The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
FINANCIAL STATISTICS OF CITIES PLATES 470-475 FINANCIAL S T A T IS T IC S O F CITIES. P late P late No. 470 471 T itle . Map of the United States showing location of cities having a population of over 30,000: 1912. 1. Population of continental United States in municipalities having over 30,000 inhabitants, iA those having from 8.000 to 30,000 inhabitants, and outside such municipal ities: 1790-1912. 2. Per cent of total population in municipalities having over 30.000 inhabitants, in those having from 8,000 to 30,000 inhabitants, and outside such municipalities: 17901912. 3. Per capita revenue receipts, and per capita payments for expenses and interest, and for outlays, in groups of cities with specified excess of revenue receipts over pay ments for expenses and interest: 1912. 4. Net revenue receipts and net governmental cost payments of 146 cities: 1902-1912. 472 1. Net governmental cost payments of the United States and 146 cities: 1902-1912. 2. Net payments for outlays for the United States and New York City: 1902-1912. 3. Net indebtedness of 146 cities, the United States, and New York City: 1902-1912. 4. Per capita net indebtedness of New York City, 146 <ities, and the United States: 1902-1912. 473 1. Per capita net revenue receipts and governmental cost pay ments for groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 2. Per capita net revenue receipts and governmental cost payments for cities with highest and lowest per capita governmental cost payments in groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 3. Per capita net payments for the principal governmental costs of 146 cities: 1902-1912. No. T it l e . 4. Per capita net receipts from the principal revenues: 19021912. 5. Per capita net payments for specified general departmental expenses, by groups of cities with specified population in 473Con. 1912. 6. Increase in the per capita payment for the principal gen eral departmental expenses: 1902-1912. 1. Per cent distribution of principal general departmental expenses: 1902-1912. 2. Revenue receipts and payments for expenses of the watersupply systems of 146 cities: 1902-1912. 3. Increases in net indebtedness and net payments for in 474 terest by 146 cities: 1902-1912. 4. Increase of per capita indebtedness with increase in size of • cities: 1912. 5. Per capita net indebtedness of cities with highest and lowest per capita in groups of cities with specified popu lation: 1912. 1. Increase of property tax levies, with increase in size of cities: 1912. 2. Averages per 100 inhabitants of the expenses of stated kinds of schools, in groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 3. Per cent distribution of the expenses of schools for stated objects, in groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 475 4. Averages per 100 inhabitants of the expenses for stated objects of the schools, in groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 5. Per cent distribution of the expenses of three kinds of schools for the maintenance of each of those kinds, in groups of cities with specified population: 1912. 6. Per cent of total population, in cities of 30,000 or more in habitants, by states: 1912 (map). PLATE NO. 470 PLATE NO. 471 P O P U L A T IO N OF C O N T IN E N T A L U N IT E D STATES IN M U N IC IP A L IT IE S H A V IN G OVER 3 0 , 0 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S , IN THOSE H A V IN G FROM 8 , 0 0 0 TO 3 0 , 0 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S , A N D O U T S ID E S U C H M U N IC IP A L IT I E S : 1 7 9 0 - 1 9 1 2 . ...........: — 1^11 13 5 0 W i1 1 ’ 1 1 /////& Z & & a s p w . - ............