View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE BOND PORTFOLIO:

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES

November 18, 1958




THE BOHD B3IOTOLIO

municipal m m x n m

By
Raymond 1« Hengren, Assistant Chief
Division of Research and Statistics
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Conference of Examiners and Assistant Examiners
Ninth Federal Deposit Insurance District
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 18, 1958

ffiie Bond Fortfolios

Municipal Securities

Both dollarwise and relative to total assets the growth In the
municipal segment of bank assets has been rapid In the postwar period.

The

municipal holdings of all Insured commercial banks Increased from about
$^ billion to $15i billion and from 2.6 percent to 6.8 percent of total
assets.
In the ninth FDIC District the growth trend in municipal
portfolios has been much the same as for the country as a whole,

looking

specifically at the State banks not members of the Federal Reserve, the
portfolios comprised $29 million of municipals la 1$&6 as compared with

$112 million in 195&# or 3 .^ percent of total assets at the beginning of
the period as compared with 6.2 percent at the close.
Sot only have the banks greatly Increased their holdings of
municipal obligations in the postwar period, but in addition, there is good
reason to believe that the growth trends will continue for some years to
come*

The amount of municipal debt outstanding has grown from the order of

$16 billion to well over $50 billion since 19&6*

The increase reflects the

unprecedented volume of new construction in the field of municipal
facilities such as schools, highways, sewer and water plants.

Currently

the pressures resulting from the great postwar expansion in population, the
dramatic shifts in industry, and progressively higher standards of living
suggest the continuance of these trends in municipal construction and debt
volume*

Furthermore, it is a fact that from one-fourth to one-third of the

amount of municipal debt outstanding has found lodgment in the commercial
banks for many years.




- a .

Am a general rule, any portion of bank asset structure that
changes rapidly is worthy of special attention.
necessarily a sign of trouble.

Change in itself is not

But fro® the viewpoint of the bank examiner

it is a sign that calls for study.

Certainly the expansion in municipal

portfolios Is sufficiently dramatic to bring the examiner's attention to
focus.
To the extent that the credits in a municipal portfolio are
evaluated by the recognised investment advisory services such as Moody's or
Standard & Poor's, the examiner's task is quite easy.

Only in the most

unusual circumstances would the ratings by these services be unsatisfactory
as guides to quality.

But the examiner's task becomes especially difficult

because there are literally thousands of small governmental subdivisions
whose credits are outside of these rating systems--and many of these
obligations find lodgment in bank portfolios.

It is wholly impractical for

the investment services to evaluate these credits.

Pertinent credit

information is difficult to obtain; the amount of debt is relatively small,
and as a consequence the Investor interest is narrow.
nevertheless, it is a fact that unrated municipal credits make up
a very substantial part of the municipal portfolios, especially for m i l
State banks not members of the Federal Reserve.

A sampling of bank

examination reports suggests that for municipal portfolios comprising up to
$500,000 of securities from two-thirds to four-fifths of the Issues are
unrated.

Moreover, the same source of information indicates that securities

held by these banks are on the average not supported by the credit files and
the general knowledge of sound investment principles and policies is meager.




-

3

*

To be sure, there are exceptions to this generalization but not many in this
group of banks.
With a substantial proportion of the municipal portfolios held by
State nonmember banks unrated by the investment advisory services and with a
minimum of information in the credit files of the holders, one would expect
a fair portion of the securities to be classified as unsuitable for bank
investment.

Quite to the contrary, the data suggest that practically all of

the unrated securities are deemed to be suitable for bank Investment purposes.
Accordingly, the question arises:

Is the municipal securities portfolio

receiving the scrutiny that it deserves in bank examination work today!
Careful study of a few reports suggests that there may be room for more
effective work In this area.
Why have the municipal holdings been treated so casually by bank
investors generally as well as by bank examiners?

Probably because there Is

an axiom now widely accepted that all municipal obligations are good-*-though
some may be considered better than others.

This axiom has gained acceptance

In the period of some twenty to thirty years that separates us from the time
when municipal financing caused an endless amount of trouble.

