View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Internet address:
http://www.bls.gov/mfp
Historical, technical
information:
(202) 691-5606
Media contact:
(202) 691-5902

USDL 04-148
For Release: 10:00 AM EST
Tuesday, February 10, 2004

MULTIFACTOR PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS IN MANUFACTURING, 2001

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported multifactor
productivity data--output per unit of combined inputs—for the manufacturing sector and for durable goods,
nondurable goods, and two-digit (SIC) manufacturing industries through the year 2001. Multifactor
productivity is designed to measure the joint influences on economic growth of technological change,
efficiency improvements, returns to scale, reallocation of resources, and other factors. Multifactor
productivity, therefore, differs from the labor productivity (output per hour) measures that are published
quarterly by BLS since it requires information on capital services and other data that are available only on an
annual basis.
In 2001, multifactor productivity in manufacturing changed at the following percentage rates:

Manufacturing
Durable manufacturing
Nondurable manufacturing

2000-01
-0.8
0.6
-2.2

The decline in multifactor productivity in manufacturing was the first in 10 years. The 2001 annual
changes are summarized in table A; further detail and historical measures are shown in tables 1 through 3.
This is the last release of manufacturing productivity measures based on the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) system. SIC-based productivity and related series through 2001 will remain available
but will no longer be updated. In the future, historical and new measures will be based on the North
American Industrial Classfication System (NAICS).

2
The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those
used in preparing the private business and private nonfarm business series published elsewhere, and these
measures are not directly comparable. See BLS News Release USDL 03-158, Multifactor Productivity
Trends, 2001 and see page 8 and the Summary of Methods for further information on data sources and
methods.
The multifactor productivity measures for manufacturing differ in several ways from those for private
business and private nonfarm business in their treatment of labor input, output, and classes of factor inputs.
First, the manufacturing measure of labor input is a direct aggregate of hours. This is in contrast to the major
sector measures for which estimates of the effects of changing labor composition have been developed.
Next, the output concept used for multifactor productivity in manufacturing is “sectoral output.”
Sectoral output is similar to gross output, but excludes shipments from one establishment to another within
the same manufacturing industry or sector. In contrast, the output concept used for private business and
nonfarm business is “gross product originating”. Gross product originating in private business equals gross
domestic product in the economy less government, private households, and non-profit institutions. Gross
product originating excludes intermediate transactions between businesses.
The resulting manufacturing multifactor productivity measure compares what is produced in the
manufacturing sector for use outside of manufacturing with the inputs used in the manufacturing process
obtained from outside of manufacturing. The comparison excludes flows of intermediate inputs between
manufacturing establishments from measures of both output and inputs. However, the comparison does
include capital service inputs and capital goods produced, even when these goods are produced and
consumed in manufacturing.
Finally, multifactor productivity in manufacturing compares "sectoral output" to three classes of
inputs: 1) hours at work of labor employed within manufacturing; 2) capital services employed by
manufacturing establishments; and 3) purchases of energy, materials, and business services from outside of
manufacturing (intermediates).
In manufacturing, intermediates are the largest input in terms of costs. Furthermore, research has
shown that substitution among inputs, including intermediates, affects productivity change. Therefore, it is
important to include intermediates in productivity measures at the level of manufacturing. In contrast, the
more aggregate productivity measures compare "value-added" output with two classes of inputs, capital and
labor. Because of these differences in methods, productivity change in manufacturing cannot be directly
compared with changes in private business or private nonfarm business.
Manufacturing productivity in 2001 and historical trends
Multifactor productivity in manufacturing declined 0.8 percent in 2001. The decline was the result of
a 4.5 percent decline in sectoral output and a 3.7 percent decrease in combined inputs. Capital services
continued to grow in 2001, but at a much more modest rate, posting a 1.5 percent advance. The decline in
hours accelerated in 2001, falling 5.6 percent.

