View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

D13OTSSI0B or

i m a m m m m vzmsas s m a m m i m m m

_

****** S. Beagran, Aaaiatant Chlef

Maiale» af Beaaarch «ad Statistica
Depoalt Inaurane© Corporation

Hmmé&m Cceraittee ot firn t t t w t Aaaoelatlon of Superrtaora af Stata - - »
BagreaeotaUaea of thè Votesi Deposit Inaurane® Corporation,
» Offlea of tha CcugitroUer ot tha Corrane? and
Sia Board of teamers af thè rateai Baaarva System




Washington, D. C.
*9*u> 5* 19 5 6 '

tojag the many questions posed to the beak examining authorities
bsr recent developments in the field of municipal finance the ones
clustering about revenue bonds are especially ttm bU m m .

So establish a

irmmfo&k fm your discussion, which will be concerned with an aspect of
this financing, it is ay intention at the outset to sketch the factual
background briefly*

ffeea the central questian w i U be brou^it into focus

as sharply as possible#

fkis will be followed by seise

about

practical difficulties that are encountered in our endeavor to com to
grips with the questions and a review of & few typical cases*

Finally, ay

r«arks will suggest some alternatives for your consideration.

It is sy

hc^e that your views and observations iii the course of the discussion will
provide me with some much needed help in analysing mveaue bond issues as
regards their suitability for bank Investment portfolios *

Ihere has been an enormous volume of revenue bond financing in
recent years,
for hugs and

this has been stimulated by sn apparently insatiable d m m i

costly p ubUe facilities, fear eacasple, highways, bridges and

tunnels, snd public building designed to serve such purposes as education,
trade centers, and recreation.
the old subdivisions of government and the eustemary arrange$oen'ts
for credit have been totally inadequate to finance the public facilities
now deemed to be essential in our wey of Ufa*

Ihere was a time when the

cities, the towns, and the counties were able to provide a network of
highways adequate for the public needs.




Similarly, the school districts

able to furnish such facilities ms were deemed ax>propriate for the
Comsat educational stiuwSards.

llsgps ©sd, costly facilities to serve the

seeds of the. tiwte, fear ©xm&ple, port authorities and elaborate recreation
establishments w r © unheard of*

Bit times have damaged; ®a& now w© suet

face the fact that teamds placed upon suMlvisica*® of government have
increased tremendously both qualitatively and quantitatively.
notion that users can be iBade to pay for »11 or a large part
of the cost of public facilities in many case# has gained widespread
acceptance in recent years.

11ms, our attitude with respect to public

highways has gone through a remarkable change.

A serration ago most

people would have found it unthinkable to finance the construction of *»**»*»
a public facility cm a basis which would anticipate the defrayment of cost
by the collection of tolls from users.

Bow that notion is widely accepted.

As a consequence, in part because of the great increase in the variety of
facilities sought foe public mas and in part because user charges have been
accepted as an appropriate means of financing than* construction of these
facilities in the field of municipal finance has been characterised by an
almost unbelievable variety of cobles and unusual financial arrangements,
la other words, flit rather prosaic task of analysing afunieipal credits «ban
most obligations rested upon a pledge of the f u n faith and credit of a
very conventional type of user has been to a considerable extent altered.
Today the analyst Is presented with as knotty an assortment of problems in
this field as he could ever aspect to find in the area of private enterprise
credits.
Municipal revenue bonds— so-called- -have developed out of this
complex situation.




Although there is adequate precedent for this type of

• g' <*
ffiaanciag in thè hlstory ©f n n i e l p l finase® ¿> thè f&ei ranclas timi thè
develo$raents bave given it alatasi «ntirely mw à*n*m***m* mà
eoloring.

Accardiiigly, history furniefaea thè im&lysc sona guidane* ai ili©

outsst bui s o m ha fiada MaatiLf alami I m i in a mmm of inaomiims«
Iha^r of tha projects flnaaead by aunietpal wmmam banda represes&i
deportares in thè scope of publie estiviti©®»

Sos© projeets are in tha

a&turs of publie utility eatexprlae cuatoHarily dssasá io fall wtthin iha
privai® sector of business aotivitiea.
are <sa thè borderline.

