View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.


An Address-^by Oliver S. Powell, Member,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
^Before the National Credit Conference
of the American Bankers Association,
LaSelle Hotel, Chicago, Illinois.

Wednesday morning, December 5, 1 9 5 1 o


It is my thought that this Conference would like to have a report
of the stewardship of the national committeemen in directing the VoluntaryCredit Restraint Program and any pertinent suggestions for the future development and performance of the Program.

It is only a few months—less

than a year—since the Voluntary Credit Restraint Program was first

In those beginning days who would have thought that voluntary

credit restraint would have become a watchword among lenders?

Who would

have thought that a Program of turning down non-essential loans would have
become so popular that groups of lenders not officially recognized in the
Program have been clamoring for an active part in the organization?


would have predicted that the voluntary credit restraint principles would
become the model for Government lending agencies or that the Program would
play a large part in the thinking of Government as to inflation control for
Yet, all of this and more has happened.
ments have confounded the skeptics.

Certainly the develop-

You may recall that even some bankers

last spring feared that this was a mousetrap play which would lead them to
assume an unperformable task after which Government would step in with ironclad limitations on loans.

Far from this development, the Program is now

considered one of the big three in the credit tools of inflation control:
general credit restraints, selective credit restraints, and voluntary credit

The praise for this achievement should go to those men of

courage and vision who designed the original Program, bo the diligent and
devoted private citizens who have guided it through the past months and to
the patriotic financiers and their customers who have adopted the principles

-2in their own lines of business.
While acclaiming the success of the Voluntary Credit Restraint
Program, we must not be led into the delusion that this Program is all

It is a necessary Program, but it is only one of many angles to

the fight against inflation.

The price level has been steady since the end

of March, defense production has been growing rapidly, unemployment is at a
low point, but we cannot assume that our Program is wholly responsible for
this development.

We must not forget that the public had over-bought in

the fall and winter of 1950-51 and that retail merchandise stocks had been
built up to unwieldy totals.

The gradual reduction in stocks of merchan-

dise in the hands of retailers has been one of the great restraints on
inflation during recent months.

Department store stocks seasonally adjusted

have been declining since the end of April, but it was not until the end of
October that the total fell below the rising level in the fall of 1950.
Consumers also have been a major factor in the control of inflation.

For the past six months or more, they have been saving rather than


Perhaps they too have caught the spirit of the Voluntary Credit

Restraint Program, which is really nothing more than encouragement of conservatism in spending and borrowing.
The Voluntary Credit Restraint Program finds one of its principal
expressions in the lending operations of commercial banks.

In the survey of

bank lending operations prepared for this Conference by the Credit Policy
Commission of the American Bankers Association, you will find the history
bank loans in . . 5 as compared with 1950.

The contrast is striking.

Total business loans have risen only half as fast as a year ago.


loans have been rising and essential agricultural loans have also risen

Other kinds of loans have either not risen or have declined.

is selective credit control on a true voluntary basis.
been made.


Essential loans have

I have yet to receive a complaint as to an essential loan being

turned down due to the Voluntary Credit Restraint Program.
Parenthetically, much of the material in the A.B.A. report to this
Conference can be directly attributed to the efforts of the voluntary credit
restraint organization and to the wholehearted assistance of 200 of the
largest banks.

For the first time when we talk about changes in business

loans of commercial banks, we know what we are talking about.

Ve have

learned much and we shall learn more as to the working of the private banking system of the United States from these illuminating weekly figures.
So much for what has happened.

However, this Conference is a work-

ing session and not an occasion for mutual admiration.

You are going to

want to take home with you concrete suggestions for improving the Program.
Performance has not been perfect—but we did not expect perfection.

I well

remember the first session in New York of the financial experts who had been
invited to draft the Program.

They faced soberly the question of less than

full acceptance and conformance by all lenders.

To their great credit, they

decided that this was a risk, but not a barrier to success, that with 70 to
80 per cent adherence the plan would work.

This margin would allow for the

inevitable lapses of memory, incomplete indoctrination, differences in
judgment, yes, even greed and an effort to make a profit while competitors
are holding off.
I am positive that compliance has been fully as good as was hoped—

-4and it has been improving, as the result of fuller understanding, the growing realization that others in all branches of finance are living up to the
principles and the concrete evidence that the Voluntary Credit Restraint
Program is playing an important part in the restraint of inflation.
I wish to explore with you the future of the Program.

It is a

hackneyed trick of the public speaker to declaim that "We are at the cross
roads" and yet that is exactly where we are today in my considered judgment.
We can either go the road of better understanding on the part of both
borrower and lender and more complete conformance in the public interest no
matter what the sacrifice in short run profits, or we can have a growing
number of cancerous defections.

Perhaps no one of them would destroy the

Program but each would surely leave a growing area of resentment and a growing sense of futility.
I choose and I am sure that American banking will choose the road
leading to continued success for the Program.

Private finance can and will

do its part toward maintaining the soundness of the American dollar.


chapter of cooperation in the national interest started on such a high level
&nd so conscientiously developed must be carried to a successful ending.
It will be helpful to take a square look at some of the problems

nd difficulties which have been met in the operation of the Program.

of them is insurmountable.
Understanding 0 f objectives.


Most of them can be cured through a better
In fact, since this is a Voluntary Program, full

information and an appeal to action in the public interest are the only
Methods for making the Program work.

Now let me outline some of the problems

-nd tell you what steps are being taken to solve them.

