View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Wage Chronology

Pacific L o n gsh o re W orkers, A u g u s t 1 9 6 9 — Ju ly 1975
August 1969-July 1971

July 1971-July 1973

A supplemental agreement for container freight sta­
tions (CFS) was reached on August 15, 1969, between
the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s
Union (ILWU) and the Pacific Maritime Association
(PMA).1 The pact specified that containers other than
factory loads be stuffed and stripped by ILWU labor as a
condition of being loaded on ships.2 All such container
work was to be brought to the CFS on the dock or areas
adjacent to the dock, unless there was mutual agreement
to have the work done elsewhere or if some other em­
ployer or the Federal Government had a legal right to
require the involved PMA members to have work done
elsewhere. In addition, no PMA member was to renew,
extend, or execute any new subcontracts for container
work.
The CFS had a basic complement of steady men
consisting of utility men and clerks. Utility men per­
formed cargo handling activities as directed by the
employer. These activities included driving forklift and
other mechanical handling and lifting equipment, stock­
piling, palletizing and depalletizing, loading and unloading
railcars, stuffing and stripping containers in the CFS,
and other cargo handling activities. Clerks were responsi­
ble for the physical checking of cargo received at,
delivered from, or within the CFS area, including spot­
ting, sorting, tallying, and tagging. The wage rate for
utility men was established at $4.30 an hour, effective
January 5, 1970 and $4.50 an hour effective January
12. No one however, actually worked at the January
5 rate.
An agreement also was reached at the time of the CFS
agreement on pension increases for all employees retired
before June 30, 1966 and receiving a $165-a-month
pension, or a benefit based on the $165 monthly pension,
to bring such pensioners to parity with those receiving
the $235-a-month benefit. The increased pensions were
to be $190 in 1969, $200 in 1970, and $235 in 1971.

The longest longshore strike in the Nation’s history
was ended on February 21, 1972, when the approxi­
mately 15,000 members of the ILWU began returning
to their jobs following ratification of a new 17-month
agreement with the PMA, reached on February 10, 1972.
The strike, which was interrupted by a Taft-Hartley Act
injunction, had closed down Pacific Coast ports in the
United States for a total of 134 days since July 1,1971.
It resulted in the passage of emergency legislation by
Congress requiring compulsory arbitration to end the
work stoppage.3 At the center of the dispute was the*
mechanization of freight handling on the waterfront
through cargo containerization, which sharply reduced
work opportunities, and the resultant jurisdictional
problem of who should have the right to stuff and unstuff
containers— ILWU workers or non-ILWU labor, mainly
warehouse workers represented by the Teamsters (IBT).
A preliminary caupus was held by the union in
October 1970 to establish bargaining goals. The caucus
was held earlier than usual because of the complex
problems of work opportunity and also to consider
a report by an ILWU container fact finding committee
which had observed container operations in several
Atlantic Coast ports.
Negotiations between the parties began on November
16, 1970 in hopes of settling the problem of work
opportunity, as outlined at the union caucus, by the
June 30, 1971 expiration date of the then current
5-year pact. Initial union demands included a 2-year

NOTE: The U.S. Census Bureau has introduced new job
titles in its Occupational Classification System to eliminate
those that denote sex stereotypes. For purposes of this
bulletin, however, such titles have been retained where they
refer specifically to contractual definitions. Where titles are used
in the generic sense, and not to describe a contract term, they
have been changed to eliminate the sex stereotype.
Supplement to Bulletin 1568
U.S. D E P A R T M E N T OF LABO R
Bureau of Labor Statistics
1974




1 A CFS was defined as a permanent facility on a dock or in
a dock area that was either specially built only for stuffing,
stripping, and storing containers, or a specially constructed shed
or a place set aside to stuff, strip, and store containers that was
distinct from the dock itself or from a container yard.
2 Only less than container lot (LCL) freight was to be
covered by CFS units. Containers loaded at the point of origin
or “containers of convenience’*were not covered by CFS units.
Containers loaded at the point of origin represented the vast
majority of containers handled by the ILWU and they were to
be loaded and unloaded by regular longshoremen and not CFS
men as were “containers of convenience” which are odd lot ship­
ments, stuffed and unstuffed for the convenience of shipper.
3 The measure was signed after the strike was over, however,
as a “symbolic gesture.”

contract; $l-an-hour wage increases in each year; an
updated penalty cargo list; no further reduction in gang
size; guaranteed work opportunity of a full week’s work
or pay; elimination of extended shifts and reduction in
shifts; establishment of 10 paid holidays (the practice
was no pay if a holiday was not worked); liberalized vaca­
tions; improved pensions including a maximum normal
pension of $500 a month and provision for cost-of-living
adjustments in pensions; improved health benefits; ex­
panded ILWU jurisdiction over container work; an
allowance for men in distressed ports who wished to
relocate; elimination of the Mechanization and Moderni­
zation Fund with outstanding claims to be paid by the
employers; and inclusion of Hawaiian workers in the
coastwise agreement.
Talks continued intermittently until early June with
little progress on the key items of work jurisdiction and
guarantees. The shippers had turned down the union’s
basic demands in early April and responded with a 3-year
package several days later. This was rejected mainly
because it did not provide the job security sought by the
union.
Union strike demands were submitted to the shippers
during last-minute negotiations held June 28-30, but
accord could not be reached and on July 1, 15,000
Pacific longshore workers began the first coastwise strike
in 23 years.
The parties did not resume bargaining until late
August, and during the weeks that followed some signifi­
cant progress had been achieved. By the end of September
the parties had narrowed the wage gap, settled on the
duration of the contract (2 years), worked out the basic
approach to the pay guarantee (but not total liability),
and reached tentative agreement on pensions. Some
progress also had been made towards resolution of the
container issue by agreeing that stuffing and unstuffing
of containers within port “zones” was to be performed
by ILWU labor with a tonnage tax being paid by em­
ployers on containers consolidated by non-ILWU labor.
The container tax approach was similar to the practice
in effect on the East Coast. An impasse was reached,
however, on the amount of the container tax and on
work jurisdiction.
Adding to the situation created by the Pacific Coast
strike, members of the International Longshoremen’s
Association struck East and Gulf Coast ports and the
Great Lakes Port of Chicago on October 1 as their
contracts terminated. This brought about the first coastto-coast longshore strike in U.S. history. It involved
about 60,000 ILWU and ILA dockworkers, and caused
President Nixon to direct the Attorney General to seek
injunctions to end the Pacific Coast tie-up4 and the
Great Lakes dispute. (The Great Lakes dispute would
have had an untimely effect on grain shipments.) It was



expected that the East and Gulf Coast disputes could be
resolved through collective bargaining since they were
less than a week old. This course of action was based on
recommendations made by a five-man Board of Inquiry,
appointed under Taft-Hartley Act machinery on October
4. In appointing the Board, the President said a continued
nationwide dock strike would “imperil the national health
and safety.” The Board found that the West Coast
dispute was “an uncommonly difficult dispute” and that
there had been some progress but no end to the strike
was in sight.
On October 6, a temporary restraining order was
obtained to halt the West Coast walkout pending hear­
ings on an 80-day injunction— which was subsequently
obtained and was to expire December 25. An injunction
to end the Great Lakes dispute was denied. Pacific long­
shore workers returned to work shortly thereafter
although some local disputes prevented full operation.
The primary tie-up was a strike in the large Los AngelesLong Beach port complex over which party had the right
to select who would be hired from a pool of about 300
highly skilled workers called “steady men” . Since steady
men worked almost exclusively for a single company and
were therefore familiar with its operations, the companies
wanted to continue to be able to designate them. The
union contended that designating men was the function
of the dispatching hall. On November 4, a Federal
District judge ordered the locals to send men involved in
the “steady men” dispute back to work and the PMA
members to stop refusing gangs that they had not desig­
nated.
In late November, longshore workers in East and Gulf
Coast ports also were enjoined from striking by TaftHartley injunctions which would expire February 14,
1972.5 Although the Pacific Coast injunction expired
December 25, the parties agreed to contract extensions
to last until January 17 in talks that reconvened in
December. Bargaining was recessed on January 12 to
allow the presidents of both the ILWU and Teamsters
(IBT) to meet in an attempt to solve the jurisdictional
problem. Before the recess, the union also was demanding
that wage increases be retroactive to the end of Phase I
of the governmental economic stabilization program
(November 14, 1971).
ILWU-PMA negotiations resumed on January 15 after
resolution by the two unions of the division of container
work, and a reported agreement for future merger of the

