View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

INDIA
I started the morning off with a visit with Herbert Spivack who is

Tape #1

the Political and Economic Officer in the Embassy.

Because of much of what he

and I discussed subsequently I reviewed with Dr. I. G. Patel, Special Secretary*
Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, andV. K. Ramaswamy, Chief
Economic Advisor, Department of Economic Affairs, 1*11 run the interviews to­
gether,

The fourth Five-Year Plan will involve a change of emphasis in pace

but the techniques will not be substantially different.
be number one in the priority list.

Agriculture will still

There is much less emphasis on industrial

development principally because there exists substantial unused capacity.

The

casualty will be social services which, according to Patel, will receive mucn
less emphasis than everyone had hoped would be possible,,

Much more emphasis

will be placed on development within the states, by the states.

In part,

this is a tacit recognition that the diversities within India are so great that
regional planning will be a necessity.

In part, it also is recognition of the

political problems the Congress party is facing.

Local parties are becoming

much stronger and unless some kind of political compromise, which will give to
the states and their local political parties a greater say in developing their
individual economies, the Federation will be in serious trouble and, of course,
along with it the Congress party.

Patel acknowledged that the planning capa­

bilities in the 15 states are not equal but he believes, and probably rightly
so, that unless they are given the obligation and the responsibility along
with the freedom to develop a structure, they never will.

None of thes^

acknowledged a problem existed with the landless laborer and the small lam
owner as a result of the Green Revolution.

Perhaps it might be better put

they did not see a problem emerging for many years.

They believed that the

problem, if there is one, can be handled for some yeara-to come by better
distribution of credit and agricultural inputs to equalize the disproportion




2-

INDIA

between the larger land units and the smallest ones.

Our monetary policy,

because of the impact it has had on interest rates around the world, has
had an effect, according to Patel.
borrowing are too high.

Current interest levels for external

He saw no way around the difficulty of financing the

larger external debt other than through increasing use of direct aid for this
purpose.
After lunch I called on Dave Hopper, who is an Agricultural Economist
for the Rockefeller Foundation.

More than anyone else I have visited with in

India, he talked sense about the Green Revolution.

He started his experience

in India by attempting to farm six acres of Indian land.

He found that regard­

less of his advanced technology and know-how, he could not match the best of the
Indian farmers.

This occurred sometime in the early 50*s and caused him to

start thinking seriously about the approaches being made by U.S. experts to
Indian agriculture.

Up until that time, the belief was commonly held that the

Indian farmer was simply inefficient and there existed no real reason why he
couldn't do as good a job as the Japanese.

The suspicion began to grow that

the problem was less with his methods and motivation and more with the kinds
of wheat and rice he was attempting to grow.

These plants were adapted to the

tropics, at least in this way, that is, they were able to grow in soils that
had become largely exhausted and in high tropical temperatures.

They did not

respond to fertilizer, however, and in some cases actually did worse with
fertilizer.

They ran largely to stem and to foliage.

Most of the plant's

energies were spent in growing high and bushey to protect itself from the sun
and its neighboring competitors.

The initial experimenting started in Mexico

with short wheat that would respond to fertilizer and produce heavy heads and
a stiff straw.

According to Hopper, no one really knew the implications of

this discovery in Mexico for tropical agriculture.

It was almost on impulse

that: an experimental plot was tried in India and it proved enormously successful*
Not only did it respond to the weather and to irrigation and the fertilizer, but




- 3 INDIA

the new wheat dispelled the old myth about the Indian farmer being
to change.

willing

He accepted the new wheat with great enthusiasm and a lively black

market developed in the seed.

Acreage expanded geometrically, and today Hopper

figures that there is roughly a ten-year lead on the population growth.

He

believes though that a new attention has to be given to bringing in additional
land and improving the road system.

Land that can be easily irrigated is

becoming in short supply, and one of these days the water table in the Punjab
is going to begin to show the effect of pumping, although they are nearly a
hundred thousand wells past their thirty thousand limit that was once thought
the maximum.

There will be a problem in the road system because the transport

of fertilizer to the fields and the return transport of grain impose require­
ments that the present road system will be inadequate to fill.

Although he

believes the four per cent growth rate in agricultural production can be main­
tained for this ten-year period, the investigation has to start soon.

He be­

lieves there is a real danger of complacency because of this success story and
also regards with some skepticism the priority given agriculture in the fourth
plan.

The history has been that agriculture has suffered when military priorities

or other priorities become important.

He draws some encouragement in that there

is a much higher quality of economists in the central government than were
present before, particularly in the Department of Agriculture which was notor­
iously weak prior to the early 60*s.

