View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

For release on delivery
9:15 AM PDT (12:15 PM EDT)
Saturday, October 12, 1985

Adapting to Change in an Interdependent World Economy

Preston Martin
Vice Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Stanford Business School Alumni Association
Stanford, California
October 12, 1985

Adapting to Change in an Interdependent World Economy
Preston Martin
Vice Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Stanford Business School Alumni Association
Stanford, California
October 12, 1985

I appreciate the opportunity to exchange views with you today about an
economy that is undergoing so many adjustments in its institutions and its
place in the world.

We witness change and transition in every line of

endeavor: business, government, and personal.
ubiquitous and pervasive;

The need to adjust and adapt is

it is also the breeding ground for uncertainty.

Although each generation muses about "the best of times, the worst of times,"
an objective view of the 1970s and 1980s reflects more than mere transition:
we live in an era of institutional transformation.
In such a dynamic economic environment, monetary policy builds upon
the lessons of its long historical experience here and abroad.

But that policy

cannot be cast in a rigid mold that would prevent the central bank from
supporting and facilitating legitimate financial growth and progress in
institutional adjustment.

However, policy flexibility does not mean

surrendering control over the pace of monetary and credit growth compatible
with disinflation.

There are a thousand ways to rationalize easy money, but

all of them fail the test of the overriding public interest in a stable price
level.
This is also a time in our history in which the media are ever
present, virtually setting the agenda of our discourse.

Thus, it is vital that

we step back from time to time from the flood of information —
misinformation —

and

and review the progress we have made, having been fully

informed about the risks and costs incurred.

That review shows that our financial system has evolved with
unprecedented speed to such fundamentals as disinflation and global
competition, to floating exchange rates and massive oil shocks, to extreme
exchange rate volatility and what has been called "the leveraging of America."
Our banks first recycled the petrodollars, then managed the less developed
country (LDC) debts.

As a society, we have coped with the dislocations in

agriculture, energy, and manufacturing.
Recall for a moment the world of your undergraduate days at this
institution.
definable —

In those dear days, you at least knew what a bank was.
simply something you kept running short of.

Money was

In 1985 there is

serious political discussion about defining a "bank" and heated economic debate
as to which ingredients properly go into the potpourri labeled "money."
Among other dramatic changes, we have seen an accelerated evolution
from a manufacturing-extractive-agricultural economic base to a further
emphasis upon services.

We have reversed the inflationary momentum built up in

the 1970s, although the process of disinflation has led to severe strains in
our domestic economy.

We suffered the worst recession, the highest

unemployment, and the most severe financial strains since the 1930s.

But we

succeeded in dramatically reducing the inflation rate, laying the foundation
for the economic expansion that has now been under way for almost three years.
Where are we today?

Employment and output growth have slowed markedly

since mid-84, despite declining interest rates and rapid money growth over the
past year.
policy.

As a result, some have questioned the very efficacy of monetary

Monetary policy has been effective in keeping aggregate demand growing

at a healthy pace.

Spending by households and businesses has continued to

3

expand at rates that would, in normal circumstances, reduce unemployment and
increase profits.
But circumstances have not been normal.

An increasing amount of

domestic spending has gone to buy foreign products.
deficit has grown to unprecedented levels.

As a result, the trade

Despite the recent announcements

that our merchandise trade deficit declined to "only" about $10 billion in July
and August, both the trade deficit and the current account deficit this year
will set new records.

In part because of these large and growing external

deficits, the effect of monetary stimulus has been dissipated, producing the
paradox of healthy growth in spending but only sluggish growth in production.
Several policy actions have been proposed to bring down the trade
deficit.

One is for the Federal Reserve to follow a significantly more

expansionary monetary policy.

But aggressive, inflationary growth of money and

credit to bring down the dollar's exchange rate would not enhance the position
of U.S. firms in world markets.

A lower external value of the dollar would be

offset by inflated domestic costs'.
a high real dollar exchange rate.
factors —

The trade deficit is in part a function of
Monetary policy is only one of several

and not the most important in the long run —

that influence real

exchange rates.
The real exchange rate is the nominal —

or market —

adjusted for differences in inflation across countries.

exchange rate

It measures the real

terms of trade for products we import and export, which depend on such real
economic factors as productivity, consumer preferences, and the proportion of
income saved.

Any beneficial impact of an overly expansionary Federal Reserve

policy on the trade deficit would be short-lived without accompanying changes
in these fundamental economic factors.

4
In the final analysis, a country's trade balance reflects
domestic spending and saving decisions.

The primary reason the Japanese run a

chronic trade surplus is not their stringent import restrictions but that the
Japanese people save much of their income.

Similarly, a major cause of the

growing U.S. trade deficit in recent years, in my judgment, is that we are a
society of high consumption and high government spending relative to our meager
pool of private savings.

This is one reason growing federal spending, which

raises government credit demands, is so worrisome.
The importance of domestic saving and spending decisions for our
current account deficit and foreign indebtedness is straightforward.
from abroad —

as reflected by an inflow of foreign capital —

side of the trade deficit.

