Rate 8................ 2........................... Ohio................... 598 13........................... Rhode Island.. Tennessee.......... City: Boston................ 73 317 1............................ 1............................ 376 7............................ 6............................ Chicago 210 Milwaukee. New York. 4,9 380 Earnings 5 ° Rate and earnings, $26 for 1 forelady and for 1 woman selling music. Rate and earnings, $45 for 1 floorwoman, who also did selling. Rate and earnings for 2 saleswomen, $40; for 3, $30. Rate 81.............. . 7 floor women had rates and earnings Earnings 78____ Earnings 21........ ranging from $28 to $39; the highest for any saleswoman was $27. 1............................ 30 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Rates by size of town or city. Up to this point the discussion has taken account of the differences in payment in the various States or large cities and the differences between rates and earnings, but there has been no general considera tion of the variations in rate according to size of town or city. The data are arranged in such a manner in Table XVI in the appendix. The medians in this table, which show wide variations in the rates fixed for women working in places of different sizes, are as follows: Number of— Median of the rates Size of town or city Stores Women 179 6,001 $13.00 27 52 22 26 27 16 9 332 771 580 944 1,314 1,470 590 9. 50 9. 50 10.00 10.00 13.00 15.00 15.00 This summary shows that the median of the rates was the same for women in towns having fewer than 10,000 inhabitants as in those having 10,000 and under 25,000. It was a little more than 5 per cent higher for women in places of 25,000 and under 50,000, and was the same here as in places of 50,000 and under 100,000. In cities of 100,000 and under 500,000 the median rose above that of the class just below by 30 per cent, and in those of 500,000 and over it rose above the class below by 15 per cent. In the largest cities the median of the rates was 57.9 per cent higher than in towns of under 25,000. In towns of less than 25,000 population the highest rate was under $19, in those of from 25,000 to 500,000 the highest rate was $27.50, and in the largest cities a few women had higher rates. The propor tions of women having rates of $15 or over, according to size of place, were as follows: Size of town or city Per cent of women with rates of $15 or over 15.9 21.0 27. 0 56. 9 63. 1 The foregoing summary shows quite clearly that much larger pro portions of women had rates above $15 in the larger cities than in the smaller towns. While the proportion advanced somewhat with each successive group of the population classification, the greatest increase came between the class 100,000 and under 500,000 and the class 500,000 and under 1,000,000. The proportion of women having rates of $20 or over was nearly 10 per cent greater in cities of 1,000,000 and over than in cities of EABNINGS IN 1928 31 500,000 but under 1,000,000. However, there was much less differ ence than this between the cities last mentioned and those of 100,000 and under 500,000. In connection with these differences in rate of payment it shoidd be remembered that the cost of living ordinarily is much higher in the larger places. Rates in various chains. In addition to differences in locality and in size of city a factor that may affect payments is the possibility of variation in the stand ards of the employing chains. A basis for the indication of such variation may be found in Table XV in the appendix, which shows by size of place the rates of the women in each of five chains. Many of the women reported in Chains I and II were in California, and this State differs from every other included in having a legal provi sion for a minimum wage. Because of this, rates in California are, from a reason aside from the standards of payment that may exist elsewhere in these two chains, higher than in other States, except for some instances in the very large cities. In Table XV, therefore, figures both including and omitting the women who worked in Cali fornia are given. Table 7, taken from the appendix table cited, shows the number and the median rates of the women in the various chains, by size of place and both including and excluding California. Table 7.—Number of women in the various chains and the medians of their rates, by size of town or city and both including and excluding California—1928 figures In States exclusive of California In all States reported Chain III Chain II Chain 1 Chain IV Chain II Chain I Chain V Size of town or city All places............... .......... . Under 10,000__________ _______ 10.000 and under 25,000........... . 25.000 and under 50,000........ ....... 50.000 and under 100,000........... 100.000 and under 600,000--------500.000 and under 1,000,000.......... 1,000,000 and over____ ________ 956 114 85 192 130 155 280 Median Number Median Number Median Number Median Number Median Number Median Number Median of the of women of the of women of the of women of the of women of the of women of the of women of the rates rates rates rates rates rates rates $14.00 9.00 16. 00 13.00 16. 00 12.00 16.00 *Not computed, owing to small number involved. 1,885 94 555 196 612 199 86 143 $10.00 12.00 9.00 9. 00 10.00 10. 00 16.00 15.00 2,088 44 31 16 899 898 200 $14.50 10. 50 10.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 18.00 506 $11.00 107 53 86 37 9.00 10. 00 10.00 9.00 223 14.00 329 26 99 23 157 24 $12.00 10. 09 11.00 11.00 12.00 14.00 500 $12.00 1,460 $10.00 89 9 107 44 136 115 9.00 <’) 11.00 9.00 12. 00 14.00 47 513 127 496 134 9.00 9.00 9.00 10. OO 10.00 143 15.00 ------------- \ WOMEN IN 5-AND- 1 0-CENT STORES Number of women 33 EARNINGS IN 1928 The chains having the highest rates reported, according to size of city, were as follows: Chain having highest median rate— Size of town or city In States In all States exclusive reported of Cali fornia Under 10,000 1............................................................. . 25,000 and under 50,000........................................ 50,000 and under 100,000......................................................................................... 100,000 and under 500,000*................................... 500,000 and under 1,000,000®__ 1,000,000 and over7.......... ................................................. III III II I I I III I and II III C1) w I III III III III 1 Includes no stores of Chains III and V. *The median rate in towns under 10,000 was the same in all chains. 1 Includes no stores of Chain V. 4 The indication is that Chain I had the highest rates, but the median was not computed, owing to the small number involved. 6 Includes no stores of Chain IV. eIn2ludes no stores of Chain IV and, in California, none of Chain II. 7 Includes no stores of Chain I. The foregoing shows that, in general, with the exclusion of the California figures, Chain III had the best median rates wherever this chain was found, the only exception being the cities in the second and third groups. In the smallest towns included in the study no stores of Chain III were found, and the median rates were alike in the other chains located in these places. When the California figures are included the definite influence of the minimum wage appears and the median rates in Chains I and II in cities of certain sizes rise to a point above the rate in Chain III—a chain that has no stores in California. Omitting the California figures, the size of city in which each chain paid best was as follows: Size of city in which median rate was— Chain number Highest I_____ ______ 500,000 and under 1,000,000___ II................... . Ill......................... IV.............. V................ Next to highest (>). 50.000 and under 100,000 and 100,000 and under 500,000. 500.000 and under 1,000,000. 10.000 and under 25,000 and 25,000 and under 50,000. 500.000 and under 1,000,000. 1 The indication was that cities of 10,000 and under 25,000 had the rate next to the highest, but the median was not computed, owing to the small number involved. Since no stores of Chain I were included in the largest towns, the foregoing shows that in every chain the highest rates prevailed in the largest cities in which the chain in question was found; the rates next to the highest were in the city next in size in Chains III and V, but were in the smaller towns in Chains II and IV. 34 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Table 8.—Proportions of women with rates in the various ranges, by chain and both including and excluding California—1928 figures In States exclusive of California Chains I and II in all States reported her of women I........................... . II______________ III.-. IV V Per cent of women who had weekly rates of— Per cent of women who had weekly rates of— Chain number 956 1,885 Un der $10 11.6 34.3 $10 and under $15 $15 and over 42.5 42.4 45. 9 23.2 $20 and over 1.7 .2 .............. Number of women 500 1,460 i 2,088 506 329 Un der $10 22.2 44.3 .1 28.9 10.6 $10 and under $15 63.0 48.9 50.1 55.5 81.2 $15 and over $20 and over 14.8 6.8 49.7 15.8 8.2 1.4 .2 9.2 1.2 1.5 i Of these women, 9.6 per cent were in Chicago, and a number in that city were highly paid, some being floor women. If the Chicago rates be excluded from this chain, 44.3 per cent of the remaining women had rates of $15 or over and 55.7 per cent had rates of $10 and under $15; the median for all women in the chain would then be $14. The proportions of women in the various chains who had rates falling in the different ranges are shown in Table 8. From this it will be seen that, considering the group from which California figures are excluded, practically half the women in Chain III had rates of $15 or over, while the corresponding figure was 15 or 16 per cent in Chains I and IV and 7 or 8 per cent in Chains II and V. The largest proportion of women with rates belowT $10 was in Chain II. Chain III thus appears to 'rise rather considerably above the other four and Chain II to pay rather below the remaining three. With the omission of the Chicago women having high rates in Chain III, the proportion having rates of $15 or over still was 28.5 per cent higher than in the chain having the next high proportion with rates of $15 or over—Chain IV. To estimate somewhat more definitely the influence upon rates of size of city or of employer’s policies, a more detailed study may be made of different chains and of towns of different size in certain States the data from which lend themselves to such a study. In each of five States studied over 500 women were included. In two of these, Florida and Ohio, the women studied were in cities of four or more classifications as regards size and in stores in four chains. These States, therefore, furnish a basis for the somewhat more detailed study of the possible effect of size of city or of difference in chain upon the standard of rates of payment to the women employed. Table 9.—Median rates in Florida and in Ohio, by size of town or city and by chain—1928 figures FLORIDA Chain I Size of town or city All places................................. 60,000 and under 100,000................. Chain II Chain IV Chain V Num Median Num Median Num Median Num- ]Median of the ber of of the of the ber of of the ber of ber of women rates women rates women rates women * rates 172 $9. 00 89 9.00 52 31 10. 00 9.00 111 40 26 45 $10.00 184 $10.00 11. 00 8. 00 10.50 78 17 52 37 9.00 9.00 11. 00 9.00 49 ' 49 $11.00 1 11.00 35 EAENINGS IN 1928 Table 9.—Median rates in Florida and in Ohio, by size of town or city and by chain—1928 figures—Continued OHIO Chain I Size of town or city 10,000 and under 25,000................... 25,000 and under 50,000.............. 50,000 and under 100,000................. 100,000 and under 500,000............. 500,000 and under 1,000,000_____ ■ Chain III Chain IV Chain V Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median ber of of the ber of of the ber of of the ber of of the women rates women rates women rates women rates 328 $12.00 9 55 13 136 115 12.75 11. 00 11.00 12. 00 14. 00 214 $13.00 . 31 10. 00 183 13. 00 17 $9. 00 17 9. 00 i i 1 I 26 $10.25 26 10. 25 • . According to Table 9, no chain in Florida showed regular progres sion of payment according to size of city. The highest median, $11, was found in three chains, Nos. II, IV, and V, in each case in a city of a different size. The lowest, $8, was in Chain II; the same chain paid a rate more than a third higher than this in a small town. Chain IV had a low rate in cities of three sizes, Chain I in cities of two sizes. In the State as a whole 41.3 per cent of the women had rates below $10. In Chains I, II, and IV the respective proportions having rates of less than $10 were 58.7 per cent, 30.6 per cent, and 42.4 per cent. No women in Chain V had earnings below $10, but this chain was found only in cities of the largest class in the State. In cities of the largest size Chain II likewise had no women with rates below $10, and Chains I and IV had, respectively, 83.9 per cent and 16.8 per cent with such rates. In cities next smaller in size these low rates applied to no women in Chain IV, to 23 per cent in Chain I, and to most of those in Chain II. Only 5.2 per cent of the women reported in Ohio had rates below $10. The lowest median rate was in Chain IV. Chain I usually had rates high as compared to those of other chains in cities of the same size. No women in Chain IV and very few in Chain V had rates of $15 or over, though in Chain III 17.5 per cent and in Chain I 21.6 per cent had such rates. In cities of 25,000 and under 50,000 in Ohio no women in Chain III and very few in Chains I and V had rates of as much as $15. In cities of 100,000 and under 500,000, 14.7 per cent of those in Chain I and 26.2 per cent of those in Chain III had rates of $15 or more. From the foregoing consideration of conditions in two States having considerable numbers of women reported from several chains in cities of several different sizes, no generalizations can be made as to the effect on rates of size of city or of difference in chain. This does not mean, however, that there are no indications of the effect of such factors within any one State. Earnings in 1928 compared to those in earlier years. The earlier studies were taken in 1920 to 1925, inclusive, a period of great business fluctuation. The number of women studied in any one year was too small to warrant comparison with the data for 1928, except in the case of 1922, a year following great depression and conditions within certain months of which could not be taken as representative of normal times. In 1928 it was not always possible to secure data for the same establishments or even the same cities as 36 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES those surveyed in earlier years; in some cases additional cities were taken to give a more accurate picture for 1928. Owing to these and other factors (see footnote 2, Appendix Table XIV), it is not possible to make adequate general comparisons of the 1928 figures