3
Multifactor productivity grew 1.2 percent annually from 1949 (when the manufacturing series started)
to 2001. Sectoral output increased at a 3.1 percent annual rate, and combined inputs rose 1.9 percent per
year (table A). Unlike the private business and private nonfarm business sectors, the productivity slowdown
in manufacturing was confined to the 1973-79 period. Multifactor productivity, which had been growing 1.5
percent annually prior to 1973, fell 0.6 percent per year between 1973 and 1979. Output growth slowed to
2.5 percent, while combined inputs grew 3.1 percent over the 1973-79 time period.
Between 1979 and 1990, multifactor productivity growth in manufacturing rebounded sharply to 1.1
percent per year. Sectoral output growth continued to slow, and, in this period, all input growth rates fell.
Hours declined, and the growth rates for both capital services and materials fell sharply. As a result,
combined inputs grew only 0.8 percent annually. The rebound in productivity was associated mainly with
slower growth in combined inputs.
From 1990 to 1995, multifactor productivity growth accelerated further, almost matching the pre-1973
growth rate. Multifactor productivity advanced 1.2 percent per year during this period. Output growth
increased to 3.1 percent per year, while combined inputs rose 1.9 percent annually. The decline in hours
slowed to 0.1 percent, and energy, materials, and purchased business services all grew much more rapidly
than in the 1979-90 period.
From 1995 to 2000, multifactor productivity advanced still faster at 2.3 percent per year. Sectoral
output growth increased to 3.9 percent per year, while combined inputs continued to advance at about the
same rate as in the early 1990s. Hours declined slightly during the 1995-2000 period, but the increase in the
growth rate of capital services, to 3.8 percent, was notable. Each intermediate input--energy, non-energy
materials, and purchased business services--grew less rapidly in the 1995-2000 period than in 1990-95.
Among detailed manufacturing industries, only durable goods manufacturers experienced multifactor
productivity gains in 2001 (table 3), while nondurable goods manufacturers experienced declines. Little
difference existed prior to 1979, but the productivity gap between the two sectors widened thereafter,
primarily due to the rapid productivity growth in industrial and commercial machinery and in electronic and
other electrical equipment. Eleven of the 18 detailed industries experienced multifactor productivity
declines in 2001.
Over the 1949-2001 period, multifactor productivity advanced most rapidly in electronic and other
electrical equipment, textile mill products, and industrial machinery. The printing and publishing industry
was the only industry to experience a multifactor productivity decline over the entire period. In the more
recent period of 1995-2000, multifactor productivity grew very rapidly in the information processing
equipment industries. It rose 8.2 percent per year in electronic and other electrical equipment and 7.7
percent per year in industrial machinery, the two industries where most information processing equipment is
produced.

4
Table A. Productivity and related data in manufacturing, percent changes, 1949-2001
(percent per year)
Productivity
Multifactor
productivity1
Output per hour
of all persons
Output per unit
of capital services
Sectoral output

1949-01

1949-73

1973-79

1979-90

1990-95

1995-00

2000-01

1.2

1.5

-0.6

1.1

1.2

2.3

-0.8

2.7

2.5

2.2

2.6

3.3

4.1

1.2

-0.5

0.0

-2.1

-0.8

0.6

0.1

-5.8

3.1

4.0

2.5

2.0

3.1

3.9

-4.5

Inputs
Hours2
0.4
1.4
0.3
-0.7
-0.1
-0.2
Capital services
3.6
4.0
4.7
2.8
2.5
3.8
Energy
2.5
4.9
0.8
0.3
1.9
0.4
Non-energy materials
2.7
2.4
6.2
1.5
3.8
2.8
Purchased business
3.6
5.1
5.4
1.9
3.5
1.2
services
Combined inputs3
1.9
2.4
3.1
0.8
1.9
1.5
1. Output per unit of combined hours, capital, energy, materials, and purchased business services inputs.
2. Hours at work of all persons.
3. The growth rate of each input is weighted by its share of nominal costs.

-5.6
1.5
-5.2
-1.3
-8.3
-3.7

Revisions
The multifactor productivity data for the 1997-2000 period reflect a number of revisions to source data.
For example, updated input-output tables and revised BEA chain-type price indexes have been incorporated.
In addition, methods underlying energy and non-energy materials data have been improved, which affect
estimates for many years in the series.
Comprehensive tables containing additional data beyond the scope of this press release are available
upon request at 202-691-5606 or at http://www.bls.gov/web/prod3.supp.toc.htm.
Summary of Methods for the Manufacturing sector and manufacturing industries
This note describes the major data sources and the procedures used in deriving BLS multifactor
productivity indexes. More detailed information on methods, limitations, and data sources is provided in
BLS Bulletin 2178 (September 1983), "Trends in Multifactor Productivity, 1948-81." Methods for
measuring manufacturing multifactor productivity are discussed in "Measurement of productivity growth in
U.S. manufacturing” in the July 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Additional data not contained in
the release can be obtained in print at 202-691-5606 or at http://www.bls.gov/mfp/home.htm.