The shocker that forced the change was

the acceleration effect of failing agricultural production which spilled over
to the industrial sector and then to tax revenues.
Tape #2

Hopper thinks there is a real social problem emerging as a by-product
of the Green Revolution.

He admitted that he was one of those who early pressed

for a commitment of resources to agricultural development in those areas where
development would occur easiest and fastest.

As he put it, the social problems

which flow from a maldistribution of economic benefit had to wait until there




INDIA

-4-

was something to distribute.

With the success of the new wheat and the some­

what more limited success of the new rices, skews of benefit among the various
agricultural areas are emerging.

The first of these has to do with the dif­

ferences between the easily irrigable areas and the less easily irrigable
areas or dry areas.

The new wheats, because of their fast response to irriga­

tion, have benefited those areas in the Punjab where water is either available
or has been easily obtained with wells.
dry areas.

It has meant little or nothing to the

The result is that areas of the Punjab are producing substantial

surpluses with much lower costs than other areas.

This is producing price

pressures that will force a break in the system of zoning that was the central
government's response to the staff and the accompanying famine of a few years
ago.

Under this system grain could^not be transported from one state to

another except by the central government-

This meant producers had to sell

surpluses to the state, at the state price, which the state could then dis­
tribute at that same low price in the urban areas*

It was one thing to make

this system work under the pressure of the national emergency and the rela­
tively limited supplies; now with the enormously increased production the
farmers in the surplus area want direct access to the markets in the other
areas•
There are also skews in the availability of credit.

The small farmer

is not as credit-worthy as the large one and it is not possible for him to
secure the credit necessary to finance the purchases of the improved seeds
and fertilizers, let alone the development of water supplies.
system will be necessary.

Some new credit

He doubted that the pressure to open branches in

rural areas, currently being exerted against the commercial banking system,
will be the answer because it will not improve the credit-worthiness of these
small operators.




Some subsidization is going to be necessary.

He referred to

-5-

INDIA

the strength of the populist tradition, which is keeping a lower interest rate
than the size and difficulty of the small agricultural loans would stand*

He

felt that something like the Philippine system, referred to by Simmons yester­
day, which would involve the money lender will be necessary.

He maintained

the money lender is the one best equipped to serve this kind of customer be­
cause of the high risk and the problems of loan supervision.

Although the

interest rates of the money lenders are high by nominal standards, that is,
sometimes 40, 50, or 60 per cent, the difficulties of collection and super­
vision make the effective rate about 12 per cent*
the release of unused agricultural labor•

The final problem will be

The limited mechanization that has

taken place has enlarged the labor market, but this cannot be expected to
continue*

At the present time, it is possible in these areas using new tech­

nology and tractors to use tractors to put in the crops quickly between the
dry season and the monsoon season, and then to harvest and replant at the other
end of the cycle.

The tilling of the crops in between has been done manually,

but he said there is pressure in the agricultural area on agricultural wages,
and he said it isn't going to be very long before farmers start using their
tractors to till the crops and when this happens, there will be a serious dis­
placement of agricultural labor.

He didn't think this day is far off.

The

old social structures, which were not unlike those existing in the South a
few years ago with the landlords taking care of the village in a paternalistic
pattern, is breaking down and will continue to do so because the cost and profit
factors will force it to.
He said he didn’t know the answer but there were a couple of possi­
bilities -- the first would be to insist on labor intensive industries and to
reduce the reliance in every way possible on capital inputs.

The other possi­

bility would be at the other extreme, which would mean to lower the bars to
capital investment by overseas companies and hope that the rush to take advan­
tage of the expanding labor supply would pick up the slack.



It takes about

-6-

INDIA

ten thousand rupees to create one new job in India.

There are two and a half

million people being added to the work force each year before any addition
from the displaced agricultural worker.

These are enormous numbers, in fact

exceed the capital budget of the fourth Five Year Plan.

Perhaps because it

agrees with my prejudices, I thought he made a much better case than the others
I've talked to who insist that the traditional patterns of Indian agriculture
will prevail long enough to permit a pattern of adjustment to evolve.
My last visit of the day was to Mr. K. S. Sankhala, Director of the
Delhi Zoological Park.
world.

This must be one of the great zoological parks of the

It is magnificently laid out with the animals kept in the so-called

natural enclosures.

There are flowers everywhere and the whole development

has been placed in and around one of the ancient-walled cities of Delhi.

The

conservation problems of India are the same as every country, aggravated per­
haps by the absence of transport and accommodations near the principal sanc­
tuaries.
birds.

