View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Tl<)/; i'U/le^ or-J**r j

uuJ

h:> l/z/o-

/*>- /^ <L

Tt f S

FEDERAL BUDGET TRENDS AND A
FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING
DEFICITS AND DEBT
Jerry L. Jordan, President
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
May 17,1993

SECTION 1

FEDERAL BUDGET TRENDS:
1969-PRESENT

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1969
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest

19.5
8.9
4.2
5.3
1.1

Revenues

19.9

Deficit

-0.4

Primary deficit

-1.2

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1969
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest

1979

19.5

20.3

8.9

4.8

4.2

5.1

5.3

9.1

1.1

1.4

Revenues

19.9

18.7

Deficit

"0.4

1.6

Primary deficit

-1.2

0.5

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1969
Expenditures
Defense

1979

19.5

1981

20.3

22.4

8.9

4.8

5.3

N-def,disc.

4.2

5.1

5.1

Transfers

5.3

9.1

10.2

1.1

1.4

i

Net interest

8

Revenues

19.9

18.7

19.8

Deficit

"0-4

1.6

2.6

Primary deficit

-1.2

0.5

1.1

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1981
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest
Revenues

1986

22.4

23.0

5.3

6.5

5.1

3.9

10.2

9.8

1 .8

2.7
19.8

17.8

Deficit

2-6

5.2

Primary deficit

1.1

3.0

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1981
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest
Revenues

1986

22.4

1989

23.0

21.7

5.3

6.5

5.9

5.1

3.9

3.6

10.2

9.8

9.4

1.8

2.7

2.9

19.8

17.8

18.8

Deficit

2.6

5.2

2.9

Primary deficit

1.1

3.0

0.6

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1986
Expenditures
Defense

1989

23.0

1992

21.7

23.1

6.5

5.9

5.1

N-def, disc.

3.9

3.6

4.0

Transfers

9.8

9.4

11.0

Net interest 2.7

2.9

3.1

Revenues

17.3

18.8

18.2

Deficit

5.2

2.9

4.9

Primary deficit

3.0

0.6

2.5

The Composition of Federal Outlays, 1969-1992
% Of GDP
25

20

15

10

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
Bush/Baseline Administration

1992
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest
Revenues

1998

23.1

1998

21.9

22.4

5.1

3.5

3.2

4.0

3.0

4.0

11.0

11.9

11.9

3.1

3.5

3.3

13.2

18.1

19.5

Deficit

4.9

3.8

2.9

Primary deficit

2.5

1.0

0.2

SECTION 2

A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING
DEFICITS AND DEBT

EXAMPLE 1
GDP

Debt

Debt/GDP

(Billionsof $)

Year 1
Increase
Year 2

$6,000

$6,000

10%

10%

$6,600

$6,600

1.0

1.0

EXAMPLE 2
GDP

Debt

Debt/GDP

(Billions of $)

Year 1
Increase
Year 2

$6,000

$6,000

10%

8%

Interest rate

2%

Primary deficit/debt

$6,600

$6,600

1.0

1.0

EXAMPLE 3
GDP

Debt

Debt/GDP

(Billions of $)

Year 1
Increase
Year 2

$6,000

$4,000

6%

4%

Interest rate

4%

Primary deficit/debt

$6,360

$4,320

0.67

0.68

APPENDIX
ARE ASSERTIONS ABOUT
NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY IN THE
SHORT-RUN VALID?

Component Rates of Growth for Total Federal Debt
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Year

Effective
Net
Interest

Primary
Deficit/Debt

Growth of
Debt
(1)+(2)

Growth
of GDP

1983

5.6%

10.2%

15.8%

8.1%

1990

4.1

1.7

5.8

5.2

1992

3.4

4.8

8.2

6.0

Federal Budget as a % of GDP
1992
Expenditures
Defense
N-def, disc.
Transfers
Net interest
Revenues

Grace Comm.

Bush/Baseline

1995

1995

23.129.5
5.1

4.0

4.0

3.7

11 .o

11.3

3.1

33
18.2

Deficit

4.9

Primary deficit

2.5

22.3

18.6

18.4

10.9

3.9

1.2

Grace Commission Projections
Trillions of $

Projections Using Current Growth Rates
Trillions of $

Current and Projected Component
Rates of Growth For Total Federal Debt
(1)
Year

Effective
Net
Interest

1992
1998
(Bush/baseline)

(2)
Primary
Deficit/Debt

(3)
Growth of
Debt

(4)

(1)+(2)

Growth
of GDP

3.4%

4.8%

8.2%

6.0%

4.1

1.2

5.3

5.9

0.3

3.7

5.5

1998
3.4
(Administration)

Long-term Policy Concerns
Eligibility for entitlements due to demographics
* Social Security
• Medicare and Medicaid
Declining saving and investment
Temptation to reinflate

Is It Adequate to Focus on Deficits and the
National Debt?
Deficits and debt levels are too aggregative and only
partially reflect the stance of fiscal policy.
Need to evaluate the allocative and incentive effects of
policies on a case-by-case basis:
* Social Security versus worker retraining programs.
• Medicare outlays versus AFDC payments.
* Investment tax credits versus educational grants.
• Income tax hikes versus spending reductions.
Marginal changes would have real economic
consequences, but may not be reflected in deficits.