with those secured earlier. An interesting condition is found in South Carolina, where the median of earnings in 1928 was 10 per cent below that of rates, though in 1921, a year of depression, earnings and rates were practically the same. In 1928 the median rate was about 11 per cent higher than the 1921 figure. In this State the stores in Chain II, taken in the same three cities in 1921 and in 1928, show the following proportions of the women included as having rates and earnings in the groups specified: Per cent of women having— Under $10 as— Rate 54.5 31.1 Earnings 56.3 37.7 $10 and under $15 as— Rate 36.4 68.9 Earnings 33.3 62.3 $15 or over as— Rate 9.1 Earnings 10.4 Of the women working in Chain II in these cities nearly 20 per cent more in 1921 than in 1928 had earnings below $10 and over 30 per cent more in 1921 than in 1928 had rates so low; but while some had rates and earnings of $15 or over in 1921—ranging as high as $25 for one woman—none in 1928 had either rates or earnings of as much as $15. Thus, while the proportion of women paid at the lowest rates was smaller in 1928 than in 1921, no woman in 1928 was paid so high as were about 10 per cent of the women in 1921, a year of depression. The greatest difference between the median rate for an early year and that for 1928 occurred in Kentucky, another State that was studied in the depressed year of 1921. The stores surveyed in 1928 were in two large cities, and Chain III was studied in these cities in both years. For this chain the figures were as follows: Year 1921.............................................................................................................................................. 1928.............................................................................................................................................. Number of Median of the rates women 74 65 $10 14 In 1928 the median in this chain for stores located in these two cities was 40 per cent above the 1921 figure. Nearly a fourth of the women had rates and actual earnings of $16 or over in 1928 and only three had rates so high in 1921. In Tennessee rates were ascertained for exactly the same number of women (317) and in the same cities in 1925 and 1928. The median of the rates was in the same range in the two years, and in each year only one woman earned as much as $20. The following gives the proportions of women having rates in the lowest ranges in the two years for which figures were obtained in Tennessee. 37 EARNINGS IN 1928 Amount Per cent of women who Per cent of had rates specified in— women who had earnings specified 1925 1928 in 1928 63.1 93.1 57. 1 92.1 61. 2 92.7 The foregoing shows that in this State the proportions of women with rates below $10 and below $12 were smaller in 1928 than in 1925. SUMMARY OF 1928 FINDINGS Median of the earnings. In 1928 the median of the week’s earnings of 6,061 women studied in 179 stores in 18 States and 5 additional cities was $12. The medians for the various States ranged from $8.80 in Maryland to $16 in California. In every locality but Georgia, Rhode Island, and South Carolina some women earned less than $5. The highest earnings in a State ranged from less than $12 in Mississippi to $45 in Ohio. Earnings of 6-day workers. More than 80 per cent of the women studied in 1928 had worked on 6 days during the week; the highest proportion in any one State was 93.2 per cent, the figure for Rhode Island. In seven of the States studied considerable proportions of the 6-day workers earned less than $10, these per cents ranging from 47.9 in Kansas to 85.8 in Alabama. In the large cities studied no women received so little as this, except a very few7 in New York. In four States the largest groups of 6-day workers earned $10 and under $12, in five States $12 and under $15, and in two States $15 and under $18. In four cities the largest groups earned $12 and under $15, and in one $18 and over. Earnings of Saturday workers. In addition to the 6,061 women who form the basis for the 1928 study 1,776 women wTere scheduled who worked only on Saturday. Their earnings for this day ranged from $1, received by some women in Maryland, Missouri, and Tennessee, to $3.50 received by two women in Chicago. Median rates of pay. The median of the weekly rates for all women reported in 1928 was $13, 7.7 per cent above the median of their earnings. In 14 States and 5 cities the median of the rates was the same as that of the earnings; it was above that of the earnings in 4 States, in 2 of these by as much as 10 per cent. The lowest rates ranged from $5 and under $6 in Ohio to $11 and under $12 in California and Ken tucky; in cities, from less than $10 in New York to as high as $13 in Milwaukee. In every State but one and in every city some women earned less than the lowest rates, the proportions of the total ranging from 2 per cent in Ohio to 24.4 per cent in Milwaukee. No woman had earnings in excess of the highest rate fixed. 88 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Rates of pay in relation to size of town or city. While much larger proportions of the women in the larger cities than of those in the smaller towns had high rates, and while the women in each group of cities showed some advance above those in the group of cities next smaller in size in the proportion having the higher rates, the greatest increase came between the classes of 100,000 and under 500,000 and those of 500,000 and under 1,000,000 popula tion. The median of the rates for cities in the classes up to 100,000 varied by no more than 6 per cent, in those over that figure by about 15 per cent, but between the class containing cities of 50,000 and under 100,000 and that containing cities of 100,000 and under 500,000 there was a difference of 30 per cent. It must be remembered that living costs usually are higher in the larger than in the smaller cities. Standards of rates of pay in different chains. From the figures available there appeared to be some variation in the standards of the rates paid by different chains, those in Chain II showing some tendency to be low and those in Chain III to be high. Earnings in 1928 compared to those in earlier years. In most cases such factors as the differences in identity of estab lishments, of chains, or of cities, or the difficulty of measuring business fluctuations in the different years of study, made it impossible to give accurate comparisons, on any wide scale, of earnings in 1928 with those in earlier years. Of 13 States for which it is possible to make the comparison 10 had rates higher in 1928 than at the earlier survey. Three somewhat small and scattered cases offer definite bases for comparisons of 1928 with earlier years. In one State in which an identical chain was studied in the same three cities in 1921, a year of depression, and in 1928, smaller proportions of the women studied in 1928 than of those studied in 1921 had very low rates and earnings, but no women in 1928 had earnings so high as had over 10 per cent of the women in 1921. In another State in which an identical chain was studied in the same two cities in 1921 and in 1928 the median rate in 1928 was 40 per cent above that in 1921, and in 1928 nearly a fourth of the women had both rates and earnings at a figure attained by only three of the women stuffied in 1921. In the State in which the same number of women (317) were studied in identical cities in 1925 and in 1928 the median of the rates showed little change; fewer women in 1928 than in 1925, by about 9 per cent, had rates below $10. These rather fragmentary and scattered cases in which valid com parisons are possible indicate some decrease in the proportions of women paid at the lowest rates, but give no positive indication of any general increase in the groups having rates or earnings in the highest ranges. APPENDIX.