Now virtually

forgotten are the many cases of municipal crédité well rated by the
investment advisory services that went into default.

There semes to be a

feeling that misfortunes will not recur in the field of municipal finance,
or if troubles do arise, they will "go away" before harm results to the bank
portfolio.
In my opinion, this no longer is a satisfactory approach for the
examiner to take when he is reviewing the municipal segment of a bank's




asset structure.

Tea years ago it may have been true that almost all of the

Items la the investment account were good.

Prosperity during the war years

had greatly strengthened the finances of municipalities*

Furthermore, debt

retirement programs had reduced the volume of securities outstanding which
could not then be augmented by new flotations to finance construction.
Wartime regulations held the construction of new community facilities to a
minimum.
But that picture has changed completely.

The volume of municipal

flotations now is at record levels and promises to move higher over the
years to come.

Henceforth it seems to m that it will be necessary for you

as examiners to scrutinise the municipal portfolios carefully and to devote
some attention to the quality of each block of securities.

By so doing, it

is my hope that you will be able to strengthen your comments on page 2 a t
the examination report form.

The purpose of these comments is to center

attention on important questions of investment policy as well as the quality
of individual blocks of securities and to lay the foundation for a remedial
effort on the part of bank management when that is necessary.

Bank Investment Policy
Does the bank have a definite investment policy?

That is the

central question on page 6 of the examination report and the work of the
examiner will be largely conditioned by the response to this question.
Undoubtedly you are familiar with cases of banks that have
formalised a bank investment policy statement and then ignored it in actual
practice.

These banks are no better off then the ones that manage their

securities account in a haphazard fashion.




In short, the examiner’s task is

- 5 to identity the presence or absence of policy fro® the results and not fro®
the files of documentation.

Tbm lack of sound policy in the management of securities or
elements of weakness in the investment practices is the signal calling for
appropriate comments,

ty this means the examiner may be able to encourage

the bank to remedy defects and to bring about the adoption of sound policy.
As an effective tool, it seems to me that the page 2 cem en t in the
examination report could be used much more effectively than it has been
heretofore in this area of remedial work by the examiners.
As regards the content of a bank Investment policy fear the
purposes of this discussion, attention will be centered on the following
major elements:
(1 ) Requirements for credit files
(2) The else and composition of the Investment portfolio
(3) Qualitative standards
(4) Maturity distribution
Adequate credit information is needed by the manager of a
municipal portfolio to determine the quality of each item*

gnaw» progress

has been made in recent years to establish standards for credit files.
State banks that are members of the federal Reserve and the national banks
now are subject to a regulation which furnishes specific guidance on data
requirements.

Although there are no uniform rules on credit files

applicable to all State nonaember banks, it is a fact that examiners for
many years have sought to persuade bankers to accumulate credit information
testifying to the quality of the bonds.




- 6 For municipal securities covered by the services publishing credit
information such as Moody's and Bun It Bradstreet there is no data gathering
problem.

The publications of such agencies present all the information

necessary to evaluate the credit quality.

As a practical matter, however,

only a small proportion of the credits in the municipal portfolios of banks
are covered by these sources, and examiners know that the existing files of
infozmtion on most credits in the portfolios leave much to be desired.
This situation calls for a never-ending effort cm your part as
examiners to persuade bankers to assemble at least a minimum of information
covering the quality of the credit at the time it is acquired by the bank.
A copy of the circular describing the securities at the time of offering
would certainly be essential.

Thereafter the files should be augmented from

time to time with information that demonstrates the continued soundness of
the securities, for example, an annual report cm the finances of the issuer-preferably one prepared by a certified public accountant.
Precise qualitative standards for testing the else of a bank
Investment portfolio and its distribution among the various types of bank
quality investments, vis., Federal securities, the obligations of States and
subdivisions, and all other Issues would be very useful as guides for
portfolio managers.

Unfortunately, there are no ideal proportions for the

composition of the investment portfolio.

Good portfolio management is

characterised by sound Judgment and not slavish adherence to rule books.
Generally speaking, however, wide departures in the size of any bank
portfolio from the pattern followed by similarly situated institutions are a
signal for sharp questioning by the examiner.