I don't believe even Africa has a greater variety of animals and
The problem has been exacerbated by the lack of a bureaucratic structure

to administer national parks separately from other agencies such as wildlife
management, forestry, etc.
The day ended with a dinner at Herb Spivack's.
attached.

It was a superb cross-section of Indian and U.S. talents.
Wednesday —

Tape #3

The guest list is

Delhi

Because of the mix-up in the plane, I had a little difficulty getting
in touch with the contact officer at the Embassy when I arrived yesterday.
finally we got together and he proved to be most helpful.
the Embassy staff was the one in charge of my arrangements.

But

Donald W. Born of
Lawrence Veit,

the Treasury attache, was involved in an indoctrination program as he had only
arrived here six weeks ago.




INDIA

-7-

My first session was with William H. Wethersbee who is the Deputy
Chief of

Mission?

in the Embassy.

This was a casual encounter and not

particularly significant although he was quite pleasant.
balance of the morning with the AID Mission.

I then spent the

Dr. John Lewis who is the Minister

Director of AID, Clarence Julick, Assistant Director for Development Policy,
and Dr. Richard Ault, Director of Economics, were the ones with whom I visited.
Dr. Lewis reviewed the AID program in India.
project directed.

Up until 1965, U.S. aid was mostly

The U.S. concentrated on electrical utilities contrasted,

for example, with Russia, which concentrated on heavy industry*

As new indus-

tries came on stream, the protectionist sentiment grew in India, in some cases
amounting to outright banning of products competing with Indian products.
There was an interesting division which still continues between Fabian socialism
and the most rugged kind of capitalism.

It became obvious as 1965 approached,

though, that the hoped for results were simply not being obtained.

In arriving

at this determination, the Indians led the way, although the conclusion finally
became a consensus of all of those on the spot.
well with agriculture.

Things had certainly not gone

The conviction grew that it ought to be possible to

accelerate the growth of agricultural production if (1) Indian farmers were
given sufficient financial incentives, (2) a major commitment to agricultural
research was made similar to that conducted by the land grant colleges in the
U.S., but with particular concentration on development of new seeds, fertilizer
and agricultural methods, and (3) the water resources were developed.

On the

non-agricultural side, it became obvious that foreign exchange had not been
properly allocated.

The emphasis had been on new plants, new equipment without

providing for maintenance and repair parts.

It became obvious that the problem

was less one of constructing new plants than using the plant they had more
effectively.

To do this it was necessary to liberalize the import policy to

permit the importation of parts and to raise the prices of imports so that the




-8-

INDIA

market could take over the process of allocation.# Several things happened in
1965 to accelerate the processes of examination*
the Indo-Pak war in the fall of 196*5•
the third was the loss of Nehru*

First was the breakout of

The second was a severe drought, and

This was severe shock therapy but it worked#

The rupee was devalued, which helped the import situation*

Instead of project

AID, program assistance was solicited and obtained from the major AID donors*
Unfortunately, another drought occurred in 1966-67 and this, together with a
cutback in foreign aid was unfortunate politically for it has made politicians
increasingly reluctant to say yes or no to the decisions that have piled up
awaiting action.

Typical of these are the off-shore drilling proposal and the

Allied Chemical proposal.

The 1965 policies, however, are still in effect.

They did not think that any of the U.S. monetary programs had had
any major effect, although there was a possibility this was a deterrent to
the Armour Fertilizer proposal.

However, this one now looks as if it will be

going forward with U.S. Steel as the contracting party.

They agreed that India

would have a hard time bleating about U.S. monetary policy because in general
Indian economy has not been attractive to U.S. capital anyway, except in the
narrow area of fertilizers.
I had lunch with Mr. and Mrs. Ensminger and a house guest, Mrs. Heiser,
at the Ensmingerfs home.
quite cordial.
inception*

It was a very pleasant lunch and the Ensmingers were

He has been in charge of the Ford program in India since its

He indicated the Ford Foundation was going to continue a major

commitment to India.

In casting about for new direction, he had asked a cabinet

minister recently what he thought the Ford Foundation should be doing now that
it had not already done.
engage in social research.

Ensminger reported that the answer was very prompt —
Not enough has been done to assess the changes that

are taking place in the distribution of people in India.

He then launched into

a discussion of the Indian counterpart of the rural-urban balance.




While it is

-9-

INDIA

true that the application of modern agricultural methods plus fertilizer,
plus the rain, plus irrigation, has enormously improved the capacity of Indian
agriculture, the benefits have been disproportionate for the larger land owners*
Nor have the benefits been equally distributed geographically.