4 The President had indicated earlier that there would have
been some question as to the necessity for an injunction as long
as the strike was confined to the West Coast.
5 Settlements were subsequently reached for North Atlantic
ports in January 1972 and Southern and Gulf Coast ports in
March 1972.

2

two union.6 The ILWU then was able to argue that PMA
acceptance of ILWU container jurisdiction proposals
would not result in strikes by the IBT. The shippers had
contended that IBT pacts held by companies forwarding
freight to the shippers precluded acceptance of ILWU con­
tainer proposals. Although the parties were close on most
major issues by the January 17 termination date of the
contract extension, agreement could not be reached on
how an agreed-upon container tax of $1 per long ton
(2,240 pounds) should be used— shippers wanted the
royalty to be used to finance the pay guarantee plan while
the union wanted it to finance further benefits— and on
the effective date of the first-year wage increase.
The strike resumed January 17, when the parties were
unable to agree on the amount of money which would be
committed for the pay guarantee plan. Four days later,
President Nixon sent an emergency measure to Congress
designed to end the Pacific Coast strike (and also
bring a settlement for Hawaiian workers who had
not been on strike) by requiring a return to work
pending binding arbitration and to prohibit a strike
or lockout for at least 18 months.
On February 8, the parties resolved their key differ­
ences and reached tentative agreement on a 17-month
contract subject to a ratification vote and Pay Board
review. Longshore workers later ratified the pact in
balloting which occurred February 17-19 and work
resumed shortly thereafter. The pact provided for firstyear wage increases retroactive to December 25, 1971,
of 72 cents for longshoremen and $1,125 for CFS utility
men. Skilled rates were also to be increased by an addi­
tional 10 to 30 cents effective February 26, 1972 which
would affect about 28 percent of the longshore work
force. The lodging allowance was increased to $8 a day
and the meal allowance was increased to $3 per meal.
To protect and preserve established work of ILWU
workers, the Container Freight Station Supplement
(CFSS) was amended to require employers to contribute
a tax of $1 per long ton (2,240 pounds) of containerized
cargo stuffed or unstuffed by non-ILWU labor within a
50-mile zone in each port (with certain exceptions).
Under the welfare and insurance program, medicalsurgical-hospital benefits in small ports were to be
brought up to large port standards; a prescription
drug plan was established for eligible active and retired
men; a dental plan was established for active men, their
wives and dependent children ages 15 to 19 (dental
benefits previously applied only to children under age
15) which provided 95 percent of a schedule of pay­
ments; life and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance was increased to $10,000 for Class A (fully
registered) workers; and an indemnity plan was estab­
lished so that insured occupationally disabled workers




could receive the difference between $125 a week and
weekly workmen’s compensation.
The pension plan was revised to provide a normal
basic pension of $350 a month at age 62 after 25 years of
service, plus a supplemental benefit of $150 until age 65.
New disability and prorata benefits were provided based
on the $350 basic benefit. Employees who had 25 years
of service could retire at or after age 59 with benefits
until age 65 having an actuarial value equivalent to
the basic and supplemental benefit otherwise payable
at age 62, and at age 65, an actuarial value equivalent to
the basic benefit. An employee age 55 with 25 years of
service could retire with the $350 basic benefit deferred
to age 65, or on an immediate pension actuarialy reduced.
Workers could leave the industry at age 55 with 13 to 24
years of service with accrued benefits, and payment
deferred to age 65. Pensions for past retirees were
increased also, to $300 per month. Beginning in 1973,
the compulsory retirement age was to be reduced to 65
(from 68).
The PMA also agreed to pay out about $800,000 to
those who had not received the full M&M death and
disability benefit.
A pay guarantee plan was established which guaran­
teed 36 hours per week for eligible Class A workers and
18 hours for eligible Class B workers. The PMA’s con­
tingent liability for funding the plan was set at $5.2
million per year with the container tax funds to be
applied against the cost of the guarantee. If any tax
funds remained, they were to be applied toward the
unfunded liability of the pension plan.
The agreement was to remain in effective until July 1,
1973, but the pact could be cancelled 30 days after
submission for Pay Board review if approval required
under the economic stabilization program was not ob­
tained within that period.
At the time of the agreement, certain matters such as
hours of work, grievance, scope of work, and the “steady
men” issue were still to be negotiated, and if settlement
could not be reached, the issues were to be submitted to
binding arbitration. Most of these matters were subse­
quently resolved through negotiations or arbitration.7
On March 16, the Pay Board announced that it had
reduced the first-year “package” (the balance of the pact
was to be reviewed later). As a result, first-year wage
6 Later in the year, the ILWU put off scheduled action on
the merger reportedly because of opposition from the ILWU
rank and file.
7 The “steady men” issue was resolved on July 5 when an
arbitrator handed down a decision which limited use of a particu­
lar employee to 22 days a month and 6 days a week and specified
methods of designating such men. The subject, however, con
tinued to be discussed by the parties.

3

increases were cut to 42 cents (from 72 cents) for long­
shoremen and to 79 cents (from $1,125) for CFS utility
men. The Board also ruled that the longshore industry’s
liability for the first year of the pay guarantee plan was
limited to a cost equal to 9.9 cents an hour. The Board
also said that if the cost of the guarantee at the end of
the year was less than this amount, the difference could
be applied retroactively to wage rates. If the cost ex­
ceeded this amount, the additional cost could be
deducted from the second-year wage increase.
In late March, ILWU and PMA negotiators met to
discuss the Pay Board cuts. According to the union, the
PMA recognized in principle that it had an obligation to
pay the money deducted from the settlement. The union
proposed that the PMA escrow such monies in a special
account to be payable by July 1,1973 (contract termina­
tion) or whenever governmental approval was obtained
or controls were ended, whichever was earlier. The Pay
Board then instructed the PMA that such an agreement
would not be allowed, and the PMA complied.
The union in turn sued to have the Pay Board enjoined
from instructing the PMA on escrowing and announced
that it had reserved the right to cancel the new agreement
as of April 15, 1972— the date cancellation would be
allowable if the pact was not approved. The union had
also suggested that manning scales be increased for the
life of the contract to compensate for Pay Board cuts,
but the PMA rejected the proposal.
In April, the Port of Seattle (not a member of the
PMA) filed suit in Federal court charging the ILWU
and PMA with violation of anti-trust laws through their
agreement that “containers originating at or destined for
delivery to a non-PMA member facility employing ILWU
labor within the Port Area CFS Zone, shall be stuffed and
unstuffed by ILWU labor employed by an employer
signatory to the Pacific Coast Longshore and Checkers
Agreement or the Container Freight Station Supple­
ment. . .” A hearing was scheduled for April 21. A
related complaint was filed with the National Labor
Relations Board against the union and shippers by several
forwarders who used Teamsters to pack and unpack vans,
charging that the container tax was an illegal attempt to
stop steamship companies from using forwarders.
On May 3 the ILWU suit against the Pay Board was
denied on the grounds that the Board’s action has been
“informal” (over the telephone). The Federal judge also
ruled that he could see nothing to prevent the unions and
shippers from reaching an agreement on the escrow of
monies, but on May 5 the Pay Board formally ruled that
the escrowing of the monies in question was not allowed.
The Board also said that if would scrutinize other
methods which might be used to circumvent its decisions.
The parties, on May 15, announced implementation
of the February agreement as revised by the Pay Board.




