View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Risk of Slower Growth Ahead

June 24, 2010

The U.S. economic recovery appears to have been solid through
second quarter 2010. However, with fiscal stimulus measures and
the inventory correction nearing an end, there are reasons to be
concerned that growth will slow in the second half of the year.
Moderate Second-Quarter Growth Likely
The outlook for second-quarter growth is bright. Gross domestic
product (GDP) grew by 3 percent in the first quarter and is expected
to grow at an even faster pace in the second. This outlook is supported by the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing
and nonmanufacturing indexes (Chart 1). The indexes are good
early indicators of GDP growth because they are timely, subject to
minimal revision and cover a broad portion of the economy. The
averages for both indexes are estimated to be higher in the second
quarter of 2010 than in the first, suggesting an acceleration in economic activity. (Any ISM reading above 50 indicates growth. The
higher the reading, the faster is the implied growth rate).
An Unusual Recovery
The composition of growth so far in this recovery is a source of concern. During the recession, real GDP fell below final sales as firms
sought to reduce bloated inventories. Once final sales began to recover, firms sought to moderate the pace of the inventory drawdown—they began to close the gap between production and sales.
The recovery up to now, which began in third quarter 2009, has
been unusual in how much it has relied on this production catch-up
effect. Inventory investment has accounted for 57 percent of GDP
growth in the first three quarters of the current recovery—the largest
percentage in the past 60 years (Chart 2). In comparison, the fraction of GDP increase accounted for by residential investment during
the first three quarters of the recovery, 2 percent, is a record low.
This feeble contribution comes despite new home-purchase tax
credits and Federal Reserve intervention in the market for mortgagebacked securities. Growth contributions from consumption and government purchases have been smaller than normal also, but well
within the past range. Contributions from nonresidential fixed investment and net exports have been about average.
The Inventory Cycle Draws to a Close
It appears the inventory correction has nearly run its course. Output
has now caught up with final demand for domestic product, signaling
that the main boost to GDP growth from inventory investment is
coming to an end (Chart 3). Unless producers or retailers now want
to add to their inventories, in coming quarters GDP growth will be
tied to growth in final demand. However, the inventory-to-sales ratio
is at a level that in the past has meant little or no change in inventories relative to GDP (Chart 4).
sumption spending is growing at roughly the same 3 percent
pace as before the recession but starting from a lower base
(Chart 5). To replace inventory investment’s contribution to the
Where Will Growth Come From?
Increasing government purchases were an important early source of recovery, this growth rate would have to increase to 5.5 percent—a pickup that is uncertain, at best, given still-tight credit
growth in final demand during the recovery but have gradually
faded. Support for residential investment from special tax incentives and households’ aversion to debt. Such an acceleration might
even be undesirable because it would risk an exacerbation of
is at an end. Business investment has been growing well in recent
global imbalances (large U.S. trade deficits and rising U.S. inquarters but usually acts as an amplifier of growth that originates
elsewhere, rather than an independent source of strength. Real con- ternational indebtedness).
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

National Economic Update

1

Net Exports a Possible Bright Spot
Net exports provided a big boost to U.S. final demand in second
quarter 2009 with a 1.6 percentage point growth contribution. Since
then, net exports have contributed little to growth, but there is some
reason to believe that this will change in the second half of 2010.
Through the first quarter, leading indexes for the U.S. and for the
major industrialized countries as a group suggested that economic
prospects here and abroad were improving about equally rapidly—
a neutral for our net exports’ prospects. Meanwhile, the U.S. gross
domestic purchases price index has been rising relative to the U.S.
gross domestic product price index (Chart 6). A growing purchases/
product price ratio means that U.S. imports are becoming more
expensive relative to U.S. exports, encouraging growth in exports
relative to imports. Ordinarily, this relative-price effect would kick in
during the second half of 2010. However, recent developments in
Europe have added to financial strains there and increased calls for
fiscal restraint. So, while some increase in the growth contribution
from net exports in the second half is possible, it is by no means
certain.
Slower Growth Likely, On Balance
In sum, GDP growth will continue in the second half of the year but
quite possibly at a slower rate than we’ve seen during the recovery
to date. Deceleration is likely because the boost to growth from
rising inventory investment is near an end now that output has
caught up with final demand. The inventory boost has accounted
for over 50 percent of GDP growth so far during the recovery, so a
substantial pickup in final demand growth will be necessary to keep
gains in employment and output from slowing. That the required
pickup will occur is far from obvious.
—Tyler Atkinson, Evan F. Koenig and Max Lichtenstein
……………………………………………………………………………
About the Authors
Atkinson is a research assistant, Koenig is a vice president and
senior policy advisor and Lichtenstein is a research assistant in the
Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

National Economic Update

2