—GENERAL TABLES Table I.—Age of women employees who supplied personal information, by Slate Number of women whose age was— Number of women 16 18 20 25 30 40 50 60 report- Under and and and and and and ing years under under under under under under 16 and 18 20 25 30 years 40 50 60 years years years years years years years State All States____ Per cent distribution. 3,086 100.0 Alabama........ ............ Arkansas......... ............ Delaware....... ............. Florida..... .................... Georgia....................... Illinois........ .............. . Kansas...................... Kentucky................. Maryland__________ Mississippi................. Missouri...... .............. . New Jersey.......... ...... Ohio______________ ’ Oklahoma_________ Rhode Island______ South Carolina_____ Tennessee............... 135 113 84 337 150 233 286 152 149 114 260 149 244 201 112 106 261 Table II. 31 1.0 7 11 5 8 843 27.3 874 28.3 809 26.2 256 8.3 38 18 26 76 37 41 123 40 64 24 90 64 43 25 40 37 57 35 30 21 109 30 69 70 34 28 32 63 43 91 89 24 20 86 32 46 29 102 32 67 49 39 22 40 56 31 64 67 22 29 82 13 11 6 27 14 28 17 15 17 12 25 7 18 10 9 6 21 174 5.6 15 7 1 16 14 16 9 21 8 2 14^ 2 19 7 7 5 11 77 2.5 17 0.6 8.2 — 1 1 14 8 7 3 5 4 7 1 8 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 Living condition of women employees who supplied personal informa tion, by State State All States................. Per cent distribution......... Alabama_____ Arkansas.............. Delaware. Florida............. Georgia........ ............ Illinois................ Kansas____ ____ Kentucky............... Maryland............. Mississippi___ Missouri...... ......... New Jersey_____ Ohio................ Oklahoma............. Rhode Island____ South Carolina......... Tennessee............... Number of women report ing 3,047 100.0 84 Number of women who were— Per cent living Living Living with relar with rela independ tives tives ently 2,803 92.0 92.0 12 88.3 89.3 16 91.7 96.6 86.1 91.5 39 40 Table WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES III.—Marital status of women employees who supplied personal information, by State Number of women who were— State Number of women report ing Single Per cent of women Widowed, who were Married separated, single or divorced 2,938 100.0 2,411 82.1 335 11.4 192 6.5 2, 411 82.1 131 in 84 325 132 231 285 150 144 110 256 118 193 199 112 100 257 112 94 74 262 87 178 259 113 116 96 190 109 142 179 97 77 226 10 9 6 44 28 27 18 21 21 9 47 7 31 13 10 15 19 9 8 4 19 17 26 8 16 7 5 19 2 20 7 5 8 12 85.5 84.7 88.1 80.6 65.9 77.1 90.9 75.3 80.6 87.3 74.2 92.4 73.6 89.9 86.6 77.0 87.9 Number of women who had been in the trade— Number of State report ing Under 1 year Total 2,730 100.0 125 109 71 320 133 193 237 139 137 103 255 143 179 182 123 103 178 ■ 6 months Under 6 and months under 1 year 10 and 5 and 15 years under 10 under 15 and over years years 1 and under 2 years 2 and under 3 years 3 and under 4 years 4 and under 5 years 133 4.9 227 4 9 1,124 41.2 668 24.5 456 16.7 595 21.8 392 14.4 218 8.0 50 37 26 96 39 53 . 158 58 71 45 115 58 74 104 49 28 63 25 15 60 18 18 117 42 45 23 70 39 46 53 35 18 24 12 11 36 21 35 41 16 26 22 45 19 28 51 14 10 39 27 27 15 70 36 57 32 30 29 25 39 28 33 42 20 34 51 25 19 10 13 57 23 26 17 19 14 33 15 22 12 8 8 40 25 24 10 13 18 18 30 10 10 6 26 15 0.5 10 29 9 8 5 8 1 1 7 8 3 2 1 26 16 8 1 1 1 A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES Table IV.—Time in the trade of women employees who supplied personal information, by State 42 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Table V.—Scheduled daily hours, by- State Number reported State Number of establishments and number of women whose daily hours were— Over 8 and Under 8 8 9 under 9 Establish- Women EsEsEsEstabtabtabtabments lish- Women lish- Women lish- Women lish- Women ments ments ments ments All States........... Per cent distribution. i 252 5. 224 100. 0 12 259 5. 0 Alabama........................ Arkansas___________ Delaware....................... Florida........................... Georgia.......................... Illinois............................ Iowa............................... Kansas....... .................. Kentucky................. . Maryland 4_.................. 1** Baltimore............. . Mississippi__________ Missouri........................ New Jersey................... Ohio................. ............. Oklahoma.................... Rhode Island.............. . South Carolina........... . Tennessee..................... i 13 11 7 24 11 20 9 a34 9 8 4 14 11 13 15 20 6 9 14 206 103 99 516 258 546 256 274 236 64 145 194 442 309 420 341 213 207 335 1 4 2 38 65 1,697 32. 5 4 1 1 7 5 10 5 5 3 92 49 21 364 176 85 185 32 82 2 16 1 1 10 63 1 48 7 14 149 345 4 80 1 64 2 53 60 1,670 32. 0 116 1,598 30.6 3 1 79 9 2 6 7 4 7 2 1 47 171 109 80 84 30 14 10 10 23 21 4 4 123 154 7 420 66 35 15 2 1 89 21 8 8 5 1 2 1 3 7 413 112 75 81 69 83 214 14 3 194 29 18 260 6 5 124 68 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some firms appear in more than 1 hour group. * Includes an establishment with 1 woman working 11 hours on 2 days in the week. • Excludes 1 firm not reporting daily hours. 4 Excludes Baltimore, which see. Table VI.—Scheduled Saturday hours, hy State Number of establishments and number of women whose Saturday hours \ All States______ h 251 5,219 Per cent distribution.__!100. 0 Alabama............... ...........j 13 Arkansas............... ......... i n Delaware____________ 7 Florida..................... 24 Georgia........................ n Illinois.______________| 20 Iowa_____________ i9 Kansas........... ........... a 33 Kentucky......... ....... 9 Maryland 3...................... 8 Baltimore. ............_. 4 Mississippi_______ 14 Missouri...... ............. 11 New Jersey_______ 13 Ohio........................... 15 Oklahoma________ Rhode Island_____ South Carolina____ Tennessee.................. 14 1 20 206 163 99 516 258 546 256 269 236 64 145 194 442 309 420 341 213 207 335 16 0.3 188 3.6 1 1 2 98 j 54 8 941 18.0 1 2 3 168 74 46 | 70 1,038 19.9 3 1 25 224 4.3 315 15 296 IS 69 1 12 _____ _____ 309 .......... .......... 262 5.0 27 ........ 44 8 497 9.5 3 2 89 48 9 2 226 41 1 46 4 1 52 4 2 16 .......... 89 122 .......... 100 a8gregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 hour group J Excludes 2 establishments not reporting Saturday hours. v * Excludes Baltimore, which see. 12 — 24 2 13 178 15 262 5.0 Women 8 151 2.9 4 4 62 89 ........ .......... .......... ....... ........ ...... 2 16 7 90 1 8 55 '144* . ! 381 7.3 212 ........ - .......... .......... -........ 20 1 12 132 305 18 .......... 1 4 92 _____ 2 _____ 59 37 18 195 ~127 1, 259 24. 1 Establishm ents Women Establishm ents j Women Over 12 and under 12% 22 A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES Establishm ents State Over 11 ant under 12 n Establishm ents ■Over 10 and under 11 Women Over 9 and under 10 Establishm ents Over 8 and under 9 Under 8 Women Number reported 9 j 1 191 7 1 CO Table VII.—Scheduled weekly hours, by State Number of establishments and number of women whose weekly hours were— All States.............. i 252 5.224 Per cent distribution... 