View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The U.S. Economy Three
Months into 2018
James Bullard
President and CEO

Arkansas Bankers Association & Arkansas State Bank
Department’s Day with the Commissioner
April 4, 2018
Little Rock, Ark.
Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Federal Open Market Committee.
1

Introduction

2

Key themes in this talk
•
•
•
•
•

Global real GDP growth surprised to the upside during
2017, driving U.S. equity markets higher.
The growth rate of U.S. real GDP looks uncertain in the
first quarter of 2018, possibly due to seasonal effects.
Inflation remains low, but inflation expectations have
generally moved more in line with the 2 percent inflation
target of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).
Yield curve inversion remains a possibility later this year.
Monetary policy is close to neutral today.

3

The 2017 Economic Growth Surprise

4

The effects of the 2017 global surprise have
stalled
•
•
•

The U.S. was joined by other large economies in achieving
better-than-expected growth in 2017.
This fed into the profits of U.S. multinationals, which helped
U.S. equity prices rally in 2017.
The effects from this surprise have stalled so far in 2018:
o U.S. real GDP growth looks uncertain in the first quarter.
o Markets are trying to discern the direction of U.S. trade policy.
o U.S. interest rates are higher.
o Markets are contemplating possible tech sector regulation.

5

The 2017 U.S. economic growth surprise

Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis and Federal Reserve Board. Last observation: 2017-Q4.

6

The 2017 global growth surprise
Country

IMF Projection for 2017
2017
Growth surprise
as of October 2016
Q4-on-Q4 (percentage points)

United States

2.2%

2.6%

+0.4

Euro area

1.5%

2.7%

+1.2

United Kingdom

1.1%

1.4%

+0.3

Japan

0.6%

2.1%

+1.5

China

6.2%

6.8%

+0.6

Sources: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, October 2016; Bureau of Economic Analysis; Eurostat;
Economic and Social Research Institute (Government of Japan); National Bureau of Statistics of China and author’s
calculations.

7

Equity valuations rally on global growth

Sources: Bloomberg and author’s calculations. Last observation: Apr. 2, 2018.

8

Tracking estimates for 2018-Q1 U.S.
real GDP growth

*

Source

Date

Estimate*

Blue Chip Consensus

Mar. 10

2.5%

St. Louis Fed Economic News Index

Mar. 30

3.6%

FRBNY Staff Nowcast

Mar. 30

2.7%

Macroeconomic Advisers

Apr. 2

1.7%

CNBC Moody’s Consensus (median)

Apr. 2

2.1%

Atlanta Fed GDPNow

Apr. 2

2.8%

percent change from the previous quarter, annualized

9

Residual seasonality?

Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis and author’s calculations. Last observation: 2017-Q2.

10

Inflation Remains Low

11

U.S. inflation has been mostly below
target since 2012

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Last observation: February 2018.

12

Trimmed-mean PCE inflation lower
than expected in 2017

Sources: FRB of Dallas and author’s calculations. Last observation: February 2018.

13

The outlook for inflation
•
•
•

The low readings on inflation during 2017 occurred against
a backdrop of relatively good labor market performance
and a still historically low policy rate.
This is why the inflation performance was particularly
surprising.
Special factors are expected to drop out of the year-overyear comparisons soon, likely suggesting that inflation is
somewhat closer to target.

14

Cell phone charges’ effect on the CPI

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and author’s calculations. Last observation: February 2018.

15

Inflation expectations have increased
but remain a bit low
•
•
•
•

According to modern theory, a variable that may give a
signal of future inflation is inflation expectations.
Market-based measures of inflation compensation have
moved higher recently.
The measures today are closer to being in line with the
FOMC’s 2 percent inflation target, but remain a bit low.
The market-based measures are for CPI inflation, and so we
adjust them downward somewhat to roughly translate into
PCE inflation.
o Historically, PCE inflation has run somewhat lower than CPI

inflation.

16

Inflation expectations remain a bit low

Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author’s calculations. Last observations: April 2 (breakeven inflation rates) and
March 23, 2018.
17

The Yield Curve

18

The slope of the yield curve
•

The U.S. nominal yield curve has been flattening since
2014.
o The spread between 10-year and one-year Treasury yields

•
•

was close to 300 basis points at the beginning of 2014.
o That same spread is currently (week of March 28) only 70
basis points.

The flattening is due to rising short-term rates vis-à-vis
relatively stable long-term rates.
It is possible that the nominal yield curve will invert
sometime in the next year, but recently the 10-year yield
has increased enough to keep pace with the FOMC’s rate
increases.
19

Nominal yield curve flattening

Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author’s calculations. Last observation: Week of Mar. 28, 2018.

20

Flattening due to rising short-term
rates

Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author’s calculations. Last observation: Week of March 28, 2018.

21

Monetary Policy

22

The monetary policy stance
•

•
•
•

The FOMC has begun to reduce the size of the Fed’s
balance sheet, gradually reversing the quantitative easing
programs that characterized U.S. monetary policy while the
policy rate was near zero.
The policy rate range has been increased gradually and now
stands at 1.50 to 1.75 percent.
Current estimates of the neutral real rate, commonly called
r*, are near zero.
With core PCE inflation at 1.6 percent, the current policy
rate setting minus PCE inflation is near r*, suggesting the
current policy setting is closer to neutral than in previous
years.
23

Monetary policy closer to neutral

Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Bureau of Economic Analysis, FRB of San Francisco and author’s calculations. Last
observation: 2017-Q4.
24

The consequences of a neutral policy
•
•
•

The neutral setting of the policy rate is a value that puts
neither upward nor downward pressure on inflation, given
everything else that is occurring in the economy.
This is appropriate for the current situation, in which
inflation is not far below target and is expected to rise.
It is not necessary in this circumstance to raise the policy
rate further in order to put downward pressure on inflation,
since inflation is already below target.

25

Conclusion

26

Conclusion
•
•
•
•
•

The global growth surprise drove global financial market
developments during 2017.
The effects of the surprise seem to have abated during the
first months of 2018 in the face of uncertain first-quarter
U.S. real GDP growth along with other factors.
Inflation remains low but is expected to move somewhat
higher during 2018.
Yield curve inversion later this year remains a possibility.
Current monetary policy settings are close to neutral, which
is appropriate for the current macroeconomic situation.

27

Connect With Us
James Bullard
stlouisfed.org/from-the-president
STLOUISFED.ORG

Federal Reserve
Economic Data
(FRED)
Thousands of data
series, millions of users

SOCIAL MEDIA

Blogs and
Publications
News and views
about the economy
and the Fed

Economic
Education
Resources
For every stage
of life

Community
Development
Promoting financial
stability of families,
neighborhoods

ECONOMY MUSEUM

28