Borrowing

is the other

If recent trends continue, we will soon become the

largest debtor nation in the world.

Why?

Because domestic borrowing —

by the

government to finance the excess of spending over tax revenues and by the
private sector to finance consumption, business investment, and housing —
exceeds our low domestic saving.

We live beyond our means, importing to live

so well and increasingly dependent on foreign financing.

As a result, foreign

investors have taken on increased importance in keeping credit flowing to our
economy.
One major result of the growing trade deficit and the pain it has
inflicted on major sectors of our economy has been a growth in protectionist
sentiment in the country.

More than three hundred bills have been introduced

in Congress to raise trade barriers.

Although understandable from a political

standpoint, the growing protectionist fervor is profoundly disturbing.

The

economic and political advantages of free trade are more than an academic

5

theory.

The prosperity in the U.S. and world economies in the postwar period

is in no small part due to liberalized international trade.

In an increasingly

free trade environment, Europe and Japan have been rebuilt, America has enjoyed
rising living standards, and the LDCs —

despite some recent setbacks —

have

built some foundation for sustained economic growth, but only providing the
environment for free and fair trade is maintained and enhanced.

Although I

recognize the frustrations caused by such a strong dollar and its contribution
to the inability of many American companies to coirpete effectively in world
markets in recent years, the worst possible public response would be an
increase in trade barriers.

Instead, we should work toward lowering trade

barriers both here and abroad and toward eliminating the internal and external
imbalances manifested in the uneven economic expansion around the world.
International trade and capital flows have, of course, played an
increasingly important role in the behavior of the U.S. economy and financial
markets.

As a result, the Federal Reserve has given more attention to

international and exchange market developments in policy deliberations, as
Chairman Volcker noted in our mid-year report to Congress and, indeed, as is
evident in the records of policy actions from recent FOMC meetings.

In an

interdependent world, policy makers here and abroad must take account of the
broad range of effects their fiscal policy and their monetary policy actions
have —

especially when domestic and international imbalances are so closely

related.
What are the prospects for redressing our internal and external
imbalances?

The outlook seemed bleak early this year . Pessimists argued that

the President and Congress were hopelessly gridlocked over the budget deficit;

6

the dollar was at levels that promised no respite from our massive trade
imbalance; and protectionist sentiment was growing exponentially.
But recent developments have been encouraging.

After a process of

negotiation and compromise, a deficit reduction objective was passed by
Congress and signed by the President.

According to the Congressional Budget

Office estimates, this agreement will lead to significant reductions in the
budget deficit over the next few years.

More needs to be done, and the

Congress continues to explore ways and means to curb spending growth over a
multi-year horizon.
In part because of the improved deficit outlook, the exchange value of
the dollar has descended from levels reached earlier.

Even before the descent

in the last three weeks, the dollar had declined about 15 percent on a trade
weighted basis from its peaks in February.

The marked adjustment of the dollar

to more realistic levels reflects in part some convergence in economic growth
rates between the United States and our major trading partners.

Our sluggish

growth has been accompanied by prospects for slightly more rapid economic
growth in Europe.

If European economies emerge from their extended period of

lethargy following the worldwide recession of 1981-82, growth rates among major
industrial countries could converge further.

The United States then would no

longer be considered the only major haven for international investment.
The enhanced prospect for redressing our internal and external
imbalances without resorting to self-destructive protectionist policies was
reflected in the communique issued by the "Group of Five" industrialized
nations after their September 22 meeting.

At the initiative of the United

States, the finance ministers and central bank representatives for England,

7

France, Germany, Japan, and the United States met three weeks ago to discuss
issues of mutual concern.

Discussions have continued this past week in Seoul.

The announcement issued after the G-5 meeting noted the efforts to promote
convergence of economic policies and performance among major industrial
countries.

More importantly, the representatives also reaffirmed their

commitment to home-front policy actions that would reinforce the recent
progress.
The press has focused on the exchange market aspects of the G-5
meeting.

Much has been made of the language in the communique recognizing that

exchange rates were not reflecting underlying economic realities.

Subsequent

reports have closely monitored the dollar sales by central banks in Japan,
Germany, and other countries.

The media have also reported the rumors in

financial markets about the amount of exchange market intervention.

It is

understandable that exchange market intervention, which is both visible and
dramatic, has received the most scrutiny.
But the increased role of intervention since the G-5 meeting is not to
me the most significant outcome.

More important, in the final analysis, is the

explicit recognition of interdependence among our nations.

As is made clear in

the communique from the G-5 meeting and in dispatches from the meetings in
Seoul, political sovereignty does not imply economic independence.
part of an integrated world economy.

We are all

This, to me, is the important message of

the "state of play" in international negotiations.
What are the concrete implications of this message?

They are that all

of the involved countries must redouble efforts to pursue policies that will
contribute to balanced, sustainable, and noninflationary growth in the world
economy.