To Illustrate, an examiner

-

7

-

may find that a hank has a relatively large portfolio of municipal
obligations.

This, standing by itself, is no cause for alar» if the

management has adequate credit information and investment know-how.

But if

the management lacked credit files and evidenced no skill in handling
securities, then even a small portfolio might be elvdence of weakness.
In short, banks may be expected to acquire a portfolio of
municipals when these securities offer an attractive opportunity for the
Investment of bank funds.

Whether the portfolio should be relatively large

or small depends upon the alternative opportunities for investment, e.g.,
other securities and loans.

It Is the examinervs Job to form a Judgment as

to the skill of the management in appraising these alternatives.
Exemption from federal taxation on income is an important
advantage to a bank in holding municipal securities.

However, the extent of

the advantage depends upon a bank's entire tax situation.

The relative

attractiveness of individual municipal Issues to different banks varies with
the income subject to taxation.

Sometimes the advantage of tax exempt

incase is great enough to persuade the bank to acquire issues that otherwise
would be Ignored for lack of quality.
As a general rule, bank investment in marginal quality or even
lower grade securities cannot be Justified.

The liabilities of banks are

such that they can ill afford to take any risk of loss stemming from lack of
quality in their securities.

Furthermore, the supply of investment grade

issues is more than sufficient to care for all bank requirements.

To be

sure, banks sometimes buy marginal grade and sub -investment quality
securities.




This may occur because of the need to support the finances of

~ 8 .
municipalities in the area served by the bank.

More likely, it is the

result of ignorance as regards credit quality or a deliberate effort to
increase earnings by sacrificing quality*
Especially in dealing with banks whose managements exhibit a

A

propensity to buy marginal quality issues, a comment on page 2 of the
examination report may be helpful*

‘This part of the report gives the

examiner an opportunity to point out the dangers inherent in sacrifiées of
quality in order to augment earnings*

Where the difficulty stems from lack

of knowledge regarding quality, the coassent can be phrased to bring out the
need for information and analysis.
The distribution of maturities in the bank's investment portfolio
can be so designed as to free the management from any dependence upon the
market as a source of cash from the sale of bonds*

Evenly spaced maturities

over a period of five to seven years will make funds available for
reinvestment or to expand other aspects of the banking business*

lot only

will the funds become available in balanced amounts at regular intervals,
but management will be Insulated somewhat from fluctuations in money rates*
Thus, by dividing the portfolio into five equal parts, one portion of which
is scheduled to mature in each of the next five years, and reinvesting
annually the maturing portion in the longest maturity, the bank will realise
a rate of return that ie a five-year moving average of interest rates*
Long-term issues have little place in the municipal portfolio of a
bank*

When the amount is small relative to the total investment account,

the distant maturities furnish no cause for concern*
• V‘

J

But if the investment

, ’v

in long-dated bonds is more than five or ten percent of the total, then
comment on page 2 of the examination report would be appropriate*




* 9 Machinery for the sale of municipal securities is chiefly
concerned with the distribution of new issues*

There is no organised

exchange for trading municipals already outstanding and each transaction
requires negotiations between buyers and sellers*

Furthermore, the details

of sales volume and prices on transactions in this secondary market are not
reported to the public•

As a consequence, banks can rely only to a very

limited extent on the secondary market for the liquidation of municipals
when cash is needed*
there is still another feature of the market for municipal
securities that is important to bank examiners*

In appraising & portfolio

of securities, market value is a significant fact*

But information <m

prices is limited to the offering t e n s for new issues and the so-called
"Blue hist* data*

The latter publication, which is designed primarily to

serve bond traders, furnishes each day the prices at which specified dealers
offer individual blocks of securities for sale*
subject to negotiation*

These offering prices are

As a result, they are merely indicative of price

levels*
For the municipal obligations that are traded on a nation-wide
basis, the offering prices in the *Blue List” would provide & reasonably
satisfactory basis for estimating value.

However, the pricing of

blocks of securities for which there is only a local interest is much more
difficult.