This followed an agreement dated May 11 that if wage
and price controls were eliminated on or before Novem­
ber 30, 1972, the pact could be terminated by 60 days’
notice or by 24 hours’ notice if controls were not
if effect on or ended on or after January 31, 1973.
A day after the implementation announcement, as a
result .of the complaint before the NLRB by the freight
forwarders, a Federal district court judge ruled illegal
new sections of the CFSS which (1) called for the con­
tainer tax, (2) provided that port zone work be performed
by ILWU labor, and (3) prevented a PMA member’s
subcontracting of container work to non-PMA employers.
The ILWU and PMA then agreed to reinstate old relevant
sections of the CFSS which required the use of ILWU
labor for the stuffing and stripping of nonfactory loads
as a condition of loading cargo on ships. This also was
ruled against, however, in mid-June by a Federal judge
thus reducing ILWU jurisdiction over container work.
On February 9, 1973, following a request from the
ILWU, the Cost of Living Council denied restoration of
wage cuts made by the Pay Board.
June 1973— July 1975
An early settlement was reached between the PMA
and ILWUon June 9, 1973 for 13,000 dockworkers. The
25-month pact was made effective June 1, a month ear­
lier than the scheduled expiration date of the previous
agreement. The early settlement reportedly reflected the
parties’ anticipation of new stiff government wage-price
controls. Workers ratified the pact by July 14.
Interim agreement on four key items was reached on
May 10, following talks which had begun on May 8. This
understanding paved the way for the peaceful final settle­
ment, and provided for a 2 5-cent wage hike on June 1, a
guarantee against layoff, and continuation of the pay
guarantee plan. It also provided for formal bargaining to
begin by May 15 in an attempt to attain full settlement
by the end of May. The Parties also agreed to discuss at
that time the use of binding arbitration to resolve any
stalemate. The union initially had sought a 50-cent-anhour wage hike in a 1-year pact, adoption of a cost-ofliving escalator clause, the establishment of paid holidays,
improved fringe benefits, and increased jurisdiction over
container work.
Terms of the new contract included general wage
increases for longshoremen of 25 cents an hour on
June 2, 1973, 15 cents on June 30, 1973, and 30 cents
on June 29, 1974. Because longshoremen received
6 hours’ pay at their basic rate plus 2 hours at/their
overtime rate, while CFS utility men received 8 hours at
their basic straight-time rate, the equivalent general wage
increases for CFS utility men amounted to 28, 17, and
33.5 cents. An escalator clause was established which
4

new system, 1/52 of annual funding was made available
for a week’s guarantee payments with reductions to be
made in the weekly payments if the payments exceeded
1/52 of annual funding. Total payments were to be
reviewed at the end of 13-week periods— if the accumu­
lated payments were less than 13/52 of funding, the
excess monies would be distributed as “make whole”
payments to employees who had received reduced weekly
guarantees, up to the amount of their guarantee (36
hours’ pay for class A workers and 18 hours for class B
workers). If monies remained after such “make whole”
payments, the excess would be paid to Class B workers
to bring their weekly guarantee up to a maximum of 24
hours.
The pact also provided that there would be no reduc­
tion in the registered longshoremen (or clerks) work
force during the term of the agreement, except due to
normal attrition, unless mutual agreement was reached
on a reduction because of unusual circumstance. The
agreement was scheduled to remain in effect until
8 a.m. on July 1, 1975.
On May 7, 1974, the ILWU and PMA reached agree­
ment for a June 1 general wage increase of 30 cents (an
equivalent 33.5 cents for CFS utility men) following
expiration of Federal wage-price controls at midnight
of April 30. This hike restored the amount cut from the
1972 agreement by the Pay Board and was in addi­
tion to the already scheduled June 29 increase. The
agreement did not otherwise alter the 1973 contract.
With the impending end of controls, the union had
demanded a reopening of the current pact under terms
of the May 11, 1972 supplemental agreement (allowing
cancellation of the 1972 settlement if controls were not
in effect on or after January 31, 1973) to discuss
restoration of the amount cut by the Pay Board in its
March 16, 1972 ruling. The PMA, however, did not con­
sider the May 11 supplemental agreement to be applicable
to the 1973 contract which had been scheduled to remain
in effect until July 1, 1975.
A 1-day coastwise work stoppage by longshoremen
occurred on May 1, because of the disagreement, but
work resumed the next day after the parties agreed to
discuss the union’s demands, and the wage agreement
was reached on May 7.
The following tables bring the wage chronology up to
date until the expiration of the contract.

provided for cost-of-living adjustments for longshoremen
in January and July of 1975 of 1 cent for each 0.3-point
increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price
Index (1967=100) during a 6-month period preceding
the adjustments. The adjustments were not to exceed 12
cents and 10 cents, respectively. Container freight station
utility men were to receive equivalent adjustments. Two
paid holidays were established in 1973 and three more
were to be added in 1974. Vacations were to be liber­
alized in 1973 and 1974.
Improvements in welfare benefits included extension
of coverage through age 22 for dependent children who
were full-time students and to any age for previously
incapacitated dependent children. Kidney dialysis treat­
ment in a patients’ home or in a nonhospital center was
to be paid for. Welfare coverage was provided 1 year
from death for a widow of an active man. The children’s
dental coverage was extended to children under age 19
(was 15) and the adult benefit was increased to 100 per­
cent of a schedule of payments. Orthodontia services
were added on a 50-percent co-insurance basis, up to
a maximum benefit of $500. A vision care program was
established in 1974 with a $5 deductible. It provided for
annual eye examinations, annual replacement of lenses
if the prescription changed, and frames every other year.
The employee was to receive these benefits through a
panel of optometrists.
Pension benefits were improved to provide employees
who elected to leave the industry after attaining age 55
and 25 years of service, the existing monthly benefit of
$350 deferred until age 62 (was age 65) or for such men
less than age 59, an immediate pension actuarially
reduced from age 62. Men who left the industry after
attaining age 55, and had 13 years but less than 25 years
of service were given the option to take an immediate
pension actuarially reduced from age 65 with widows’
benefit coverage of one-half the actuarially reduced
pension (these men previously were limited to a deferred
pension payable at age 65 of full dollar benefit accrued
at time they left the industry). The widow of an active
employee who died at age 59 (was age 60) or after with
25 years of service was entitled to a widows’ benefit.
Substantial improvements were made in the pay
guarantee plan. The companies’ contribution was in­
creased to $6 million per contract year, and the method
of allocating the guarantee pay was revised. Under the




5

Table 1. General wage changes
Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Effective date

Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS memo- Basic wage rate of $4.30 an hour
established for CFS utility men.2
randum of agreement
dated Oct. 28, 1969).
Jan. 12,1970 (CFS
memorandum of agreement dated Oct. 28,
1969).