5
The manufacturing multifactor productivity measures describe the relationship between output in real
terms and the inputs involved in its production. They do not measure the specific contributions of labor,
capital, or any other factor of production. Rather, multifactor productivity is designed to measure the joint
influences on economic growth of technological change, efficiency improvements, returns to scale,
reallocation of resources due to shifts in factor inputs across industries, and other factors. The multifactor
productivity indexes are derived by dividing an output index by an index of the combined input of labor,
capital services, energy, non-energy materials, and business service inputs. The output indexes are computed
as chained superlative indexes (Tornqvist indexes) of components of output.
Capital input measures the services derived from the stock of physical assets and software. The assets
included are fixed business equipment, structures, inventories, and land. Among equipment, BLS provides
additional detail for information processing equipment and software (IPES). IPES is composed of four broad
classes of assets: computers and related equipment, software, communications equipment, and other IPES
equipment. Computers and related equipment includes mainframe computers, personal computers, printers,
video displays, and other related equipment. Software is comprised of pre-packaged, custom, and ownaccount software. Communications equipment is not further differentiated. Other IPES includes scientific
and related equipment, photocopying and related equipment, and office and accounting equipment.
Structures include nonresidential structures and residential capital that is rented out by profit-making firms or
persons. Financial assets are excluded. The aggregate capital measures are obtained by Tornqvist
aggregation of the capital stocks for each asset type within each of 53 industries using estimated rental prices
for each asset type. Each rental price reflects the nominal rate of return to all assets within the industry and
rates of economic depreciation and revaluation for the specific asset; rental prices are adjusted for the effects
of taxes. Data on investments in physical assets are obtained from BEA. Current-dollar gross product
originating (GPO) data, obtained from BEA, are used in estimating capital rental prices.
Hours paid of employees are obtained from the Current Employment Statistics program. The hours at
work of proprietors, unpaid family workers, and farm employees are derived from the Current Population
Survey. The hours of employees are converted to an at-work basis by using the Hours at Work survey.
Labor input in manufacturing is measured as the sum of hours at work of all persons. The construction of
hours at work follows the methods used in the private business sector described in USDL 03-158 Multifactor
Productivity Trends, 2001, except that hours in manufacturing are directly aggregated and do not include the
effects of changing labor composition.
The labor and capital components of the input indexes are combined with Tornqvist weights that
represent each component's share of total costs. Total costs are defined as the value of output (gross product
originating) less a portion of indirect business taxes. Most indirect taxes, such as excise taxes, are excluded
from costs; however, property and motor vehicle taxes remain in total costs. The index uses changing
weights: The share in each year is averaged with the preceding year's share.
The output index for total manufacturing is computed using a chained superlative index (Tornqvist) of
4-digit SIC industry outputs. Industry outputs are developed by BLS from data obtained from the Annual
Survey of Manufactures (ASM) and the Census of Manufactures (CM) from the Bureau of the Census, U.S.
Department of Commerce, together with Producer Price Indexes from BLS and price data from BEA.

6
Energy input is constructed using costs and quantity data from the ASM, the CM, and the
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey of the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of
Energy, together with BLS Producer Price Indexes. The series on non-energy materials input also relies on
ASM and CM data. Indexes of purchased business services are developed by BLS using input-output tables
to estimate the proportion of costs attributed to nine types of services. Tornqvist indexes of each of these
three input classes are developed at the 2-digit SIC level and then aggregated to total manufacturing. As
with the sectoral output measures, materials and energy inputs are adjusted to exclude transactions between
establishments within the same sector.
The five input indexes (capital services, hours, energy, materials, and purchased business services) are
combined using Tornqvist aggregation, employing weights that represent each component's share of total
costs. Total costs are defined as the value of manufacturing sectoral output. The index uses changing
weights: The share in each year is averaged with the preceding year's share.

