View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

121
Broadcast over
Radio Station W-J-R, Detroit, Michigan
July
.

OUR PRESENT ECONOMIC SITUATION
Introduction: Governor Szymczak, as a member of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System over the past 15 years and with experience abroad in .1944. for the Foreign Economic Administration and
again in 194-6 and 194? with the American Military Government for
Germany, has been in an unusually good position to watch economic
developments, both in this country and abroad. We are delighted to
have him discuss "Our Present Economic Situation".
Question: Governor, I think the economic problem uppermost in the minds
of many of us is the high cost of living. Can you tell us what
prices are so. high? And why the chances are that they might come
down after a while?
Answer: That is a long story. Even so, I think we might first take a
look at how high the cost of living is now. According to the Bureau
of Labor Statistics index (which is to be used to adjust wage rates
under the new General Motors-United Automobile Workers contract),
consumer prices in May were 70 per cent higher than in 1939 and 9
per cent higher than a year ago.
Question:

Wasn't there a sharp drop in grain prices early this year?

Answer: Yes, but it did not help the cost of living much. Food prices
dipped temporarily, but they are now somewhat above their January
peak and clothing prices have risen further. So have rents, but
in comparison with 1939 levels rents are up less than 20 per cent
while food and clothing are double what they were before the war.
Question:

Governor Szymczak, what about meat prices?

Answer: They have risen considerably in the past few months and are now
about 20 per cent higher than a year ago and more than two and a
half times the pre-war level.
Question: You said that since a year ago the total cost of living has
risen 9 per cent. Have any items come down?
Answer: Reductions in retail prices have been few and far between.
Radios and vacuum cleaners are cheaper than they weie a year ago.
Some textiles and miscellaneous products have also been reduced.
Question: That covers the main facts on the present cost of living;
plenty of housewives can supply the details from their own experience. Now, can you tell us what caused these high prices?
Answer: Chiefly the war. During that period a great deal of the world's
productive resources was diverted to war purposes. In this country,
at the peak of the war over two-fifths of all production was for
war uses. Abroad, factories were destroyed and trade was disrupted
to an extent not readily appreciated by those of us living at a distance from the scenes of actual warfare.

122

Question: So that for a period of five or six years production for
civilians was low and supplies of consumer goods were reduced.

_

Answer5 Yes, and at the.same time incomes the world over were ex-^
panded tremendously because people were being paid for producing
munitions and waging war. The increased'incomes were partly taken
away by Government taxes but people still had much more money to
buy goods than there were goods to be bought. Price rises were
'•limited by controls. In this country the amount that people
saved out of their incomes increased very greatly during the war
period.
Question: And as a result of this people had more money in the bank
after the war?
•
•
Answer: More money in the bank, more cash in their pockets, and more
Government bonds. The total amount of these so-called "liquid
assets" held by individuals and corporations at the end of the
war was more than three times as great as before the war.
Question:

*nd where did all these liquid assets come from?

Answer: Less than half of the Government's expenditures during the war
was financed by taxes and the remaining amount was borrowed, Some
of this amount was borrowed from savings and the rest was borrowed
from the banks. The Government paid the money out for war.equipment, and the money was deposited in bonks or held as currency.
The expansion in these funds and increased holdings of redeemable
Government bonds resulted in a record supply of purchasing power.
Question: The main point, as I get it, is that people accumulated
• money during the war, when many goods were not on the market.
Then after the war they were able to pay high prices if necessary
for what they wanted urgently in the way of.food, automobiles, ana
houses. Is that right?
Answer: Yes, people could back- up their wishes with more dollars than
ever before—dollars accumulated during the war and also dollars
received out of current incomes which generally continued high
after the war in spite of the curtailment of the war program.
There were plenty of jobs immediately after the war and even more
now. In June employment reached a new record and wage rates have
advanced further.
Question:

How much have wages risen?

Answer: At manufacturing plants average hourly earnings are more than
double prewar levels. This spring wage rates have risen less than
before as marked resistance developed in leading industries.
<
Recent increases in automobile and electrical equipment industries
have been within the general range of 5 to 15 cents an hour, whicn
has been.characteristic this year where any increases et all have
been negotiated.
Question:" Now that you are discussing wages, Governor, I want to ask
you whether they are high because prices are high or are prices