20-cents-an-hour increase for CFS
utility men.

Retroactive increases in accordance with Pay Board ruling
announced Mar. 16, 1972. The Feb. 10, 1972, memo­
randum of understanding originally had provided for wage
increases of 72 cents for longshoremen and $1,125 for
CFS utility men retroactive to Dec. 25, 1971, but the
Pay Board subsequently denied the full amounts under the
economic stabilization policies of Phase 2.

Dec. 25, 1971 (memo42-cents-an-hour increase for longrandum of understandshoremen and 79-cents-an-hour
ing dated Feb. 10, 1972, increase for CFS utility men.
and supplemental
memorandum of understanding dated May 12,
1972).

Agreement also provided for deferred increases effective July 1,
1972.
Feb. 26, 1972 (memorandum of agreement
dated Feb. 10, 1972).

Increases ranging from 10 to 30 cents an hour were provided
as adjustments in skilled rate differentials. These increases
amounted to about 9 cents an hour when averaged over the
entire bargaining unit.

July 1, 1972 (memoran­
dum of agreement
dated Feb. 10,1972).

40-cents-an-hour increase for long­
shoremen and 45-cents-an-hour
increase for CFS utility men.

Deferred increases.

June 2,1973 (memo­
randum of understand­
ing dated June 24,
1973).

25-cents-an-hour increase for long­
shoremen and 28 cents for CFS
utility men.

Agreement also provided for establishment of an escalator
clause providing for semiannual cost-of-living adjustments of
1 cent for longshoremen and 1.125 cents for CFS utility
men for each 0.3-point increase in the Bureau of Labor
Statistics’ Consumer Price Index (1967=100). The first
adjustment was to be limited to a maximum 12 cents
for longshoremen and 13.5 cents for CFS utility men
and was to be effective Jan. 1, 1975, based on the increase
in the November 1974 Index over the May 1974 Index.3
The second adjustment was to be limited to a maximum of
10 cents for longshoremen and 11.25 cents for CFS
utility men and was to be effective July 1, 1975, based on
the increase in the Index for May 1975 over the Index
of November 1974.3
The agreement also provided for wage increases effective
June 30, 1973 and June 29, 1974.

June 30,1973 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

15-cents-an-hour increase for long­
shoremen and 17 cents for CFS
utility men.

June 1, 1974 (supple­
mental agreement
dated May 7, 1974).

30-cents-an-hour increase for long­
shoremen and 33.5 cents for CFS
utility men.

See footnotes at end of table.




6

Table 1. General wage changes1— Continued
Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Effective date
June 29, 1974 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

Deferred increases.

30-cents-an-hour increase for long­
shoremen and 33.5 cents for CFS
utility men.

1 General wage changes are construed as upward or downward adjustments that affect an entire establishment, bargaining unit or
substantial group of employees at one time. Not included within the term are adjustments in individual rates (promotions, merit
increases, etc.) and minor adjustments in the wage structure (such as changes in specific classification rates) that do not have an
immediate effect on the general wage level.
The changes listed above were the major adjustments in wage rates made during the period covered. Because of fluctuations in
earnings occasioned by premium and penalty rates and other factors, the total of the general changes listed will not necessarily coin­
cide with the change in average hourly earnings over the period.
CFS utility men perform functions similar to longshoremen and are included for the first time since they were first
defined under the 1969 supplemental agreement. Since container freight stations were not established until Jan. 5, 1970, this rate
was never actually paid to the workers.
The cost-of-living adjustments (subject to maximums) were determined as follows:




Increase above base month *
Consumer Price Index
(1967=100)
0.3 to 0.5
0.6 to 0.8
0.9 to 1.1
1.2 to 1.4
1.5 to 1.7
1.8 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.3
2.4 to 2.6
2.7 to 2.9
3.0 to 3.2
3.3 to 3.5
3.6 or over

Am ount o f cost-of-living adjustment**
. (cents per hour)
Longshoremen

..................................... .........
..................................... .........
....................................
..................................... .........
.....................................
.....................................
..................................... .........
..................................... .........
.................................... .........
.....................................
.....................................
.................................. .........

1
2
4

7
8
9

12

CFS utility men
1.125
2.25
3.375
4.5
5.625
6.75
7.875
9.0
10.125
11.25
12.375
13.5

* May 1974 Index level for first adjustment and November 1974 for second
adjustment.
** The allowance was not part of the basic wage rate, but was used to compute over­
time, holiday, vacation, and pay guarantee plan pay.

7

Table 2. Basic hourly rates for selected occupations and operations in all ports, December 1971—June 1 9 7 4 1
Effective date
Occupation and operations

Longshoremen:
General cargo:
Basic r a t e ....................................................
Overtime rate12 ...........................................
Selected penalty cargoes:
Specified commodities in lots of 15 short
tons or more 3 .........................................
Green hides ...............................................
Leaking or damaged cargo in faulty
containers ...............................................
Creosoted products out of water
(hold and boom men only)
...............
Shoveling jobs on any commodity ...........
Bulk commodities (excluding bulk
liquids) not otherwise classified which
are loaded or discharged mechanically ..
Stowing bulk grain, to board workers . . .
Damaged and offensive cargo4 .*................
Working hatch when fire burning or
cargo smoldering in hatch ......................
Explosives ..................................................
Working in cramped space on paper
and pulp in packages of 300 pounds
or more (hold men only)
.................
Hatch tenders, winch drivers, and lift truck...........
jitney drivers, and skilled hold men
Gang bosses67* ........................................................
Bulldozer operators .............................................
Crane operators ....................................................
CFS utility men:10
Basic r a t e ..........................................................

