The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Search Site Home > Newsroom > St. Louis Fed's Bullard Discusses In ation Targets, the Dual Mandate, Hawks, Doves and Bubbles 4/16/2012 LOGAN, Utah – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard delivered remarks titled “Hawks, Doves, Bubbles and In ation Targets” on Monday during the 2012 George S. Eccles Distinguished Lecture at Utah State University’s Jon M. Huntsman School of Business. Bullard discussed the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC’s) decision at the January 2012 meeting to name an explicit, numerical in ation target of 2 percent. While some discussion has suggested that in ation targeting is inconsistent with the Fed’s dual mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices, Bullard said that “in ation targeting is perfectly consistent with the Fed’s dual mandate.” He added that “much of the discussion about the dual mandate is, in my view, really about the nature of the Fed’s reaction function to economic events,” which is separate from setting an in ation target. In addition, “in ation targeting is consistent with hawks, doves and even bubbles,” he said. In ation Targeting Bullard noted that with this move at the January 2012 FOMC meeting, the Fed joins many other central banks around the world in adopting an in ation target. The European Central Bank, for example, has an in ation target along with a single mandate to promote stable prices, which is in contrast with the Fed’s dual mandate. However, Bullard said, “in practice, monetary policy is viewed in the same way in Europe as it is in the U.S., despite the differing mandates.” Bullard said that historically, central banks did not say explicitly what rate of in ation they were trying to achieve in the medium to long run, but this practice was called into question after the global in ation debacle during the 1970s. “Since the central bank controls the in ation rate, there seems to be little to be gained from ‘hiding’ the in ation target,” he said, adding that nancial markets will “pencil in” their own perception of the in ation target, with some uncertainty about its true value. “That just adds unnecessary uncertainty to the macroeconomic system,” he said. “Naming an explicit numerical in ation target is neither hawkish nor dovish,” Bullard said. “It is simply a recognition that the central bank controls the medium- to long-run rate of in ation, and that in order to minimize uncertainty the central bank may as well say what it is trying to achieve,” he stated. Consistency with the Dual Mandate Bullard discussed a simple economic model, in which the monetary authority controls a short-term nominal interest rate and uses a Taylor-type policy rule to describe the interest rate decisions. He said that in the model, the central bank can move the nominal interest rate to offset incoming shocks exactly, and in ation remains at the target rate and employment remains at the maximum level. Thus, he said, “the dual mandate is achieved exactly at every point in time.” With a single price stability mandate system, Bullard said that the essential story would not change and that “achieving the single mandate is still consistent with the maximum level of employment of households.” Hawks and Doves While in ation targeting is consistent with the dual mandate, Bullard noted that “there are more aspects to policy than just the in ation target.” He said that the Taylor-type policy rule partly depends on how aggressively the central bank reacts to in ation and to the output gap (which, in the model, is not the output gap of common parlance) when setting the nominal interest rate. Placing more weight on in ation might be viewed as “hawkish,” while placing more weight on the output gap might be viewed as “dovish,” he stated, adding that in both cases, the system operates within the context of an in ation target. “In other words, the nature of the policy rule is separate from the issue of naming an in ation target,” he said. “I think most of the discussion about the dual mandate is really a discussion about how much emphasis should be put on each of the two parts of the Taylor-type policy rule,” Bullard added. Beyond Interest Rate Adjustment “Heavy focus on the nature of the Fed’s interest rate reaction function in the current environment is questionable,” Bullard said. “There are many issues at least as important, and resolution of any of those issues could change the argument for a particular reaction function.” For instance, most monetary policy is not currently about interest rate adjustment, he said, adding that so-called “unconventional” policy (e.g., quantitative easing) has come to the fore. In addition, he noted that there has been discussion concerning the possibility that current Fed policy may lead to “bubbles” in the economy. This can occur if the weights on in ation and the output gap in the policy rule are too small, he said. “In effect, the policymaker must be su ciently aggressive in responding to shocks,” Bullard said. One of the worst policies in this particular model is to place zero weight on both in ation and the output gap, which is also known as the “interest rate peg” policy because interest rates never change, he added. Actual policy rates in the U.S. have been near zero since December 2008 and are projected to remain there until late 2014, which Bullard said could be viewed as an approximation to the “interest rate peg” policy. ### GENERAL Home About Us Bank Supervision Careers Community Development Economic Education Events Inside the Economy Museum Newsroom On the Economy Blog Open Vault Blog OUR DISTRICT Little Rock Branch Louisville Branch Memphis Branch Agricultural Finance Monitor Housing Market Conditions SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Bridges Economic Synopses Housing Market Perspectives In the Balance Page One Economics The Quarterly Debt Monitor Review Regional Economist ST. LOUIS FED PRESIDENT James Bullard's Website INITIATIVES Center for Household Financial Stability Dialogue with the Fed Federal Banking Regulations FOMC Speak In Plain English - Making Sense of the Federal Reserve Timely Topics Podcasts and Videos DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICES CASSIDI® FRASER® FRED® FRED® Blog GeoFRED® IDEAS FOLLOW THE FED Twitter Facebook YouTube Google Plus Email Subscriptions RSS CONTACT US | LEGAL INFORMATION | PRIVACY NOTICE & POLICY | FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ONLINE