~ i y/////////ty\ 1 1 ; '840E,1 , : 2. PER C ENT OF TOTAL POPULATION IN M U N IC IP A L IT IE S H A VIN G OVER 3 0 , 0 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S , IN THOSE HAVING FROM 8 , 0 0 0 TO 3 0 , 0 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S , AND O UTSID E SUCH M U N IC IP A L IT IE S : 1 7 9 0 1 9 1 2 1 1 m MMYS/MW/y/S//////,'//////. 1 \ boo >790 C I T I E S W IT H 3 0 , 0 0 0 O R M O R F K Z 2 V ////A B 8 , 0 0 0 TO 3 0 , 0 0 0 P O P U L A T I O N P O P U L A T IO N O U T S ID E S U C H C IT IE S H / P O P U L A T IO N C IT IE S W IT H / L 3. PER C A P IT A R EVEN U E RECEIPTS, A N D PER C A PIT A P A Y M E N T S FOR EXPEN SES A N D IN TER EST, A N D FOR O U T LA YS, IN G RO UPS OF C IT IE S W IT H SPEC IFIED EXCESS OF R E V E N U E RECEIPTS OVER P A Y M E N T S FOR EXPENSES A N D IN T E R E S T : 1 9 1 2 B / P tn C E N T 1N C I T I E S P E R C E N T IN ) PEW C E N T C IT IC 8 O U T S ID E W IT H 3 0 . 0 0 0 O R M O R I C O P U L A T IO N W IT H H , 0 0 0 TO 3 0 , 0 0 0 P O P U L A T IO N S U C H C IT IE S 4. NET REVENUE RECEIPTS A ND NET G OVERN M ENTA L COST P A Y M E N T S OF 1 4 6 CIT IE S: 1 9 0 2 1 9 1 2 M IL L IO N S OF D O L LA R S 400 800 G R O U P S OF C IT IE S M O R E T H A N 4 0 PER C E N T 1909 3 0 T O 4 0 P ER C E N T 1908 1907 2 0 TO 3 0 P ER C E N T 1906 1906 10 TO 2 0 P ER C E N T 1904 1903 LES S T H A N 10 P ER C E N T 1902 H^m R EVEN U E o u tla y s R E C E IP T S V Z Z Z a E X P E N S E S A N D I N T E R E S T I 1 1e x c e s s r evenue r e c e ip t s NET REVENUE R E C E IP T S m m zm NET GOVERNM ENTAL COST PAYM ENTS PLATE NO. 472 1. N E T G O V E R N M E N T A L COST P A Y M E N T S OF TH E U N IT E D STA TES A N D 1 4 6 C IT IE S : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 M IL L IO N S O F O O L L A R S 400 2. NET P A Y M E N T S FOR O U T L A Y S FOR T H E U N IT E D STA TES A N D NEW YO R K C IT Y : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 M IL L IO N S O F D O L L A R S 600 800 I______ _______ _______I : V / / A' Z / / / W\ ’y??7777ZW/''V4fy///////)W/V//^^ » U N IT E D S T A T E S 3. N ET IN D E B T E D N E S S OF 1 4 6 C IT IE S , T H E U N IT E D STATES, A N D N EW YO R K C IT Y : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 M ILLIO N S OF DOLLARS 90 0 » 1 » 14 6 C IT IE S O U T L A Y S , U N IT E D 600 ... 1200 KZZ2 148 C ITIES U NITED STATES ■ ■ ■ NEW YORK CITY STATES O U T L A Y S . N E W Y O R K C IT Y 4. PER C A P IT A N E T IN D E B T E D N E S S OF N E W Y O R K C I T Y , 1 4 6 C IT IE S , A N D T H E U N I T E D S TA TE S : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 PLATE NO. 473 1. P E R C A P I T A N E T R E V E N U E R E C E I P T S A N D G O V E R N M E N T A L C O S T P A Y M E N T S FOR G R O U P S OF C IT IE S W IT H S P E C IF IE D P O P U L A T IO N ! 1 9 1 2 G R O U P S O F C IT IE S W IT H S P E C IF IE D P O P U L A T I O N 0 2. PE R C A P I T A N E T R E V E N U E R E C E I P T S A N D G O V E R N M E N T A L C O S T P A Y M E N T S F O R C I T I E S W I T H H I G H E S T A N D L O W E S T PE R C A P I T A G O V E R N M E N T A L C O S T P A Y M E N T S IN G R O U P S OF C I T I E S W I T H S P E C I F I E D PO P U LA TIO N i 1 9 1 2 O V ER 5 0 0 0 0 0 N EW YO RK o P H IL A D E L P H IA 300000 t o 500000 LOS AN GELES N EW OR LE AN S 10 0 0 0 0 t o 3 0 0 0 0 0 O M AH A SAN A N T O N IO 6 0 0 0 0 t o IOOOOO TACOM A JO H N S T O W N 3 0 0 0 0 TO 5 0 0 0 0 SAN OIEGO Q U IN C Y ■ ■ ■ 3. PER C A P IT A N E T P A Y M E N T S FOR TH E P R IN C IP