Tfc value such credits probably there is no substitute for the

professional judgment of local traders in these Issues--though it is
extremely difficult to obtain "professional** as contrasted with "trader*
opinion*




-

10

-

Broadly speaking, when the examiner reviews a hank investment
program, he is searching for the element of balance that distinguishes a
good securities account from a weak one.

From time to time, it may be quite

constructive for the examiner to point out departures from balance that come
to his attention as he studies the various aspects of the bank's investment
policy.

Testing the Credit Quality of Municipal Securities
At the outset of any discussion pertaining to the quality of
individual issues of municipal bonds in bank portfolios, it is well to note
that each obligation presents a question as regards Its legality.

This

question can only be answered satisfactorily by experts in the field of
municipal law.

An opinion by a qualified bond attorney pertaining to the

legality of each issue should be available when the examiner is reviewing
the investment portfolio*

Sellers of municipal bonds ordinarily furnish a

copy of the legal opinion to the buyer in the regular course of business.
Furthermore, the name of the attorney approving the legality of an issue may
be found in every well prepared circular offering securities for sale, and
municipal bond dealers frequently are helpful in obtaining copies of
documents.

In any event, the examiner needs assurance that the securities

are valid obligations.
Qualitative ratings by the investment advisory services, namely,
Moody's and Standard & Poor's, are useful guides for the examiner in
evaluating the municipal portfolio.

By definition, it seems clear that the

credits in the three highest rating bands deserve to be considered
Investment grade.




To be sure, at times during the acute phases of the Great

11

-

Depression in the 1930’s some credits in these categories were
unsatisfactory as bank investments.

But those circumstances should be

viewed as quite exceptional.
According to the definition, speculative characteristics are
recognised as inherent In obligations classified in the fourth rating band
by Idle investment advisory services»

Nevertheless, the investment

characteristics of these credits are supposed to predominate and as a
consequence all of the securities so rated are deemed to be suitable for
bank investment purposes.

The bank supervisory authorities both State and

Federal recognised securities In the four highest rating bands as suitable
for bank investment in the so-called 1938 agreement concerning the appraisal
of bonds for bank examination purposes and the principle was subsequently
restated in 19^9*

In view of these speculative aspects, however, a

substantial commitment in the fourth or marginal grade is deserving of
special attention and comment»
During prosperous times the yield differentials between securities
In the third and the fourth rating bands tend to shrink, probably because
investors overlook shortcomings qualitywise in obligations.

So, when a bank

is under pressure to obtain tax exempt income and the manager of the
investment portfolio is very profit-minded a concentration of high yielding
securities at the margin of acceptability may develop«

As a practical

matter, the examiner cannot classify any individual issue rated in the
fourth grade as unsuited for investment purposes for that reason alone, but
he can recognise the weakness in the basic investment policy and endeavor to
persuade the management to follow more orthodox policy by investing funds in
the best grade of issues*




-

12

-

The qualitative ratings by investment advisory services cover
general market bonds that are traded more or less actively on a nationwide
basis#

Unfortunately, there is a very substantial amount of municipal debt

floated by literally thousands of governmental subdivisions that falls
outside of the rating system#

Furthermore, it is a fact that the investment

advisory services in recent years have been a bit tardy in rating certain
large Issues— e. g. some of the toll roads as well as other business-type
enterprises— where operating records are lacking or there is some element of
novelty in the situation#

Sub-investment quality ratings would be helpful

if there are real doubts as to the quality of the credit#

Thus, examiners

are severely handicapped by the lack of guidance fro© the investment
advisory services in evaluating credits in a large area of the municipal
field.
A preliminary analysis of data obtained from examination reports
covering a substantial number of State nonmember banks suggests a sizable
concentration in municipal securities deemed to be bank quality that are
unrated by the recognized investment advisory services.
noticeable In the portfolios of the smaller banks.

This is especially

But the task that

confronts the examiner when he seeks to appraise the quality of the items in
these portfolios becomes especially difficult.

In certain areas he can

obtain some help in evaluating credits from local agencies.
now exist, for example, in the Carolines and Oklahoma.