100.0 Illinois_______ _______ i 13 11 7 24 11 20 19 3 34 9 8 4 14 11 13 15 i 20 6 9 14 206 163 99 516 258 546 256 274 236 64 145 194 442 309 420 341 213 207 335 8 146 2.8 1 4 1 1 2 17 21 16 1 63 2 45 4 1 1 2 162 3.1 98 54 10 32 1,023 19.6 1 3 2 6 2 3 2 21 202 92 58 24 21 69 1 8 48 320 4 168 22 522 10.0 1 49 4 85 3 1 1 161 6 13 4 7 84 100 1 24 X 1 a© 03 H it ao 30 763 14.6 1 4 9 92 2 2 8 23 30 91 2 15 7 2 2 405 51 4 1 3 a a© £ 79 1.5 14 65 47 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 hour group. * This woman worked part time—34 hours weekly, 5 hours daily. Other women in this firm worked 54 hours, s Excludes 1 firm not reporting weekly hours. 4 Excludes Baltimore, which see. p ao £ p © ao £ 30 637 12.2 49 614 11.8 2 1 1 52 2 1 1 9 27 152 1 4 3 2 2 1 45 72 73 12 30 14 8 1 31 1 1 14 10 6 87 3 29 85 18 256 16 166 1 16 1 3 61 3 1 5 p © a £ 8 172 3.3 1 1 3 1 5 16 64 6 ......1 1 51 30 18 P © a o it 280 5.4 2 2 62 19 2 21 12 178 Establishm ents P © ao £ CO p © a 1 3 jtfl CO w Over 55 and under 60 55 Establishm ents £ p © ao § Over 54 and under 55 54 Establishm ents ao a Establishm ents a CO 45 Over 52 and under 54 52 Establishm ents P © a o it Establishm ents Establishm ents o is Establishm ents a i© Over 50 and under 52 50 P 1 o it 50 826 15.8 10 123 1 21 4 1 420 66 1 8 2 16 6 5 124 68 WOMEN IN 5-AND- 1 0-CENT STORES Establishm ents State Over 48 and under 50 48 Under 48 Establishm ents Number reported Table VIII. Relation of scheduled daily, Saturday, and weekly hours to hours legally established, by State Daily and Saturday hours Weekly hours Number reported Number having hours shorter than maximum permitted by law Number having hours shorter than maximum permitted by law Stats All States................................................ . Total in States fixing 9 hours and a weekly limit... Total in States fixing 10 hours and a weekly limit______ Arkansas.......................................... Delaware....................... Illinois________ Kansas................................. Kentucky............................. Maryland 3___ Baltimore____ ________ Mississippi......................... Missouri.................... New Jersey_________ Ohio............................. . Oklahoma................... Rhode Island................... ..................... South Carolina............................... Tennessee........................ Daily hours Estab lish ments Maxi mum hours per Estab mitted lish by law ments Saturday hours Women Number Per cent Estab lishments Women Women Number Per cent Number Per cent 1,461 36.6 549 1 33. 6 41 1,016 62.0 342 27.1 60 1,259 99.9 2 7 367 2 70 24 21 132 1.2 7.1 67.2 26.0 10.2 32.8 91.0 54 55 2 6 11 98 6.7 99.0 54 60 60 60 20 9 8 4 187 236 64 145 68.2 100.0 100. 0 100.0 93. 4 195 3,988 149 91 31,640 45 1,108 67.6 61 1,260 61 1,260 100.0 11 7 20 2 34 9 8 4 14 11 13 15 20 6 9 14 163 99 546 274 236 64 145 194 442 309 420 341 213 207 335 1 7 20 19 9 8 4 14 8 13 15 2 6 9 14 9 99 546 185 236 64 145 194 413 309 420 81 213 207 335 5.5 100.0 100.0 67.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 2 3 10 27 2 3 3 93.4 2 127 28.7 54 8 413 100.0 23.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 7 3 3 4 5 305 45 158 59 144 72.6 13.2 74.2 28.5 43.0 50 54 54 60 57 8 3 6 9 14 320 76.2 213 207 335 100.0 100.0 100.0 9 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 9 10 12 10K 3,456 86. 7 21 2,817 70.6 A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES Estab lish ments Maxi mum daily hours per mitted Women by law * Total for Saturday hours, 1,635, owing to variation in Kansas. Per cent having shorter Saturday hours based on 1,635. * Saturday hours reported for 33 establishments, employing 269 women. * Excludes Baltimore, which see Oi Table IXWeekly rates and actual week’s earnings, by State and year CD Number of women for whom amount specified was weekly rate and number for whom it was week’s earnings Amount $6 and under $7............................... $7 and under $8............................... $8 and under $9.............. —.......... $9 and under $10--------------------$10 and under $11-------------------$11 and under $12.......................... $12 and under $13............................ $13 and under $14-------------------- $22 and under $23........................... $23 and under $24,......................... Week’s earnings Week’s earnings Weekly rate Week’s earnings Weekly rate Week's earnings Weekly rate Week’s earnings W eekly rate Week’s earnings Weekly rate Week's earnings Weekly rate 190 $8. 45 190 $8.10 137 $9. 75 137 $9. 50 77 $9. 75 77 $9. 45 230 $10. 20 230 $9.40 215 $8. 95 215 $8. 75 193 $8.20 193 $8.40 410 $10.15 410 $9.95 17.9 4.7 1.6 1.1 15.3 4.2 1.6 1.6 42.3 26.3 4.4 1.5 37.2 22.6 4.4 1.5 40.3 7.8 33.8 2.6 55.7 22.6 5.7 .4 40.9 18.3 4.8 .4 33.5 17.2 5.6 1.4 30.7 15.3 5.1 1.4 8.8 1.6 9.3 4.7 53.2 22.7 7.3 1.7 48.5 21.0 6.1 1.5 20 49 57 30 21 13 6 15 14 43 47 23 21 17 17 45 17 5 7 19 4 4 2 2 6 5 18 19 34 15 5 5 16 4 4 3 7 45 47 65 11 27 6 6 8 1 3 1 19 1 8 13 18 43 34 40 12 21 6 4 6 1 3 1 l 4 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 $25 and under $30........................... .................. Missou ri, 1922 Weekly rate 1 $18 and under $19_ ......................... $19 and under $20—----------------$20 and under $21........................... Mississippi, 1924 Kentucky, 1921 ’ 1 1 I 2 3 8 33 20 5 5 1 3 1 2 3 8 12 22 16 8 2 1 7 36 65 33 23 12 12 6 7 9 1 9 .................. 5 8 6 19 75 25 72 56 23 27 8 21 6 12 3 9 7 6 7 i l — .................. ...... ........... ........... ........... .................. .................. _____ _____ ................. .......... ..............2 .............. ¥ -----— 9 —-.......... 2 2 6 13 24 42 29 74 133 33 84 6 41 3 34 6 16 3 13 12 8 3 3 2 1 ........... 12 6 3 23 28 32 107 73 40 30 17 14 10 6 3 3 1 1 .. ------------ i ........... ----------- —! -------------- WOMEN IN 6-AND- 10-CENT STORES Number of women reported........ Median for all women..—.......... Per cent of women receiving— $10 and over---------------------$12 and over.............................. $15 and over_........................... Georgia, 1920 and 1921 Delaware, 1924 Arkansas, 1922 Alabama, 1922 Number of women for whom amount specified was weekly rate and number for whom it was week’s earnings Contd. Amount $18 and over_.................................................................. Tennessee, xJ25 Week's earnings Weekly rate Week's earnings Weekly rate Week’s earnings Weekly rate Week’s earnings Weekly rate Week’s earnings W eekly rate 281 $12. 25 281 $11. 80 350 $10. 80 350 $10.55 340 $9. 90 340 $9. 45 157 $12. 30 157 $11.90 154 $9.00 154 $8.90 317 $9. 55 317 $9.20 92.9 59.8 8.2 2.5 81.9 48.8 7.1 2.5 71.4 37.7 8.0 1.7 60.9 33.1 7.4 1.7 46.5 9.7 1.8 .9 36.2 7.4 1.5 .9 80.3 58.6 12.1 2.5 73.2 49.0 9. 6 1.9 29.9 9.7 4.5 1.3 29.9 9.7 4.5 1.3 36.9 6.9 1.3 .3 30.9 6.0 .9 .3 1 35 64 92 26 72 18 14 12 8 2 5 10 6 7 16 7 28 63 71 26 62 15 13 10 8 2 5 18 64 100 113 12 19 3 5 2 1 15 4 12 9 26 62 89 87 11 12 3 5 1 1 1 23 53 31 21 10 7 2 2 2 14 12 3 25 9 46 19 8 8 5 2 2 1 3 3 8 20 46 27 21 10 7 1 1 1 7 2 3 4 5 10 20 77 16 78 25 14 11 1 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 South Carolina, 1921 Weekly rate 2 2 16 77 16 104 28 13 12 3 1 * This woman had a rate of $15 a week and earned Rhode Island, 1920 Oklahoma, 1924 Ohio 1922 1 1 4 16 15 4 24 14 37 18 7 6 4 2 1 i 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 Week’s earnings 16 10 4 4 3 12 7 11 11 18 85 75 65 14 8 4 4 2 1 1 5 20 84 91 79 A P P E N D IX — GENERAL TABLES Per cent of women receiving— New Jersey, 1922 1 1 1 1 a $10 commission. •vl Table X.