View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FLEXIBILITY, INTEGRITY, AND CHOICE

An Address Before the
Georgia Foundation for Independent Colleges
Annual Meeting
Hyatt Regency Atlanta
February 3, 1975

by

Monroe Kimbrel, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

FLEXIBILITY, INTEGRITY, AND CHOICE*

An Address Before the

Georgia Foundation for Independent Colleges
Annual Meeting
Hyatt Regency Atlanta
February 3, 1975

by

Monroe Kimbrel, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Thank you for the privilege of being with you tonight as we
review our progress of the past, discuss our plans for the future,
and prepare to pursue that essential ingredient for making our
plans come true— money.

Money is my business, in a way.

I suppose

that must be one of the reasons Joe Treadway extended me this
invitation to address you tonight.
I am especially gratified to join my previous associate from
the Federal Reserve, Mr. Denmark over here.

As our Treasurer, he

is the fellow who is going to keep track of the money in this fund­
raising effort.

I expect that he will be more successful in keeping

track of this money than we have been at the Federal Reserve in
keeping track of ours.

^Prepared for Mr. Kimbrel's use by William N. Cox, Assistant Vice
President and Chief Financial Economist



- 2 -

My own perceptions of the peculiar advantages the independent
liberal arts colleges offer come from two distinct perspectives.

As

an alumnus of the state University in Athens, first of all, I am
naturally inclined to compare the educational contributions of the
large public university with the smaller independent college.

In

my responsibilities at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, secondly,
I am privileged to have a view of and concern for our economy and
our financial system.
From each of these perspectives, I have come to place an ex­
tremely high value on the contribution the small liberal arts college
can make.

These colleges have characteristics and traditions which

are essential to the mix of our system of higher education.

In

several respects they are advantageously placed to develop some
essential qualities in their students.

These qualities, I think,

will be very much needed during the years ahead.
I would summarize these qualities in the words "flexibility,
integrity, and choice;" I would like to share with you tonight the
reasons why I think these qualities will be so important and, there­
fore, why our support of these colleges will bring important dividends
in the persons of the men and women they develop.
First:

flexibility.

When I look behind the headlines at the

undercurrents in our economy, one of the few constants I see is...
change.

Let me pursue a current example of what I mean.

The two

dollar devaluations and the increases in energy prices, prompted by
increases in the price of imported petroleum, have triggered important




- 3 -

underlying changes in our economy.

Families in the United States,

reacting to changes in prices, are changing the mix of what they
buy.
One of the fundamental results of the devaluations has been to
break down some of the barriers between world markets for food and
our own domestic markets.

One result of that has been to increase

the proportion of its income the American family spends for food.
Some of this is apparently temporary, I am happy to tell you, but
some of it is here to stay.
To take another example, it looks very much as if the American
household is going to spend a smaller number of cents per budget
dollar than it used to on the automobile.

Again, we probably have

an overreaction right now in the market for automobiles, but it does
seem apparent that higher energy prices, perhaps along with fears
of scarcity, have shifted the budget preferences of the average
American family.

I could cite other examples, tying them to some

of the headlines you and I have been reading.

But the point I want

to emphasize is not the examples themselves.

It is the result that

the American consumer has been making substantial changes in the
way he allocates his family budget.
things; less of others.

He is buying more of some

So, incidentally, are the foreign consumers

of our export products.
Such significant changes in the mix of what people want to buy
are obviously causing changes in the mixture of what our economy




- 4 -

produces.

We are now in a process— a painful process, in some

cases— of shifting people and machines away from the production
of some products and services, shifting them toward the production
of other products and services people want more of.

This shifting

goes a long way, in my opinion, toward explaining some of the riddles
in our present economic situation:

unemployment in the midst of

inflation, layoffs in some industries side-by-side with other in­
dustries working around the clock.
We don’t know, very frankly, what the end mixture will be once
our economy, and the consumers and producers in it, works its way
through this process of adjustment.

A lot of us wish we did know,

believe me, and a lot of us are trying to make some educated guesses.
But one of the characteristics of a free-market system is that it
works out its own answers.

They are generally good ones.

Painful as the present period of adjustments may be, it is at
the same time reassuring evidence of the adaptive vitality of our
economy.

Our producers and consumers are proceeding rapidly in

making these adjustments.

This, incidentally, is one of the reasons

why I am personally so opposed to policies, such as price controls,
which tend to impede the adjustment process.

We need to facilitate

the adjustments our consumers and producers are making, not impede
them.
What does all this have to do with the small private college?
A great deal, in my opinion.

Similar episodes of change and adjust­

ment will, I think, characterize the period within which today’s




- 5 -

college students and their successors pursue their careers.