In substantial

measure this was a deliberate policy because the requirement that food produc­
tion be significantly increased was so pressing that the deliberate decision
was made to put the major effort in those areas where the greatest gains could
be obtained in the shortest period of time,
helped influence this decision.
up the others*

Ensminger indicated that he had

Now it is necessary to go back and help catch

I questioned him on this, because it seemed to me this might be

perpetuating inefficient unit.

The answer he gave was not particularly satis­

factory, in that he relied defensively on the differences between U.S. agri­
culture and Indian agriculture.

He argued that the small unit of five or six

acres can support a family and the benefits of the new technologies, fertilizer,
etc., while disportionately balanced against the small farmer, can still be of
sufficient benefit to enable him to raise his family and provide a certain
measure of security.

This sounded suspiciously like the family farm concept

to me, and I ,told him so.

He agreed that it probably was no long term solution,

but in the short run, it would help stabilize the population by keeping these
people out of the cities.
He pointed out that in Calcutta there are as many people living in

Tape #4

one slum district as live in the whole Boston area.

These people have no

water, no sewage, no electricity, no public health services and are the most
highly explosive element of Indian society.
I received some interesting reactions to Gunnar Myrdal's work on
Asia.

In general, they are negative.

but for the wrong reasons.

Ensminger was quite critical of it

He argued that the solutions to India1s problems

cannot be solved in economic terms but by an examination of the social structure,




-10-

INDIA

the normative values, etc.* for it is within these the solutions have to be found*
This, I thought, was the one valid observation Meredolf made but I didnft argue
the point*

Lewis was much more critical of Meredolf*

He thought he not only

had missed the boat on agriculture, which is pretty obvious, but that he also
missed the shift in Indian policy which occurred in late 1965 and early 1966*
This, of course, was because Meredolf closed up his book in the spring of 1966
but really with data, according to Lewis, that was derived from 1962 and earlier*
For these reasons, he felt that as an instrument of policy it was dangerous to
place much reliance on the statistical data and the conclusions which Meredolf
drew from them.
I spent the afternoon in three visits with different departments of
the Ford Foundation.

The first one was with Reuben Simmons, a Consultant on

Agricultural Credit to the Ford Foundation.

Simmons is a black man from the

U.S. who worked for the Farmers Home Administration, Farm Credit Administration,
and has been overseas for 18 or 20 years.

He was very knowledgeable and my

session with him will rate as one of the high spots of this trip.
back from optimism to pessimism and back again.

He bounced

He was not sure that the pro­

posals being made to assist the landless agricultural worker and the small
farmer would work.

As he stated it, everyone sees the problems and recognizes

the ingredients for answer, but to attempt to apply these from the central
government position will be impossible.

Somehow the state governments have

to be involved and regional solutions sought.
was bank lending.
abated in part.
considered.

His particular area of interest

The pressure to nationalize the private banks in India has
It might be questioned how seriously the proposal was ever

It would indicate, at least to an outsider, that much of the

pressure to nationalize was designed to force the banks into new patterns of
operation.

Interlocking directorships, self-interest were accepted patterns

of the industry.




By an instrument called fsocial control,1 banks have been
,
1

INDIA

-11-

forced into agricultural lending.

Many other steps have been taken to curtail

the abuses, such as, an authority now granted to the central bank to remove
bank officers and requiring approval by the central bank of all directors.
This latter is designed to force a broader representation of the economy on
bank boards.

Simmons believed that this would be a major step forward.

The

control of the central bank, he said, is so extreme that they are now in a
position to compell banks to respond to their direction.

The Indian banks,

he said, were quite good, at least in the top management.

In any event, he

said they're much better and much faster in making decisions than the coopera­
tive banks, which was one of the cornerstones of the Congress party.
making is much faster, he said, in the private section.

Decision

By forcing commercial

banks into the country and to open branches in selected areas, several things
will be accomplished.

First of all, the enormous financial resources of rural

India which have not been tapped by the commercial sector may become available
if the farmers bring their money into banks out of the tin cans and other
traditional depositories that they have used.

Simmons believes this will

happen as farmers see that new credit sources are being made available to them.
He cited several instances where this had occurred.

The second advantage will

be the development of small growth centers* for servicing agriculture scattered
around India.

From these there should be spin-off to new employment opportunities

for the landless agricultural workers.

The Ford Foundation has agreed to support

the training process for agricultural lending bank officers in selected areas
at no cost to the banks provided they go ahead with the new branches.
of the problems has been to get the rate structure revised.
party has a felt?