July 1,
1972

Dec. 25,
1971

June 2,
1973

June 30,
1973

June 1,
1974

June 29,
1974

$4.70
7.05

$5.10
7.65

$5.35
8.03

$5.50
8.25

$5.80
8.70

$6.10
9.15

4.85
4.95

5.25
5.35

5.50
5.60

5.65
5.75

5.95
6.05

6.25
6.35

4.85

5.25

5.50

5.65

5.95

6.25

4.95
4.95

5.35
5.35

5.60
5.60

5.75
5.75

6.05
6.05

6.35
6.35

4.95
5.05
5.55

5.35
5.45
5.95

5.60
5.70
6.20

5.75
5.85
6.35

6.05
6.15
6.65

6.35
6.45
6.95

5.90
9.40

6.30
10.20

6.55
10.70

6.70
11.00

7.00
11.60

7.30
12.20

4.85

5.25

5.50

5.65

5.95

6.25

s4.85
74.90
*5.00
95.10

5.35
5.45
5.60
5.80

5.60
5.70
5.85
6.05

5.75
5.85
6.00
6.20

6.05
6.15
6.30
6.50

6.35
6.45
6.60
6.80

5.29

5.74

6.02

6.19

6.525

6.86

1 Exclusive of premium pay for night work.
2 Overtime differentials for penalty rates and for skilled occupations were lV z times the straight-time rates.
The list covered 18 commodities.
Following the 1973 negotiations, a Pacific Coast arbitrator ruled on July 30, 1973, that words “and offensive” should be
omitted from the penalty cargo definition.
Skilled rate increased an additional 10 cents effective Feb. 26, 1972.
The differential paid employees performing gang boss functions in some ports varied. The differential shown is applicable to
Northern California ports and Oregon ports.
7 Skilled rate for ports indicated in footnote 6 increased an additional 15 cents effective Feb. 26, 1972.
Skilled rate increased an additional 20 cents effective Feb. 26, 1972.
Skilled rate increased an additional 30 cents effective Feb. 26, 1972.
CFS utility men were first covered under the PMA-ILWU supplemental agreement of 1969. Basic rates for utility men
before Dec. 25, 1971 were $4.30 effective Jan. 5, 1970 and $4.50 effective Jan. 12, 1970 (the $4.30 rate was never paid since the
CFS units were not established until Jan. 5, 1970). Workers at CFS units receive 8 hours’ pay at their basic rate on a regular day
whereas regular longshoremen receive 6 hours’ pay at their straight-time rate plus 2 hours overtime on a regular daily shift. Utility
men were paid penalty cargo rates as for longshoremen, except that when shift differentials or overtime rates applied in the case
of a worker receiving a penalty cargo rate, the hourly rate for working on penalty cargo (rather than only the basic rate) was
to be augmented by the shift differential premium or overtime premium.




8

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision
Premium pay for nightwork

Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS
memorandum of
agreement dated
Oct. 28, 1969).

CFS employees: Rate for work on a
designated second shift (one that
started between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m.)
to be 33 1/3 percent above
straight-time rate, and third shift
(1 a.m. to 8 a.m.) to be paid 8
hours for the 7 hours worked
(such pay to be time and one-half
regular pay).

Daily overtime pay
Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS
memorandum of
agreement dated
Oct. 28, 1969).

CFS employees: Overtime rate for
first hour in excess of 8 and time
and one-half the overtime rate for
second hour in excess of 8 (max­
imum of 2 hours* overtime) in any
shift to finish cars, trucks, and
containers, either inbound or out­
bound, when such work was
required to meet efficient opera­
tional needs.

Meal pay
Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS
memorandum of
agreement dated
O ct 28, 1969).

CFS employees: Workers not required
to work over 6 hours without
opportunity to eat.

Holiday pay
Established: 2 paid holidays.
Holidays were Christmas Day and New Years Day.
July 1,1973 (memo­
randum of agreement
Employee paid 8 hours at basic
To be eligible for paid holiday, employee had to be registered
straight-time rate of pay when holi­
employee as of holiday; have worked 800 hours in previous
dated June 24, 1973).
day not worked and overtime rate
payroll year or in most recent payroll year during which
for hours worked on paid holiday.
there was sufficient work available to meet 800 hours
requirement; and meet availability requirement of pay
guarantee plan for at least 2 of 5 days, Monday through
Friday (not including holiday) during payroll week in
which holiday fell (except in the case of a steady employee
who had to meet availability requirement of his employer)
unless he was on vacation or because of verified sickness
or injury.
If the paid holiday fell on a Sunday, the holiday was to be
observed on the following Monday, with pay.
July 1, 1974 (memo­
Added: 3 paid holidays (total 5).
Holidays were Independence Day, Labor Day, and Thanks­
randum of agreement
giving Day.
dated June 24,1973).

See footnotes at end of table.




9

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Effective date

Paid vacations
Jan. 1,1972 (supple­
mental memorandum
of understanding
dated Mar. 1, 1972).
July 1, 1973 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24,1973).

Changed: Qualifying hours for vacation purposes to include
all hours for which pay was received, except vacation
hours and pay guarantee plan hours.

Effective for 1975
Reduced: Service requirement to 17
vacations (memo­
years for additional week of
randum of agreement
vacation for employees qualifying
dated June 24, 1973).
for 1, 2, or 3 weeks under other
provisions.
Added: Additional week of vacation
after 23 years of service for em­
ployees qualifying fo r 1 , 2, 3, or 4
weeks under other provisions.

Changed: Effective for qualifications in 1973, the vacation
allowance for an employee who did not qualify because he
lost work opportunity due to sickness or accident was to be
based on average hours worked per month during period he
was not absent because of sickness or accident.1
Applicable to qualification in 1974.
Reduced: 2 week basic vacation requirement of 1,344 hours
to 1,300 hours worked in a calendar year.
Reduced:
Qualifying hours for 45 hours vacation pay to
1,500 hours or more (1,400 or more in ports with 8 gangs or
less). Continued to be 1,200 hours for men age 60 or more.

Call-in pay
Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS
memorandum of
agreement dated
Oct. 28,1969).

CFS employees— steady workers—
employee who completed pro­
bation and was called and reported
to work at starting time on a
Monday, guaranteed 40 hours’
work or pay (probationary
employee guaranteed 8 hours if
work available and 4 hours if work
not available). The 40-hour guar­
antee was reduced to 32 hours for
any week in which a holiday fell
between Monday and Friday
inclusive.
CFS employees— extra workers— any Extra workers were those used to supplement basic complement
of steady workers because of varying work loads. In some
Class A or Class B registered em­
cases where sufficient workers were not available through
ployee dispatched and reporting for
ILWU dispatching halls, the employer could employ extra
CFS extra labor duty guaranteed 8
labor from a source of his own choosing.
hours* pay if work available or 4
hours if no work available. A nonregistered worker dispatched and
reporting for CFS extra labor duty
guaranteed minimum of 4 hours’
pay and/or time worked and if
called back following day,
guaranteed 8 hours for initial day
and subsequent days until released.
Workers knocked off 6 minutes or
more after the hour or half hour,
paid to the end of the respective
30-minute period.

See footnotes at end of table.




10

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision
Subsistence pay

Jan. 5, 1970 (CFS
memorandum of
agreement dated
Oct. 28, 1969).
Feb. 26, 1972 (memorandum of understanding dated
Feb. 10, 1972).

CFS employees— not applicable.

Increased: To $8 per day for lodging
and $3 for each meal.

Welfare and insurance benefits

Dec. 4, 1971....................
Feb. 26, 1972 (memorandum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10, 1972).
Mar. 25,1972 (memorandum of understanding dated
Feb. 10, 1972).
Aug. 4, 1973 (memorandum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

I. Employer Contributions— All Ports:
Increased to 27.5 cents per man-hour.
Increased to $1,157 per man-hour.

Reduced to 65.1 cents per manhour.

Increased to 73.7 cents per manhour.
II. Medical, Surgical, and Hospital
Benefits:
A. Los Angeles-Long Beach, San
Francisco, and Portland-Vancover, Olympia, Sacramento, and
San Diego service type plans
(with option to select insured
plans since 1954).2

Mar. 19,1972 (memo­
randum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10,1972).
July 1, 1973 (memo­
randum of agree­
ment dated
June 24, 1973).

July 1, 1974 (memo­
randum of agree­
ment dated
Jnne 24, 1973).

Added: Kidney dialysis— paid for
in home or non-hospital treatment
center during first 2 months before
Medicare assumed cost and for
those not entitled to Medicare
coverage.
B. Small ports3 — Insured plans.

See footnotes at end of table.



11

Expanded: Retirees welfare coverage to those retiring under
pension plan at age 59 or more with 25 years of service.
Added: Hours paid for under Pay Guarantee Plan included in
determination of eligibility for welfare benefits for Class B
workers.
In these ports, insurance programs were to be improved so
that out-of-pocket expense to employee would be reduced
to same proportionate level in existence at inception of plan.
Expanded: Retirees welfare coverage to pensioners age 59
or more with 13 but less than 25 years of service.
Changed: Dependent definition to include dependent children
to age 19 (age 21 in Portland under Kaiser program) and to
age 23 for dependent full-time students and to include
dependent incapacitated children as long as incapacitated.
Added: Upon death of an active worker, welfare coverage for
widow and dependent children to be continued for 1
year— thereafter at widow’s expense.

