The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Search Site Home > Newsroom > St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses Time Consistency and Recent Fed Policy 3/24/2016 NEW YORK – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard discussed “Time Consistency and Fed Policy” in a presentation Thursday to the New York Association for Business Economics. Bullard addressed the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) decision to leave the policy rate unchanged at its March meeting and the importance of whether this action could be viewed as “time inconsistent” in macroeconomics literature terms. Each quarter, the FOMC releases an updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), which outlines economic projections for key macroeconomic variables (real GDP growth, unemployment, headline and core in ation), as well as a projected path for the appropriate policy rate. He noted that the December 2015 SEP suggested four policy rate increases of 25 basis points each during 2016. “The state of the U.S. economy as of the March 2016 FOMC meeting was arguably consistent with December 2015 SEP projections. Yet, the Committee did not increase the policy rate at the March meeting,” Bullard said. “This state of affairs might be viewed as ‘time inconsistent’ in the macroeconomics literature. Financial markets may have trouble interpreting Fed behavior in the future if this is the case.” He further noted that expectations are important in macroeconomics. “Not following through on a proposed action can damage a policymaker's credibility,” he said. Comparison of December and March In evaluating whether the December-March episode was an example of timeinconsistent policymaking, Bullard compared the state of the economy as of the December FOMC meeting to the state of the economy as of the March FOMC meeting. In addition to looking at the variables that contribute to the SEP, he included three other variables that may in uence FOMC decision-making above and beyond expected developments of the real economy and in ation. He examined the St. Louis Fed Financial Stress Index, a U.S. nancial conditions index; a global real GDP growth outlook, from the International Monetary Fund’s World Economic Outlook; and TIPSbased measures of in ation expectations. After discussing how each variable changed between the December and March FOMC meetings, Bullard summarized the changes in the following “scorecard”: The outlook for U.S. and global growth was downgraded somewhat. For media inquiries contact: Laura Girresch mediainquiries@stls.frb.org O ce: (314) 444-6166 Cell: (314) 348-3639 James Bullard St. Louis Fed President and CEO James Bullard is president and chief executive o cer of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. In these roles, he participates in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and directs the activities of the Federal Reserve’s Eighth District. President's Website Speeches & Presentations Video Appearances Media Interviews Research Papers The outlook for the U.S. labor market was upgraded somewhat. The outlook for all other variables was about the same as of the December FOMC meeting. “Certainly a case could be made that as of March, the economy had progressed about as had been expected in December,” Bullard said. “Therefore, the Committee might have been expected to follow through with its December policy rate projection at the March meeting.” However, he noted, this would have relied on a view that the labor market upgrade essentially offset the global and U.S. growth downgrade. “As it turns out, the decision to pause seems to have put more weight on the global and U.S. growth downgrade,” he said. Bullard concluded that the FOMC did not have to raise the policy rate in March to remain time-consistent. “On balance, I think it is reasonable to interpret the Committee as remaining time-consistent at the March meeting,” he said. Bullard noted that some key, although minor, changes to the SEP projections were enough to justify a somewhat different policy stance than would otherwise have been warranted. “The difference in macroeconomic outcomes between moving at one meeting versus another is currently small,” he added. “The relatively minor downgrades contained in the March SEP suggest that the next rate increase may not be far off provided that the economy evolves as expected,” Bullard said. GENERAL Home About Us Bank Supervision Careers Community Development Economic Education Events Inside the Economy Museum Newsroom On the Economy Blog Open Vault Blog OUR DISTRICT Little Rock Branch Louisville Branch Memphis Branch Agricultural Finance Monitor Housing Market Conditions SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Bridges Economic Synopses Housing Market Perspectives In the Balance Page One Economics The Quarterly Debt Monitor Review Regional Economist ST. LOUIS FED PRESIDENT James Bullard's Website INITIATIVES Center for Household Financial Stability Dialogue with the Fed Federal Banking Regulations FOMC Speak In Plain English - Making Sense of the Federal Reserve Timely Topics Podcasts and Videos DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES CASSIDI® FRASER® FRED® FRED® Blog GeoFRED® IDEAS FOLLOW THE FED Twitter Facebook YouTube Google Plus Email Subscriptions RSS CONTACT US | LEGAL INFORMATION | PRIVACY NOTICE & POLICY | FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ONLINE