—Median of the week’s earnings, of the weekly rates, and of the year’s earnings, by State and year State and year Median 1920 July-August................................................ 237 157 $8.10 11.90 1920 and 1921 (<)....................................................-............ 230 ........ do............................................................ 1921 1922 1924 1925 February...................................................... Number of women Median of the rates Per cent Median by which Number of the earnings of earnings fell below women rates 157 w $12. 30 (>) $11.90 <*>. 3.4 i 26 21 * $460 604 9.40 230 10.20 9.40 7.8 28 510 215 155 8. 75 8.90 215 154 8.95 9.00 8.75 8.90 2.2 1.1 23 21 565 506 194 137 440 309 420 8. 05 9.50 9.80 11.30 10.55 190 137 410 281 350 8.45 9. 75 10.15 12.25 10.80 8.10 9.50 9.95 11.80 10.55 4.1 2.6 2.0 3.7 2.3 36 19 66 34 81 438 496 622 667 613 99 340 194 9. 75 9. 45 8. 40 77 340 193 9. 75 9. 90 8.20 9.45 9.45 8.40 3.0 4. 5 •2.4 19 59 34 525 510 431 317 9.20 317 9.55 9.20 3.7 38 510 o 1 Year’s earnings were secured from 52-week pay-roll records for all States except Kansas. Tn Kansas, records were for 50 or more weeks. * Month or other period including the week in which earnings were taken in most of the establishments visited. * No rates were reported for Kansas. There were 170 full-time workers and the median of their earnings was *9.15, 4 Irregular. * In this case earnings exceeded rates by the per cent reported Median WOMEN IN 5-AND- 10-CENT STOKE3 Number of women Month 1 Year’s earnings1 Week’s earnings and weekly rates Week's earnings Table XI.—Median of the week’s earnings and time in the trade, by Slate and year Women who had been in the trade— All women reported State and year Under 1 year 1 and under 2 years 2 and under 3 years 3 and under 4 years 4 and under 5 years 5 and under 10 years 10 and under 15 years 15 years and over Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi Num Medi ber ber ber ber ber ber an ber ber an an ber an an an an an an New Jersey, 1922.________________________ Oklahoma, 1924_________ ______ __________ Rhode Island, 1920 . .. 182 113 103 178 $8.25 9. 55 10.10 9.95 8.10 9.00 8. 55 10.20 12. 05 10. 45 9.45 12.20 9.00 9. 40 iNot computed, owing to small number involved* 50 37 26 38 158 59 45 115 58 104 42 28 63 $7.55 8. 45 9.15 9. 25 7.85 8. 45 8. 20 9. 55 10.80 10.10 8.90 10. 55 8.25 8.65 27 26 15 36 32 30 25 39 28 33 42 19 34 51 $8. 30 9. 80 10. 05 9.20 8. 35 8.80 8. 50 10. 30 12. 20 10. 30 10.10 12. 55 8. 75 9.25 25 18 12 23 17 19 12 40 25 24 13 18 18 30 $8. 55 10.20 (i) 10. 50 8.50 9.90 (i) 10.90 12.25 10.70 (■) 12.00 9. 75 9.65 0) 10 c) 12 (>) 2 16 $10. 65 (0 12 to 8 (l) 8 24 12. 25 (0 10 (0 14 f‘) 10 (') 8 (0 6 (l) 13 4 <■) 3 <>) (>) 10 9 $10. 75 <■) 5 7 0) (>) 7 (■) 7 o 9 0) 8 0) 3 7 (') (') 8 4 C1) (0 9 7 (>) (') 6 9 $11. 75 0) 11 w 10 5 24 12. 50 CO 10 26 12.00 (') 8 16 15.00 8 16 11.00 1 (■) 1 1 4 1 4 2 (*) to (i> (0 0) 0) 1 1 2 « <>) (■) 2 1 (■) (>) 1 1 1 1 « (■> (') (!) i 2 o) 0) A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES Kansas, 1920...................................... ................... Kentucky, 1921..... ................................................ 125 104 71 133 237 139 103 255 143 CC Table XII.—Median earnings of all women and number of women receiving $10 and over and $15 and over, according to time in the trade, by * State and year ’ Or O Number of women who had been in the trade— Number of women receiving— Under 1 year State and Median Number rnings of women reporting $8. 25 9. 55 10.10 9. 95 8.10 9.00 8. 55 10.20 12. 05 10.45 9.45 12.20 9.00 9.40 125 104 71 133 237 139 103 255 143 179 182 113 103 178 5 and under 10 years Number receiving— $10 and over $15 and over 21 40 37 65 20 46 13 139 121 114 65 94 31 66 1 2 7 1 7 15 11 3 2 13 7 Total $10 and over 50 37 26 38 158 59 45 115 58 74 104 42 28 63 1 5 7 10 5 7 37 44 40 19 29 15 $15 and over Number receiving— Total $10 and over 9 7 6 9 11 10 5 24 10 26 8 16 8 16 $15 and over 5 6 7 4 9 20 10 21 7 15 2 7 4 3 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Alabama, 1922........... . Arkansas, 1922______ Delaware, 1924______ Georgia, 1920 and 1921 Kansas, 1920________ Kentucky, 1921............ Mississippi, 1924.......... Missouri, 1922_______ New Jersey, 1922____ Ohio, 1922___________ Oklahoma, 1924______ Rhode Island, 1920___ South Carolina, 1921... Tennessee, 1925......... . year Table XIII.—Earnings of women who worked on six days, by State or city—1928 figures Um, - ____— --------------------------------------------------------------- :-----------------All women reported State or city Number Women who worked on 6 days Median of the Number earnings Per cent of women working on 6 days who earned— Per cent of total Median of the earnings Under $10 $15 and $10 and $12 and under $12 under $15 under $18 6,036 $12.00 4,937 81.8 $13.00 17.9 18.1 28.7 9. 00 10.00 16.00 11.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 14.00 8.80 15.00 9.00 13.00 13.00 12.00 10.00 11.00 9. 00 9.00 120 96 753 39 443 77 165 57 76 447 36 410 127 498 267 68 89 268 83.3 84.2 82.2 84.8 86.4 87.5 80.5 87.7 78.4 81.4 80.0 78.7 78.9 79.9 76.9 93.2 89.0 84.5 9. 00 10.00 16.00 12.00 10.00 9. 00 10.00 14.00 9. 00 16. 00 9.00 14.00 13. 00 12.50 10.00 11. 00 10.00 9.00 85.8 33.3 10.8 45.8 15.4 41.8 62.3 47.9 33.3 42.0 33.8 41.8 3.5 31.6 .4 22.2 8.8 24.4 24.9 56.2 41.2 36.0 36.9 2.5 20.8 17.1 35.9 13.5 3.9 8.5 54.4 5.3 15.2 Tennessee--------------------- ------------ ---------------------- --------- -.................... 144 114 916 46 513 88 205 65 97 549 45 521 161 623 347 73 100 317 New York------- ------ --------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 376 223 84 49 380 12. 00 18.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 311 184 70 39 297 82.7 82.5 83.3 79.6 78.2 12.00 19.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 63.2 77.8 7.8 6.0 34.1 13.2 49.4 54.5 .3 .5 .3 1.0 27.0 8.3 0.8 77.6 15.4 1.8 5.3 .9 1.8 29.8 12.3 55.9 28.4 52.2 50.4 47.0 7. 1 33.8 13.5 7.5 24.6 15.7 17.7 2.6 7.4 1.1 .7 6.6 9.4 4.4 81.0 3.3 68.6 69.2 51.2 12.5 33.7 24.3 28.2 38.0 4.4 .4 6.1 62.5 7. 1 2.6 9.4 A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES All places___________________ _____ _________ _____ ___ _____ ____ $18 and over Cn Cn to Table XIV.—Week’s earnings, by State or city—1928 figures Number of women with earnings as specified in— Week’s earnings $15 and over_______________ __________________ Ala bama Arkan sas Dela ware Cali fornia Florida Georgia Kansas Michi gan Mary land Ken tucky Missis sippi 179 i 6,061 $12.00 6 144 $9.00 6 114 $10.00 35 916 $16.00 4 46 $11.00 24 516 $10.00 5 88 $9.00 13 205 $9.00 2 65 $14.00 5 97 $8.80 5 549 $15.00 3 45 $9.00 74.4 29.8 12.5 .7 59.6 95.1 70.4 76.1 13.0 51.2 2.3 34.1 42.4 1.5 92.3 36.9 29.9 94.9 71.2 17.8 174 68 96 163 381 670 749 369 640 493 454 415 806 159 141 67 64 31 31 25 11 39 9 3 3 9 2 4 19 24 68 11 3 1 1 1 1 4 5 2 6 2 27 30 16 9 11 2 10 7 4 1 19 4 16 25 85 40 60 19 553 33 26 3 5 1 1 1 16 6 11 18 91 110 124 68 31 21 8 6 11 3 7 18 21 58 53 17 10 3 1 1 1 1 3 5 2 6 23 14 18 23 2 3 10 10 1 4 1 2 12 7 30 47 34 132 76 52 45 23 20 11 12 6 5 6 3 2 1 1 2 16 15 2 6 2 3 5 6 8 9 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 19 34 21 6 2 1 1 1 2 2 16 7 9 8 8 1 5 1 2 1 1 4 i i i WOMEN IN 5-AND- 1 0-CENT STORES Per cent of women receiving— All places Number of women with earnings as specified in— Week’s earnings Missouri $9 and under $10........................... ...................................... $10 and under $11................ ................................................ $11 and under $12.................................................................. $12 and under $13............................. ................................... $13 and under $14____________________ ____________ $15 and under $16................................................................. $19 and under $20................................................................ $20 and under $21........................................... ................ . $21 and under $22................................................................. $23 and under $24............................................................. $30 and under $35................................................................ $35 and under $40................................................................ Okla homa Ohio Rhode Island South Carolina Tennes see Boston Chicago Indian apolis Mil waukee New York 9 521 $13.00 4 161 $13.00 18 645 $12.00 11 347 $10. 00 2 73 $11.00 4 100 $9.00 8 317 $9.00 3 376 $12.00 2 223 $18.00 2 84 $13.00 1 49 $14.00 7 380 $14.00 81.6 25.5 85.7 21.1 81.6 17.7 51.3 2.0 82.2 11.0 47.0 1.0 38.8 .9 90.2 15.4 97.3 84.3 91.7 27.4 89.8 24.5 90.5 37.1 21 3 6 9 16 41 36 30 61 67 98 48 48 8 9 4 8 2 1 1 14 2 2 2 2 1 29 9 10 47 9 9 7 5 4 2 2 2 16 6 7 15 21 54 98 72 116 60 66 51 31 10 6 3 5 7 11 9 9 51 82 110 41 12 8 15 1 15 14 44 105 90 10 8 6 6 1 9 3 6 16 28 22 12 4 3 5 1 1 4 1 2 4 3 2 1 11 9 15 15 15 83 1 4 2 1 1 1 4 1 3 4 4 5 4 19 10 13 4 6 1 2 2 1 1 ........ "T" 1 9 6 11 2 22 2 172 50 35 22 12 5 9 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 3 8 6 8 22 29 17 18 22 15 15 12 14 3 15 3 3 3 1 3 24 14 8 3 6 2 1 9 1 2 1 1 70 28 15 14 5 5 1 1 A PPEN D IX . — GENERAL TABLES Number of establishments................................................. Number of women reported............................................. Median of the earnings 12..................................................... Per cent of women receiving— $10 and over.................................................................. $15 and over................................................................... New Jersey 2 1 Excludes 1,776 women whose regular work was on Saturday only. 2 Unlike wage studies covering a variety of industries, considerable numbers of women in the present survey had exactly the same earnings and were paid in even dollars. For this reason the usual statistical formula for locating the median has not been used, as in each case it would have resulted in uneven dollars-and-cents figures not true of actual conditions. The median given here is the amount received by the middle woman or women in the group, one-half earning more and one-half less. CJi GO 54 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES Table XV.—Weekly rates in the various chains, by size of town or Chain 11 Chain II i Number of women in places of— Number of women in places of— 8 o.'C 8 § S3 da R.'d 3 69 7 5 4 280 1,885 94 155 130 100.0 29.3 5.0 13.6 16.2 $9. 00 $16.00 $13.00 $16.00 $12.00 $16- 00 $10.00 $12.00 36 956 114 100.0 11. $14.00 7 85 8. 1 5. 5. 11 32 16 6 68 94 43 145 64 60 37 328 33 19 35 555 29.4 $9.00 8 192 20.1 37 6 do 'do 03 © •gi S te 20 16 8 4 58 16 32 20 112 18 8 8 2 1 43 143 460 424 134 108 61 73 11 3 46 22 29 99 214 77 54 22 10 7 3 36 66 330 19 19 2 1 . 1,000,000 and 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 and under 1,000,000 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 and under 500,000 un der 100,000 50,000 and 25,000 and u n der 50,000 All classes and over 1,000,000 der 100,000 All classes Weekly rate un Number of women in places of— 50,000 and Number of women in places of— 25,000 and u n der 50,000 Chain V 10,000 and un der 25,000 Chain IV over 5_ Under 10,000 Number of establishments__ Number of women reported.. Per cent distribution----------Median of the rates________ $5 and under $6......................... $6 and under $7......................... $7 and under $8........................ $8 and under $9........................ $9 and under $10....................... $10 and under $11..................... $11 and under $12..................... $12 and under $13...... .............. $13 and under $14........... ......... $14 and under $15..................... $15 and under $16..................... $16 and under $17..................... $17-and under $18.................... $18 and under $19..................... $19 and under $20..................... $20 and under $21.................... $21 and under $22..................... $22 and under $23.................... $23 and under $24.................... $24 and under $25 $25 and under $30................... . $30 and under $35..................... $35 and under $40..................... $40 and over..................... ......... do flo fl Weekly rate 2 9 Number of establishments. 3 3 2 3 3 1 2 20 9 1 37 23 24 53 86 223 329 26 99 157 Number of women reported 107 506 7.3 17.0 7.3 7.9 30.1 7.0 47.7 10.5 100.0 Per cent distribution.......... 100.0 21.1 44.1 Median of the rates............. $11.00 $9.00 $10.00 $10. 00 $9.00 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $11.00 $11.00 $12.00 $14.00 1 1 1 1 10 29 19 1 1 8 1 1 34 26 10 3 32 19 18 14 21 82 29 25 1 23 26 11 38 3 9 75 15 3 9 8 21 3 26 2 18 6 44 7 3 3 2 146 6 11 4 121 4 15 1 40 7 30 2 92 1 3 86 1 1 17 9 53 5 1 2 55 1 1 29 13 4 1 6 1 1 29 3 2 1 16 16 12 12 2 2 2 1 1 11 4 11 5 5 2 1 1 4 4 1 .......... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 In interpreting figures relating to Chain I and Chain II it must be remembered that, except in cities of in other States because of the legal provision for a minimum wage. See last two sections of table. 55 APPENDIX.—GENERAL TABLES city and both including and excluding California—1928 figures 1 Chain III Chain II *—Continued 1 1 1 2 6 28 33 18 24 16 21 12 19 63 14 4 2 1 31 20 4 1 1 3 4 1 11 32 16 17 12 3 4 .......... 26 3 7 2 1 3 2 25 13 51 18 8 10 7 1 1 3 11 3 22 20 14 20 11 4 2 3 2 1 43 143 460 424 133 48 61 48 66 19 8 3 4 47 3.2 $9. 00 4 10* 14 12 3 1 2 1 4 11 2 3 127 496 134 143 8.7 34.0 9.2 9.8 $9.00 $10.00 $10.00 $15.00 10 26 62 10 6 2 1C 1 8 120 261 65 23 14 1 1 3 100,000 and under 500,000 32 513 35.1 $9.00 1 29 99 214 77 54 18 1C 6 3 1 1 50,000 and un der 100,000 25,000 and un der 50,000 All classes over under Under 10,000 and 500,000 500,000 and 1 56 3 2 115 1,460 136 44 23.0 100.0 8.8 27.2 $9. 00 $12. 00 $14. 00 $10.00 10,000 and un der 25,000 1 5 9 107 1.8 21.4 to $11.00 100,000 10,000 and un der 25,000 50,000 and un der 100,000 Number of women in places of— 25,000 and un der 50,000 Number of women in places of— 6 89 17.8 $9.00 over 1,000,000 and 3 8 133 73 90 212 136 66 62 35 22 14 14 6 7 10 6 Chain II, exclusive of California Under 10,006 All classes 55 48 206 179 171 106 56 30 13 4 15 2 3 3 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 200 9.6 $18.00 Chain I, exclusive of California 1 37 68 94 43 97 53 98 86' 7 898 43.0 $15.00 10 ......... 2 ...... l 18 500 100.0 $12.00 16 899 43.1 $13.00 50 64 5 4 6 4 1 over 19 36 61 7 1 24 2 4 1 16 0.8 $13.00 1,000,000 and 3 1 81 3 4 103 21 9 71 353 8 1 255 265 2 348 227 114 101 55 58 28 361.............. 15!---........ 12 30 100,000 and under 500,000 i7 over 10 8 6 11 un 501 64 2 31 1.5 $10.00 der 100,000 8 120 261 65 52 10 6 8 10 4 44 2. 1 $10.50 31 2,088 100.0 $14. 50 50,000 and 26 25,000 and u n der 50,000 and 3 143 7.6 $15.00 10,000 and u n der 25,000 and 500,000 under 1,000,000 2 86 4.6 $16. 