Such agencies

However, in most

instances the examiner is likely to find himself faced with the necessity of
forming a judgment as regards the quality of most of the securities--and the
credit information is likely to be inadequate or nonexistent.




From tide to time people have searched for shortcut tests to
ascertain the credit quality of a municipal obligation.

As a matter of

fact, there are undoubtedly situations for ’which very simple tests are
entirely adequate to appraise quality.

Sometimes by computing one or two

straightforward ratios it is possible to demonstrate that a debt is quite
small and well within the ability of the obligor to pay.

nevertheless,

these tests are likely to have very limited applicability.
In appraising a municipal credit, first it is necessaxy to
determine precisely the nature of the security under consideration.

Is it a

general obligation supported by a pledge of the full faith and credit of the
Issuer or is it the obligation of a business-type of activity whose revenues
are derived from the performance of specific services?

In addition, there

are flotations that have some of the characteristics of both of the
preceding securities, namely, a general pledge of credit together with
specific support from revenues such as the Income of a municipal electric or
water service or support from the yield of a specified tax.

In detail, the

pattern of analysis depends upon the precise nature of the obligation.
In the evaluation of a municipal credit the starting point should
always be the study of the economic background of the obligor with special
reference to questions such as the following:

1. Where is the obligor situated?
2. What are the characteristics of population trend?
3. Is there significant evidence of economic strength or weakness?
The latter query includes consideration of estimated per capita Income, the
nature of industry structure in the area, and the basic facts with respect
to transportation and trade.




By and large, the obligation of a governmental unit situated la an
area that lacks a substantial economic base will be weak irrespective of all
efforts to buttress the credit by legal means or otherwise.

Or the other

hand, many situations that are thin at the outset can be relied upon to
overcome these disadvantages if the growth factor is powerful enough.
The debt record, that is, the history of performance on securities
that have been floated previously by the obligor is always a pertinent
element in the appraisal of a municipal credit.

A record of default is bad.

Nevertheless, old defaults do not necessarily testify to the inability or
unwillingness to pay today.

More significant, however, are recent defaults,

that is, any failure to meet the obligation according to the terns of the
bond within the past decade or two.
JSven in prosperous times, defaults of a technical nature occur.
While undue importance should not be given to these happenings, they are
indicative of unsatisfactory financial management.

Technical defaults in

good times may be the forerunner of serious troubles when business is poor.
The debt statement of the obligor is probably the most important
single compilation of data for evaluating a municipal security.
statement lists all of the obligations now outstanding.

This

In addition to

direct debt, the statement also should include all underlying debt,
designated as such.

The latter includes the debt of «sailer geographical

areas that are completely

by the one under consideration.

Also,

the debt statement will indicate the amount of overlapping debt, namely, the
debt of larger geographical areas that comprise the one under consideration,
altogether or in part.




The direct debt, the overlapping debt, and the

-

15

*

underlying debt make up the total debt resting on the community*

Though the

direct debt is the sole burden of the obligor whose credit is being
analyzed, the economic resources of the area must furnish the means for
supporting the entire debt, irrespective of the obligor.
The crucial element in credit analysis is the determination of the
margin of protection for the holder of the security under study*

The margin

of protection concept represents the aggregation of evidence testifying to
the ability of the debtor to meet his obligations*
evidence relevant to the margin of protection.

There are many bits of

For example, such measures

Include the amount of direct debt expressed as a percentage of assessed
value or in dollars per capita*

Unfortunately, there are no satisfactory

standards for appraising these measures*

Viewed in terms of five or ten

year trends, however, they become progressively more significant*

Thus, it

is important to note that an appraisal of the margin of protection for debt
service is essentially subjective in character*
For the vast majority of the small governmental subdivisions the
general property tax is relied upon as the chief source of revenue*

The

yield from this tax which is levied at a stated rate in dollars per thousand
of assessed value is dependent upon the millage and the assessment base*
However, assessment practices vary greatly among governmental subdivisions*
Sometimes property is valued for tax purposes cm terms that approximate a
fair market price while in other instances the valuation for tax purposes
may be only a fraction thereof.