7
Table 1. Manufacturing sector: Productivity and related measures, 1949-2001
Indexes 1996=100
Productivity

Inputs

Year

Output per
hour of all
persons

Output
per unit
of capital

1949

29.7

121.5

59.7

22.7

76.4

18.7

1950

30.1

128.9

62.8

24.9

82.5

1955

34.3

130.7

66.8

31.3

1960

37.0

119.7

67.9

1965
1966
1967
1968
1969

42.9
43.4
45.0
46.6
47.4

131.5
131.7
125.4
125.8
122.8

1970
1971
1972
1973
1974

48.0
51.2
53.3
54.3
54.1

1975
1976
1977
1978
1979

Materials

Purchased
business
services

Combined
units of all
inputs5

27.0

26.1

15.2

37.9

19.3

28.3

25.8

17.7

39.6

91.2

24.0

39.4

32.0

22.8

46.9

32.8

88.8

27.4

47.9

33.0

25.3

48.3

77.2
77.5
77.1
79.4
79.9

42.2
45.5
46.9
49.2
50.6

98.3
104.8
104.1
105.6
106.9

32.1
34.5
37.4
39.1
41.2

62.5
67.0
72.3
76.8
79.5

35.6
37.9
39.7
40.2
40.2

33.3
37.6
42.6
42.5
45.1

54.7
58.6
60.8
62.0
63.4

112.2
112.1
118.4
120.5
110.9

78.8
81.0
84.0
85.4
80.8

48.2
49.6
54.1
57.9
56.4

100.6
96.9
101.4
106.6
104.1

43.0
44.3
45.7
48.0
50.8

79.7
80.8
83.0
85.6
87.9

38.7
41.2
44.0
46.0
50.5

43.6
43.1
46.0
50.1
53.7

61.2
61.2
64.3
67.7
69.8

56.8
59.2
61.6
62.2
61.8

99.9
104.9
108.8
109.8
106.3

78.5
81.3
82.4
83.1
82.5

53.3
58.2
63.1
66.4
67.1

93.9
98.3
102.4
106.7
108.7

53.4
55.5
58.0
60.5
63.2

81.8
84.9
85.0
86.1
89.7

53.1
57.5
64.9
67.7
65.9

51.9
53.2
57.6
60.8
68.5

67.9
71.6
76.6
79.9
81.4

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984

62.0
62.7
66.0
68.0
70.3

97.2
93.3
87.2
90.2
96.6

81.2
81.7
83.0
85.1
87.7

64.3
64.6
62.0
64.8
71.5

103.7
103.0
94.0
95.4
101.6

66.1
69.2
71.2
71.9
74.0

86.1
85.8
77.6
78.5
83.5

63.9
63.5
61.9
62.0
68.2

65.8
63.5
55.9
62.7
66.6

79.2
79.0
74.7
76.2
81.5

1985
1986
1987
1988
1989

72.9
76.1
78.3
79.9
80.0

96.1
96.3
97.6
100.7
99.2

89.2
90.7
93.6
95.3
93.5

73.5
75.6
78.3
82.2
82.6

100.8
99.4
100.0
102.8
103.3

76.5
78.5
80.2
81.6
83.2

80.7
81.4
86.5
89.9
90.2

72.2
74.2
70.9
71.9
75.0

62.1
65.4
70.8
77.4
82.6

82.4
83.4
83.7
86.2
88.3

1990
1991
1992
1993
1994

82.2
84.1
88.6
90.2
93.0

97.5
93.6
95.9
96.9
99.7

93.3
92.4
94.0
95.1
97.3

83.2
81.5
85.5
88.3
92.9

101.1
96.9
96.5
97.8
99.9

85.3
87.1
89.1
91.1
93.2

93.1
93.2
93.1
96.6
99.9

77.5
78.5
83.5
86.5
90.3

84.7
84.6
92.0
92.9
96.0

89.1
88.3
90.9
92.8
95.5

1995
1996
1997

96.5
100.0
103.8

100.6
100.0
101.4

99.2
100.0
103.1

96.9
100.0
105.6

100.4
100.0
101.7

96.4
100.0
104.1

102.3
100.0
97.5

93.1
100.0
101.9

100.4
100.0
103.9

97.7
100.0
102.4

1998
1999

108.9
114.0

101.7
101.7

105.7
108.7

110.5
114.7

101.5
100.7

108.7
112.8

100.6
102.9

107.5
107.9

103.1
105.4

104.6
105.5

2000
2001

118.3
119.7

101.0
95.1

111.3
110.3

117.4
112.1

99.2
93.6

116.2
117.9

104.3
98.9

106.9
105.5

106.5
97.7

105.5
101.6

See footnotes following table 2.