N n y of theaa provecta, ©f eourae,

HisioricaUy, far exasple, ve bave had both pohlia

and privatela ovmed vaiar cárpanles m veli m gas and elegirlo utiliti®®„
recanti? thè mmü for empiex and higfcly socializad faciliti*« in
trading center® has givesi iapatus to creati« of pori authoritiea with
bvmà. pmmm to f l a m acal aparate eatezprisa,
Practica!!? all of thè procaci® flaanoad by nunielpal revaime
b m d e are nee*

la eiher verde* thè individuai procaci has ne reeord of

cpsrstlons«

Siailarly* a m i of ihs finaaelng is oasi in thè ftìsra of long*

tmm bonds*

ibis is a serious departurs tiem thè principie vhicà use

firtóy estàfeUshed and thorougbOy testad duriag thè period of thè Greai
Bepressioa* vom ì#, that eerialisaiiot! of aaturlties is ths basi vay to
arrangs far thè asaaganeai of a debi ensatad by a subdivisión ©f governami,

thè doblen
tre» ibis background of rapld changa and experiasatatlon in thè
fté ìA of »mleìpel finance theze mmr?m thè probi*» of ©aneara to thè benk
saasniaing authorities.
foUouss

fhrassd in slnplest teme, it saay b® espressati as

Ars municipal revenas bonds suitshls for bmak investaant wfaen

thsy bere thè f ò U o d a g càaracterietics?



»

»

(») The proceeds are used to finance a novel .project, and
(b) There la

no operating record.

Quite frequently the enterprise m y belong to a type that haa been proved
feasible in terse of engineering and aeoaoaie aonelderaUane.

Bevertheleee,

Vo» project under ocnslderation has not denonatrated its ability to service
a debt.
Orthodox credit analysis does provide sane testa for situations
of this character.

As a natter of fact, all such revenue

automatically be defined aa credits unsuited far bank investment purposes.
To» basis for this conclusion la quite reasonable.

Thus, prior to the

oo^letion of a project the obligations floated to finance it axe deened
to be construction loans.

Since construction is freu#it v i a may

»neertalntles, it is easy to understand vhy Municipal revenue bonds under
the orthodox approach to the credit analysis problem are deemed to ha
unwiited for banka until the project is completed,
teat stresaes seasoning of a credit.

The second orthodox

Specifically this

that the

credit cannot be appraised with any real assurance until the ability to
•«vice the debt has bean demonstrated by a aetleftoteey operating record.
At this tine it seems to as that one Must recognize tbs serious
difficulties arising when the orthodox criteria are applied rigorously to
all current revenue bond financing.

The fact is inescapable that some very

promising projects have performed exceedingly

veil after completion.

In

this connection ana need only mention the Rev Jersey Turnpike and the
Belavara Manorial Bridge.

Parenthetically, it should be noted that if

there is a single thread running through all the tangled skein of financing
it leads to the conclusion that vary frequently a few good projects at the




a»

m

outset loll investo*« to sleep and they fall io epply proper critici»« to
thè inferior provecta th&t appear later in thè oourse of developeieat.

Furthemort^ it la obvioua ibat m m informad Dímd boyare bave
abandonad thè ortfaodox teste «usi snbstdtuted aaaìysis in appr&lsiiig current
¿
‘mmi.ci.-pal reventa© flotationg eoverìag venture» timi M y be noval and
vitbout cperating ¡neeords* Hnally, it le a feet tfcat thè eonaerclal
rating agüeles sean to mfìm% a diffferesee of opiado« regarding thè
tmaimmt gì thè«« aituations,
Practicaily all of theae revenías boni projeete involve leticane
¡¡piestiosis$ boeever^ ea« only be answrwS

of engineering f©asibllity «
by ^ualified taatm^ai egg^peerte*
position to

fhe analyst of oredite le scarcely in a

¿ n a a g * reporte*

h^«t

tbat

provecta deesed to be practica! by eoapeteat engineere ean in feet m
cooetrttcted ns planned»
Occasionali^^ to be aure, a projeet tfeat le feaeible
engineering
®3ii8@ple>

m

rimpoint dose
bave t11

tram m

noi prove to be a sound eeononie '/enture,

of foli- ronda eonatrocted in thè face of

fflaàt engineering ^ fff.eelties tbat bave falled 'io pay thèIr wey
w w e eospletod*

For

As a setter of faet#

tfoay

thè credit analyst la m oe»g>eteat m

arpone to apprai.se thè ovié^c© and fona a jodgeent as regará® thè ear&ing
power of a projeet*

^ypioal Cases
By taking advesetage of hlodsight* thè characteriatice of a
successici aunielpal reventas bond projeet stand out rmther elearly.




In

t a first place,

1« always

convincing evidence of a

for t a service*

^dooodly* astiaste« of revenad§ baaed upon the
service« and tèa cost of tèe project
abla to service it« debt*

« I H be

la shorty tèi»

that it 1« unnecessary to

folgr upon nay projected growth in the

services io eetiaetlag

of earnlag power*
Other important characteristics of revean# bcasd projects that
to he successful ere tar
i# in «11
position of the creditor has been «eli

four caments in ta
of

marketed within t a

or three pear« «111 be helpful i©

t a extant to which
orthodox rule«

It «eco» to sa

author!tie« cannot

departments acquire issues tar

purposes t a t do

rigid io

mmtmt up to the orthodox standards then it is
very carefully




to scrutinise those