00 All classes 100,000 and under 500,000 3 199 10.6 $10.00 1,000,000 50,000 and u n der 100,000 13 612 32.5 $10. 00 25,000 and u n der 50,000 6 196 10.4 $9.00 500,000 and under 1,000,000 Number of women in places of— Number of women in places of—Contd. 19 36 61 15 6 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,000,000 and over, many of the women included were in California, a State in which rates were higher than * Not computed, owing to small number involved. 56 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STOKES Table XVI.—Weekly rate, by size of town or city—1928 figures Number of women with rate as specified in places of— Weekly rate All places Number of establishments ............ 179 Number of women reported.......... 6,001 Per cent distribution....................... 100.0 Median of the rates____________ $13.00 $5 and under $6.................... ............ $9 and under $10..... .................. ....... $10 and under $11_ __________ $11 and under $12............................ $12 and under $13..... ....................... $13 and under $14_ $14 and under $15____ _____ ____ $15 and under $16. ............ ............. $16 and under $17______________ $18 and under $19........................... 1 2 98 271 681 767 325 796 525 476 497 936 180 156 66 72 30 40 17 13 37 10 2 3 Under 10,000 10,000 and under 25,000 25.000 and under 50.000 50.000 100,000 500,000 and and and under under under 100.000 500,000 1,000,000 27 332 5. 5 $9.50 52 771 12.8 $9. 50 22 580 9.7 $10. 00 26 944 15.7 $10. 00 23 68 76 50 17 22 11 4 2 55 1 44 105 238 125 72 47 14 11 5 103 3 3 4 27 1,314 21.9 $13. 00 16 1,470 24.5 $16.00 1,000,000 and over 9 590 9.8 $16.00 1 28 60 112 98 50 44 30 18 6 112 11 5 1 1 38 190 301 97 83 32 21 11 146 11 1 4 2 1 2 2 1 50 156 73 279 207 192 118 143 36 18 5 17 3 4 3 2 12 36 13 315 124 132 233 312 88 77 38 25 14 14 6 8 1 3 3 1 3 6 107 98 122 65 38 13 7 PUBLICATIONS OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU 57 PUBLICATIONS OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU [Any of these bulletins still available will be sent free of charge upon request] No. No. No. No. *No. No. No. *No. *No. *No. No. *No. No. *No. No. No. No. No. No. *No. No. *No. 1. Proposed Employment of Women During the War in the Industries of Niagara Falls, N. Y. 16 pp. 1918. 2. Labor Laws for Women in Industry in Indiana. 29 pp. 1919. 3. Standards for the Employment of Women in Industry. 8 no Third ed., 1921. 4. Wages of Candy Makers in Philadelphia in 1919. 46 pp. 1919. 6. The Eight-Hour Day in Federal and State Legislation. 19 pp. 1919. 6. The Employment of Women in Hazardous Industries in the United States. 8 pp. 1921. 7. Night-Work Laws in the United States. (1919.) 4 pp. 1920. 8. Women in the Government Service. 37 pp. 1920. 9. Home Work in Bridgeport, Conn. 35 pp. 1920. 10. Hours and Conditions of Work for Women in Industry in Virginia 32 pp. 1920. 11. Women Street Car Conductors and Ticket Agents. 90 pp. 1921. 12. The New Position of Women in American Industry. 158 pp. 1920. 13. Industrial Opportunities and Training for Women and Girls. 48 on 1921. 14. A Physiological Basis for the Shorter Working Day for Women. 20 dd 1921. 15. Some Effects of Legislation Limiting Hours of Work for Women. 26 pp. 1921. 16. (See Bulletin 63.) 17. Women’s Wages in Kansas. 104 pp. 1921. 18. Health Problems of Women in Industry. 11 pp. 1921. 19. Iowa Women in Industry. 73 pp. 1922. 20. Negro Women in Industry. 65 pp. 1922. 21. Women in Rhode Island Industries. 73 pp. 1922. 22. Women in Georgia Industries. 89 pp. 1922. No. 23. The Family Status of Breadwinning Women. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. No. 42. No. 43. No. 44. No. 45. No. 46. No. 47. 43 pp. 1922. Women in Maryland Industries. 96 pp. 1922. Women in the Candy Industry in Chicago and St. Louis. 72 pp. 1923. Women in Arkansas Industries. 86 pp. 1923. The Occupational Progress of Women. 37 pp. 1922. Women’s Contributions in the Field of Invention. 51 pp. 1923. Women in Kentucky Industries. 114 pp. 1923. The Share of Wage-Earning Women in Family Support. 170 pp. 1923. What Industry Means to Women Workers. 10 pp. 1923. Women in South Carolina Industries. 128 pp. 1923. Proceedings of the Women’s Industrial Conference. 190 pp. 1923. Women in Alabama Industries. 86 pp. 1924. Women in Missouri Industries. 127 pp. 1924. Radio Talks on Women in Industry. 34 pp. 1924. Women in New Jersey Industries. 99 pp. 1924. Married Women in Industry. 8 pp. 1924, Domestic Workers and Their Employment Relations. 87 pp. 1924. (See Bulletin 63.) Family Status of Breadwinning Women in Four Selected Cities. 145 pp. 1925. List of References on Minimum Wage for Women in the United States and Canada. 42 pp. 1925. Standard and Scheduled Hours of Work for Women in Industry. 68 pp. 1925. Women in Ohio Industries. 137 pp. 1925. Home Environment and Employment Opportunities of Women in Coal Mine Workers’ Families. 61 pp. 1925. Facts about Working Women—A Graphic Presentation Based on Census Statistics. 64 pp. 1925. Women in the Fruit-Growing and Canning Industries in the State of Washington. 223 pp. 1926. Supply exhausted. 58 WOMEN IN 5-AND-10-CENT STORES *No. 48. Women in Oklahoma Industries. 118 pp. 1926. No. 49. Women Workers and Family Support. 10 pp. 1925. No. 50. Effects of Applied Research upon the Employment Opportunities of American Women. 54 pp. 1926. *No. 51. Women in Illinois Industries. 108 pp. 1926. No. 52. Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills. 203 pp. 1926. No. 53. The Status of Women in the Government Service in 1925. 103 pp. 1926. No. 54. Changing Jobs. 12 pp. 1926. No. 55. Women in Mississippi Industries. 89 pp. 1926. No. 56. Women in Tennessee Industries. 120 pp. 1927. No. 57. Women Workers and Industrial Poisons. 5 pp. 1926. No. 58. Women in Delaware Industries. 156 pp. 1927. No. 59. Short Talks About Working Women. 24 pp. 1927. No. 60. Industrial Accidents to Women in New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin. 316 pp. 1927. No. 61. The Development of Minimum-Wage Laws in the United States, 1912 to 1927. 635 pp. 1928. Price, 90 cents. No. 62. Women’s Employment in Vegetable Canneries in Delaware. 47 pp. 1927. No. 63. State Laws Affecting Working Women. 51 pp. 1927. (Revision of Bulletins 16 and 40.) No. 64. The Employment of Women at Night. 86 pp. 1928. *No. 65. The Effects of Labor Legislation on the Employment Opportunities of Women. 498 pp. 1928. No. 66. History of Labor Legislation for Women in Three States; Chronological Development of Labor Legislation for Women in the United States. 288 pp. 1929. No. 67. Women Workers in Flint, Mich. 80 pp. 1928. No. 68. Summary: The Effects of Labor Legislation on the Employment Oppor tunities of Women. (Reprint of Chapter II of Bulletin 65.) 22 pp. 1928. No. 69. Causes of Absence for Men and for Women in Four Cotton Mills. 24 pp. 1929. No. 70. Negro Women in Industry in 15 States. 74 pp. 1929. No. 71. Selected References on the Health of Women in Industry. 8 pp. 1929. No. 72. Conditions of Work in Spin Rooms. 41 pp. 1929. No. 73. Variations in Employment Trends of Women and Men. (In press.) No. 74. The Immigrant Woman and Her Job. 175 pp. 1929. No. 75. What the Wage-Earning Woman Contributes to Family Support. 20 pp. 1929. No. 76. Women in 5-and-10-Cent Stores and Limited-Price Chain Department Stores. 59 pp. 1929. No. 77. A Study of Two Groups of Denver Married Women Applying for Jobs. 10 pp. 1929. Annual reports of the Director, 1919*, 1920*, 1921*, 1922, 1923, 1924*, 1925, 1926, 1927* 1928, 1929. Supply exhausted* O