123

high because wages are high?
Answer: I am glad you asked that because there seems to be so much misunderstanding about it. Basically prices, wages, and profits are
all high because of heavy demands for goods. It needs to be remembered that wages are not the only business cost; that, particularly in times like these, many prices are not very closely related
to costs; and that consequently care should be taken in attributing
price increases to wage increases.
Question: But wage increases add to costs and they add to incomes so
they must have some influence on price increases.
Answer: They most certainly do. Actually these things are all interrelated, which is one reason why we talk about the "inflationary
spiral". Such a spiral once under way is difficult to stop. In a
period of heavy demand and rising prices, increases in prices and
wages reinforce each other. Only those who receive fixed incomes
can claim that they do not contribute to the spiral.
Question: Governor, there is another question I would like to ask you ir.
this connection—has the banking system contributed to the rise in
prices by expanding loans?
Answer: Earlier I mentioned that during the war the banks loaned a great
deal of money to the Government, which the Government spent for war
purposes, and this resulted in an increase in the purchasing power
people held. In the last two years the Government has raised more
in taxes than it has spent and with the surplus has paid back some
of these loans, which has tended to reduce the supply of money. But
bank loans to private business and to consumers have expanded
sharply since the war, tending to increase spending.
Question:

Have bank loans continued to rise this year?

Answer: Loans for commercial and industrial purposes have not risen
since the beginning of the year, partly because of seasonal influences and partly because of substitution of other means of financing. Also, banks have shown some restraint in making loans. Loans
on real estate have continued to rise rapidly, despite some restrictive policies; and so also have consumer loans.
Question: Do you regard increases in loans as a cause or a result of
rising prices?
Answer: Extension of credit since the war has in some degree made possible more production, but borrowed funds have also been used to
compete for a limited supply of goods, thereby adding to the pressure on prices. Higher prices in turn have required larger loans to
finance a given physical volume of business.
Question: How about loans to foreign countries?
able and helped push up prices?
Answer:

Haven't they been size-

Yes, Federal loans and grants to foreign countries have been

12U

large and they have contributed to increases in prices of domestic
commodities, but it is a cost that we have willingly assumed in
order to assist in relief and recovery abroad. Even without United
States assistance, however, foreign demands would have been very
large relative to prewar because of wartime shortages of goods and
accumulations of gold and dollar balances.
Question: You have been discussing so far the influence on prices of
various demands for goods, How, would you tell us something about
supplies? how large has production been?
Answer: Total physical production of goods and services has been about
two-thirds higher this year than in the 1935-39 period; output of
manufactured goods has been double the prewar average. Of course,
that period was cuite a while ago and since then the population has
increased by 11 per cent. Also, there were many unemployed in the
1935-39 period. Even so, the present production level is very hitfipractically at peacetime capacity with present equipment.
Question: You are emphasizing then that in spite of a very large volume
of output since the end of the war the pressure for price increases
has been very great.
Answer: Yes, and this pressure was particularly evident in the latter
part of 194.6 when practically all price controls except those over
rents were removed. This action was taken partly with the hope
that production could thereby be increased. Since then, in the
past year and a half, production has increased, but by only a
moderate 'amount because of capacity limitations, and prices have .,
advanced further.
Question: Has the high level of production since the war eased the
shortages of goods prevailing then?
Answer: Yes, quite a little. Merchants and manufacturers have been
able to substantially increase their stocks of goods. Acre-though not enough—housing accommodations have become available.
Consumers hove satisfied some of their more urgent deferred
demands for goods not available in wartime. In some lines, as
in the shoe industry, supplies have exceeded demand and output has
been curtailed.
Question: Have there been any periods when supplies of goods generally
seemed to be catching up with or exceeding demand?
Answer: Such appeared to be the case for a time in the second quarter
of 1947 when hesitation was noticeable in a number ox markets,
even reducing production in a number of lines for a short time;
but a new wave of buying and price rises occurred in the summer ana
autumn, stimulated partly by short feed grain crops and new plans
for aid to Europe, and production later reached new peak levels.
Question:

How about the situation since then?

125

Answer: Early this year there again was some hesitation in buying, as
grain prices declined sharply on prospects of excellent crops in
this country and abroad, but demand has since increased again owing
in part to the actual and anticipated effects of a reduction in
taxes, increased foreign aid, and the expanded armament program.
Generally, production has been close to capacity levels and supplies of some important products, such as steel, have continued to
fall short of demands. Upward pressures on prices and wages have
been strong.
Question: Can it be expected that prices, wages and profits, and the
volume of bank credit will go on expanding indefinitely?
Answer: That is a very basic question. The answer which economists
read from the pages of history is that booms come to an end, with
serious consequences for production, employment, financial assets,
and economic well being generally. The bigger the boom the more
likely it is that the bust will be disastrous. That is why efforts
should be made to check a boom and prevent the distortions in
prices, production, profits, and the like which lead to severe
reaction.