View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Home > Newsroom

St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses Recent
Developments in U.S. Monetary Policy
September 23, 2019
EFFINGHAM, Ill. – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard presented
“Recent Developments in U.S. Monetary Policy” to the Ef�ngham County Chamber of
Commerce on Monday.
Bullard noted that the U.S. economy is slowing down relative to 2017 and 2018. He added
that the economy faces downside risk that may cause the slowdown to be sharper than
expected. “A sharper-than-expected slowdown may make it more dif�cult for the Federal
Open Market Committee (FOMC) to achieve its 2% in�ation target,” he said.
He pointed out that the FOMC has tried to help insure against this downside risk by
dramatically altering the path of monetary policy during 2019. “The FOMC may choose to
provide additional accommodation going forward, but decisions will be made on a meetingby-meeting basis,” he said.

A Slowing Economy and Downside Risks to Growth
Bullard pointed out that the U.S. economy grew at a 2.5% pace during 2018, but growth for
2019 has long been expected to be slower as the economy returns to its potential growth
rate. “The key risk is that this slowing may be sharper than anticipated,” he said.
“It is possible that a sharper-than-expected slowdown could materialize in the quarters
ahead,” Bullard added. He then discussed the downside risks, which he noted are possibly
interrelated. These downside risks include the effects of magni�ed global trade policy
uncertainty; slowing growth in the global economy; contraction in global and U.S.
manufacturing; slowing U.S. business investment; and an inverted yield curve, “which
seems to suggest U.S. monetary policy may be too restrictive for the current environment,”
he said.
On the issue of trade policy uncertainty, Bullard said, “U.S. monetary policy cannot
reasonably react to the day-to-day give-and-take of trade negotiations.” He added that he
thinks of trade policy uncertainty as being high in the current environment and as

something that is already factored into his monetary policy calculus. “I do not expect this
uncertainty to dissipate in the quarters and years ahead,” he said.
“Trade policy uncertainty creates a disincentive for global investment. Accordingly, the
global growth environment looks weaker in recent quarters,” he said, adding, “Slower global
growth may feed back into slower growth in the U.S.”
Regarding the yield curve, Bullard explained that an inversion of the yield curve has tended
to predict the onset of recession in the U.S. during the postwar era. Some portions of the
Treasury yield curve are inverted today, he said, noting that the 10-year yield is below the
effective federal funds rate. “However, the 10-year yield is currently above the two-year
yield, likely because markets are anticipating future policy moves by the FOMC, and so we
are not seeing an intensi�cation of the yield curve inversion so far,” he said.

Muted In�ation
In a discussion of muted in�ation pressures, Bullard noted that both in�ation and in�ation
expectations are below the FOMC’s 2% in�ation target. “This is occurring despite more than
two years of upside surprise on the real growth rate of the U.S. economy,” he said.
“Insurance rate cuts may help re-center in�ation and in�ation expectations at the 2% target
sooner than otherwise,” he added.

A Turnaround in U.S. Monetary Policy
Regarding U.S. monetary policy, Bullard noted that the FOMC has been cognizant of the
developing downside risks. During the �rst half of 2019, he explained, the FOMC began to
project fewer increases in the policy rate and also laid out a plan to cease the runoff of the
Fed’s balance sheet. He added that, on June 19, the FOMC did not change the policy rate but
strongly suggested that a future downward adjustment in the rate could be warranted. The
FOMC reduced the policy rate at its July 30-31 meeting and again at its Sept. 17-18 meeting.
Bullard said that the effect of this turnaround in U.S. monetary policy has been much larger
than simply the two latest reductions in the policy rate because the expectation as of late
last year was that the FOMC would actually raise rates further in 2019.
He pointed out that the two-year Treasury yield declined by 129 basis points from Nov. 8 to
Sept. 20. “This is a very large change over this time frame,” he said, noting the outlook for
shorter-term interest rates dropped because of FOMC actions. “Furthermore, these policy
actions fed through to longer-term yields, which are more important for investment
decisions,” Bullard said.
“The bottom line is that U.S. monetary policy is considerably more accommodative today

than it was as of late last year,” he said.

Conclusion
The FOMC continues to face a slowing economy with some downside risk due to ongoing
global trade regime uncertainty, Bullard said. He added that in�ation and in�ation
expectations continue to fall short of the FOMC’s 2% target.
“However, FOMC actions have also changed the outlook for shorter-term interest rates
considerably over the last 10 months, ultimately providing more accommodation to the
economy,” Bullard said.