Multifactor
2
Productivity

Sectoral
3
Output

4

Hours

Capital
1
Services

Energy

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

8
Table 2. Manufacturing sector: Productivity and related measures, 1950-2001
Percent Change
Productivity

Inputs

Year

Output per
hour of all
persons

1950

1.5

6.1

5.1

9.7

8.1

3.4

4.8

-1.3

16.8

4.4

1955

4.0

5.7

2.8

9.7

5.5

3.8

14.0

8.7

11.3

6.7

1960

2.2

-0.7

0.3

1.7

-0.4

2.4

1.8

4.1

1.7

1.5

1965
1966
1967
1968
1969

2.4
1.1
3.7
3.5
1.7

3.0
0.2
-4.8
0.3
-2.3

2.7
0.4
-0.6
3.0
0.7

8.4
7.6
3.1
5.0
2.9

5.9
6.5
-0.6
1.4
1.2

5.2
7.4
8.2
4.8
5.3

5.7
7.4
7.8
6.2
3.5

4.5
6.4
4.6
1.3
0.0

7.0
12.9
13.4
-0.2
6.1

5.5
7.2
3.7
2.0
2.2

1970
1971
1972
1973
1974

1.2
6.7
4.2
1.9
-0.3

-8.6
-0.1
5.6
1.8
-7.9

-1.4
2.8
3.7
1.7
-5.5

-4.8
2.9
8.9
7.1
-2.6

-5.9
-3.6
4.6
5.1
-2.3

4.2
3.0
3.2
5.2
5.8

0.3
1.5
2.7
3.1
2.7

-3.7
6.5
6.8
4.6
9.6

-3.4
-1.1
6.7
8.9
7.2

-3.4
0.0
5.0
5.3
3.1

1975
1976
1977
1978
1979

4.9
4.2
4.1
1.0
-0.7

-10.0
5.0
3.7
0.9
-3.2

-2.8
3.5
1.4
0.9
-0.8

-5.4
9.1
8.4
5.2
1.2

-9.9
4.8
4.1
4.2
1.9

5.1
3.9
4.5
4.3
4.5

-7.0
3.8
0.1
1.2
4.2

5.3
8.3
12.7
4.4
-2.7

-3.3
2.4
8.3
5.6
12.7

-2.7
5.4
6.9
4.3
2.0

1980
1981
1982
1983
1984

0.4
1.1
5.2
3.0
3.5

-8.5
-4.1
-6.6
3.4
7.1

-1.5
0.6
1.6
2.5
3.1

-4.2
0.4
-3.9
4.5
10.2

-4.6
-0.7
-8.7
1.4
6.5

4.7
4.6
2.9
1.0
2.9

-4.0
-0.4
-9.6
1.1
6.4

-3.0
-0.7
-2.5
0.3
9.9

-4.0
-3.4
-12.1
12.1
6.3

-2.7
-0.2
-5.4
1.9
6.9

1985
1986
1987
1988
1989

3.7
4.3
3.0
2.0
0.1

-0.5
0.2
1.4
3.1
-1.4

1.7
1.7
3.2
1.8
-1.9

2.9
2.8
3.6
4.9
0.5

-0.8
-1.4
0.6
2.8
0.5

3.4
2.6
2.2
1.7
2.0

-3.3
0.8
6.2
4.0
0.2

5.9
2.7
-4.4
1.4
4.4

-6.8
5.4
8.3
9.3
6.7

1.2
1.2
0.4
3.0
2.5

1990
1991
1992
1993
1994

2.8
2.3
5.3
1.8
3.0

-1.7
-4.0
2.5
1.0
2.9

-0.2
-1.0
1.8
1.1
2.3

0.7
-2.0
4.8
3.3
5.3

-2.1
-4.2
-0.4
1.4
2.2

2.5
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3

3.2
0.2
-0.1
3.7
3.4

3.3
1.4
6.4
3.5
4.4

2.5
-0.1
8.7
1.0
3.4

0.9
-1.0
3.0
2.1
3.0

1995
1996
1997
1998
1999

3.9
3.6
3.8
4.9
4.6

0.9
-0.6
1.4
0.3
0.0

2.0
0.8
3.1
2.6
2.8

4.3
3.2
5.6
4.7
3.8

0.4
-0.4
1.7
-0.2
-0.8

3.4
3.8
4.1
4.4
3.8

2.4
-2.2
-2.5
3.3
2.2

3.2
7.4
1.9
5.4
0.4

4.6
-0.4
3.9
-0.8
2.2

2.3
2.3
2.4
2.1
0.9

2000
2001

3.8
1.2

-0.7
-5.8

2.3
-0.8

2.3
-4.5

-1.5
-5.6

3.0
1.5

1.3
-5.2

-1.0
-1.3

1.1
-8.3

-0.1
-3.7

Output
per unit
of capital

See footnotes following table 2.