One

The Congress

commitment to maintain low interest rates even though the

traditional sources of lending to farmers, that is the rural money lenders,
carry interest charges of 80, 90 and 100 per cent.




Only by raising the rates

INDIA

-12-

which commercial banks can charge agricultural customers, will it be possible
to increase the level of interest paid on deposited funds and thereby get the
other part of the engine working.

He believed that in some way the money

lenders have got to be brought into the pattern.

He argued that these men

serve valuable roles in many communities, serving as the engines for whatever
economic growth is occurring.

In many ways, he said, they serve the typical

catalytic role of the historic small town banker in the U.S.

The most difficult

problem is going to be to keep new job opportunities opening up off the farm
in the rural areas as the on-the-farm job opportunities tend to decline under
the pressure of improving agricultural practices.

A number of keys, he said,

would have to be tried but certainly one of most promise was changing the
credit distribution in India.
My next visit was with Dr. Hugh Leavel whose address, like the rest
of the Ford personnel, is 55 Lodi Estate, New Delhi, 3.

I promised I would

send him the Hill studies on medical care and nursing care in the Ninth Federal
Reserve District.
Foundation.

Dr. Leavel is in charge of the family planning efforts of the

Only recently, he said, has the Indian government faced up to

this as their most serious social problem, and pledged to commit the resources
that will be necessary to make the program fully effective.

Leavel said it's

not: so much that the birth rate has changed, but the survival rate has materially
increased.
Religion is less an obstacle than distance, money, trained personnel,

Tape #5

and social patterns.
sons.

This last relates to the desire of the Indian family for

Given the very high infant mortality, the probability of a son growing

to maturity is far less than would be tolerable in the most backward area of
the U.S., of course.

The whole intra-structure of Indian medicine is in trouble

because the population has increased so much faster than its capacity.

The

ideal structure towards which they're working is one of district health centers



-n-

INDIA

with sub-ciistrict h r * U h enter# a t various locations distributed around the
perimeter o t « circJo »urrtmnding the center.

There are 5,200 of these centers

necessary, with lu or ooro sub-centers required.

To staff these even with the

moat rudlftxmtary kinds of medical or paramedical people is enormous.

Although

the number of medical schools in India has increased, the nursing training
programs have not kept pace, so there are many more doctors than there are
nurses, which is the reverse of the U.S. situation.

He felt great progress

had been made particularly in this new commitment of the government in a
financial sense.

Compared with the scope of the problem, however, it certainly

is enough to make an outsider despair.
The final session of the afternoon was with Ed Kieloch, who is the
political liaison officer for the Foundation.

His principal efforts have been

to bring about something like a Hoover Commission in India.

The heart of the

Indian administrative structure and the glue that is holding the country to­
gether is made up of the 17,000 class one administrators in the government.
These men are supported by an incredibly huge bureaucracy of clerks.

This is

a holdover from the old British colonial system for it was the only way the
British could administer so large a country with so few people.
the only ingredient for promotion is seniority.

Unfortunately,

This means there is no in­

centive for anyone to make decisions, because if they make a good decision
it isn't going to help them advance, but if they make a bad one they may be
passed over.

As a result, decisions have to be bucked from one to another

until they reach one of these administrative heads.

The entire civil service

is staffed by the system, that is, there is a personnel section independent
of every other department of government.

Department heads are unable to hire,

fire, or transfer personnel, nor do they have any control over their budgets.
At least this last is being cured.

From what Kieloch said, the current budget

will carry specific appropriations on a program basis instead of a line basis,



INDIA

-14

and department heads will have controls then over the expenditure funds*
Like everyone else, Kieloch varied back and forth between optimism and
pessimism.
enormous.
context.

He felt the political strides that have been in India have been
They were attempting to solve their problems within a democratic
Unfortunately, they also had some of the very volatile elements of

a democratic form; for example, the use of the parliamentary form of govern­
ment means that the loss of one vote will bring the government down.
this time, the Congress party has been all-powerful.

Up until

This meant that political

decisions could be made within the party rather than within parliament and,
therefore, the threat of government collapse was not real.

However, the

process of change from the generation that saw the Congress party as the party
of liberation to younger members who are concerned with the immediate social
and economic problems of India is producing strains within the Congress party,
and it does not look as though it can continue much longer.

The common denominator

of the party label covers a spectrum that ranges from communists on one side
to a political philosophy to the right of McKinley on -the other.

This polariza­

tion is increasing.
In the evening I went to dinner at the Veit's home.

This was very

pleasant for there were just the two young couples -- the Veits and the Borns.
I should remember to send them some books.