A L G O V ER N M EN TA L COSTS OF 1 4 6 C IT IE S : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 NET GOVERNMENTAL COST PAVM tN Tt W Z Z I A K IT REVENUE *E C E » rrt N E T R E V E N U E R E C E IP T S 4 . PE R C A P I T A N E T R E C E I P T S FR OM T H E P R I N C I P A L R E V E N U E S : 1902-1912 1912 191 I 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\5<X V / / / 1904 1903 1902 ■ iE N E R A L P R O P E R T Y T A X S P B C IA L A S S E S S M iN T S - AX E S ON LIQUOR T R A F F IC EXPENSES o f g e n e r a l d e p a r tm e n t s lim n S U B V E N TIO N S . G R A N T S . G IF T S . E T C . DENSE T A X E S O T H ER T H A N LIQUOR H . : , 1 P U B L IC S E R V IC E E N T E R P R IS E S V ///A E X P E N S E S O F P U B L IC S E R V IC E E N T E R P R IS E S [ ....... m m -M [ i O TH ER T A X E S lO T H E R R E V E N U E S IN T E R E S T O U TLA YS 5. P ER C A P IT A N E T P A Y M E N T S FOR S P E C IF IE D G ENERAL D EP A R TM E N TA L E X P E N S E S , B Y G R O U P S O F C I T I E S W I T H S P E C I F I E D P O P U L A T I O N IN 1 9 1 2 6 . I N C R E A S E IN T H E PE R C A P I T A P A Y M E N T FOR T H E P R I N C I P A L G E N E R A L D E P A R T M E N T A L EXPENSES'. 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 C R O U PS OF C IT IE S W ITH SPECIFIED PO PU LA TIO N OVER 16 BO STON 1911 1910 B A L T IM O R E 3 0 0 0 0 0 TO 5 0 0 0 0 0 W A S H IN G T O N TO 3 0 0 0 0 0 DENVER B IR M IN G H A M 60000 Y ////y ///y /s)G 6 G io o o o c 11x j xi i i i 1909 1908 v ssz/ / s/ / s/ & ^ ® & 1907 1906 1905 NEW O R LE AN S 10 0 0 0 0 S5 1912 500000 T O 10 0 0 0 0 S P R I N G F IE L D A LLE N TO W N III! 1889888^a i 1904 30000 TO 5 0 0 0 0 N EW TON 1903 1902 C H AR LO TTE ] EDU C ATION IHlim C ON SER VATION E D U C A T IO N OF H E A LT H P R O T E C T IO N T O P ER SO N A N D P R O P E R TY E E E E S l POLIC E DEPARTM ENT 8 8 8 8 ^9 G ENERAL 8888 GOVERNMENT ■mm G E N E R A L G O V E R N M E N T fi*KS H IG H W AY8 H IG H W A Y S C H A R IT IE S ,H O S P IT A L S .A N D C ORRECTIONS FIRE DEPARTM ENT [ A L L OTHER s s s s f C O N S E R V A T IO N O F H E A L T H \ C H A R IT IE S , H O S P IT A L S .A N D C O R R E C T IO N S A LL OTHER PLATE NO. 474 2, R E V E N U E R E C E I P T S A N D P A Y M E N T S FO R E X P E N S E S O F T H E W A T E R S U P P L Y S Y S T E M S OF 1 4 6 C I T I E S : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 1. P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N O F P R I N C I P A L G E N E R A L D E P A R T M E N T A L E X P E N S E S OF 1 4 6 C I T I E S : 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 M IL L IO N S PER C E N T OF D O LLAR S 30 45 1912 1911 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1910 1909 1908 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1907 E D U C A T IO N 1IIIIII v //n GENERAL GOVERNMENT 7 /> P O L IC E D E P A R T M E N T K S 3 s a c s 1906 C O N S E R V A T IO N F IR E OF 1905 H EALTH DEPAR TM EN T C H A R I T I E S . H O S P I T A L S . A N D C O R R E C T IO N S I / / / / / / / / / / / HI GHWAYS 1904 I ALL OTHER 1903 1902 / / / / / / / / / / , / /////////> '/ / / / / / / / / z ////////z I I ■ R E V E N U E R E C E IP T S 3 . I N C R E A S E S IN N E T I N D E B T E D N E S S A N D N E T P A Y M E N T S BY 146 CITIESs 1 9 0 2 - 1 9 1 2 V jW j P A Y M E N T S FO R EXPEN SES FO R I N T E R E S T 4. IN C R E A S E OF P E R C A P I T A I N D E B T E D N E S S W I T H IN C R E A S E IN S I Z E OF C IT IE S : 1912 N E T IN D E B T E D N E S S D O LLAR S O 1912 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 15 30 45 60 N E T P A Y M E N