-5The first problem was that of defining lending standards which
are appropriate in a time of strong inflationary pressures.

The Statement

of Principles was drawn in very general language and critics said that there
were very few black or white loans and a very broad area of gray loans.


a practical matter, this problem has turned out to be more theoretical than

We have found that the banking judgment on borderline cases as

evidenced by the opinions of the regional committees has been almost uniform
and invariably conservative throughout the United States.
Realizing the nature of this problem at the outset, the National
Committee immediately set about narrowing the problem by a series of bulletins on special kinds of loans which were mailed to all lenders.


bulletins were supplemented by informal memoranda to the regional committees
on problems which were only occasionally met and did not seem broad enough
to warrant advising all lenders.

A number of these cases were submitted to

the National Committee by the regional committees for an opinion.


Problems continually arise and constitute the subject matter for the
periodic meetings of the National Committee.
Probably the most helpful move recently made by the National Committee was to distribute a Digest of Opinions which have been rendered by
the regional committees in a broad variety of cases.

These digests have been

mailed to all lenders and have received a good deal of newspaper and other

The Digest was limited to the types of cases which seemed to have

a general application.

In addition to these specific aids to credit judgment,

there has been a tremendous amount of publicity in the way of letters, press
Releases, public addresses, radio programs, etc.

As a result, the combination

-6of native good judgment on the part of lenders and broad dissemination of
basic information has kept the problems of interpreting lending standards
to a minimum and has reduced criticism of the Program to a negligible
The second type of problem arises out of a conflict of interests.
One conflict is between private short-term interests and the broad public

There is the occasional institution which "just had to make an

exception for a good customer," but which believes that if most institutions
conform to the Statement of Principles most of the time, the Program will

Here the remedy is partly better information leading to a better-

understanding of the importance of the Program on the part of both the
insistent borrower and the lender and partly a matter of courage on the part
of the lender.

To the extent that the borrower understands the national

inflationary problem the degree of courage required on the part of the
lender is reduced.

In fact, one of the arts of a program of this sort is

the ability of the lender to explain the inflationary problem to the borrower.
Another type of conflict arises occasionally between state and
local interests and the national interest.

There was the instance of the

municipal university that could not wait for a more appropriate time to construct a library.

There was the state whose mandate to pay a soldiers' bonus

overrode the obvious fact that the payment of the bonus at this time would
add to inflationary pressures and thus would be contrary to the national welfare.

Fortunately such cases have been few.

Public officials have given

excellent support to the Voluntary Program and have shown great understanding
of its objectives.

A continued broadening of the informational activities on

the part of lenders should minimize problems of this sort as time goe3 on.

-7Another type of problem arises from failure to pass the word down
the line among the lending officers within an institution.

There was the

top executive officer who went fishing without telling his second in command
about the Voluntary Credit Restraint Program.

The result was that a loan

was made which had been turned down by a competitor in accordance with the
Statement of Principles of the Program.

There was the state bankers associ-

ation which inadvertently overlooked placing the Voluntary Credit Restraint
Program on the agenda for its group meetings and thus passed vp a splendid
opportunity to inform practically every bank in its state about the Program.
There was the institutional investor which did not tell the firm originating
mortgages of the new tests which it expected to apply to home mortgages with
the result that some less conservative mortgages were created in the early
stages of the Program.

In all of these cases, the answer is better informa-

tion and a realization of the necessity for informing the men who close the
Finally, there is the continuing fear that if private financial
institutions do a good job in holding down unnecessary loans, some government agency will step in and make the loan.

In my judgment this is more of

a threat than an actuality at the present time, but there have been quite
a few cases of government competition which was disliked by private lenders
and that have come to the attention of the National Committee.

Every one of

these cases has been discussed frankly and objectively with the government
agency involved.

In this way we hope to keep this problem at a minimum.


should add that the heads of the government lending agencies have expressed


n eagerness to be told of cases where their operations seem to conflict

ith the Voluntary Program.


A report of stewardship would not be complete without some comments as to the future operation of the Program.
you to keep up the good work.

First, I would encourage

We must recognize that the Voluntary Credit

Restraint Program has been operating under a general set of economic conditions favorable to its use.

The Program was conceived in the stark drama

of the early Korean conflict.

Our greatest danger is that the Program will

fail in the humdrum era following an armistice—if there should be one—and
before the slackening of the defense effort makes it possible to send out a
"well done" message.

There is nothing spectacular about a continuation of

conservatism in lending activities and yet that is the prescription for the
immediate future.
My second recommendation, particularly to bankers and other
lenders of short-term credit, is that you strive to obtain the maximum
seasonal pay off of loans in the months ahead.

It is just as important to

get the money back after it has served its original essential purpose as it
is to be conservative in making the loan.
My third recommendation is that the operation of the Program be
strengthened in individual institutions.
ing officers.

Spread the word among your lend-

Apply the same lending tests to your best customers as to

Avoid the temptation to see how close to the borderline a loan can

be before it becomes absolutely black.

In case of doubt, submit loan appli-

cations to your regional committee.
Finally, let us all continue actively to publicize the Program
^mong businessmen and. the public in general.

Continued repetition of the

basic principles is the fundamental method for increasing public knowledge

of the Program and keeping it actively before them.

The men in this

audience are experts in telling their story to the public.
efforts and ingenuity will do the job.

Your combined

If we can keep up the tempo and

spirit of the Program during the remainder of the emergency period, we
shall have the satisfaction of having written a most excellent chapter in
the history of private finance in the United States.