View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Library
îMR 1 4 i960
federal d e po sit

in su r a n c e

CORPORATION
Statement on

SL

R. 5280

"To amend the National Bank Act, to provide for
financial regulation simplification, to increase
home mortgage financing, and for other purposes.

Presented to

Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision,
Regulation and Insurance
of the
Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs
House of Representatives

by

0

Irvine H. Sprague, Chairman
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

September 27, 1979

Mr. Chairman, we appreciate this opportunity to present our views
on H. R. 5280, the "Depository Institutions Act of 1979."
TITLE I - AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL BANKING LAWS
Title I would amend the National Bank Act by eliminating the six
percent ceiling on dividends of preferred stock of national banks;
extending the length of time that a national bank may hold real estate,
subject to certain conditions; authorizing the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency to restrict the trust activities of a national bank;
authorizing the Comptroller to proclaim certain days as legal holidays
for national banks; authorizing the Comptroller: to delegate powers and
prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; providing for more flexibility
in the bank examination process; altering the ownership requirements for
directors of national banks; changing the voting procedure for selecting
panels to determine the value of shares of stock of national banks which
have been converted, consolidated or merged for dissenting shareholders;
and permitting the purchase of shares of stock in federally insured
State-chartered banks, which are owned exclusively by other banks and which
provide banking services exclusively for other banks and their officers,
directors or employees, and are located in States where State-chartered
banks are permitted to make such purchases.
Since the Comptroller of the Currency has the responsibility
for supervising national banks, that Office would be in the best position
to evaluate these proposed amendments to the National Bank Act.




-

2-

The Ccraptroiler of the Currency believes that these amendments will
strengthen his ability to supervise’the national banking system, and we
agree.

Therefore, in our role as insurer of the deposits of all national

banks, the FDIC supports enactment of this Title.
TITLE II - TERMINATICN OF NATIONAL BANK CLOSED RECEIVERSHIP FUND
Title II of this bill is concerned with the disposition of undisbursed
receivership funds from national banks closed prior to January 23, 1934.
Pursuant to Title II, a claimant would be able to submit a claim against.
these funds within 12 months of the time that the Comptroller issues a
final notice of the availability of such funds.

Failure to submit a

claim during that period would cut off all rights, with the money remaining
in the receivership fund becoming part of the general funds of the Comptroller
of the Currency.
We defer to the Comptroller of the Currency with respect to the provisions
of this Title.
TITLE III - FINANCIAL REGULATION SIMPLIFICATION
Title III provides that regulations issued by the Federal financial
regulatory agencies shall insure that the need for and purpose of a
particular regulation are shown, meaningful alternatives are considered,
burdens to all parties are minimized, language is clearly written, timely
participation and comment are made available, and conflicts, duplication
and inconsistencies between regulations issued by Federal financial regulatory
agencies are eliminated to the extent possible.

This Title would also call

for a review of existing regulations and the submission of an annual
progress report to Congress.




-3-

Title III, in effect/ extends the coverage of Executive Order 12044
to the Federal financial regulatory agencies.

In accordance with the spirit

of that Executive Order the FDIC has implemented a policy of reviewing
existing regulations regularly to determine whether they should be
continued, modified or eliminated.

Additionally, the FDIC has established

a Task Force on Regulations. The policy objectives of the Task Force,
which are almost identical to the objectives of Title III, seek to
insure that regulations are clearly and understandably written, that
their need and purpose are clearly established, that the public is
afforded a meaningful opportunity to participate in the rulemaking
process, that alternative approaches are carefully considered, and
that burdens imposed on the public are minimized.
The FDIC presently seems to be in compliance with the requirements
of Title III and would have no objection to enactment thereof.

We would

recommend, however, that the introductory portion of § 303 be revised to
require that the Federal financial regulatory agencies issue regulations
in a manner designed to ensure that the bill's objectives are met.

As

presently worded, the section seems to require, absolutely, that Title Ill's
objectives be achieved in every detailed respect in each and every case.
While every effort should certainly be made to achieve these objectives,
an absolute requirement of this nature could give rise to frivolous
litigation challenging the validity of each new regulation which
an agency seeks to promulgate.




-4-

TITLE IV - INCREASING HOME MORTGAGE FINANCING
This Title contains four technical amendments to Federal legislation
affecting savings and loan associations.

It would (1) reduce required

reserve accounts of Federal savings and loan associations from five to
four percent of their insured accounts, (2) increase from $60,000 to
$75,000 the amount which Federal savings and loan associations may lend
on residential property, (3) increase the amount limitations on Federal
Horae Loan Bank advances to member institutions, and (4) otherwise make
certain liberalizing changes in the requirements applicable to Federal
Heme Loan Bank loans to member institutions.
We express no opinion on these amendments and defer to the
Federal Home Loan Bank Board with respect to the merits thereof.