I

do not think that future episodes of change and adjustment will
be as painful as the one we are now going through, however.

The

reason is that we are putting a premium on vocational flexibility
in our economy.

That flexibility will help make future adjust­

ments easier and less painful.

In our new environment, the more

flexible a person is, the more flexible he can be in his career
directions and in his approach to the job market.

And I hardly

need tell you that the development of this flexible approach to
the problems and situations life brings, is one of the traditional
hallmarks of the small liberal arts college.

Maybe the pendulum

is swinging back from specialized to generalized college training.
We are swinging away from the emphasis of the Sixties on narrower
vocational training to the more flexible generalist.

This will

continue, I think, as we perceive the dangers of training specialists
for jobs which aren't there.

The traditional advantage of the

small liberal arts school is in the development of the generalist,
grounded deep enough in the basics to survive the shifting winds
of our economy's vocational demands.
There is some irony here tonight.

These painful adjustments

I was speaking of, the ones our economy is working through right
now, are going to make our fund-raising job this year a lot harder.
We all know this.

Our economic situation will challenge our efforts

at the same time as they point up the need we have to make them.
Our fund-raising challenge will be harder this year for the same




6

reasons that meeting our challenge successfully will be more im­
portant.
So, to summarize my first point, I think the economic environ­
ment in the years ahead will place a premium on the quality of flexi­
bility, and I think the smaller liberal arts schools can bring some
peculiar advantages to the task of developing people to meet these
more complicated needs.
Second, let me focus on the attribute of integrity.

I would

not start pessimistically with a recounting of some of the disappoint­
ing revelations which have come out of Washington these past ten
years.

I would rather concentrate on what I sense to be a strong

constructive reaction to these events.

From now on, America’s

public and private figures alike will be held to more exacting
standards of integrity.
This reaction would not have occurred, I recognize, without the
steady increase in the portion of our public which is well-educated
and well-informed, and our entire educational establishment, small
independent colleges included, can take a well-justified bow here.
Where does integrity come from?
we can bottle up and sell.

It's obviously not something

If there is a way to nurture it as

part of our educational process, it would seem to be in an environ^
ment where the subjects we loosely call "liberal arts" are actively
discussed in smaller groups in and out of the classroom, where
students are encouraged to expand and argue their thinking about




- 7 -

values, and where professors help students focus our society’s
experience on today’s problems.

Our smaller colleges are more

likely to produce this kind of environment.
on this subject.

I have another thought

Before a man can have integrity, he has to be

convinced that his ideas and actions matter.

We are all more

tempted, on the other hand, if we can rationalize our trans­
gressions on the theory that "it won’t hurt anyone."

Here, too,

I think the smaller college is, with smaller size and more personal
interaction, more likely to build a consciousness of how our de­
cisions and actions affect other people.
For these reasons, I think the smaller independent colleges,
with its traditionally smaller classes, closer faculty contact
with students, and emphasis on individual values, are peculiarly
placed to develop the kind of person who can meet higher standards
of integrity.

We are sure to demand them in the years to come.

I do not mean to say, incidentally, that the larger state
universities do a poor job in this area, but I think I do detect
some advantage to the smaller school.

The smaller school is more

likely to produce the iconoclast who bucks the crowd and says
"Now wait a minute, this isn’t right."

We shall have great need

of men like this.
Finally, let me point to the element of choice.

Choice is

important to anyone who deals with the economy and the financial
markets.

It is important in higher education, too.

Every college

student is different, and I would attach heavy value to the often
mentioned point that the smaller college can do a better job of




- 8 -

developing the potential in some students, even while the larger
university can do a better job with others.
Enthusiastic an alumnus of the University as I am, I am quick
to concede that the University of Georgia is not the best place for
everyone.

In my unguarded moments, I would even be willing to con­

cede that, with some students, maybe even Georgia Tech could do a
better job.
schools.

I feel the same way about the smaller independent

I feel very strongly that the college student must have

a choice— a selection of institutions— available to him for develop­
ing his own potential.
So from my perspective, I would focus on the advantages the
small independent liberal arts colleges offer for the development
of flexibility, integrity, and choice.

As I have tried to illustrate,

I think our society and our economy in the years ahead will attach
a great premium to these three qualities.
I think it is essential that the small colleges protect and
expand their peculiar abilities to develop these qualities in our
students.

We have a chance to make our efforts matter in raising

funds to support them.

It may be hard this year.

The people we

contact will be watching every dollar, trying to be sure it goes
to a place that counts.
The funds we raise will count, in dividends to our economy and
our society.

I challenge you, as I challenge myself, to convey the

importance of our effort, to unlock the purse strings, and to give
these colleges the chance to make their contribution.