T S FO R IN T E R E S T I 1912 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 75 ,A V/ / V/ AW M V ////M ////M w m VMM.VMMVMM/V MA M VMM,VMMVMM WM VMM VMMVMM,VMMw //M //m /^ m /m VMMWM m / • -’■m VMM,VMM vm /M mm Mmma W /M VMMa W M WM W M ,V////A^//M /J//W M .WM/,W M A WM WM,V ///M /M W //M .vm/a V / VMMVMM,VM/MMMtyMM m i W M WM,VMM,:WMAWMW////a V///A r 7//A r W M WM V/ / ~ MA VMMVMMVMMWMtyMMfyMM W M VMMWM/t D O LLAR S 2 VMMW/M W/M VMM,m m W/M VMMVMMVMMm M ■*.v/w W/M V/ AVMMVMMVMMVMM,VMMVMMi ■ VMMW/M VMMWMAVMMV//A VMMVMM, Ma WM V //////VMMVMMVMM,V M VMMV/ A W/M VMMVMMVMMW //A V/ / VMMWA MA W/M WM/\ M V MVMMVMMV/////A V/ / V//A MA MA W M,VMMVMMVMMVMMV/ / VMM,V ’ A V //////VMM' M V MVMMV/////A V/ / MA VMMV //////VMMW/M V/ / V A MA M V/ / VMM/VMMVMMVMMw m i MA MA ' VMMV/ / VMMW M V/ / V/ / ! MA MA 5. PER C A P I T A NET I N D E B T E D N E S S OF C I T I E S W I T H H I G H E S T A N D L O W E ST PE R C A P I T A IN G R O U P S OF C I T I E S W IT H S P E C I F I E D P O P U L A T I O N : 1 9 1 2 GROUPS OF CITIES WITH SPECIFIED POPULATION O V E R 500000 N EW YO R K D E T R O IT 30QOCO TO 500000 C IN C IN N A TI W A S H IN G TO N 100000 TO 300000 I OM AHA D E N V ER 60000 TO IOOOOO PO R TLA N D ERIE 30000 TO 50000 G ALV ESTO N S P R IN G F IEL D PLATE NO. 475 1. INCREASE OF PR O PERTY T A X LEVIE S, W IT H INCREASE IN S IZ E OF C IT IE S : 1 9 1 2 2 . AVERAGES PER 1 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S OF TH E EXPENSES OF S T A T E D K IN D S OF SCHOOLS, IN GROUPS OF C IT IE S W IT H SP E C IFIE D PO PU LA T IO N : 1 9 1 2 GROUPS OF CITIES WITH SPECIFIED POPULATION 0 OVER ONOU^S OF CITIES WITH s * t a n t D p o p u l a t io n 9 500000 300000 to 500000 OVER 500000 100000 TO 3 0 0 0 0 0 aooooo to _________________ ______ ________________ ____ 50000 TO 10 0 0 0 0 iooooo to aooooo 30000 to 500 M 000 6oooo to io o o o o 30000 50000 to M M ® 5 5 W 5 K ® 5 W M K 5 W M 5 ® a ^ //y 3 K « I 5 5 iK « iM SKKiumintmv o t a 3 SECONDARY DAY 3 . PER C E N T D IS T R IB U T IO N OF T H E EXPENSES OF SCHOOLS FOR S T A T E D OBJECTS, IN GROUPS OF C IT IE S W IT H S P E C IF IE D P O P U L A T IO N : 1 9 1 2 OVER « E Ic ® a 50000 MW OY AU. 0 Y * (« 4. AVERAGES PER 1 0 0 IN H A B IT A N T S OF THE EXPENSES FOR S TA TE D OBJECTS OF TH E SCHOOLS, IN GROUPS OF C IT IE S W IT H SPEC IF IE D PO PU LATIO N: 1 9 1 2 OVER 500000 500000 300000 to 500000 3 0 0 0 0 0 TO 5 0 0 0 0 0 IOOOOO TO 300000 10 0 0 0 0 TO 300000 &0000 TO 10 0 0 0 0 30000 TO 50000 50000 TO IOOOOO 30000 to 50000 instru ction IN STR U C TIO N OPERATION OF SCMOOi PLANT MAINTENANCE of SCMOOL PLAN? fc y W S fl OPERATION OF SCHOOL PLAN T OENERAL AOMINISTRAIKJN M AINTENANCE OF SCHOOL PLAN T ■ ■ ■ I MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL A D M IN IST R AT IO N M ISC ELLANEOU S 5. PER C E N T D IS T R IB U T IO N OF TH E EXPENSES OF THREE K IN D S OF SCHOOLS FOR TH E MA IN TEN A N CE OF EACH OF TH O SE K IN D S , IN GROUPS OF C IT IE S W IT H SPECIFIED PO PU LA T IO N : 1 9 1 2 GROUPS OF CITIES W ITH SPECIFIED POPULATION „ OVER PER CENT 20 40 «0 M 00 500000 300000 to 500000 iooooo to 3 60000 TO 30000 TO 50000 0 0 0 0 0 . IOOOOO 555532 Z/////////////////// V/////// ELEM ENTARY DAY ] SECONDARY DAY H H H NIGHT W /M A A L L OTHER 6 . PER C E N T OF T O T A L P O P U L A T IO N , IN C ITIES OF 3 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE IN H A B IT A N T S , BY STATES: 1 9 1 2 331 | L E S S T H A N 1 0 PER C E N T V ^10 TO 2 0 PER CENT 3 2 0 TO 3 0 PER CENT 3 3 0 TO 4 0 m PER CENT TO 5 0 PER C E N T 50 ★ PER C E N T A N D OVER NO C IT IE S OVER 3 0 , 0 0 0
@FedFRASER