View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE CHANGING FINANCIAL INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND REGULATION: BRIDGING STATES, COUNTRIES, AND INDUSTRIES 36TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON BANK STRUCTURE AND COMPETITION Chicago, Illinois May 4, 2000  .....................................................................  Welcoming Remarks I’d like to welcome you to the 36th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition. Once again, we have an outstanding tur nout. And I’m not surprised. This year’s topic, the Changing Financial Industr y Structure and Regulation, is of interest to ever yone in the industr y, affecting institutions of all sizes. This, of course, is an especially dynamic time for the financial ser v ices industr y. Many of the traditional barriers — both geographic and product — have been dismantled and the old distinctions have become increasingly blurred. Back in the ‘50s and ‘60s, banking could be compared to a work of art rooted in realistic images — a Nor man Rockwell painting with sharply defined and clear subject matter. Today, banking is closer to a moder n abstract piece: challenging — often provocative — with fewer easily recognized images and less traditional orderliness. This year’s conference theme retur ns us to the original purpose of the conference: the analysis of financial industr y structure and competition. Our first Bank Structure Conference in 1963 was held to discuss recent developments within the banking industr y. In particular, that first conference focused on the passage of the Bank Merger Act of 1960 — which required regulators to consider competitive factors when evaluating mergers — and a Justice Department suit to stop a merger by the Philadelphia National Bank, a suit that is now recognized as a pivotal case in U.S. banking histor y. Although the origins of the conference are linked to competitive issues, we’ve covered the gamut since then. For example, we examined the costs, benefits and risks of deregulation in the 1970s, moral hazard and deposit insurance in the 1980s, and global financial crises in the 1990s. Today, the Bank Structure Conference is generally acknowledged to be the nation’s leading forum for discussing public-policy issues facing the financial industr y. The changing nature of the financial ser v ices  Michael Moskow Speeches  2000  297  industr y has been an increasingly important topic over the past decade, and I have no doubt it will continue to be in years to come. As you well know, the recent elimination of geographic barriers has triggered a significant increase in the number and size of bank mergers, both in the U.S. and abroad. We’re also seeing cross-industr y mergers and affiliations — a convergence of commercial banks, investment banks and insurance fir ms into moder n financial ser v ice prov iders. With the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, this trend is expected to increase. One quick example that illustrates the blurring of these traditional distinctions can be found in a recent article in the American Banker. The article quoted Amazon.com’s Director of Global Payments — not a common job title in a company that just a few short years ago did nothing but sell books. Over the next few days we will consider how the many changes in the financial ser v ices industr y are affecting all of us — as industr y participants, regulators, obser vers and consumers. Among the key questions that we’ll be discussing are: •  What opportunities and challenges do these changes present for financial ser v ices prov iders?  •  What is driv ing the merger trend?  •  What are the implications for current antitrust methodologies and for industr y competition?  •  Are there significant efficiency gains from universal banking or one-stop shopping?  •  What impact might Inter net banking have on industr y structure and competition, or on market definitions and related regulator y issues such as CRA?  •  With all these changes, has the role of small banks been enhanced or diminished?  The answers to these questions will have an enor mous impact on the future of the financial ser v ices industr y. To launch these discussions, I’d now like to introduce our keynote speaker, Alan Greenspan. Alan’s outstanding reputation and extraordinar y talents are well known to ever yone in this audience. It’s widely acknowledged that Alan has done a superb job in carr ying out the ver y complex responsibilities of Federal Reser ve Chair man. So much so that Alan’s reputation for excellence has spread to the popular culture — not a typical occurrence for a central banker. Earlier this year the A&E T V network bestowed its “Biography of the Year” title on Alan. Both Jay Leno and Dav id Letter man have consistently worked Alan’s name into their monologues. On a local note, Barron’s reported that a Chicago restaurant boasted in its ads that “Alan Greenspan dined here.” Alan was even called the “Babe Ruth of our economic policy” during a recent public appearance, but I think you can make a case for another sports hero who ear ned his reputation right here in Chicago — Michael Jordan. Both Alan and Michael have superb leadership ability but are also great team players; both head up organizations based in Washington — although I would say that the Fed has a had much better record of success than the Washington Wizards have had in recent years. Both are willing to do the less  298  Michael Moskow Speeches  2000  glamorous work that’s necessar y for success — Michael played tough defense on the court; Alan studies dr y statistics in his bathtub; and both Alan and Michael have an unparalleled ability to rise to the occasion in times of crisis. However, one significant difference between the two is that Michael Jordan, at 6’6”, can dunk a basketball. And though I’ve never asked him, I seriously doubt that Chair man Greenspan can. Height differences aside, though, Alan is to central banking what Michael is to basketball — the ver y best at what he does. I was poking fun at that Chicago restaurant for boasting that “Alan Greenspan dined here,” but I have to admit that all of us here at the Chicago Fed take great pride in the fact that Alan has spoken here at the Bank Structure Conference—and has done so for the past decade. His perceptive remarks have always been the highlight of the conference. We greatly appreciate his willingness to join us once again. Please join me in welcoming Alan Greenspan.  Michael Moskow Speeches  2000  299