Multifactor
2
Productivity

Sectoral
3
Output

4

Hours

Capital
1
Services

Energy

Materials

Purchased
business
services

Combined
units of all
inputs5

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

9
Footnotes, Tables 1-2
Source: Output data are from the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, and modified
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), U.S. Department of Labor. Compensation and hours data are
from BLS. Capital measures are based on data supplied by BEA and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. See also Summary of Methods in this release.

(1) A measure of the flow of capital services used in the sector.
(2) Sectoral output per combined units of capital, hours, energy, non-energy materials,
and purchased business services.
(3) Manufacturing gross output excluding transactions between manufacturing
establishments, superlative chained index.
(4) Hours at work of all persons.
(5) Combined units of capital services, hours, energy, non-energy materials, and
purchased business services, superlative chained index.

10
Table 3. Manufacturing industries: Multifactor productivity trends, 1949-2001

Average annual growth rates
Industry

1949-01

1949-73

1973-79

1979-90

1990-95

1995-00

2000-01

Manufacturing

1.2

1.5

-0.6

1.1

1.2

2.3

-0.8

Nondurable manufacturing
Food and kindred products
Tobacco manufactures
Textile mill products
Apparel & related products
Paper and allied products

0.6
0.3
N.A.
2.3
1.0
0.6

1.3
0.7
N.A.
2.3
0.7
1.6

-0.5
0.1
N.A.
3.3
1.9
-1.2

0.3
0.4
N.A.
2.1
0.6
0.0

0.3
0.7
N.A.
1.6
0.8
0.2

0.0
-0.8
N.A.
1.8
2.1
0.4

-2.2
-3.1
N.A.
2.0
2.5
-1.9

Printing and publishing
Chemicals & allied products
Petroleum refining
Rubber & misc. plastic products
Leather & leather products

-0.3
0.9
0.4
0.7
N.A.

0.5
2.5
0.8
1.0
N.A.

-0.7
-2.5
-0.6
-1.9
N.A.

-0.9
0.7
-0.1
1.4
N.A.

-1.2
-0.2
0.3
1.2
N.A.

-0.6
-0.3
0.5
1.5
N.A.

-5.0
-1.1
0.3
-1.0
N.A.

Durable manufacturing
Lumber and wood products
Furniture and fixtures
Stone, clay, glass
& concrete products
Primary metals industries
Fabricated metals products

1.6
1.0
0.6
0.6

1.5
1.7
0.6
1.1

-0.6
0.4
0.4
-1.2

1.8
2.5
0.7
1.4

2.0
-1.7
0.9
0.7

4.2
-1.3
0.7
0.0

0.6
-1.2
-0.4
-5.2

0.1
0.3

0.4
0.5

-2.3
-1.0

0.3
0.5

0.8
1.0

0.0
0.2

1.4
-3.1

Industrial &
commercial machinery
Electronic & other electrical
equipment
Transportation equipment
Instruments
Miscellaneous manufacturing

2.1

0.7

0.2

3.2

3.1

7.7

1.4

3.1

2.1

0.9

3.0

5.9

8.2

4.4

0.8
1.5
1.0

1.5
1.8
1.6

-0.5
1.2
-0.7

0.2
1.4
1.1

0.5
0.0
-0.2

1.3
2.6
1.8

1.0
-0.9
-3.0

N.A.

Multifactor productivity measures for tobacco and leather manufacturers are not published because of
the small size of the industry and data limitations. These industries are included in the aggregate
measures for total and nondurable manufacturing.

Note: Multifactor productivity measures by industry are not directly comparable to measures
for aggregate manufacturing because industry measures exclude transactions only within
the specific industry while the aggregate manufacturing measures also exclude
transactions between all manufacturing industries.