8

For the United States, a most important contribution would be to
insure continued progress toward fiscal responsibility.
ways to further reduce the federal budget deficit.

We simply must find

Less attention has been

devoted to the possible relationship of tax reform and simplification to
continued foreign investment in the United States.

Finally, the favorable

impact of improved fiscal and tax policies can be reinforced by the Federal
Reserve's continued pursuit of a monetary policy aimed at sustainable growth
and continued progress toward price stability.
As the United States makes progress toward correcting our internal
imbalances, our trading partners could complement our actions by adopting
policies that reinforce the convergence of economic growth rates and redressing
the trade imbalances.

The strengthening of other currencies relative to the

dollar provides greater scope for our European allies to pursue more
expansionary domestic policies with less risk of reigniting inflation.

There

is already some evidence that our friends in Europe are taking advantage of the
opportunity afforded by the decline in the dollar.

In Germany, for example,

monetary growth has recently moved above the midpoint of the long-run range
established by the Bundesbank.
The reaction in foreign exchange markets indicates that the statement
of intentions by the G-5 countries has been taken seriously.
declined about 7 percent in the last three weeks.

The dollar has

Together with earlier

declines, this development inplies that the foreign sector's drag on the U.S.
economy could lessen.

As a result, the gap between growth in domestic

production and spending could begin to narrow.

9

Moreover, some recent data suggest that the U.S. economy has
strengthened slightly after remaining in the doldrums for several quarters.
The unemployment rate has moved slightly below the 7.3 percent level where it
had been stuck for most of the year.
gains in production for September.

The survey of purchasing agents showed
The most encouraging news has been the

three months of solid gains in the index of leading indicators.
positive note:

One last

because of the decline in the value of the dollar, less of the

growth in domestic spending will go for imports.
However, no single economic sector yet shows promise of playing the
role of accelerator.

Housing has not responded as much as was expected to the

decline in mortgage interest rates —

in part because of an offsetting

tightening of credit standards by FNMA, mortgage lenders, and mortgage
insurers.

Inventory investment is unlikely to contribute much.

Disinflation

is the order of the day; "just in time" inventory management has replaced "buy
now."

Nor is a boom in consumption spending likely.

Consumers have to be

enticed to counters and showrooms with concessional financing or pricing.
Saving rates look unsustainably low, and consumers' debt has been rising faster
than their financial assets.
On balance, I think the chances are good that the slight pickup in GNP
growth inplied by the 2.8 percent flash estimate for the third quarter could be
extended for the remainder of this year and beyond.

A return to higher levels

of sustainable economic growth following a period of sluggishness has airple
precedent in previous U.S. expansions.

Obviously history has a way of straying

from previous paths, but it may be comforting to recall that slow growth need
not be a precursor to recession.

10

Even so, the U.S. economy can't be counted on to function as the
"locomotive" for global economic progress.

Smaller increments in exports from

Europe, LDCs, and elsewhere will continue.

The effects on the LDCs' ability to

earn the foreign exchange with which to service their external debt could be
particularly troublesome.
developed countries —

The meeting in Seoul recognized the role of other

markets expanding rapidly enough to pick up the slack of

slower growth in U.S. imports.
Another potentially troublesome effect of the decline in the value of
the dollar could be some additional inflationary pressure in the short run.
Our inports will be more expensive, and domestic producers v/ill be under less
pressure to keep prices and wages down.

The effect on inflation of the dollar

decline can easily be exaggerated, though.

Moreover, in my view, continued

declines in the dollar at a moderate pace would not have a large short-run
effect on inflation.

Based on historical relationships, a 20 percent

depreciation would raise the inflation rate by an average of 1 percentage point
over the next three years.

But I expect the inpact to be smaller this time

around because profit margins have been unusually wide for many foreign firms
that have new, expanded distribution systems in place in the United States.
Because these firms will be reluctant to give up market share, they may not
raise selling prices this time around as much as historical relationships
suggest.
prices.

In addition, the disarray in OPEC portends further declines in energy
Most importantly, the Federal Reserve remains committed to a monetary

policy that will lead to further progress toward price stability.
It may be a peculiarly American trait to focus so much public
discourse upon our difficulties and risks of failure.

My argument today is

11
that a balanced view is necessary if we are to continue in the interest of
consumers the revolution in our institutions in such a changing world.

Let us

recognize that the trend over the past decade has been toward a healthy "return
to basics."

Your organization may have divested companies unrelated to your

core business.
workers.

There are sane signs of more cooperation between management and

Productivity is no longer a four letter word.
We continue to face major adjustments and significant risks, both here

and abroad.

Monetary policy can and will contribute to stability and growth by

avoiding rigid adherence to policies dictated by yesterday's institutions and
environment.

In today's world, the Federal Reserve's methods of conducting

monetary policy must be pragmatic, considering a wide range of indicators from
commodity prices and exchange rates to the monetary aggregates and interest
rates.

Whatever indicators we use, though, the goal remains the same:

contributing to further disinflation and building upon our progress to date —
which has been achieved at considerable cost in these difficult times.