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Welfare and insurance I>enefits— Continued
May 1,1968 (agreement
date Apr. 26,1968).

Increased: Hospitalization— pay­
ment at regular 3-bed ward rate for
employees and dependents for up to
70 days.
Expanded: Hospital extras— to
cover all hospital extras.
Added: Supplemental accident
benefit— to provide up to $300
per accident for certain charges
not otherwise covered, such as
special nursing and physician’s
charges in excess of basic surgical
or medical benefits.
Changed: Emergency service—
provided within 72 hours of
accident (was 24 hours).
Increased: Medical care—
dependents to $6 for each
hospital or home call and $4 for
each office visit.
Changed: Anesthesia benefit from
$200 maximum to $4 per unit of
1960 California Relative Value
Schedule.

Mar. 19, 1972 (memo­
randum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10, 1972).
Increased: Hospitalization—
maximum to 111 days per
confinement at regular 3-bed ward
rate for necessary services and
supplies (included outpatient
surgery and care).
Increased: Medical care— full
payment of prevailing fee for
hospital call, office call, home
visit (subject to $2 charge for
first visit); and for surgeon,
assistant surgeon, and anesthesia.
Increased: Maternity benefits—
hospital, payment at 3-bed ward
rate for up to 111 day per con­
finement; doctor, full payment
of prevailing fee.
Increased: Ambulance service—
up to $45 per disability.
Increased: Diagnostic X-ray and
laboratory services— full payment
of prevailing fee.
Added: Nuclear medicine— full
payment of prevailing fee.

See footnotes at end of table.




12

Benefits effective Feb. 19,1972 for walking bosses.
Extended: Retirees welfare coverage to those retiring under
pension plan at age 59 or more with 25 years of service.
Added: Hours paid for under Pay Guarantee Plan included
in determination of eligibility for welfare benefits.
The program of improved hospital and medical benefits for
active and retired workers in the small ports were under­
written by Republic National Life Insurance Company.
(Benefits were increased for nonchoice port locals to level
as dose as possible to level of service plan coverage in
large ports.)
Ihere were no changes in benefits for workers or dependents
enrolled in Medicare.

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Welfare and insurance 1benefits— Continued
July 1, 1973 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

July 1, 1974 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

July 1, 1968 (agree­
ment dated
June 7, 1968).
May 1, 1973 (agreement
dated Aug. 27, 1973).

Added: Kidney dialysis— paid for
in home or nonhospital treatment
center during first 2 months
before Medicare assumed cost and
for those not entitled to Medicare
coverage.
III. Nonoccupational Disability
Benefit, Oregon and Washington:
Increased— to $80 a week.
Increased— to $105 a week.

Expanded: Retirees welfare coverage to pensioners age 59 or
more with 13 but less than 25 years service.
Changed: Dependent definition to include dependent children
up to age 19 and up to age 23 for dependent full-time
students and to include incapacitated children as long as
incapacitated.
Added: Upon death of an active worker, welfare coverage for
widow and dependent children to be continued for one
year— thereafter at widow’s expense.

IV. Dental Benefits— All Ports
(since 1955):
Mar. 19,1972 (memo­
randum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10, 1972).

Added: Benefits for men, their
wives, and dependent children age
15 to 19, which provided 95 percent
of schedule for each dental
procedure.
Changed: Children’s dental
July 1, 1973 (memo­
benefits program to provide
randum of agreement
100 percent of cost of covered
dated June 24, 1973).
expenses for dependent
children under age 19.
Increased: Benefits for men and
their wives (including full-time
students age 19 and under age
23 and incapacitated children
age 19 or over) to 100 percent
of schedule for each dental
procedure.
Added: Orthodontia services
provided on 50-percent coinsurance basis, up to maximum
of $500 (plan would pay one
half of first $1,000 per
individual).
V. Life and Accidental Death and
Dismemberment Insurance—
All Ports:
Added: Life and accidental death
Mar. 19,1972 (memo­
and dismemberment insurance
randum of under
of $10,000 for fully registered
standing dated
(Class A) active men with at
Feb. 10,1972).
least 5 years of qualifying
service and eligible for welfare
plan coverage on date of death
or accident. If such amount was
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------i

See footnotes at end of table.




13

Effective Feb. 19,1972, for walking bosses.
Coverage provided under California Dental Service, Oregon
Dental Service, and Washington Dental Service through the
Delta Plans (in Los Angeles and San Francisco comparable
optional plans were available).
Retirees and their dependents (over age 15) were not covered.

Effective Feb. 19, 1972, for walking bosses.
The $10,000 life insurance was payable to the surviving
spouse or dependent children only if they were not
eligible for benefits under the pension plan.

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Effective date

Welfare and insurance benefits— Continued
Mar. 19,1972—
Continued

Mar. 19, 1972 (memorandum of understanding dated
Feb. 10, 1972).

Mar. 19, 1972 (memorandum of understanding dated
Feb. 10, 1972).

July 1, 1974 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973).

payable, life and accidental death
and dismemberment benefits else­
where under plan were not payable.
VI. Indemnity Plan— All Ports:
Effective Feb. 19,1972, for walking bosses.
Established: Longshoremen
eligible for welfare plan benefits
who were injured in the course of
employment and as a result of
the injury became entitled to
workmen’s compensation, were
to receive amount equal to
difference between $125 a week
and the weekly workmen’s
compensation.
VII. Prescription Drug Plan— All
Ports:
Effective Feb. 19, 1972, for walking bosses.
Established: Prescription drug
benefits for welfare plan eligible
active and retired workers and
their dependents (Kaiser Plan IV
or comparable) with $1 co­
payment per refill for prescription
drugs, including oral contracep­
tives, insulin, and certain diabetic
supplies (did not provide vitamins,
nonprescription medicines, blood
or blood plasma, and drugs pre­
scribed for treatment of condition
which is not part of the basic
Kaiser Health Plan or Western
Clinic Benefit).
VIII. Vision Care Benefits— All Ports:
Vision care provided by panel optometrists.
Established: Plan providing for
annual eye examination, annual
lenses if prescription changes,
and frames every other year
with a $5 deductible.
Pension plan

July 1, 1969 (company
letter dated July 24,
1969).

July 1, 1970 (company
letter dated Oct. 28,
1969).

Increased: For those receiving a pen­
These retirees, were to receive further pension increases at
sion benefit as a result of retirement
later dates to bring them to parity with those receiving a
before June 30, 1966, the basic
pension of $235 a month.
benefit was increased to $190
(from $165) a month and benefits
were increased proportionately for
pensioners and widows receiving
less than basic maximum benefits.
Increased: For those who received
pension increases effective July 1,
1969, the basic benefit was in­
creased to $200 a month and
benefits were increased propor­
tionately for pensioners and widows
receiving less than the basic benefit.

See footnotes at end of table.




14

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision
Pension plan-—Continued

July 1, 1971 (company
letter dated July 24,
1969).

Apr. 1, 1972 (memo­
randum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10, 1972).