As a result, ratios of debt to assessed

value tend to lose significance in comparisons of cm© community with another.
For still another reason the ratio of debt to assessed value is now losing




significance.

The general property tax appears to be declining in

importance as municipalities turn to other sources of revenue such as income
and sales taxes.
With respect to general obligations, the facts regarding the tax
levies in terms of millage as compared with taxation practices elsewhere are
indicative of the margin of protection for debt service.

If some communities

typically assess property at modest figure® and levy low taxes, there is
clearly a margin of protection that could be tapped by increasing assessments
or tax rates.
The summary of current financial operations showing the source of
revenues end the nature of disbursements is indicative of the financial
strength of the municipality.

But the Interpretation and analysis of

financial reports requires a knowledge of municipal accounting practices.
Typically the accounts are maintained on a cash and fund basis.

To indicate

some of the difficulties confronting the analyst, inter-fund transfers may
give a picture of financial strength to parts of the debt structure, when in
aggregate terms the margin of protection is unsatisfactory.
To the extent that a community covers the cost of operations and
thereby avoids the accumulation of a floating debt, the credit is strong.
Furthermore, a margin of protection may be found in the financing of long­
term capital investments in part from the current income.

It is obvious

that over a period of years a community should balance Its financial
operations without incurring deficits.

Failure to do so is evidence of

weakness.
As compared with obligations supported by an issuer*e pledge of
full faith and credit, the analysis with respect to investment quality of




- 1? obligations Issued by the business-type of municipal enterprise In some
respects Is easier and in others more difficult*

It is easier because the

determination of credit worthiness is not clouded by the appraisal of
intangible features that may be important in a general pledge of credit*
Bit at Hie same time, it is more difficult because it depends upon estimates
of operating revenues and expenses projected into the future*
Governmental subdivisions engaged in business-type activities, for
example, the furnishing of gas, electric, and water utilities, or special
facilities such as M i d g e s and highways financed by charges for services,
entail evaluation with respect to credit quality as any other public service
enterprise*

Standard textbooks in the field of investment outline the

pattern for this type of analysis*

The starting point Is always a

projection of revenues, operating expenses, and debt service requirements
for at least five years*

These projections will furnish a basis for

estimating the margin of protection for bondholders*

To be satisfactory the

coverage is expected to range from one and one-half to double the debt
service requirements*

However, in a very fundamental sense the adequacy of

the margin can be evaluated only in terms of performance by similarly
situated projects that in the past have been able to manage a debt
successfully*
In evaluating the quality of municipal credits, the analyst will
encounter many complications in addition to the ones covered by these remarks*
There are no easy ways to resolve these difficulties*

Experience has

demonstrated that a sound judgment as to credit quality can always be
reached by carefully analysing the pertinent facts*
work is time-consuming*




Unfortunately, this

- 18 Summary and Conclusion

To sum up, th en , the municipal segment of the assets held by the
insured commercial banks has grown both dollarwise and relative to total
assets at a substantial rate over the postwar years.

Moreover, the volume

of new municipal flotations is high and there is no indication of abatement
in the future.

The growing importance of municipal holdings suggests that it will
be necessary for examiners to devote an increasing amount of attention both
to bank investment policy and to the determination of the credit quality of
individual securities.

Especially will this be true for the State nmmmber

banks that are examined by the federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The

bulk of these banks are «sail and they are not likely to be well equipped to
handle investment problems.

Municipal obligations in the investment

portfolios of these banks typically are floated by small governmental units*
Furthermore, the size and the location of these obligors for the most part
are such that bank examiners do not have the assistance of the investment
advisory services for guidance in ascertaining credit quality.
When actual or potential trembles are detected by the bank
examiner, it Is incumbent upon him to alert management to the difficulties
and encourage remedial efforts.

Comments on page 2 of the examination

report may be very effective for this purpose.

In a very real sense, the

examiner is the man best situated to bring about improvement in the
municipal portfolio.

His oral and written comments may bestir the

management of a bank to adopt corrective measures.