Increased: For those who received
pension increase effective July 1,
1969, basic benefit increased to
$235 a month and increased
proportionately for pensioners
and widows receiving less than
basic benefit.
Pension plan was revised to provide:
Normal retirement— monthly
basic benefit of $350 for
employee retired on or after
July 1, 1971 at age 62 with 25
years of service as a longshoreman
out of the preceding 35 years,
plus a supplemental monthly
bridge benefit of $150 payable until
age 65. Employee who retired on or
after July 1, 1971 at age 65 with
less than 25 years of service to
receive prorata benefit based on
normal pension of $350.
Disability retiremen t— employee
who retired on disability on or
after July 1, 1971 to receive
benefit proportional to basic
normal benefit or prorata benefit
as appropriate.
Special early retirement—
employee with 25 years of service
as a longshoreman out of the
preceding 35 years could retire at
or after age 59 with benefit to age
65 having an actuarial value
equivalent to the basic and supple­
mental benefit payable at age 62,
and at age 65 and thereafter,
receive a benefit having the
actuarial value equivalent to the
basic monthly benefit
Regular early retirement—
employee who elected to leave
industry after attaining age 55
(1) could receive pension benefit
equal to full dollar benefit accrued
to date with payment deferred
until age 65 if he had 13 but less
than 25 years of service and (2) if
he had 25 years of service out of 35
could receive monthly pension
benefit deferred until age 65 of
$350 or an immediate pension of
actuarial value equivalent to the
amount of pension payable at age 65.

See footnotes at end of table.




15

In addition, see pension increases retroactive to July 1, 1971,
from Feb. 10, 1972, memorandum of agreement which are
detailed below.
Such additional increases were in lieu of a cost-of-living
increase in pensions which had been scheduled to be
effective on July 1, 1971.
Effective Mar. 1, 1972, for walking bosses.

Such benefits were as follows:

Age

62......................
6 1 ...................
6 0 ...................
5 9 ...................

Basic
benefit
. . . $350.00
. . . 317.59
. . . 289.00
. . . 263.70

Supple­
mental
benefit
$150.00
108.52
83.78
67.40

Total
benefit
$500.00
426.11
372.78
331.00

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Apr. 1,1972—
Continued

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Pension plan-—Continued
I
An employee who retired prior to July 1, 1966, with a basic
monthly benefit was to receive a basic monthly benefit
of $300 effective July 1, 1971. An employee who retired
before July 1, 1966, with a reduced basic benefit or a
disability pension was to have his benefit increased pro­
portionately. The increased benefits for these groups of
employees were retroactive to July 1, 1971.
An employee who retired after June 30, 1966, and before
July 1, 1971, was to receive a basic monthly benefit of
$300 effective with 61st monthly pension payment. An
employee who retired after June 30, 1966, and before
July 1, 1971, with a reduced basic benefit or a disability
pension was to have benefit increased proportionately
effective with 61st pension payment.

Jan. 1, 1973

July 1, 1973 (memo­
Changed: Regular early retirement—
randum of agreement
employee who elected (1) to
dated June 24, 1973).
leave industry at or after age 55
with 25 years of service (out of
35)— could receive monthly
pension benefit deferred until age
62 of $350 or an immediate
pension for those age 55 but less
than 59 of actuarial value
equivalent to the amount of
pension payable at age 62; and
(2) employee who elected to
leave industry at or after age 55
with 13 but less than 25 years
of service— could receive immediate
pension actuarially discounted
from age 65 of the full dollar bene­
fit accrued to date with payment
deferred until age 65 with provision
for a widow’s benefit of one-half
the actuarially discounted pension.
July 1,1974 (memo­
randum of agreement
dated June 24, 1973.

Extended: Widow’s benefit to widow of non-retired worker
who died when age 59 (was age 60) with 25 years of
service or more.

See footnotes at end of table.




Reduced: Compulsory retirement age to 65 (was age 68).
An employee who attained age 65 and was entitled to
retire on basic monthly benefit or reduced basic benefit
was required to retire. Employee currently registered who
first became eligible to receive immediate pension benefits
at age 65 but not after age 68 required to retire when
first eligible for a pension.

16

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision

Laborsaving (mechanization and modernization) fund
Because fund would be exhausted by
June 30, 1971, due to insufficient
monies, death and disability benefits
were revised. To determine how
much was available for death and
disability benefits, workers who
qualified for and wanted a vested
benefit were required to decide in
writing no later than Mar. 1,1971,
that they would leave industry by
July 1, 1971. (Deadline for filing
for vested pension later extended
to June 1,1971.)
If a man who was found eligible for a disability benefit died
Disability benefits— eligibility re­
before trustees calculated his proprotionate share, his wife
quirements changed so that
(if she had not remarried) was to receive a death benefit
employee must prove qualification
provided she lived with him for 3 years immediately
for Social Security disability
preceding his death.
benefit and must be certified
totally and permanently disabled
for his longshore work by 2
doctors. Benefit claims received on
or after May 17, 1970, were also
held up and whatever monies were
available were to be paid in 2 parts
(July 1, 1971 and June 1, 1972).
Death benefits— payable only to
widow and if eligible worker died
on or after May 17, 1970,
widow could not collect death
benefit until after July 1, 1971,
based on share available in fund.
July 29, 1971 (agreement Fund discontinued and balance of
of same date).
assets were used to pay outstanding
claims (the shortage in assets after
remaining assets were paid out
was estimated by the union to be
about $890,000).
June 8, 1972 (memo­
Companies agreed to pay amount
randum of under­
equal to deficit in fund when
standing dated
fund’s remaining assets were paid
Feb. 10, 1972).
off so that outstanding claims as
of Jan. 1, 1972 could be paid in
full.
July 16,1970

See footnotes at end of table.




17

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other

Provision

related matters

Pay guara]ntee plan
Mar. 4, 1972 (memo­
randum of under­
standing dated
Feb. 10, 1972, and
supplemental memo­
randum of agreement
dated Mar. 2, 1972).

Established: Plan guaranteeing amount
to bring employees* total weekly
earnings to 36 hours and 18 hours
at straight-time pay for Class A
and Class B workers, respectively.
Eligibility: A Class A or Class B
employee was eligible if his paid
hours for a payroll week, or a
“guarantee period,*’ were 80 per­
cent or more of the average paid
hours per worker in his respective
class (A or B) in his local for that
payroll week, or “guarantee
period” (wage guarantee pay­
ments not to be counted as paid
hours for purposes of this
paragraph).

Plan to be funded through companies’ contribution of $5,200,000
per contract year.
Earnings included pay at/or for straight-time overtime, pen­
alty overtime, penalty cargo, skill, travel time, vacation,
State unemployment benefit, workmen’s compensation,
and PMA/ILWU indemnity and wage guarantee payments.
For purposes of plan, initial “guarantee periods” were:
1st period— Mar. 4, 1972 through Sept. 1, 1972;
2nd period— Sept. 2, 1972 through Mar. 2, 1973;
3rd period— Mar. 3, 1973 until Jjme 30, 1973.
Class A and Class B workers paid less than 13 and 7.25 hours,
respectively, in a payroll week were excluded with their
hours in computation of payroll week averages for their
respective classes in 1st two guarantee periods. Class A
and Class B workers paid less than 11.5 and 6.25 hours,
respectively, in a payroll week were excluded with their
hours in computation of payroll week averages for their
respective classes in the 3rd guarantee period. Class A and
Class B workers and their hours were excluded from com­
putation of averages for their respective classes of the
port for all of the payroll week since the start of the 26-week
period if during the 1st or 2nd 26-week guarantee periods
they were paid less than 13 and 7.25 hours for Class A
and Class B workers, respectively, times number of payroll
weeks, or if in the remaining payroll weeks they were
paid less than 11.5 and 6.25 hours for Class A and Gass B
workers, respectively, times number of payroll weeks (wage
guarantee payments not to be counted as paid hours for
purposes of this paragraph).
Workers were not eligible for a payment as a result of an
illegal work stoppage.
A reduction in payments could be agreed upon by ports
affected for more than 1 payroll week, by work stoppage,
by nonsignatory unions or act of God.
Hours worked in excess of the guarantee for payroll week
(36 or 18 hours, whichever applicable) were to be carried
forward into succeeding weeks and added to the successive
weeks paid hours in determination of eligibility for payment.
This accumulating process was to continue until the end
of the “guarantee period.”
Vacation hours were excluded in calculating the local’s or
port’s average hours of worker per payroll week or guarantee
period.
Workers absent because of illness or injury, jury duty, union
employ, military service or authorized leave of absence
for personal reasons were not eligible for guarantee payment
for any week in which they failed to meet 80 percent test
Such workers, however, were granted eligibility credit upon
their return to work for purpose of maintaining eligibility
for the guarantee.
Hours paid to “visitor” longshoremen were excluded in calcu­
lating the local’s or port’s average hours of workers per

See footnotes at end of table.




18

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision
Pay guarantee plan— Continued

payroll week or guarantee period. Their earnings for guarantee
purposes, upon return to their home port, were their actual
earnings.

Mar. 4, 1972—
Continued
June 30, 1973 (memo­
Increased: Companies’ contribution
randum of agreement
to $6 million per contract year.
dated June 24, 1973). Changed: Method of allocating monies
was revised so that at the end of
each week 1/52 of the annual fund­
ing amount would be available for
guarantee payments. An across-theboard percentage reduction would
be made in weekly payments to
limit the total weekly payments to
1/52 of annual funding. Total pay­
ments were to be reviewed at the
end of 13-week periods to insure
that accumulated weekly payments
during each period did not ex­
ceed 13/52 of annual funding. If
the total payments for a 13-week
period were less than 13/52 of
annual funding, the difference was
to be paid out as “make whole”
payments to employees who had
received any reduced weekly
guarantee (up to the amount
payable to an employee without
the reduction). If the total of
such “make whole” payments
would exceed the excess monies,
the “make whole” payments were
to be reduced on an across-theboard percentage basis to main­
tain 13/52 of annual funding.
If there were monies left over after
full “make whole” payment were
made, these additional monies
would be paid out to Class B
workers to increase their weekly
guarantee up to a maximum of 24
hours (the regular guarantee for
Class B workers remained at 18
hours).
Changed: Eligibility— workers were to
be included on a pay guarantee
plan eligibility list (1) as of June 30,
1973 because of 1 hour or more
work during the 52 weeks ending
May 26, 1973 or (2) as of the
July 1 or January 1 that workers be­
came eligible for welfare coverage.
Workers on the eligibility list were
eligible for the guarantee for any
week in which they were “available”

See footnotes at end of table.




19

Added: Holiday pay and jury duty pay added to definition
of earnings for pay guarantee plan purposes.
Eliminated: Workers’ compensation and PMA/ILWU indemnity
payments from definition of earnings for pay guarantee
plan purposes.
If weekly earnings were less than pay guarantee benefit, worker
was paid the difference. If after third week of pay
guarantee, earnings for current 4 week period was less than
pay guarantee for the 4 weeks, worker was paid difference.
If in any of the 4 weeks earnings were less than pay guar­
antee and worker did not receive guarantee because of ineligi­
bility for that week, earnings and guarantee for that week
were considered equal for purposes of determining pay
guarantee for the 4 week period.

Workers not included on eligibility list were those worker?
age 62 with 25 years of service or more with eligibility for
pension, workers while working on a steady basis for
employer under a guarantee for which employer was
responsible, and workers dropped from the registration list.
Workers employed or released as steady men during a payroll
week were not eligible for that week.
Workers absent for any reason, except jury duty, were not
entitled to guarantee for any week in which 5 day
availability requirement was not met (jury duty counted
as availability).

Table 3. Supplementary compensation practices— Continued

Effective date

Applications, exceptions, and other
related matters

Provision
Pay guarantee plan— Continued

June 30, 1973—
Continued

for work on the 5 days, Monday
through Friday, less the day on
which any paid holiday was ob­
served (the previous 80 percent
test and average hours worked
calculations to which the 80percent test was applied were
eliminated).
Moving allowance

A “low work opportunity” port was defined as one in
Established: Benefits for workers
July 1, 1973 (arbi­
which the average hours of work per week was less than
wishing to transfer from “low
tration award of
18 hours for Class A workers and 9 hours for Class B
work opportunity” port which
July 30, 1973 and
workers.
provided:
supplemental memoClass A workers were to be given preference over Class B
(a) Round trip transportation,
of understanding
workers for such transfers.
subsistence, and lodging for
dated Nov. 12,1973).
one advance trip by man, his
wife, or both, to look for
housing in port he was being
transferred to (5-day maximum);
(b) moving of belongings by a
licensed moving company
(limited to 6,500 pounds for a
married man and 2,500 for a
single man);
(c) transportation to new port and
subsistence and lodging for man
and his family;
(d) minimum cost required to dis­
connect and hook up appliances;
and
(e) storage of household effects
necessitated by unsual circum­
stances (subject to approval of
both parties).
1 The vacation allowance was determined as follows:
Average hours worked per
month in vacation eligibility
year before illness or injury

Worker classification
and weeks o f vacation *

Less than 67 hours
67-111 hours . . . .
112 hours or more

Under age 60
No vacation
1 week of vacation
2 weeks of vacation

Less than SO hours
50-91 h o u rs.........
92 hours or more .

60 years or older
in minor port
No vacation
1 week of vacation
2 weeks of vacation

60 years or older
Less than 58 hours............................
No vacation
58-99 h o u rs.......................................
1 week of vacation
100 hours or m ore............................
2 weeks of vacation
* An employee’s vacation was to be reduced 1/12 for
each 30 days of absence over 30 days during vacation eligi­
bility year.
2

3 In these areas the service type plan was the Kaiser Health Plan.
Ports other than Los Angeles-Long Beach, San Francisco, Portland-Vancouver, Olympia, Sacramento, and San Diego.




20

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
REGIONAL OFFICES

Region I
1603 JFK Federal Building
Government Center
Boston, Mass. 02203
Phone: 223-6762 (Area Code 617)

Region V
8th Floor, 300 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, III. 60606
Phone: 353-1880 (Area Code 312)

Region II
Suite 3400
1515 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10036
Phone: 971-5405 (Area Code 212)

Region VI
1100 Commerce St., Rm. 6B7
Dallas, Tex. 75202
Phone: 749-3516 (Area Code 214)

Region III
P.O. Box 13309
Philadelphia, Pa. 19101
Phone: 597-1154 (Area Code 215)

Regions VII and VIII *
Federal Office Building
911 Walnut St., 15th Floor
Kansas City, Mo. 64106
Phone: 374-2481 (Area Code 816)

Region IV
Suite 540
1371 Peachtree St., NE.
Atlanta, Ga. 30309
Phone: 526-5418 (Area Code 404)

Regions IX and X **
450 Golden Gate Ave.
Box 36017
San Francisco, Calif. 94102
Phone: 556-4678 (Area Code 415)




* Regions VII and VIII are serviced by Kansas City
** Regions IX and X are serviced by San Francisco